间断纵行缝扎硬化注射治疗直肠黏膜内脱垂68例临床分析

目的:观察和评价间断纵行缝扎硬化注射治疗直肠黏膜内脱垂的临床疗效。方法:将68例直肠黏膜内脱垂患者随机分成两组,治疗组(36例)采用经间断纵行缝扎硬化注射治疗,对照组(32例)采用单纯硬化注射治疗。并对临床资料进行分析总结。结果:术后3个月随访,治疗组与对照组的症状、体征总得分比较,治疗组均优于对照组。结论:纵行缝扎硬化注射治疗后症状消除快,近远期疗效佳。     

自动痔疮套扎术(RPH)治疗轻中度痔疮

目的研究自动痔疮套扎术(RPH)治疗轻中度痔疮的临床疗效.方法应用自动痔疮套扎器对156例轻中度痔疮患者施行自动痔疮套扎术,观察手术疗效、并发症和病人满意度.结果共施行套扎治疗287例次,平均每人1.8次.术后全部患者的痔疮症状均有不同程度的好转,其中症状完全消除者143例(91.7%),以便血为主要症状者术后便血全部停止.术后主要不适有急便感或坠胀感51例(32.7%);术后痔块回缩不全8例(5.1%);无出血、感染、肛门狭窄等并发症.问卷调查病人的满意度,表示满意者149例(95.5%),基本满意6例(3.9%),不满意1例(0.6%).结论RPH对轻中度痔疮不仅具有极好的疗效,而且无需麻醉和住院,操作简便,术后痛苦轻微,几无并发症,病人满意度高.     

后路治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折

目的：探讨后路环椎管减压，椎弓根钉系统复位固定并植骨治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的疗效。方法：1996－2001年，环椎环椎管减压，结合具有钉杆角的椎弓根钉系统复位固定，并横突及小关节突间植骨或椎间植骨治疗128例病人，从伤椎椎体前后缘高度恢复，Cobb角矫正度及神经功能恢复情况评价疗效。结果：128例病人脊髓神经损害无加重，神经功能有不同程度恢复；伤椎高度恢复理想，Cobb角明显减少，植骨融合成功108例（占84．4％），术后部分病例出现伤椎复位度丢失现象。结论：后路环椎管减压内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折效果好，应重视植骨融合以获得良好稳定性。     

手术治疗跟骨塌陷性骨折

目的　评估跟骨塌陷性骨折手术治疗的效果。方法　 1996年 5月～ 2 0 0 0年 6月共手术治疗跟骨塌陷性骨折 15例 ,8例内固定 ,7例植骨 ,平均随访 14个月 ,参照AOFAS评分对患者有否疼痛、步态、距下关节活动 ,是否支架辅助、术后X线照片等加以评估。结果　两组结果无明显差异。 2例手术切口皮缘坏死 ,6例疗效为优 ,9例为良。结论　跟骨塌陷性骨折手术解剖复位能取得好的效果     

肱骨近端移位骨折的手术治疗

目的：总结肱骨近端移位骨折的手术治疗方法和疗效。方法：分析手术治疗肱骨近端骨折28例资料。患者平均年龄24．4岁，平均随访2年6个月；手术均采用三角肌胸大肌间隙入路，钢板固定15例，交叉克氏针固定11例，单纯螺丝钉固定15例；采用Neer分类及评分方法评价手术结果。结果：两部分外科颈骨折优良率为64．7％，无头坏死及不愈合，三部分骨折和四部分骨折切开复位的满意率较低。结论：两部分骨折和三部分骨折可采用切开复位内固定，但尽量避免使用钢板；对四部分骨折，内固定满意率较低且肱骨头坏死率较高。     

