Health-related quality of life and its predictive role for analgesic effect in patients with painful polyneuropathy.

Painful polyneuropathy is a common neuropathic pain condition. The present study describes health-related quality of life (HRQL) in a sample of patients with painful polyneuropathy of different origin and the possible predictive role of HRQL for analgesic effect. Ninety-three patients with a diagnosis of painful polyneuropathy were included in the analysis. Data were obtained from three randomised, placebo-controlled cross-over studies testing the effect of different drugs on polyneuropathic pain (St. John's wort, venlafaxine/imipramine and valproic acid). Patients completed a HRQL questionnaire (SF-36) after a drug-free baseline period and at the end of each treatment period. At baseline, all eight SF-36 scores were lower than in the normal population. No significant differences were found between SF-36 scales during placebo and treatment with valproic acid and St. John's wort. Those two drugs had not shown a pain relieving effect in former analysis. The SF-36 scale of bodily pain (BP) was improved by venlafaxine treatment (p=0.023). General health (GH) and vitality (VT) were improved under treatment with imipramine (GH: p=0.006, VT: p=0.015). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline SF-36 scores predicted subsequent response to pharmacological treatment. Results show an impaired HRQL in painful polyneuropathy and suggest that HRQL may predict response to analgesic treatment.     

The effect of quinidine on the analgesic effect of codeine

Summary We have studied the hypoalgesic effect of codeine (100 mg) after blocking the hepatic O-demethylation of codeine to morphine via the sparteine oxygenase (CYP2D6) by quinidine (200 mg). The study was performed in 16 extensive metabolizers of sparteine, using a double-blind, randomized, four-way, cross-over design. The treatments given at 3 h intervals during the four sessions were placebo/placebo, quinidine/placebo, placebo/codeine, and quinidine/codeine. We measured pin-prick pain and pain tolerance thresholds to high energy argon laser stimuli before and 1, 2, and 3 h after codeine or placebo.After codeine and placebo, the peak plasma concentration of morphine was 6–62 (median 18) nmol·.l^–1. When quinidine pre-treatment was given, no morphine could be detected (<4 nmol·l^–1) after codeine. The pin-prick pain thresholds were significantly increased after placebo/codeine, but not after quinidine/codeine compared with placebo/placebo. Both placebo/codeine and quinidine/codeine increased pain tolerance thresholds significantly. Quinidine/codeine and quinidine/placebo did not differ significantly for either pin-prick or tolerance pain thresholds.These results are compatible with local CYP2D6 mediated formation of morphine in the brain, not being blocked by quinidine. Alternatively, a hypoalgesic effect of quinidine might have confounded the results.     

Nonlinear kinetics of imipramine in low and medium plasma level ranges

Steady state plasma concentrations of imipramine and desipramine were studied at three to nine different imipramine dose levels in 17 extensive metabolizers of sparteine and at two dose levels in two poor metabolizers of sparteine, all treated for diabetic neuropathy symptoms. The imipramine doses were changed stepwise from doses yielding plasma concentrations of imipramine plus desipramine below 150 nM, up to doses yielding therapeutic drug levels of at least 300-500 nM. The imipramine doses required to achieve therapeutic drug levels was 20 or 25 mg/day in the two poor metabolizers and 50-350 mg/day in the extensive metabolizers. In the extensive metabolizers, the concentration/dose ratio increased for imipramine and desipramine with increasing dose. Dose adjustments based on a simple linear prediction from drug levels at initial dose (50 or 75 mg imipramine/day) thus would result in 0-130% (median, 20%) overestimates, most pronounced in patients with initial low steady state levels. The nonlinear kinetics of imipramine thus may be a significant clinical problem in patients treated for diabetic neuropathy symptoms.     

Statins and peripheral neuropathy

Within the past 3 years seven cases of reversible peripheral neuropathy apparently caused by statins have been reported. Here we report seven additional cases associated with long-term statin therapy, in which other causes of neuropathy were thoroughly excluded. The neuropathy was in all cases axonal and with affection of both thick and thin nerve fibers. The symptoms of neuropathy persisted during an observation period lasting from 10 weeks to 1 year in four cases after statin treatment had been withdrawn. We suggest that long-term statin treatment may be associated with chronic peripheral neuropathy. Received: 6 July 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 1 October 1998     

