排序方式： 共有91条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
The time delay experiment proposed by I.I. Shapiro in 1964 and conducted in the seventies was the most precise experiment
of general relativity until that time. Further experimentation has improved the accuracy level of both the time delay and
the light deflection experiments. A simulation model is proposed that involves only a simple mass and time transformation
factor involving velocity of light. The light deflection and the time delay experiments are numerically simulated using this
model that does not use the general relativistic equations. The computed values presented in this paper compare well with
recent levels of accuracy of their respective experimental results. 相似文献
2.
Bortoletto D Goldberg M Horwitz N Mestayer MD Moneti GC Sharma V Shipsey IP Skwarnicki T Csorna SE Letson T Brock IC Ferguson T Artuso M Bebek C Berkelman K Blucher E Byrd J Cassel DG Cheu E Coffman DM Crawford G DeSalvo R DeWire JW Drell PS Ehrlich R Galik RS Gittelman B Gray SW Halling AM Hartill DL Heltsley BK Kandaswamy J Kowalewski R Kreinick DL Kubota Y Lewis JD Mistry NB Mueller J Namjoshi R Nandi S Nordberg E O'Grady C Peterson D Pisharody M Riley D Sapper M Silverman A Stone S Worden H 《Physical review letters》1989,62(21):2436-2439
3.
Alam MS Katayama N Kim IJ Li WC Lou XC Sun CR Bortoletto D Goldberg M Horwitz N Mestayer MD Moneti GC Sharma V Shipsey IP Skwarnicki T Csorna SE Letson T Brock IC Ferguson T Artuso M Bebek C Berkelman K Blucher E Byrd J Cassel DG Cheu E Coffman DM Crawford G DeSalvo R DeWire JW Drell PS Ehrlich R Galik RS Gittelman B Gray SW Halling AM Hartill DL Heltsley BK Kandaswamy J Kowalewski R Kreinick DL Kubota Y Lewis JD Mistry NB Mueller J Namjoshi R Nandi S Nordberg E O'Grady C Peterson D Pisharody M 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1989,40(11):3790
4.
Barish B Chadha M Chan S Cowen DF Eigen G Miller JS O'Grady C Urheim J Weinstein AJ Acosta D Athanas M Masek G Paar HP Gronberg J Kutschke R Menary S Morrison RJ Nakanishi S Nelson HN Nelson TK Qiao C Richman JD Ryd A Tajima H Sperka D Witherell MS Procario M Balest R Cho K Daoudi M Ford WT Johnson DR Lingel K Lohner M Rankin P Smith JG Alexander JP Bebek C Berkelman K Bloom K Browder TE Cassel DG Cho HA Coffman DM Crowcroft DS Drell PS Ehrlich R Gaidarev P Galik RS Garcia-Sciveres M Geiser B 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1995,51(3):1014-1033
5.
Acosta D Athanas M Masek G Paar H Bean A Gronberg J Kutschke R Menary S Morrison RJ Nakanishi S Nelson HN Nelson TK Richman JD Ryd A Tajima H Schmidt D Sperka D Witherell MS Procario M Yang S Balest R Cho K Daoudi M Ford WT Johnson DR Lingel K Lohner M Rankin P Smith JG Alexander JP Bebek C Berkelman K Besson D Browder TE Cassel DG Cho HA Coffman DM Drell PS Ehrlich R Galik RS Garcia-Sciveres M Geiser B Gittelman B Gray SW Hartill DL Heltsley BK Jones CD Jones SL Kandaswamy J Katayama N Kim PC 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1994,49(11):5690-5700
6.
Bean A Gronberg J Kutschke R Menary S Morrison RJ Nelson H Richman J Tajima H Schmidt D Sperka D Witherell M Procario M Yang S Daoudi M Ford WT Johnson DR Lingel K Lohner M Rankin P Smith JG Alexander JP Bebek C Berkelman K Besson D Browder TE Cassel DG Coffman DM Drell PS Ehrlich R Galik RS Garcia-Sciveres M Geiser B Gittelman B Gray SW Hartill DL Heltsley BK Honscheid K Jones C Kandaswamy J Katayama N Kim PC Kreinick DL Ludwig GS Masui J Mevissen J Mistry NB Ng CR Nordberg E O'Grady C 《Physical review letters》1993,70(2):138-142
7.
