Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Following Disease Progression on Atezolizumab or Sunitinib Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in IMmotion150: A Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial

BackgroundThe use of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy as second-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cancer (mRCC) has not been evaluated prospectively.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab + bevacizumab following disease progression on atezolizumab or sunitinib monotherapy in patients with mRCC.Design, setting, and participantsIMmotion150 was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of patients with untreated mRCC. Patients randomized to the atezolizumab or sunitinib arm who had investigator-assessed progression as per RECIST 1.1 could be treated with second-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab.InterventionPatients received atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously (IV) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 wk following disease progression on either atezolizumab or sunitinib monotherapy.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe secondary endpoints analyzed during the second-line part of IMmotion150 included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. PFS was examined using Kaplan-Meier methods.Results and limitationsFifty-nine patients in the atezolizumab arm and 78 in the sunitinib arm were eligible, and 103 initiated second-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezolizumab arm, n = 44; sunitinib arm, n = 59). ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 27% (19–37%). The median PFS (95% CI) from the start of second line was 8.7 (5.6–13.7) mo. The median event follow-up duration was 19.4 (12.9–21.9) mo among the 25 patients without a PFS event. Eighty-six (83%) patients had treatment-related adverse events; 31 of 103 (30%) had grade 3/4 events. Limitations were the small sample size and selection for progressors.ConclusionsThe atezolizumab + bevacizumab combination had activity and was tolerable in patients with progression on atezolizumab or sunitinib. Further studies are needed to investigate sequencing strategies in mRCC.Patient summaryPatients with advanced kidney cancer whose disease had worsened during treatment with atezolizumab or sunitinib began second-line treatment with atezolizumab + bevacizumab. Tumors shrank in more than one-quarter of patients treated with this combination, and side effects were manageable.     

First-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Real-world experience from >2000 patients treated in the multicentre AVANTI study

AimThe multicentre non-interventional AVANTI study assessed safety, effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes with approved first-line bevacizumab-containing regimens for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/MBC) in German routine oncology practice.MethodsEligible patients had HER2-negative LR/MBC, no bevacizumab contraindications and no prior chemotherapy for LR/MBC. Chemotherapy schedule, diagnostics and follow-up were at physicians’ discretion. Data were collected for 1 year after starting bevacizumab, then every 6 months for 1.5 years (maximum follow-up: 2.5 years). Patients and physicians rated treatment satisfaction. Subgroup analyses were prespecified in clinically relevant populations, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).ResultsBetween November 1, 2009 and April 30, 2016, 2065 eligible patients at 346 centres received bevacizumab with paclitaxel or capecitabine. Patients receiving bevacizumab–capecitabine were less likely to have de novo disease and more likely to have TNBC, age ≥60 years and prior anthracycline/taxane and/or endocrine therapy. Median PFS was 12.6 (95% CI 11.9–13.2) months (12.8 with bevacizumab–paclitaxel, 10.5 with bevacizumab–capecitabine); median OS was 23.9 (95% CI 22.2–25.1) months. Outcomes were worse in patients with TNBC, prior anthracycline/taxane or prior endocrine therapy. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 27% of patients. Treatment was discontinued for adverse events in 15%. Treatment satisfaction was rated as good or better by 304/394 responding patients (77%) at week 54 and in 1393/2065 patients (67%) by physicians overall.ConclusionsIn routine clinical practice, effectiveness and safety of first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for LR/MBC were consistent with experience from phase III trials. Patient and physician treatment satisfaction showed high concordance.     

Phase II study of bevacizumab and pemetrexed for recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian,fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination bevacizumab/pemetrexed for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

Platinum-sensitive or -resistant patients with recurrent or persistent EOC were eligible if they had received up to 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, including a platinum/taxane regimen without prior bevacizumab. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m² IV and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV were administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS); other endpoints included toxicities, PFS and overall survival (OS).

