���ڸ߽�̩�ռ���չ��ʽ�Ķ������ӳ����ڲ��о�

???????μ???巽??????????????????????????ZTD?????÷????????????????????????????????????????????幫?????????????????????????????????????????Ч????ZTD????徫???????SCIGN?????GPS?????????????????????????Χ?????????????????????????????????????ZTD???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????     

һ�ָĽ�������RTK�������ӳ���������ڲ�ģ��

??????RTK??????λ?У???????????ο?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????λ????????????????????????????LIM???????????????????????????????????????????CORS?????????ο??????????????????????????????????????LIM???????徫?????????1~2 cm??     

��ѹ��GPS�����ɽ�ˮ�������Ӱ�����

????????????λ?ο??????????????GPS?????????????????????????ZTD???????????????ZHD???????????????????????GPS/MET????????У?ZTD??GPS?????????????????????????????????????????????????Щ?????????????GPT????????????????????????????????????й????????????t??????????????????????????????GPS???λ?ò???μ????Σ??????????????λ?ù???????????????????????????GPS???????????????????     

��������CORS���춥�������ӳ�4D��ģ�о�

????????CORS???ο????????????????????????????????????????????λ???й??????????????????????????CORS??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????8.5 mm??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????PWV????????????????1.5 mm??     

地震动群延时不确定性对反应谱的影响研究

为了考察外部激励群延时对反应谱的影响,分别从确定性的角度和统计的角度分析了群延时对线性单自由度结构体系位移响应最大值的影响。推导出了对应于给定单自由度结构体系在任意外部激励作用下最大位移响应的群延时。据此可以利用任意外部激励的群延时与结构体系的最大位移响应群延时的关系评估体系在该外部激励作用下位移响应峰值的大小。统计分析的结果表明:激励群延时的均值和方差对结构体系位移响应最大值的影响具有明显的规律性;激励群延时的分布频数与结构体系最大位移响应之间也存在着显著的关系。     

两种电离层延迟改正方法的对比研究

从模型改正法和双频改正法两个方面阐述了目前对于在GPS数据处理中关于电离层延迟改正的两种思路,主要整理了Klobuchar模型的解算步骤,给出了双频改正的具体方法。并结合实测数据,分别用这两种方法对电离层延迟进行改正,然后与不用任何方法改正的解算结果进行比较,通过对比这两种方法对电离层延迟的改正效果,得出有益的结论。     

����MODIS�����������ʪ�ӳ�ģ�ͽ��������о�

?????????????????????????????MODIS????????????о????????μ????????????о???????MODIS??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????     

���ڵشų���ģ�ĵ�������������������

??IGRF????????????й???????????????????????й?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Χ??????????2.5???????????????????????????????λ??????????IGRF????????????????????????????￡???????????????????????????????????????     

超深孔一次成井微差爆破技术研究

起爆时差是超深孔一次成井爆破设计中的一个重要参数,合理设计起爆时差和起爆顺序,能够达到先起爆炮孔为后起爆炮孔创造良好自由面和补偿空间,实现筒状硐室分层、分段爆破的目的,并能降低围岩震动破坏。为合理选取起爆时差,基于超深孔微差爆破破岩机制,从理论上推导了一次成井预裂爆破延期时间,掏槽孔与相邻辅助孔、同分段辅助孔、相邻分段辅助孔的起爆时差等计算公式;同时提出了自下而上预裂爆破、先上下后中间光面爆破等6种一次成井起爆顺序。在华恒矿-650矸石仓,结合施工条件合理确定起爆时差等爆破参数,形成爆破设计方案。爆破过程中实现了分层、分段爆破,获得了良好的硐室成型,验证了形成的超深孔微差爆破技术是成功的,其结果对类似工程的实施具有一定的参考价值。     

Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real‐time hybrid structural simulation

Compensation of delay and dynamic response of servo‐hydraulic actuators is critical for stability and accuracy of hybrid experimental and numerical simulations of seismic response of structures. In this study, current procedures for compensation of actuator delay are examined and improved procedures are proposed to minimize experimental errors. The new procedures require little or no a priori information about the behavior of the test specimen or the input excitation. First, a simple approach is introduced for rapid online estimation of system delay and actuator command gain, thus capturing the variability of system response through a simulation. Second, an extrapolation procedure for delay compensation, based on the same kinematics equations used in numerical integration procedures is examined. Simulations using the proposed procedures indicate a reduction in high‐frequency noise in force measurements that can minimize the excitation of high‐frequency modes. To further verify the effectiveness of the compensation procedures, the artificial energy added to a hybrid simulation as a result of actuator tracking errors is measured and used for demonstrating the improved accuracy in the simulations. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.