首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

超声造影与增强CT在鉴别诊断胆囊良恶性病变中的应用价值
引用本文:唐春霖,郭燕丽,陈萍,陈凯旋,谭鹰,陈朝辉,王艳,柳强维,邹野,曾渱越.超声造影与增强CT在鉴别诊断胆囊良恶性病变中的应用价值[J].中华医学超声杂志,2018,15(4):251-257.
作者姓名:唐春霖  郭燕丽  陈萍  陈凯旋  谭鹰  陈朝辉  王艳  柳强维  邹野  曾渱越
作者单位:1. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学第一附属医院超声诊断科
基金项目:国家国际科技合作专项项目(2015DFA30920); 重庆市科技研发基地建设计划(国际科技合作)项目(cstc2014gjhz110004)
摘    要:目的对比分析胆囊良恶性病变超声造影(CEUS)及增强CT(CECT)的图像特征,探讨二者在胆囊良恶性病变中的诊断价值。 方法选取2010年1月至2017年9月在陆军军医大学第一附属医院就诊的经病理证实的86例胆囊病变患者,术前CEUS与CECT的图像特征以及术前诊断结果进行对比分析。胆囊病变CEUS与CECT的增强模式比较以及单用CEUS或CECT与联合运用的诊断准确性的比较采用McNemer检验,CEUS胆囊良恶性病变由高增强转变为低增强的时间比较用t检验。 结果胆囊良恶性病变CEUS与CECT的增强模式类似。动脉期,良恶性病变CEUS与CECT均以高增强为主,其中,恶性病变分别为83.8%(57/68)、85.3%(58/68),差异无统计学意义(P=1.000),良性病变分别为100%(18/18)、94.4%%(17/18)。恶性病变CEUS与CECT在增强晚期或延迟期表现为低增强者分别为86.8%(59/68)、85.3%(58/68),差异无统计学意义(P=0.500),良性病变CEUS与CECT在增强晚期或延迟期表现为低增强者分别为83.3%(15/18)、77.8%(14/18)。良恶性病变CEUS转变为低增强的时间比较,差异有统计学意义(53.9±10.0)s vs(35.50±6.72)s,t=6.729,P<0.001)]。单用CEUS其诊断胆囊恶性病变的敏感度、特异度及准确性分别为77.9%(53/68)、77.8%(14/18)、77.9%(67/86);单用CECT其诊断敏感度、特异度及准确性分别为75%(51/68)、55.6%(10/18)、70.9%(61/86);联合应用两种检查方法的敏感度、特异度及准确性分别为83.8%(57/68)、55.6%(10/18)、77.9%(67/86);CEUS与CECT联合应用对胆囊恶性病变诊断准确性高于单用CECT。 结论CEUS与CECT结合有助于提高胆囊恶性病变诊断准确性,为胆囊良恶性病变的鉴别诊断提供更多有价值的信息。

关 键 词:超声检查  造影剂  胆囊疾病  
收稿时间:2017-12-03

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gallbladder diseases
Chunlin Tang,Yanli Guo,Ping Chen,Kaixuan Chen,Ying Tan,Zhaohui Chen,Yan Wang,Qiangwei Liu,Ye Zou,Hongyue Zeng.The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gallbladder diseases[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound,2018,15(4):251-257.
Authors:Chunlin Tang  Yanli Guo  Ping Chen  Kaixuan Chen  Ying Tan  Zhaohui Chen  Yan Wang  Qiangwei Liu  Ye Zou  Hongyue Zeng
Affiliation:1. Department of Ultrasound, the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo comparatively analyze the image characteristic of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), and explore the diagnostic value of the two methods in benign and malignant lesions of gallbladder. Methodscomparative analysis the image characteristic of CEUS and CECT, the preoperative diagnostic results of 86 cases of gallbladder diseases were confirmed by pathology. ResultsThe enhancement patterns of CEUS and CECT in benign and malignant lesions of gallbladder are similar. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CEUS were 77.9% (53/68), 77.8% (14/18), 77.9% (67/86), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CECT were 75% (51/68), 55.6% (10/18), 70.9% (61/86), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the combination of CEUS and CECT were 83.8% (57/68), 55.6% (10/18), 77.9% (67/86), respectively. The accuracy of the combination of CEUS and CECT was higher than that of CECT in the diagnosis of malignant gallbladder lesions (53.9±10.00) s vs (35.50±6.72) s], the differences were statistically significant (t=6.729, P<0.001). ConclusionsThe enhancement patterns of CEUS and CECT in benign and malignant gallbladder lesions are similar. The combination of CEUS and CECT is helpful for improving the diagnostic accuracy of malignant gallbladder lesions. CEUS and CECT could corroborate and complement each other, and provide more valuable information for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gallbladder lesions.
Keywords:Ultrasonography  Contrast media  Gallbladder disease  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华医学超声杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华医学超声杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号