Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Drug Product Development: the M-CERSI Workshop Summary Report

On May 15th–17th, 2017, the US FDA and the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) held a workshop at the University of Maryland’s Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI), to discuss the role of dissolution testing and translational modeling and simulation in enabling patient-centric solid oral drug product development. This 3-day event was attended by scientists from regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and academia. The workshop included podium presentations followed by breakout session discussions. The first day of the meeting focused on the challenges in dissolution method development and the role of dissolution testing throughout drug product development. On the second day, approaches to establish a link between in vitro testing and in vivo drug product performance (e.g., systemic exposure) were presented. Overall success rates and challenges in establishing IVIVCs via traditional and modern physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation approaches were discussed. Day 3 provided an opportunity to discuss the expectations for establishing clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS). It was recognized that understanding the impact of formulation and process variations on dissolution and in vivo performance is critical for most drug products formulated with poorly soluble drugs to ensure consistent product performance. The breakout sessions served as platforms for discussing controversial topics such as the clarification of dissolution terminology, PBPK model development and validation expectations, and approaches to set CRDPS. The meeting concluded with a commitment to continue the dialog between regulators, industry, and academia to advance overall product quality understanding.     

Efficacy and safety of high dose versus low dose furosemide with or without dopamine infusion: The Dopamine in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure II (DAD-HF II) Trial

Aims

The role of low-dose dopamine infusion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains controversial. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high- versus low-dose furosemide with or without low-dose dopamine infusion in this patient population.

Methods and results

161 ADHF patients (78 years; 46% female; ejection fraction 31%) were randomized to 8-hour continuous infusions of: a) high-dose furosemide (HDF, n = 50, 20 mg/h), b) low-dose furosemide and low-dose dopamine (LDFD, n = 56, 5 mg/h and 5 μg kg^− 1 min^− 1 respectively), or c) low-dose furosemide (LDF, n = 55, furosemide 5 mg/h). The main outcomes were 60-day and one-year all-cause mortality (ACM) and hospitalization for HF (HHF). Dyspnea relief (Borg index), worsening renal function (WRF, rise in serum creatinine (sCr) ≥ 0.3 mg/dL), and length of stay (LOS) were also assessed. The urinary output at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h was not significantly different in the three groups. Neither the ACM at day 60 (4.0%, 7.1%, and 7.2%; P = 0.74) or at one year (38.1%, 33.9% and 32.7%, P = 0.84) nor the HHF at day 60 (22.0%, 21.4%, and 14.5%, P = 0.55) or one year (60.0%, 50.0%, and 47%, P = 0.40) differed between HDF, LDFD, and LDF groups, respectively. No differences in the Borg index or LOS were noted. WRF was higher in the HDF than in LDFD and LDF groups at day 1 (24% vs. 11% vs. 7%, P < 0.0001) but not at sCr peak (44% vs. 38% vs. 29%, P = 0.27). No significant differences in adverse events were noted.

Conclusions

In ADHF patients, there were no significant differences in the in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes between high- vs. low-dose furosemide infusion; the addition of low-dose dopamine infusion was not associated with any beneficial effects.     

Food Effect Projections via Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling: Predictive Case Studies

Food can alter the absorption of orally administered drugs. Biopharmaceutics physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling offers the possibility to simulate a compound's pharmacokinetics under fasted or fed states. To advance the utility of PBPK modeling, with a view to regulatory impact, we have pooled our experience across 4 pharmaceutical companies to propose a general multistep PBPK workflow leveraging pre-existing clinical data for immediate-release formulations of Biopharmaceutics Classification System I and II compounds. With this strategy, we wish to promote pragmatic PBPK approaches for compounds where absorption is well understood, that is, compounds with moderate-to-high permeability that are not substrates for uptake transporters. Five case studies demonstrate how food effect can be well predicted using appropriately established and validated models. The case studies integrate solubility and dissolution data for initial model development and apply a “middle-out” validation with clinical data in one prandial state. Then, whenever possible, a validation against both fasted and fed state data is recommended before application of the models prospectively for to-be-marketed formulations. Thus, when combined with limited clinical data, PBPK models could be used to simulate outcomes for new doses, formulations, or active pharmaceutical ingredient forms, in lieu of a clinical food-effect study.     

Laparoscopic versus open left lateral segmentectomy

Background  

Laparoscopic liver surgery is becoming increasingly common. This cohort study was designed to directly compare perioperative outcomes of the left lateral segmentectomy via laparoscopic and open approach.     

HIV entry inhibitors： a new generation of antiretroviral drugs

AIDS is presently treatable, and patients can have a good prognosis due to the success of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), but it is still not curable or preventable. High toxicity of HAART, and the emergence of drug resistance add to the imperative to continue research into new strategies and interventions. Considerable progress in the understanding of HIV attachment and entry into host cells has suggested new possibilities for rationally designing agents that interfere with this process. The approval and introduction of the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide (Fuzeon) for clinical use signals a new era in AIDS therapeutics. Here we review the crucial steps the virus uses to achieve cell entry, which merit attention as potential targets, and the compounds at pre-clinical and clinical development stages, reported to effectively inhibit cell entry.     

In vitro cytopathic effects of mycotoxin T-2 on human peripheral blood T lymphocytes

The trichothecene mycotoxin T-2 is reported to exhibit immunotoxic activity. The potential presence of T-2 in foods renders it as public health hazard and its toxicity needs to be better understood. We investigated the in vitro effects of T-2 at sub-toxic (0.1 ng/ml) and toxic (10 ng/ml) levels on freshly isolated human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs). We observed no direct influence on untreated PBLs. The toxic dose of T-2, however, totally inhibited phytohemagglutinin-induced T lymphocyte proliferation and caused early apoptosis that peaked after 8 h of exposure. Both major T lymphocyte subsets (CD4⁺ and CD8⁺) were affected as they appeared to show a positive response to T-2 at 8 h followed by their sharp reduction after 96 h. Further investigation on the naïve (CD45RA⁺) and memory (CD45RO⁺) subpopulations confirmed these observations and indicated that T-2 affected equally all the subpopulations studied, although PHA preferentially stimulated CD45RO⁺ T lymphocytes. Sub-toxic T-2 appeared to exhibit co stimulatory properties to PHA-stimulated cells. These results support the hypothesis that T-2 affects the activation-induced cell death mechanism of T lymphocytes.