首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


Protocol driven palliative care consultation: Outcomes of the ENABLE CHF-PC pilot study
Authors:Rachel Wells  Deborah Ejem  J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom  Gulcan Bagcivan  Konda Keebler  Jennifer Frost  Andres Azuero  Alan Kono  Keith M. Swetz  Marie Bakitas
Affiliation:1. School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, MT412B, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1210, USA;2. Cardiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center/Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Heart and Vascular Center DHMC, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA;3. Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, UAB Center for Palliative & Supportive Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0012, USA;4. Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
Abstract:

Background

Little has been reported about protocol-driven outpatient palliative care consultation (OPCC) for advanced heart failure (HF).

Objectives

To describe evaluation practices and treatment recommendations made during protocol-driven OPCCs for advanced HF.

Methods

We performed content analysis of OPCCs completed as part of ENABLE CHF-PC, an early palliative care HF intervention, conducted at sites in the Northeast and Southeast. T-tests, Fisher's exact, and Chi-square tests were used to evaluate sociodemographic, outcome measures, and site content differences.

Results

Of 61 ENABLE CHF-PC participants, 39 (64%) had an OPCC (Northeast, n=27; Southeast, n=12). Social and medical history assessed most were close relationships (n=35, 90%), family support (n=33, 85%), advance directive status (n=33, 85%), functional status (n=30, 77%); and symptoms were mood (n= 35, 90%), breathlessness (n=28, 72%), and chest pain (n=24, 62%). Treatment recommendations focused on care coordination (n=13, 33%) and specialty referrals (n=12, 31%). Between-site OPCC differences included assessment of family support (Northeast vs. Southeast: 100% vs. 50%), code status (96% vs. 58%), goals of care discussions (89% vs. 41.7%), and prognosis understanding (85% vs. 33%).

Conclusion

OPCCs for HF focused on evaluating medical and social history, along with goals of care and code status discussions. Symptom evaluation commonly included mood disorders, pain, dyspnea, and fatigue. Notable regional differences were found in topics evaluated and OPCC completion rates.
Keywords:Outpatient supportive care  Heart failure  Content analysis  OPCC  outpatient palliative care consultation  HF  heart failure  ENABLE CHF-PC  Educate, Nurture, Advise Before Life Ends: Comprehensive Heartcare for Patients and Caregivers single-arm pilot study  PC  palliative care
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号