Implicit branching and parameterized partial cover problems

Covering problems are fundamental classical problems in optimization, computer science and complexity theory. Typically an input to these problems is a family of sets over a finite universe and the goal is to cover the elements of the universe with as few sets of the family as possible. The variations of covering problems include well-known problems like Set Cover, Vertex Cover, Dominating Set and Facility Location to name a few. Recently there has been a lot of study on partial covering problems, a natural generalization of covering problems. Here, the goal is not to cover all the elements but to cover the specified number of elements with the minimum number of sets. In this paper we study partial covering problems in graphs in the realm of parameterized complexity. Classical (non-partial) version of all these problems has been intensively studied in planar graphs and in graphs excluding a fixed graph H as a minor. However, the techniques developed for parameterized version of non-partial covering problems cannot be applied directly to their partial counterparts. The approach we use, to show that various partial covering problems are fixed parameter tractable on planar graphs, graphs of bounded local treewidth and graph excluding some graph as a minor, is quite different from previously known techniques. The main idea behind our approach is the concept of implicit branching. We find implicit branching technique to be interesting on its own and believe that it can be used for some other problems.     

Nondeterministic Graph Searching: From Pathwidth to Treewidth

We introduce nondeterministic graph searching with a controlled amount of nondeterminism and show how this new tool can be used in algorithm design and combinatorial analysis applying to both pathwidth and treewidth. We prove equivalence between this game-theoretic approach and graph decompositions called q -branched tree decompositions, which can be interpreted as a parameterized version of tree decompositions. Path decomposition and (standard) tree decomposition are two extreme cases of q-branched tree decompositions. The equivalence between nondeterministic graph searching and q-branched tree decomposition enables us to design an exact (exponential time) algorithm computing q-branched treewidth for all q≥0, which is thus valid for both treewidth and pathwidth. This algorithm performs as fast as the best known exact algorithm for pathwidth. Conversely, this equivalence also enables us to design a lower bound on the amount of nondeterminism required to search a graph with the minimum number of searchers. Additional support of F.V. Fomin by the Research Council of Norway. Additional supports of P. Fraigniaud from the INRIA Project “Grand Large”, and from the Project PairAPair of the ACI “Masse de Données”. Additional supports of N. Nisse from the Project Fragile of the ACI “Sécurité & Informatique”.     

Monotony properties of connected visible graph searching

Search games are attractive for their correspondence with classical width parameters. For instance, the invisible search number (a.k.a. node search number) of a graph is equal to its pathwidth plus 1, and the visible search number of a graph is equal to its treewidth plus 1. The connected variants of these games ask for search strategies that are connected, i.e., at every step of the strategy, the searched part of the graph induces a connected subgraph. We focus on monotone search strategies, i.e., strategies for which every node is searched exactly once. The monotone connected visible search number of an n-node graph is at most O(logn) times its visible search number. First, we prove that this logarithmic bound is tight. Precisely, we prove that there is an infinite family of graphs for which the ratio monotone connected visible search number over visible search number is Ω(logn). Second, we prove that, as opposed to the non-connected variant of visible graph searching, “recontamination helps” for connected visible search. Precisely, we prove that, for any k4, there exists a graph with connected visible search number at most k, and monotone connected visible search number >k     

Degree-constrained decompositions of graphs: Bounded treewidth and planarity

We study the problem of decomposing the vertex set V$V$ of a graph into two nonempty parts _V1,_V2$V_1,V_2$ which induce subgraphs where each vertex v∈_V1$v\in V_1$ has degree at least a(v)$a(v)$ inside _V1$V_1$ and each v∈_V2$v\in V_2$ has degree at least b(v)$b(v)$ inside _V2$V_2$. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for graphs with bounded treewidth which decides if a graph admits a decomposition, and gives such a decomposition if it exists. This result and its variants are then applied to designing polynomial-time approximation schemes for planar graphs where a decomposition does not necessarily exist but the local degree conditions should be met for as many vertices as possible.     

