新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间急性心肌梗死患者急诊介入手术的应急策略

新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)具有强传染性、人群普遍易感性、高病死率等特点;而急性心肌梗死具有发病迅速、最佳救治窗口期短、病情危重等特点,其救治关键在于选择最佳策略以最大限度地提高再灌注效率。目前疫情防控形势严峻,对急性心肌梗死行急诊腔内介入治疗等临床工作也提出了新的要求。为规范救治流程,本研究对心血管医务人员的岗前培训,首诊COVID-19筛查,急性心肌梗死患者病情评估流程,以及急性心肌梗死行急诊介入手术的适应证、手术管理策略等进行了探讨。     

肿瘤内科患者PICC置管期感染相关因素分析及应对措施研究

目的探讨肿瘤内科患者PICC置管期感染高危因素及应对措施。方法选取医院2014年2月-2017年6月PICC置管患者1 340例为研究对象,对可能影响置管期感染的危险因素进行单因素分析,进一步将差异有统计学意义的因素纳入多因素logistic回归分析,分析感染患者的病原学特点和耐药性。结果 1 340例患者中有225例发生感染,感染率为16.79%。单因素分析结果显示:PICC置管期感染与患者同步化疗、导管留置时间、导管维护周期、导管移动、导管材料和血栓史有关。多因素分析结果显示:同步化疗、导管留置时间(>30d)、导管维护周期(<7d)、导管移动和导管材料是PICC置管期患者发生感染的独立危险因素。225例PICC置管感染患者,共检出病原菌233株,革兰阴性菌主要为铜绿假单胞菌和鲍氏不动杆菌,革兰阳性菌主要为金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌,真菌主要为白假丝酵母和热带假丝酵母。结论同步化疗、导管留置时间(>30d)、导管维护周期(<7d)、导管移动和导管材料是PICC置管期发生感染的独立危险因素,临床上应采取相应的护理措施,以防止置管期感染。     

经梨状肌和臀小肌间隙入路行全髋关节置换对老年髋部骨折的治疗效果及病人生存质量的影响

目的探究经梨状肌和臀小肌的间隙入路行全髋关节置换对老年髋部骨折的治疗效果及病人生存质量的影响。方法选取96例老年髋部骨折病人(108髋)为本研究对象，其中50例病人(55髋)行后外侧入路全髋关节置换术为A组，46例病人(53髋)行经梨状肌和臀小肌间隙入路全髋关节置换术为B组，记录对比2组病人围手术期情况(手术时间、切口最大长度、术中出血量、术后下地时间)、并发症情况、术前术后髋关节HHS评分、VAS疼痛评分和下肢功能变化情况、术后6个月病人影像学指标情况(外展角、前倾角、偏心距)和生存质量情况(以SF-36量表表示)。结果A组病人手术时间、切口长度短于B组，术后首次下地时间长于B组(P < 0.05~P < 0.01)；A组病人术后1、3、7 d的HISS评分低于B组，VAS评分高于B组(P < 0.05~P < 0.01)，2组病人术前、术后14、30、90、180 d的HISS和VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；B组病人术后30、90 d“起立-行走”计时测试显著优于A组，术后30 d单腿站立测试时间长于A组，术后90 d的6 min步行测试距离优于A组(P < 0.05)，其他时间点2组病人下肢功能情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；A组前倾角小于B组，偏心距大于B组(P < 0.05)；B组病人SF-36评分量表肢体功能、社会功能、心理健康和总健康程度得分均优于A组(P < 0.05)。结论相比于传统后外侧入路行全髋关节置，经梨状肌与臀小肌间隙入路对老年髋部骨折病人的损伤更小、恢复更快，近期疗效指标显著优于传统术式，符合快速康复理念，但手术时长显著增加，病人术后前倾角偏大，偏心距偏小。     