锁骨钩钢板内固定配合康复治疗锁骨远端骨折

目的探讨和分析应用锁骨钩钢板内固定配合康复治疗锁骨远端骨折的新方法。方法42例应用锁骨钩钢板配合术后早期康复治疗锁骨远端骨折的患者全部得到了随访,随访时间2～46个月(平均15.6个月),患者年龄36～57岁,平均45.6岁。术后2d患肩按照制定的康复训练方法进行功能训练,最终随访按Lazzcano评价标准〔1〕评价治疗结果。结果42例患者术后X线检查均达到满意复位与固定,局部Lazzcano功能评定关节功能恢复优良率97.6%。结论应用锁骨钩钢板治疗锁骨远端骨折手术操作简单,配合术后完善的康复治疗,可得到非常满意的结果。     

Indications and limitations of locked plating

The goal of fracture fixation is to achieve bone healing and restore the function of the injured limb in the shortest possible time without compromising safety. Newer technologies such as the locking compression plate (LCP) and its derivatives are valuable additions to the orthopaedic traumatologist's armamentarium. As with any emerging technology, the indications will be extended until a threshold is reached and the limitations of the technology are seen. It is vital that surgeons involved in fracture care are aware of when locked plating is superior to other methods and also when they should use another treatment modality.This paper reviews the use of locked plating as a fixation method. Five topics covered in this review are: a historical perspective on locked plating, general indications, specific modes and techniques, patterns of failure, and an anatomical overview of current indications for locked plating.     

Results of non-operative treatment following hip fracture compared to surgical intervention

We followed all consecutive hip fracture patients admitted between 2004 and 2006, identified cases in which the intention was to treat non-operative and compared their functional outcome and mortality with a similar cohort treated surgically over the same period. We recorded length of hospital stay, place of discharge, pre and post-fracture mobility and residence, 30 days and 1 year mortality, re-admission due to same fracture and delayed surgery. The group treated surgically was recruited and matched for age, gender, pre and post-fracture mobility, mental confusion and independence. 25 patients were treated non-operative. 22 patients treated surgically over the same time period matched the patient characteristics of the non-operative arm. The mean hospital stay was 13 days in both groups. There were 4 extra-capsular fractures (3 displaced) and 21 intra-capsular fractures (5 displaced) in the non-operative arm and 11 extra-capsular fractures and 9 intra-capsular fractures in the surgically treated arm. 4 patients from the non-operative treatment group underwent late surgery because of persisting hip pain 20 days-2 months after the index event (2 cannulated screws, 1 hemiarthroplasty, 1 total hip arthroplasty). 11 patients in the surgical treatment arm underwent dynamic screw fixation, 1 had cannulated screw, 1 had total hip replacement and 7 had hemiarthroplasty. 14 of the non-operative treated patients were mobile independently or with aid before fracture but only 9 patients retained their pre-fracture mobility following treatment, compared to 16 patients pre-fracture and 11 patients post-fracture after surgery. 16 patients treated non-operative were living independently prior to injury but only 7 went back to their own residence. Of the operatively treated patients 14 patients were living independently and 10 patients went back to their previous residence. 1 month and 1 year mortality in the non-operative treated group was 4/21 and 7/21 respectively compared to 1/20 and 5/20 in the operative fixation group. There was no statistically significant difference in mobility, residence or mortality between the two groups (Fisher exact test, p > 0.05). Non-operative management after hip fracture is suitable for medically unfit patients and does not result in statistically significant difference in functional outcome or mortality compared to patients treated surgically.     

关节镜监视下治疗胫骨平台骨折

2004—2006年，我院采用关节镜监视和定位治疗胫骨平台骨折，获得了良好的效果。     

跟骨骨折治疗方法的疗效观察

目的比较跟骨骨折不同治疗方法的效果。方法88例96足跟骨骨折分成三组,分别应用撬拨复位石膏外固定、切开复位钢板内固定、可调节跟骨骨折外固定器治疗,术后从Bhler角的恢复、主观症状、并发症三个方面进行比较分析。结果可调节跟骨骨折外固定组在恢复Bhler角、术后主观症状改善、减少并发症方面优于撬拨复位石膏外固定组及切开复位内固定组。结论可调式跟骨骨折外固定器治疗跟骨骨折疗效优于撬拨组和内固定组。