首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

全身麻醉术中知晓的临床分析
引用本文:樊新彩,王迎军,郭素香,代志刚,姜红. 全身麻醉术中知晓的临床分析[J]. 生物磁学, 2014, 0(9): 1700-1703
作者姓名:樊新彩  王迎军  郭素香  代志刚  姜红
作者单位:[1]石河子大学第一附属医院麻醉科,新疆石河子832000 [2]石河子大学第二附属医院麻醉科,新疆乌鲁木齐830000
摘    要:目的:探讨新疆建设兵团“三甲”医院择期全身麻醉患者术中知晓的发生率及其相关影响因素。方法:采用前瞻性调查研究收集2012年3月至9月新疆建设兵团“三甲”医院1429例择期全麻手术患者,术后使用改良Brice调查表进行随访,调查术中知晓情况,参照Sandin等的方法将所有患者最终判定为无知晓,可疑知晓及知晓。结果:1429例患者中,11例(0.77%)发生术中知晓,39例(2.73%)判定为可疑知晓,其中24例(1.68%)诉做梦。采用Binarylogistic回归分析发现,咪唑安定、阿片类药物的使用及手术时间为术中知晓发生的影响因素(P〈0.05),而患者的性别、年龄、族别、肥胖指数、ASA分级、麻醉方法、手术类别、术中血压波动情况均与术中知晓的发生无关。结论:新疆建设兵团“三甲”医院术中知晓发生率为0.77%,在国内术中知晓发生率水平趋中;术前应用咪达唑仑及手术时间长是术中知晓发生的保护因素,而阿片类药物维持麻醉是术中知晓发生的危险因素。

关 键 词:术中知晓  全身麻醉  危险因素

Clinical Analysis of the Intraopertive Awareness During General Anesthesia
FAN Xin-cai,WANG Ying-jun,GUO Su-xiang,DAI Zhi-gang,JIANG Hong. Clinical Analysis of the Intraopertive Awareness During General Anesthesia[J]. Biomagnetism, 2014, 0(9): 1700-1703
Authors:FAN Xin-cai  WANG Ying-jun  GUO Su-xiang  DAI Zhi-gang  JIANG Hong
Affiliation:1 Department of anesthesiology, The first Affiliated Hospital Of Shihezi university, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832000, China; 2 Department of anesthesiology, The secondAffiliated Hospital Of Shihezi university, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, 830000, China)
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the incidence of awareness during general anesthesia and analyze the risk factor in anesthetic practice and patient populations. Methods: Acroding to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1429 cases of patients with general anesthesia were enrolled between March 2012 to September in the grade A class 3 hospital in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps(XPCC) .Patients were interviewed postoperatively with improved Brice questionnaire survey. Each patients was classified into categories as no awareness, possible awareness, and awareness. Results: Eleven patients (0.77%) definitely reported awareness, and 39 (2.73%)reported possible awareness. Another 24 (1.68%)had a dream. Midazolam,Opioids and time of operation were associated effect factors. Other factors were not related with the intraoperative awareness, they were gender,age, different nationality, BMI, ASA, type of anesthesia, types of surgery, and hemodynamic fluctuations. Conclusion: The rate of awareness in XPCC was 0.77%. It was similar to domestic intraoperative awareness level. Preoperative application of midazolam and long operation time were known in the protective factors, and opioid maintain anesthesia was risk factors.
Keywords:Intraopertive awareness  General anesthesia  Risk factor
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号