首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


Medical technology procurement in Europe: A cross-country comparison of current practice and policy
Authors:Corinna Sorenson  Panos Kanavos
Affiliation:1. LSE Health, London School of Economics, Cowdray House, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK;2. European Health Technology Institute for Socio-Economic Research, Brussels, Belgium;1. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;2. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;3. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;4. Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Canada;1. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA;2. Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA;3. The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;4. Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;1. School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden;2. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Uppsala University, Sweden
Abstract:Procurement policy can influence the diffusion of medical devices into national health systems, but limited comparative evidence exists on how countries procure such technologies. This paper discusses the procurement of select medical devices across five countries (England, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain) based on a review of published and grey literature and policy documents, as well as expert interviews. All countries have introduced various regulatory or policy measures that implicitly or explicitly influence device procurement, from lists of devices for purchase to changes in financing mechanisms. There has also been movement toward more centralized procurement with the introduction of purchasing groups or consortiums, notably in England, France, Germany, and Italy. While a number of stakeholder groups are involved in purchasing activities, a greater, more formalized role for physicians and governments is needed to ensure that technologies procured best meet patient needs and align with national health care priorities and other sectoral objectives. A general theme across all national procurement systems was a focus on cost-containment, but like other areas of technology policy (e.g., coverage), basing purchasing decisions on a broader range of criteria, such as quality and health outcomes, might better allow governments to achieve value for money and support patient access to beneficial innovations. More research is needed, however, to substantiate the role and influence of procurement on balancing the adoption and affordability of medical technologies.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号