Marrow transplantation for chronic myelocytic leukemia: a controlled trial of cyclosporine versus methotrexate for prophylaxis of graft- versus-host disease

Forty-eight patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia, aged 11 to 47, were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation, followed by infusion of marrow from HLA-identical siblings. They were randomized to receive either methotrexate (MTX) (n = 23) or cyclosporine (CSP) (n = 25) as postgrafting prophylaxis for graft-v-host disease (GVHD). All patients had evidence of sustained hematopoietic engraftment. Seventeen of the 25 patients receiving CSP and 17 of the 23 patients receiving MTX are alive between one and almost four (median, 1.7) years, with an actuarial survival rate at three years of 62% and 66%, respectively (P = .60). Also, with respect to most other parameters studied, the two drugs were identical. The probability of acute GVHD was .42 and .46, respectively (P = .70), that of chronic GVHD, .50 and .63 (P = .44), and that of death from transplant-related causes, .30 and .24 (P = .51). There were no differences in the speed of granulocyte and platelet engraftment (P = .82 and .94, respectively), and the duration of hospitalization was comparable (P = .58). Patients receiving MTX required red cell transfusions for a shorter period of time (P = .02), but had a slightly increased morbidity from early oral mucositis. The leukemia recurrence rates were comparable (P = .60). With the regimens used in this study, we conclude that CSP failed to reduce the incidence of GVHD and improve the survival of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia when compared to results with standard MTX.     

Unrelated donor or autologous marrow transplantation for treatment of acute leukemia

High-dose chemoradiotherapy followed by marrow transplantation from an HLA-matched sibling donor is curative for patients with acute leukemia. Autologous marrow transplantation has been used with success for some patients without such a sibling. Alternatively, the option of performing a transplant from an HLA-matched unrelated donor has been made possible by the recent development of large registries of HLA- typed volunteers. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes for patients with advanced leukemia treated by unrelated or autologous marrow transplantation. Forty-three patients with acute myeloid or lymphoid leukemia were transplanted from a closely HLA-matched unrelated donor. Results were compared with those of a disease-, disease-stage-, and age-matched cohort of 77 patients treated with autologous marrow transplantation at the same institution during the same period. Myeloid reconstitution with peripheral granulocyte counts greater than 10(9)/L was achieved in 93% of unrelated recipients and 70% of autologous recipients at a median of 24 and 36 days after transplantation, respectively (P = .0001). The cumulative proportions of patients discharged alive (79% v 77%) and times from transplant to first hospital discharge (35 v 34 days) were not different between unrelated and autologous recipients (P = .65). For patients transplanted in complete remission, relapse occurred after transplantation in 27% of the unrelated and in 55% of the autologous recipients (P = .08). For patients transplanted in relapse, the corresponding posttransplant relapse rates were 48% and 63%, respectively (P = .72). Forty percent of unrelated recipients and 28% of autologous recipients died in remission. Leukemia-free survivals were 33% for unrelated and 25% for autologous recipients transplanted in remission (P = .45), and 12% for unrelated and 5% for autologous recipients transplanted in relapse (P = .75). Unrelated donor transplants appear no less effective than autologous transplants to achieve long-term survival and may be more effective in eradicating leukemia in patients who have failed conventional chemotherapy. Further studies are warranted to assess the relative effectiveness of unrelated and autologous transplantation performed earlier in the course of the disease.     

Cervical Cancer Prevention on Instagram: Content and Social Interaction Analysis of Brazilian Accounts

Abstract: Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyse the content of posts on Instagram about cervical cancer. Methods: It was conducted a qualitative analysis using the 50 most popular publicly available Portuguese-language Instagram posts, containing the hashtags #cervicalcancer, #papsmear, #hpv, #papillomavirus, and #hpvvac-cine, during the Brazilian national cervical cancer prevention campaign in March 2018. Results: Posts recruited using #cervicalcancer provided 60% of posts with contents related to secondary prevention; the #papsmear provided 46% of posts with irrelevant contents; the #hpv and #papillomavirus provided 50% and 64% of posts with informative content, respectively; and the #hpvvaccine provided 58% of posts with content related to primary prevention. The posts that received the highest number of likes were those from the hashtags #hpv and #papillomavirus with 151.33 and 78.00 likes/post, respectively. The majority of posts presented less than 05 comments/post, except for the #hpv, which had 64.76 comments/post. According to the users’ profiles, the majority of the posts, regardless of the hashtag used, were made by health professionals. Conclusion: The focus of Instagram posts about cervical cancer is on secondary prevention, which can contribute to the promotion of health behaviours not directed to aspects of primary prevention of the disease.