CAJ—CD规范存在的问题及对策

《中国学术期刊(光盘版)检索与评价数据规范》在参考文献著录方面存在着主要责任者缺位、文献分类含混、页码著录宽纵、转引缺项等问题。译作者和注疏校勘者同样应被视为主要责任者;文献分类方面,文献类型的界定应作出更详细的说明;页码著录,建议将文集、论文集、全集、选集、学位论文、报告几种参考文献的页码作为必选项;转引问题,建议分情况对待。

On the Problems with CAJ-CD Norm and the Solution

There are some problems with the reference books' annotation in the CAJ-CD norm. The problems are as follows: the main author is Absent and the classification of reference books is chaotic. In addition, the marking of the page number is not correct. The method to cancel the quotation from a secondary source is subjective. The present article gives some pieces of advice that the translator and collator should be regarded as the persons who own the copyright, the classification of the reference books should be clear and in detail, the page number should be a required item and the quotation from a second source should be dealt with in accordance with the specific situation.