Algorithms for generalized vertex-rankings of partial k-trees

A c-vertex-ranking of a graph G for a positive integer c is a labeling of the vertices of G with integers such that, for any label i, deletion of all vertices with labels >i leaves connected components, each having at most c vertices with label i. A c-vertex-ranking is optimal if the number of labels used is as small as possible. We present sequential and parallel algorithms to find an optimal c-vertex-ranking of a partial k-tree, that is, a graph of treewidth bounded by a fixed integer k. The sequential algorithm takes polynomial-time for any positive integer c. The parallel algorithm takes O(log n) parallel time using a polynomial number of processors on the common CRCW PRAM, where n is the number of vertices in G.     

Spanners in sparse graphs

A t-spanner of a graph G is a spanning subgraph S in which the distance between every pair of vertices is at most t times their distance in G. If S is required to be a tree then S is called a tree t-spanner of G. In 1998, Fekete and Kremer showed that on unweighted planar graphs deciding whether G admits a tree t-spanner is polynomial time solvable for t?3 and is NP-complete when t is part of the input. They also left as an open problem if the problem is polynomial time solvable for every fixed t?4. In this work we resolve the open question of Fekete and Kremer by proving much more general results:

• • 

  The problem of finding a t-spanner of treewidth at most k in a given planar graph G is fixed parameter tractable parameterized by k and t. Moreover, for every fixed t and k, the running time of our algorithm is linear.

• • 

  Our technique allows to extend the result from planar graphs to much more general classes of graphs. An apex graph is a graph that can be made planar by the removal of a single vertex. We prove that the problem of finding a t-spanner of treewidth k is fixed parameter tractable on graphs that do not contain some fixed apex graph as a minor, i.e. on apex-minor-free graphs. The class of apex-minor-free graphs contains planar graphs and graphs of bounded genus.

• • 

  Finally, we show that the tractability border of the t-spanner problem cannot be extended beyond the class of apex-minor-free graphs and in this sense our results are tight. In particular, for every t?4, the problem of finding a tree t-spanner is NP-complete on K6-minor-free graphs.

     

Treewidth computations II. Lower bounds

For several applications, it is important to be able to compute the treewidth of a given graph and to find tree decompositions of small width reasonably fast. Good lower bounds on the treewidth of a graph can, amongst others, help to speed up branch and bound algorithms that compute the treewidth of a graph exactly. A high lower bound for a specific graph instance can tell that a dynamic programming approach for solving a problem is infeasible for this instance. This paper gives an overview of several recent methods that give lower bounds on the treewidth of graphs.     

Algorithmic Graph Minor Theory: Improved Grid Minor Bounds and Wagner’s Contraction

We explore three important avenues of research in algorithmic graph-minor theory, which all stem from a key min-max relation between the treewidth of a graph and its largest grid minor. This min-max relation is a keystone of the Graph Minor Theory of Robertson and Seymour, which ultimately proves Wagner’s Conjecture about the structure of minor-closed graph properties. First, we obtain the only known polynomial min-max relation for graphs that do not exclude any fixed minor, namely, map graphs and power graphs. Second, we obtain explicit (and improved) bounds on the min-max relation for an important class of graphs excluding a minor, namely, K _3,k -minor-free graphs, using new techniques that do not rely on Graph Minor Theory. These two avenues lead to faster fixed-parameter algorithms for two families of graph problems, called minor-bidimensional and contraction-bidimensional parameters, which include feedback vertex set, vertex cover, minimum maximal matching, face cover, a series of vertex-removal parameters, dominating set, edge dominating set, R-dominating set, connected dominating set, connected edge dominating set, connected R-dominating set, and unweighted TSP tour. Third, we disprove a variation of Wagner’s Conjecture for the case of graph contractions in general graphs, and in a sense characterize which graphs satisfy the variation. This result demonstrates the limitations of a general theory of algorithms for the family of contraction-closed problems (which includes, for example, the celebrated dominating-set problem). If this conjecture had been true, we would have had an extremely powerful tool for proving the existence of efficient algorithms for any contraction-closed problem, like we do for minor-closed problems via Graph Minor Theory.