The Value of Periodic Follow-up in the Detection of Recurrences after Radical Treatment in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

AimsTo determine the value of routine follow-up in detecting and salvaging recurrence after radical treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and to identify clinical or pathological prognostic factors that predicted for survival.Materials and methodsA retrospective medical chart review was conducted at the Odette Cancer Centre between January 2000 and May 2006. Two hundred and twenty-three patients with advanced (stage III or IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who were treated with curative intent were reviewed. Recurrences were divided into local, regional or distant recurrences. The detection method for each recurrence was categorised as self or physician detected. A self-detected recurrence arose from symptoms that led to investigations that confirmed a recurrence (even if initiated at the time of a routine visit), whereas a physician-detected recurrence was found during the routine follow-up examination and was asymptomatic.ResultsThere was no evidence to suggest a significant improvement in disease-free or overall survival in the physician-detected versus patient-detected groups. Regional and distant recurrences were only detected by physicians in one-fifth of cases and, overall, patients self-detected their own recurrence in two-thirds of the cases that experienced disease progression within the sample. Of the 12 clinical/pathological variables considered, only the response to treatment and perineural invasion were associated with survival.ConclusionsCurrent surveillance methods do not appear to improve cancer control in the stage III/IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma population. However, technological advances and biomarker development may lead to surveillance technique enhancements. Also, post-treatment follow-up remains important for the evaluation of treatment results, emotional support and management of late complications. Among the clinical and pathological factors considered, only the treatment response and perineural invasion predicted survival.