首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

2016-2020年广东省定量降水预报检验评估
引用本文:汪瑛,胡胜,涂静,曾沁,张红艳,黄晓莹,龚月婷,张华龙. 2016-2020年广东省定量降水预报检验评估[J]. 热带气象学报, 2021, 37(2): 154-165. DOI: 10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2021.015
作者姓名:汪瑛  胡胜  涂静  曾沁  张红艳  黄晓莹  龚月婷  张华龙
作者单位:广东省气象台,广东广州510641;中国气象局广州热带海洋气象研究所,广东广州510641;国家气象信息中心,北京100081
基金项目:广东省科技计划项目2019B020208016广东省科技计划项目2018B020207012广东省气象局科技项目GRMC2018Z05广东省气象局智能网格预报技术创新团队GRMCTD202004
摘    要:对2016-2020年全球模式ECMWF和区域模式GZ_GRAPES、基于模式的解释应用和广东省气象局发布的定量降水预报(QPF)进行检验和评估.结果表明:ECMWF和GZ_GRAPES模式对一般性降水预报技巧在逐年提升,对大雨或以上的降水预报技巧的提升缓慢.GZ_GRAPES对大雨以上降水的预报技巧和定量降水预报的精...

关 键 词:定量降水预报  暴雨  模式解释应用  检验和评估  预报员作用
收稿时间:2020-12-11

VERIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF QUANTITATIVE PRECIPITATION FORECAST FOR GUANGDONG PROVINCE DURING 2016-2020
WANG Ying,HU Sheng,TU Jing,ZENG Qin,ZHANG Hong-yan,HUANG Xiao-ying,GONG Yue-ting,ZHANG Hua-long. VERIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF QUANTITATIVE PRECIPITATION FORECAST FOR GUANGDONG PROVINCE DURING 2016-2020[J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2021, 37(2): 154-165. DOI: 10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2021.015
Authors:WANG Ying  HU Sheng  TU Jing  ZENG Qin  ZHANG Hong-yan  HUANG Xiao-ying  GONG Yue-ting  ZHANG Hua-long
Affiliation:1.Guangdong Meteorological Observatory, Guangzhou 510641, China2.Guangzhou Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, Guangzhou 510641, China3.National Meteorological Information Centre, Beijing 100080, China
Abstract:The present study examines and evaluates the 2016-2020 global model ECMWF and regional model GZ_GRAPES, model-based interpretation and application, and quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) issued by forecasters from the Guangdong Meteorological Service. The results show that the forecast skill of QPF (< 25mm) by the ECMWF and GZ_GRAPES increases year by year and the skill of QPF (≥25mm) varies from year to year. The GZ_GRAPES forecast skill for precipitation stronger than heavy rain and the fine temporal and spatial distribution of QPF are better than those of the ECMWF, and it is easier for the regional model to forecast small and medium-scale precipitation. Classified rainstorm evaluation shows that the models have the best forecast for typhoon rain, followed by frontal rainstorm and monsoon rain. The models'rainstorm forecast underestimates the rainfall area, and the underestimation is obvious. Forecasters have significantly improved the rainstorm forecast score through empirical corrections. Among them, the amount of correction for monsoon rain is the largest, but there are problems of a large forecast range and high false alarms. The interpretation and application based on the ECMWF ensemble forecast is equivalent to the QPF ability of forecasters. The stronger the precipitation, the more obvious the advantages of model interpretation and application, but there is also serious underestimation or underreporting of the monsoon rain. At present, the precise temporal and spatial distribution of precipitation, monsoon rains and extreme rainstorms still rely mainly on the empirical correction of forecasters. With the improvement of the capabilities of ensemble forecasting models and regional high-resolution models, forecasts will become more objective, which, combined with numerical forecasting techniques, can help improve QPF. 
Keywords:quantitative precipitation forecast   heavy rain   model-based interpretation and application   verification and evaluation   the role of forecasters
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《热带气象学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《热带气象学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号