Results

Thirty-four patients received a median of 7 treatment cycles (range, 2–26). Median follow-up was 25.7 months (range, 3.0–47.2). Six month progression-free survival (PFS) was 56% (95% CI: 38–71). The following response rates were documented (%; 95% CI): 0 complete response, 14 partial responses (41%; 25–59), 18 stable disease (53%; 35–70) and 2 progressive disease (6%; 1–20). Median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI, 4.6–10.9), with a median OS of 25.7 months (95% CI, 15.4–29.8). Twenty-two patients (64.7%) had a platinum-free interval (PFI) of > 6 months prior to enrollment. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (12%) and anemia (9%). Non-hematologic grade 3–4 toxicities included metabolic (29%), constitutional (18%), pain (18%) and gastrointestinal (15%). Two patients developed hematologic malignancies within one year of treatment.

Conclusions

Combination bevacizumab/pemetrexed is an active option for both platinum-sensitive and -resistant recurrent EOC. Further investigation of cost and novel toxicities associated with this regimen may be warranted.     

洛铂与替加氟联合贝伐单抗治疗晚期大肠癌的临床研究

目的探讨洛铂与替加氟注射液（方克）联合贝伐单抗治疗晚期大肠癌的临床疗效及毒副反应。方法64例晚期大肠癌患者分别接受方案A（32例）、方案B（32例）治疗。方案A组：替加氟800 mg/m2,CIV（24 h）,d1-d5;LV200 mg/m2,静脉滴注（2 h）,d1~d5;洛铂35 mg/m2,静脉滴注,d1。方案B组：替加氟800 mg/m2,CIV（24 h）d1~d5;LV200 mg/m2,静脉滴注（2 h）,d1~d5,洛铂35 mg/m2;静脉滴注,d1;贝伐单抗15 mg/kg,静脉滴注,d1。结果方案A组：CR 3例,PR 7例,有效率31.3%;方案B组：CR 6例,PR 12例,有效率为56.3%,静脉滴注,2组有效率比较,差异有显著性（χ2=4.0635,P=0.044）。2组均未出现明显肝、肾功能及心脏毒性反应。不良反应发生率比较,2组无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论洛铂与替加氟联合贝伐单抗是治疗晚期大肠癌安全有效的方案之一,能显著提高晚期患者的有效率,毒副作用可以耐受。     

The bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen is more suitable for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with a history of schistosomiasis: a clinical retrospective analysis

BackgroundThe basic platelet counts of schistosomiasis patients are low. If it does not meet the requirements for chemotherapy, the patient’s treatment will not be carried out, which directly affects their prognosis. Therefore the impact of treatment on platelet counts is critically important. The effects of bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab plus irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimens on platelets are different but have not been determined. In order to find a more suitable plan for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with a history of schistosomiasis, we conducted a retrospective analysis of mCRC patients and evaluated the impact of bevacizumab on their platelets.MethodsThe medical records of all mCRC patients with a history of schistosomiasis who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy or irinotecan-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for no less than 4 cycles, with or without bevacizumab from September 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019, in Kunshan Hospital were reviewed. Six-month cumulative incidence rates of splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia of chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab groups, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab groups, irinotecan-based chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab groups were compared from the first cycle until the completion of chemotherapy using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-rank test.ResultsEvaluable splenic enlargement and thrombocytopenia results were obtained from 153 mCRC patients. The 6-month cumulative incidence rates of splenomegaly (23.3% vs. 55%; P=0.01) and that of thrombocytopenia (43.8% vs. 57.5%; P=0.40) were lower in the bevacizumab group than the non-bevacizumab group, however there were no statistical differences for the rates of thrombocytopenia. For patients treated with oxaliplatin, the rates of splenomegaly (19.5% vs. 66.7%; P=0.01) and thrombocytopenia (31.7% vs. 77.2%; P=0.02) were lower in the bevacizumab-treated cohort than that in the non-bevacizumab cohort. When stratified for irinotecan, there were no statistical differences in the frequency of splenomegaly between the two groups. However, the rates of thrombocytopenia were higher in the bevacizumab-treated cohort than that in the non-bevacizumab cohort (59.4% vs. 8.7%; P=0.01).ConclusionsThe bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen is safer for mCRC patients with a history of schistosomiasis, especially for patients with a lower platelet count.     