Haas P Hempstead M Jensen T Kagan H Kass R Behrends S Gentile T Guida JM Guida JA Morrow F Poling R Rosenfeld C Thorndike EH Tipton P Besson D Green J Namjoshi R Sannes F Skubic P Stone R Bortoletto D Chen A Goldberg M Horwitz N Jawahery A Lubrano P Moneti GC Trahern CG van Hecke H Csorna SE Garren L Mestayer MD Panvini RS Word GB Yi X Alam MS Bean A Ferguson T Avery P Bebek C Berkelman K Blucher E Cassel DG Copie T DeSalvo R DeWire JW Ehrlich R Galik RS Gilchriese MG Gittelman B Gray SW 《Physical review letters》1985,55(12):1248-1251
8.
Fulton R Jensen T Johnson DR Kagan H Kass R Morrow F Whitmore J Wilson P Bortoletto D Chen W Dominick J McIlwain RL Miller DH Ng CR Schaffner SF Shibata EI Shipsey IP Yao W Battle M Sparks K Thorndike EH Wang C Alam MS Kim IJ Li WC Romero V Sun CR Wang P Zoeller MM Goldberg M Haupt T Horwitz N Jain V Mestayer MD Moneti GC Rozen Y Rubin P Sharma V Skwarnicki T Thulasidas M Zhu G Csorna SE Letson T Alexander J Artuso M Bebek C Berkelman K Browder T Cassel DG Cheu E Coffman DM Crawford G DeWire JW 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1991,43(3):651-663
9.
Adam NE Alexander JP Berkelman K Cassel DG Crede V Duboscq JE Ecklund KM Ehrlich R Fields L Galik RS Gibbons L Gittelman B Gray R Gray SW Hartill DL Heltsley BK Hertz D Hsu L Jones CD Kandaswamy J Kreinick DL Kuznetsov VE Mahlke-Krüger H Meyer TO Onyisi PU Patterson JR Peterson D Phillips EA Pivarski J Riley D Ryd A Sadoff AJ Schwarthoff H Shepherd MR Stroiney S Sun WM Urner D Wilksen T Weinberger M Athar SB Avery P Breva-Newell L Patel R Potlia V Stoeck H Yelton J Rubin P Cawlfield C 《Physical review letters》2005,94(23):232002
We describe new measurements of the inclusive and exclusive branching fractions for psi(2S) transitions to J/psi using e(+)e(-) collision data collected with the CLEO detector operating at CESR. All branching fractions and ratios of branching fractions reported here represent either the most precise measurements to date or the first direct measurements. Indirectly and in combination with other CLEO measurements, we determine B(chi(cJ) --> gamma(J/psi)) and B[psi(2S) --> light hadrons]. 相似文献
10.
Adams GS Chasse M Cravey M Cummings JP Danko I Napolitano J Cronin-Hennessy D Park CS Park W Thayer JB Thorndike EH Coan TE Gao YS Liu F Stroynowski R Artuso M Boulahouache C Blusk S Butt J Dambasuren E Dorjkhaidav O Menaa N Mountain R Muramatsu H Nandakumar R Redjimi R Sia R Skwarnicki T Stone S Wang JC Zhang K Csorna SE Bonvicini G Cinabro D Dubrovin M Bornheim A Pappas SP Weinstein AJ Briere RA Chen GP Ferguson T Tatishvili G Vogel H Watkins ME Adam NE Alexander JP Berkelman K Cassel DG 《Physical review letters》2005,94(1):012001
The decay branching fractions of the three narrow Upsilon resonances to mu(+)mu(-) have been measured by analyzing about 4.3 fb(-1) e(+)e(-) data collected with the CLEO III detector. The branching fraction B(Upsilon(1S)-->mu(+)mu(-))=(2.49+/-0.02+/-0.07)% is consistent with the current world average, but B(Upsilon(2S)-->mu(+)mu(-))=(2.03+/-0.03+/-0.08)% and B(Upsilon(3S)-->mu(+)mu(-))=(2.39+/-0.07+/-0.10)% are significantly larger than prior results. These new muonic branching fractions imply a narrower total decay width for the Upsilon(2S) and Upsilon(3S) resonances and lower other branching fractions that rely on these decays in their determination. 相似文献
