Evolución e impacto bibliométrico de las becas de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología/Fundación Española del Corazón en el periodo 2007-2012

Introduction and objectivesThe Spanish Society of Cardiology/Spanish Heart Foundation (SEC/FEC) annually awards grants for cardiovascular research projects. Our objective was to analyze the trend in these investments and their resulting scientific production from 2007 to 2012.MethodsA search of the publications funded by the SEC/FEC was carried out, according to the following inclusion criteria: publication in a journal indexed in MEDLINE or EMBASE, publication date after the grant, authorship by the principal investigator of the grant, and acknowledgment of SEC/FEC funding. The impact factor and subsequent citations of the articles were analyzed (Web of Science).ResultsA total of 235 grants were awarded (39/y) with an allocation of €3 854 300 (€642 383/y), 37% of them to women. In all, 122 publications resulted from 88 research projects (37%) funded by the SEC/FEC. Up to October 2017, these publications had received 2258 citations in subsequent studies in the Web of Science, with a mean of 18.5 and a median of 8 citations/study.ConclusionsDespite the economic crisis, the mean number and size of the grants awarded by the SEC/FEC increased in the period analyzed. Grants were awarded on an equal opportunity basis to men and women. The bibliometric impact of the funded projects is acceptable, although efforts should be made to improve it.     

Scientific quality of clinical research an analysis of 40 research projects in pharmacology/pharmacotherapy

Objective: The scientific quality of research is an important ethical issue. To clarify the quality of research projects in pharmacotherapy/pharmacology, 40 randomly selected research projects in pharmacotherapy/pharmacology submitted to a research ethics committee were reviewed. Results: Eight of the projects would not have contributed new knowledge nor were they necessary as controls for the results of previous research. Fifteen of the research protocols were of good quality, 15 could be used after revisions, and 10 were unfit for use. Eleven of the research projects were not finished 5 years after they were started. A written report was produced from 26 of the projects. Nine were of good quality and could be accepted for publication in a medical journal, 10 of the reports were in need of revision before publication, and 7 should not be accepted for publication. Conclusion: Research in this field ought to be improved, and ways to improve the standard of clinical trials in pharmacotherapy are dicussed. Received: 1 April 1996 / Accepted in revised form: 28 June 1996     

conference report: Mental health and intellectual disability: an international perspective

The present paper reports on the inaugural meeting of the Mental Health Special Interest Research Group (SIRG) of the International Association for the Scientific study of Intellectual disability which was held at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, UK, in March 1998. The meeting was organized in conjunction with the Ninth Annual SIRG on ageing and intellectual disability. Representatives from North America, several European and Scandinavian countries, Australia, and Israel attended. Two broad themes had been determined prior to the meeting: ‘Improving the detection of mental health problems’ and ‘Research strategies for identifying risk factors for mental health problems’. In the presentations and subsequent discussions, it was apparent that there were extrenely diverse perspectives both across and within the different countries represented. Not only were individuals' experiences very different, but most strikingly, the theoretical frameworks were very diverse. This was partly a function of there being understandable differences in perspectives across disciplines, but at its most marked, there were fundamental differences in the way both intellectual disability and mental health were conceptualized.     

美国国立医学图书馆Index Medicus/MEDLINE收录期刊的标准

就医学期刊而言，美国国立医学图书馆的Index Medicus／Medline／PubMed应是生物医学类期刊的最佳选择，是否被该检索系统收录对医学期刊及其内容的影响至关重要。期刊被该数据库的收录审查过程极其严格，涉及很多具体问题。     

Latent variable discovery in classification models

The naive Bayes model makes the often unrealistic assumption that the feature variables are mutually independent given the class variable. We interpret a violation of this assumption as an indication of the presence of latent variables, and we show how latent variables can be detected. Latent variable discovery is interesting, especially for medical applications, because it can lead to a better understanding of application domains. It can also improve classification accuracy and boost user confidence in classification models.     

学术期刊关联数据出版与共享中的信息安全管理

【目的】 对我国学术期刊关联数据出版与共享中的信息安全管理的概念、政策及其存在的问题进行梳理,有助于科学数据出版与共享工作的推进。【方法】 基于我国科学数据出版与共享的演化过程,以及地理资源期刊在科学数据共享方面的现状与发展情况,对期刊论文关联数据出版和安全管理情况进行分析,对平台间合作的模式进行探讨。【结果】 为实现科学数据的价值最大化,中国自上而下建立起了科学数据共享系统,包括网络基础设施、数据库、数据中心、数据服务平台等,制定了一系列数据获取和管理规范,并制定了保障科学数据信息安全的相关法律。【结论】 科学数据出版与共享应建立在安全的基础上。经过初期的大规模建设后,数据出版与共享及其安全管理应走向“提质增效”阶段,要注重高新技术的注入和专业人才的培养。在管理措施上要以保证数据安全为基础,以数据质量为核心,从而提升信息安全管理水平,提高数据再应用效率。     

中国ESI高被引科学家和ESI学术期刊的学科分布探析与比较

【目的】 结合国家对学术期刊发展的指导政策,为中国英文学术期刊发展路径提供思路、数据支撑和理论指导。【方法】 以中国ESI高被引科学家和ESI期刊在ESI 22个学科的分布为研究对象,对两者分别在世界ESI高被引科学家和世界ESI高被引期刊中的发展脉络进行分析。【结果】 两类研究对象的发展现状不均衡,中国ESI期刊行业布局尚未对中国ESI高被引学者的跨学科发展趋势做出响应。【结论】 在中国基础学科的高被引科学家不断涌现的背景下,除了大力发展基础学科的高质量期刊以外,扶持交叉领域期刊、综合性学术期刊以及文科和应用型学科期刊的发展对促进中国ESI期刊学科分布均衡发展有重要意义;中国ESI期刊应将扶植国内科研工作者作为首要使命。     

科云生产管理平台在期刊集约化生产中的探索实践

【目的】 分享科云生产管理平台(以下简称“科云平台”)在数据中台建设以及出版生产管理方面的实践与经验,为出版同行建设学术服务平台以及实现数字化出版流程管理提供参考。【方法】 分享科云平台架构,梳理科云平台在期刊集约化出版生产中的特色功能与作用,阐明科云平台对期刊集群化发展的促进作用,同时提出科云平台下一步设想。【结果】 基于科云平台,对出版流程进行切分、优化,细化编辑分工,有助于提升期刊质量和出版效率,并形成集约化出版模式;构建数据中台,将数据与业务相契合,形成闭环模式,有助于提升数字出版平台的学术服务能力。【结论】 坚持以技术革新为突破口,突破传统出版模式,搭建具有自主知识产权的数字化出版管理平台是实现科技期刊可持续发展的必由之路,有助于推动科技期刊数字化转型升级、加快科技期刊集群化发展。