Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intracranial spread: CT and MR characteristics

PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) frequently spreads intracranially. We compare CT and MRI in identifying intracranial spread and reexamine the route of infiltration. METHOD: One hundred fourteen consecutive patients with proven NPC were evaluated prospectively with T1-, T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced MRI and CT. RESULTS: MRI showed 35 (31%) patients with middle cranial fossa involvement. Twenty-nine (25%) patients had cavernous sinus infiltration, while six (5%) showed only dural thickening. The most common route of spread is through the foramen ovale (FO) (12/35 patients, 34%), followed by skull base destruction (6/35 patients, 17%), foramen lacerum (FL) (6/35 patients, 17%), sphenoid sinus (6/35 patients, 17%), and combined FO and FL (5/35 patients, 14%). Using MRI as a standard, CT demonstrated the following involvement: cavernous sinus in 26 of 29 (90%) patients, FO in 9 of 12 patients, skull base in 6 of 6 patients, FO and FL in 3 of 5 patients, FL in 6 of 6 patients, sphenoid sinus in 6 of 6 patients and dura in 0 of 18 patients. CONCLUSION: It is believed that NPC most commonly spreads intracranially via the FL or by direct erosion. Perineural spread through the FO is an important route, which explains why with CT evidence of cavernous sinus involvement there may be no skull base erosion. These findings are best seen on MRI.     

A comparative analysis of pulmonary perfusion scans with pulmonary angiograms

Pulmonary angiograms and pulmonary lung perfusion scans on 162 patients with pulmonary embolism were comparatively analyzed. Among the expert angiographic panel members who independently evaluated the studies there was consistent agreement on the diagnosis, size of the emboli, and severity. Consistency of agreement among the expert pulmonary lung perfusion scan panelists was considerably less. These data demonstrate that, in addition to the lack of specificity of the lung perfusion scan for the diagnosis of pulmonary thromboemboli, there is a considerable problem of interpretation in this patient population.