Pharmacologic treatment of pain in polyneuropathy

Tricyclic antidepressants and anticonvulsants have become the mainstay in the treatment of pain in polyneuropathy. Within the last decade, controlled trials have shown that numerous other drugs relieve such pain. To estimate the efficacy of the different treatments, the authors identified all placebo-controlled trials and calculated numbers needed to treat (NNT) to obtain one patient with more than 50% pain relief. The NNT was 2.6 for tricyclic antidepressants, 6.7 for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, 2.5 for anticonvulsant sodium channel blockers, 4.1 for the anticonvulsant calcium channel blocker gabapentin, and 3.4 for the mixed opioid and monoaminergic drug tramadol, as calculated from a sufficiently large number of patients. Favorable point estimates of NNT of 1.9 for the NMDA-antagonist dextromethorphan and 3.4 for L-dopa were determined from a limited number of data. For capsaicin, the NNT calculated from many exposed patients was 5.9, but most of the data are controversial owing to trial methodology. Finally, the NNT for the antiarrhythmic sodium channel blocker mexiletine was 38, but this value may be biased because of a lack of dichotomous data in several positive trials. Tricyclic antidepressants are at the moment still the drugs of first choice, and drugs such as gabapentin, carbamazepine, and tramadol may be tried if contraindications or tolerability problems are encountered with the tricyclics.     

Specific effect of levetiracetam in experimental human pain models.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam is a new antiepileptic drug. There is only limited experience with levetiracetam in clinical neuropathic pain. AIM: To test the analgesic effect of levetiracetam in a human experimental pain model in order to obtain preclinical evidence for its potential effect in neuropathic pain. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers completed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with a single oral dose of 1500 mg levetiracetam against placebo. Pain tests included pain detection and tolerance to single electrical stimulation and temporal pain summation threshold to repetitive electrical stimulation (3 Hz) of the sural nerve. RESULTS: Levetiracetam significantly increased the pain tolerance thresholds (p=0.04), and the pain detection thresholds tended to be increased (p=0.06), whereas levetiracetam had no effect on temporal pain summation thresholds (p=0.30). CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam has an analgesic effect in the electrical sural nerve stimulation pain model, but it did not increase temporal pain summation threshold. Levetiracetam may still be effective in clinical neuropathic pain.     

Small and large fiber sensory polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetes: Influence of diagnostic criteria on neuropathy subtypes

Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) can be classified based on fiber diameter into three subtypes: small fiber neuropathy (SFN), large fiber neuropathy (LFN), and mixed fiber neuropathy (MFN). We examined the effect of different diagnostic models on the frequency of polyneuropathy subtypes in type 2 diabetes patients with DPN. This study was based on patients from the Danish Center for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes cohort. We defined DPN as probable or definite DPN according to the Toronto Consensus Criteria. DPN was then subtyped according to four distinct diagnostic models. A total of 277 diabetes patients (214 with DPN and 63 with no DPN) were included in the study. We found a considerable variation in polyneuropathy subtypes by applying different diagnostic models independent of the degree of certainty of DPN diagnosis. For probable and definite DPN, the frequency of subtypes across diagnostic models varied from: 1.4% to 13.1% for SFN, 9.3% to 21.5% for LFN, 51.4% to 83.2% for MFN, and 0.5% to 14.5% for non‐classifiable neuropathy (NCN). For the definite DPN group, the frequency of subtypes varied from: 1.6% to 13.5% for SFN, 5.6% to 20.6% for LFN, 61.9% to 89.7% for MFN, and 0.0% to 6.3% for NCN. The frequency of polyneuropathy subtypes depends on the type and number of criteria applied in a diagnostic model. Future consensus criteria should clearly define sensory functions to be tested, methods of testing, and how findings should be interpreted for both clinical practice and research purpose.     

Interobserver variation in the evaluation of neurological signs: observer dependent factors.

Introduction - Interobserver variation among four observers in evaluation of eight selected neurological signs was investigated. Material & methods - Two hundred and two consecutive unselected inpatients were examined by two senior neurologists and two trainees, all without knowledge of the neurological case history. The signs examined were: anisocoria, jerky eye movements, facial palsy, elbow extension force, finger-nose test, Barré sign, knee jerk, and extensor plantar reflex. Observed agreement rates and kappa coefficients were calculated in order to compare the interobserver variability among neurologists and trainees, and to evaluate differences in the interobserver variability between signs. Results - Observed agreement rates varied from 0.80 to 0.95 for neurologists and from 0.65 to 0.98 for trainees. For neurologists kappa coefficients ranged from 0.40 to 0.67 and for trainees from 0.22 to 0.81. The neurologists had higher kappa values than the trainees in 5 signs, but this difference was only statistically significant for jerky eye movements. For the individual signs the observed agreement rates were between 0.50 and 0.93 for all four examiners combined, and overall kappa values varied from 0.32 to 0.71 with highest agreement for facial palsy and lowest for knee jerk. Conclusion - The magnitude of the interobserver and intersign variation indicates that the interpretation of the neurological signs tested, without knowledge of the case history, should be done with some caution.