学科性质差异所致两种授课模式效果差别的分析与思考

为更好地进一步培养生物科学人才，本研究对本校生物科学专业课程的不同教学模式获得的教学效果进行了比较分析。在考试科目和试卷难度不变的情况下，收集并比较了覆盖3个年级学生的线上教学模式的科目考试成绩与其相对应的前一学年传统教学模式的考试成绩。在对比了21门课程的期末考试成绩后，研究发现课程开设时间长且含有实验课的考试类课程线上授课效果较好（如生理学、病理学等）。线上教学时实验课无法正常开展这一现象对大部分（66.28%，57/86）学生造成了影响，表明实验课尚无法被网络授课取代。同时，期待生物科学专业课程能够进行系统化的教学改革的学生在调查中占据主体（80.23%，69/86）。据此推断，将传统授课作为教学主体、线上平台技术作辅助的混合教学模式可以成为医学院校生物科学专业在本科生教学方面新的探索方向。

Analysis and reflection on the effect difference between the two teaching modes caused by the difference of discipline nature

In order to further cultivate bioscience talents, we compared and analyzed the teaching effects of different teaching modes of Bioscience courses in our university. Under the condition that the difficulty of the examination subjects and papers remains unchanged, we collected and compared the examination results of the online teaching mode covering three grades of students with the corresponding examination results of the traditional teaching mode of the previous academic year. After comparing the final examination results of 21 courses, we found that the online teaching effect of examination courses with long courses and experimental courses is better (such as physiology, pathology, etc.). The phenomenon that online teaching cannot be carried out normally has affected most students (66.28%, 57/86), indicating that the experimental course cannot be replaced by online teaching. At the same time, students who expected systematic teaching reform of biological science major courses accounted for the majority in the survey (80.23%, 69/86). Based on this, we conclude that the mixed teaching mode with traditional teaching as the main body of teaching and online platform technology as the auxiliary can become a new exploration direction in undergraduate teaching of Bioscience majors in medical colleges and universities.