Epileptic and non-epileptic paroxysmal motor phenomena in newborns

Objective: The aim of this study is to provide an extensive overview of the clinical features of neonatal paroxysmal motor phenomena, both self-limited, related to the immaturity of the central nervous system, and pathological (epileptic and non-epileptic), in order to help the diagnostic approach.

Methods: We reviewed the scientific literature about epileptic and non-epileptic paroxysmal motor phenomena in newborns.

Results: Paroxysmal motor phenomena in newborns represent a challenge for the clinicians due to the different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. A proper differential diagnosis is required.

Conclusions: There are some clinical features that may help clinicians with the differentiation among physiological and pathological, epileptic, and non-epileptic events. However, further investigations are often needed to identify the cause. A continuous synchronized video–electroencephalogram (EEG)–recording, interpreted by an expert in neonatal neurology, remains the gold standard to prove the epileptic origin of a paroxysmal motor phenomenon.     

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the ACL-deficient knee

Symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee develops often in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. Two distinct pathologies should be recognised while considering treatment options in patients with end-stage medial compartment OA and ACL deficiency. Patients with primary ACL deficiency (usually traumatic ACL rupture) can develop secondary OA (typically presenting with symptoms of instability and pain) and these patients are typically young and active. Patients with primary end stage medial compartment OA can develop secondary ACL deficiency (usually degenerate ACL rupture) and these patients tend to be older. Treatment options in either of these patient groups include arthroscopic debridement, reconstruction of the ACL, high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with or without ACL reconstruction, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). General opinion is that a functionally intact ACL is a fundamental prerequisite to perform a UKA. This is because previous reports showed higher failure rates when ACL was deficient, probably secondary to wear and tibial loosening. Nevertheless in some cases of ACL deficiency with end-stage medial compartment OA, UKA has been performed in isolation and recent papers confirm good short- to mid-term outcome without increased risk of implant failure. Shorter hospital stay, fewer blood transfusions, faster recovery and significantly lower risk of developing major complications like death, myocardial infarction, stroke, deep vein thrombosis (as compared to TKA) make the UKA an attractive option, especially in the older patients. On the other hand, younger patients with higher functional demands are likely to benefit from a simultaneous or staged ACL reconstruction in addition to UKA to regain knee stability. These procedures tend to be technically demanding. The main aim of this review was to provide a synopsis of the existing literature and outline an evidence-based treatment algorithm.