首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

法律推理前提如何获得——以法律心理学为考察视角
引用本文:李安,乐国安.法律推理前提如何获得——以法律心理学为考察视角[J].法律科学,2008,26(2):29-37.
作者姓名:李安  乐国安
作者单位:浙江工业大学法学院 浙江杭州310023(李安),中国政法大学 北京100088(乐国安)
摘    要:法律推理前提之获得又称为法律发现,一度被视为是心理学的研究议题。但是,实际存在的法律发现毕竟为法律证立提供了逻辑起点。而且,探究法律前提获得的机制还可以为人们提高在证成的脉络中提炼证成要件的准确性与效率。我们没有理由放弃对法律发现的深入探讨。法律前提的获得虽然可以从思维与推理的双重加工理论这一新近的心理学研究成果进行普通的阐释,但更要从能够体现法律领域特点的法律认知上进行解读。

关 键 词:法律发现  法律证成  法律思维  法律裁判
文章编号:1671-6914(2008)02-0029-(09)
修稿时间:2007年5月30日

On Legal Discovery in the Process of Justice
LI An,YUE Guo-an.On Legal Discovery in the Process of Justice[J].Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law),2008,26(2):29-37.
Authors:LI An  YUE Guo-an
Affiliation:LI An YUE Guo-an
Abstract:As discovery is distinguished from testification in scientific philosophy,the field of legal judgment can also be divided into legal discovery and justification.Furthermore,psychologists view the legal discovery as another studying issue.However,the actual legal discovery is the logical starting point of justification.Moreover,the cognition of legal discovery benefits the effects of justification.Thus we have no reasons to give up exploring legal discovery and employing the latest psychological research results-dual processing theory of thinking and reasoning-to analyze the cognitive mechanism of legal discovery.We can come to the conclusion that the realization of legal discovery mostly depends on judge's heuristic thinking.Meanwhile,representative heuristic thinking mode,available heuristic thinking mode and anchor heuristic thinking mode are used to describe the actual process of legal discovery.
Keywords:legal discovery  justification  legal thinking  judgment
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号