首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   131篇
  免费   18篇
  国内免费   11篇
医药卫生   160篇
  2023年   2篇
  2021年   4篇
  2020年   6篇
  2018年   2篇
  2017年   8篇
  2016年   4篇
  2015年   7篇
  2014年   11篇
  2013年   11篇
  2012年   4篇
  2011年   10篇
  2010年   5篇
  2009年   12篇
  2008年   6篇
  2007年   3篇
  2006年   4篇
  2005年   1篇
  2004年   3篇
  2003年   2篇
  2002年   2篇
  2001年   2篇
  1999年   2篇
  1998年   13篇
  1997年   8篇
  1996年   3篇
  1995年   10篇
  1993年   3篇
  1992年   3篇
  1991年   1篇
  1990年   1篇
  1989年   1篇
  1988年   4篇
  1987年   1篇
  1985年   1篇
排序方式: 共有160条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
Inhaled beta-agonists can produce bronchodilatation and reduce airway hyperreactivity in patients with asthma. Using these two measures, we compared inhaled bitolterol (three puffs, 1110 micrograms), albuterol (two puffs, 180 micrograms), and placebo administered by metered-dose inhaler in a blinded, crossover study of 40 subjects with chronic asthma. On each study day, subjects underwent histamine challenges at 1 1/2 hours before, and 1/2, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after inhaling one of the three test-drug treatments. Both drugs produced significant bronchodilatation at 30 minutes through 4 hours and significant effects on airway reactivity at 30 minutes through 2 hours (p less than 0.05). Bitolterol also produced small but significant bronchodilator effects at 6 hours and effects on airway reactivity at 4 hours (p less than 0.05). Effects of bitolterol on airway reactivity diminished significantly more slowly than effects of albuterol in subjects with baseline provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/ml of histamine (half-life of biologic effect 1.37 versus 0.92 hours; p less than 0.05) but not in subjects with baseline provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 less than or equal to 1.0 mg/ml (half-life of biologic effect of 1.01 versus 1.00 hours; p greater than 0.05).  相似文献   
5.
6.
7.

Purpose

The use of volatile-based sedation within critical care environments has been limited by difficulties of drug administration and safety concerns over environment pollution and staff exposure in an intensive care unit (ICU) with no scavenging. The aim of this study was to develop a simple scavenging system to be used with the Anesthesia Conserving Device (AnaConDa®) and to determine whether or not ambient concentrations of residual anesthetic are within current acceptable limits.

Technical features

The scavenging system consists of two Deltasorb® canisters attached to the ICU ventilator in series. AnaConDa is a miniature vaporizer designed to provide volatile-based sedation within an ICU. The first ten patients recruited into a larger randomized trial assessing outcomes after elective coronary graft bypass surgery were sedated within the cardiac ICU using either isoflurane or sevoflurane. Sedation was guided by the Sedation Agitation Scale, resulting in an end-tidal minimum anesthetic concentration of volatile agent ranging from 0.1-0.3. At one hour post ICU admission, infrared photometric analysis was used to assess environmental contamination at four points along the ventilator circuit and scavenging system and around the patient’s head. All measurements taken within the patient’s room were below 1 part per million, which satisfies criteria for occupational exposure.

Conclusions

This study shows that volatile agents can be administered safely within critical care settings using a simple scavenging system. Our scavenging system used in conjunction with the AnaConDa device reduced the concentration of environmental contamination to a level that is acceptable to Canadian standards and standards in most Western countries and thus conforms to international safety standards. The related clinical trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01151254).  相似文献   
8.

Background

In many studies, gabapentinoids, such as pregabalin, have been shown to reduce preoperative anxiety. This anxiolysis is often accompanied by sedation, one of the most frequent side effects of pregabalin. We hypothesized that pregabalin taken preoperatively could reduce propofol requirements for induction of general anesthesia.

Methods

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted after approval by the local ethics committee. Fifty women aged 18-40 yr, American Anesthesiologists Society physical status I and II, and scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic gynecologic procedures were enrolled after written consent. Treatment group patients were given pregabalin 150 mg po one hour before surgery while patients in the control group received a placebo. The primary outcome was the propofol dose required to achieve a targeted anesthetic depth in 50% of the population, i.e., effective dose (ED)50. The ED50 was estimated using Dixon’s up-and-down methodology. The targeted anesthetic depth was defined based on predetermined entropy monitoring values (State Entropy [SE] < 50 and Response Entropy [RE]-SE < 10). As a secondary outcome, we tested if pregabalin reduced pre-induction anxiety levels which were measured on a 0-100 scale.

Results

The propofol ED50 was not statistically different between the pregabalin group (mean 1.33 mg·kg?1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23 to 1.43) vs the placebo group (mean 1.37 mg·kg?1; 95% CI 1.28 to 1.46); P = 0.19. Also, pre-induction anxiety level was not different between groups (median 31; interquartile range [IQR] [10-52] vs median 42; IQR [4-71], respectively; P = 0.41).

Conclusions

Preoperative pregabalin does not reduce propofol requirements in a population of healthy young women undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. This study failed to show a pre-induction anxiolytic effect of pregabalin in such a population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01158859).  相似文献   
9.
10.
Since the first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was identified in Taiwan 2020.01.21. Several family cluster infections were found later. This study aimed to report family cluster infections and observe subsequent development. We collected domestic family cluster infections among COVID-19 confirmed cases from 21 January 2020 to 16 March 2020. There were three domestic family clusters infections in this period. The first cluster was cases 19 to 23. The infectious source was a Taiwanese passenger from Zhejiang. The second cluster was cases 24 to 26 and the third cluster was cases 27 to 32. The infectious sources of the latter clusters are currently uncertain. All contacts of three clusters have been isolated and no new confirmed cases have been identified to date. Some measures which have reduced the spread of these three clusters included: First, high suspicion of COVID-19 for unexplained pneumonia is very important for early detection. Second, immediate epidemic investigation is taken especially COVID-19 is infectious during the incubation period. Third, when the second and third clusters could not find infectious sources, CECC's press conference let the public know immediately the epidemic situation, so that people could raise their awareness and seek medical treatment or quarantine.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号