Nonoperative treatment ofacromioclavicular joint injuries |
| |
Authors: | James N. Gladstone MD Kevin E. Wilk PT James R. Andrews MD |
| |
Affiliation: | aAmerican Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham; and HEALTH-SOUTH Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Center, Birmingham, AL, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Nonoperative treatment is generally the choice for Type I and II acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. The situation issomewhat more controversial when Type III AC dislocations are considered, particularly with respect to athletes and heavy laborers. A number of recent studies have supported conservative treatment in these groups. There is general consensus as to the need for surgical intervention for Type IV, V, and VI AC injuries. Integral to any form of management, nonoperative or operative, is a rehabilitation program that addresses range of motion, strength, and neuromuscular control. We describe our program, which is divided into four phases: (1) Pain control and immediate protected range of motion and isometric exercises; (2) strengthening exercises using isotonic contractions and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) exercises; (3) Unrestricted functional participation with the goal of increasing strength, power, endurance, and neuromuscular control; and (4) return to activity with sport specific functional drills. An athlete is ready to return to competitive sports once the following criteria are met: full range of motion (ROM), no pain or tenderness, satisfactory clinical exam, and demonstration of adequate strength on isokinetic testing. The unique considerations in a throwing athlete with an AC injury are also addressed. The primary goal of the nonoperative treatment protocol is to return the athlete to full activities as quickly and as safely as possible. |
| |
Keywords: | acromioclavicular joint injury dislocation nonoperative treatment throwing athlete |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|