经鼻高流量氧气湿化治疗老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并呼吸衰竭的可行性研究

ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of transnasal heated humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) with respiratory failure in elderly patients. MethodsA total of 176 elderly patients with AECOPD complicated with respiratory failure who were hospitalized at Peking University Shougang Hospital from December 2016 to January 2022 were enrolled, including 82 patients in an HFNC group and 94 patients in an NPPV group. After treatment, pulse oxygen saturation (SPO₂), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂), oxygenation index (OI), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), comfort score, discharge rate, rate of endotracheal intubation, rate of transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality were compared between the two groups. The independent sample t-test was used for comparison between the two groups. Statistical data are expressed in percentage or number of cases and the χ² test was used for their comparisons. ResultsThe SPO₂ values at 30 min, 1 h, and 6 h were significantly higher in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (t=-2.049,-2.618, and -3.314, P=0.043, 0.010, and 0.001, respectively). SPO₂ before discharge was significantly lower than that of the NPPV group (t=2.162, P=0.033), but OI at each time point and before discharge had no statistical significance (P＞0.05). MAP at 6 h was significantly higher in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (t=-2.209, P=0.029), but within the normal range. HRs at 2 h and 3 h in the HFNC group were significantly higher than those of the NPPV group (t=-2.199 and -2.336, P=0.030 and 0.021, respectively). There were no significant differences in RR, HR, or MAP between the two groups at other time points and before discharge (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in PaCO2 between the two groups (P＞0.05). Comfort score in the HFNC group was significantly higher than that of the NPPV group (t=-46.807, P＜0.001). There were no significant differences in discharge rate, ICU transfer rate, endotracheal intubation rate, and mortality between the two groups (P＞0.05). ConclusionHFNC is as effective as NPPV in treating elderly patients with AECOPD complicated with type Ⅰ or mild type Ⅱ respiratory failure, and HFNC is more comfortable than NPPV.     

肝细胞癌TACE术后病灶存活或复发18F-FDGPET/CT和增强CT诊断价值Meta分析

目的采用Meta分析方法评价¹⁸F-脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射计算机体层摄影(¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT)和增强CT(CECT)诊断经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)术后存活或复发病灶的临床价值。方法根据PRISMA报告规范开展Meta分析。检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、万方和维普数据库中¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT和CECT诊断TACE术后存活或复发病灶的临床研究,时间至2019-04。由2位研究人员独立筛选文献、提取资料,根据诊断准确性研究质量评价工具-2(QUADAS-2)评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Stata 12.0软件进行Meta分析,计算其汇总敏感度(Sen)和特异度(Spe),绘制受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。结果共纳入10篇¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT及13篇CECT诊断TACE术后存活或复发病灶的原始研究,分别包括322例患者的467个病灶和748例患者的943个病灶。Meta分析显示,¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT诊断TACE术后存活或复发病灶的Sen=0.92(95%CI为0.87~0.94)、Spe=0.95(95%CI为0.82~0.99)、AUC=0.97(95%CI为0.93~0.99);CECT诊断TACE术后存活或复发病灶的Sen=0.72(95%CI为0.66~0.78)、Spe=0.99(95%CI为0.93~1.00)、AUC=0.87(95%CI为0.83~0.89)。此外,CECT诊断TACE术后存活或复发Sen(Z=2.34,P=0.02)和AUC(Z=2.21,P=0.03)值低于¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT,差异有统计学意义。结论相比于CECT,¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT对TACE术后存活或复发病灶具有较高诊断效能,可视为TACE术后存活或复发病灶有效的影像学诊断方法。     

微创经皮椎弓根置钉和传统开放置钉治疗无神经系统症状胸腰椎骨折患者的效果对比

目的：研究微创经皮椎弓根置钉治疗无神经系统症状胸腰椎骨折患者的效果。方法：选取我院2018年1月~2018年11月收治的83例胸腰椎骨折患者为研究对象，随机分为对照组和观察组，对照组31例、观察组52例。对照组采用传统后路开放式置钉，观察组采用微创经皮椎弓根置钉。比较两组手术相关指标、置钉合格率、椎体前缘高度、Cobb角及矢状面指数。结果：观察组手术时间、切口长度、出血量、下地时间均明显低于对照组（P＜0.05），观察组置钉合格率为95.67%，明显高于对照组87.50%（P＜0.05）。手术前，两组椎体前缘高度、Cobb角、矢状面指数比较无明显差异（P＞0.05）；手术后，观察组椎体前缘高度、矢状面指数高于对照组，Cobb角低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论：微创经皮椎弓根置钉能够促进胸腰椎骨折患者伤椎高度的恢复，加速术后脊柱功能的恢复，术中更加安全，治疗效果更佳。