Antitumor effect of the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab is dependent on susceptibility of tumors to hypoxia-induced apoptosis

Angiogenesis inhibition has been shown to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. The basis of the contribution of this modality has not been defined fully. To determine the potential role of hypoxia-induced apoptosis, we studied a series of colon cancer cell lines with varying susceptibility to hypoxia. We exposed HT29 and HCT116 colon adenocarcinoma cell lines to sublethal periods of hypoxia three times weekly for 40 exposures, and derived cell lines both more resistant (from HT29) and more sensitive (from HCT116) to hypoxia-induced apoptosis. Both hypoxia-derived cell lines demonstrated more rapid growth than the parental lines when implanted subcutaneously in immunodeficient mice. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with bevacizumab resulted in depletion of tumor microvasculature, upregulation of Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1alpha), and increased pimonidazole staining, consistent with an anti-angiogenic effect and induction of hypoxia in tumors derived from all cell lines. The proportion of apoptotic cells was increased in all the treated tumors, and was most pronounced in the bevacizumab-treated HCT116-derived cells. The bevacizumab-treated tumors showed growth delay in HT29 and its derivative, and the parental HCT116. In the hypoxia-sensitive HCT116-derived tumors, marked tumor shrinkage and prolonged growth control occurred. Therefore, bevacizumab treatment is an effective inducer of a hypoxic environment, but the resulting cell kill and tumor shrinkage is determined by the susceptibility of the tumor to apoptosis. The induction of apoptosis by hypoxia may contribute to the benefits of such treatment in the clinical setting.     

Combination gemcitabine, platinum, and bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

ObjectiveTo describe the response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profile of combination gemcitabine, platinum, and bevacizumab (GPB) for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).MethodsA chart review of all patients with recurrent EOC who were treated with D1, D15 GPB in a 28-day cycle at a single institution was performed. Standard doses were gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², cisplatin 30 mg/m² or carboplatin AUC 3, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg. All patients were analyzed for toxicity. RR and PFS were assessed in all patients who received at least 2 cycles of GPB.ResultsThirty-five patients were identified, and 33 received at least 2 cycles of GPB. The majority of patients (80%) were platinum sensitive. Patients received a median of 6 cycles of GPB (range 1–24). Sixteen patients (48%) had a complete response (CR), and 10 patients (30%) had a partial response (PR), for a total RR of 78%. An additional 5 patients (15%) had stable disease, and only 2 (6%) patients had progressive disease. The median overall PFS was 12 months (95% CI 7–15), with a median follow-up time of 10 months (2–22). Two patients (6%) had bowel perforations, and both survived. Hematologic toxicities were most common, with 29% and 14% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia respectively.ConclusionsThe combination of GPB demonstrated excellent efficacy for the treatment of recurrent EOC. However, serious toxicities occurred, and the safety profile of this combination requires further study.     

贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗转移性乳腺癌的成本效果分析

【摘要】 目的 从现阶段医疗卫生角度出发,评价四川地区贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗转移性乳腺癌的成本 效果优势。方法〓根据E2100临床试验数据,结合四川地区医疗费用水平,采用成本 效果分析法,以增量成本 效果比（ICER）为评价指标,评价贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗转移性乳腺癌方案的优劣,并分析结果敏感度。结果〓紫杉醇与贝伐珠单抗联合组与紫杉醇单药组相比,ICER值远远高于3倍GDP;敏感度分析结果提示,当贝伐珠单抗药品费用下降50%时,联合组仍不具有成本 效果优势。贝伐珠单抗使用成本和医疗检查成本对总成本影响最大,其他参数影响较小。结论〓从我国现阶段医疗卫生角度出发,四川地区转移性乳腺癌使用贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗,尚不具有成本效果优势。