Sialometry and sialochemistry: a non-invasive approach for diagnosing Sjögren''s syndrome

Background: Analysis of salivary variables has frequently been proposed as a diagnostic tool for Sjögren''s syndrome (SS). Because univocal salivary reference values are lacking, it is currently rather difficult to use sialometry and sialochemistry for diagnosing SS unless major changes have occurred in salivary secretion and composition. Objective: To define reference values of several salivary variables, which offer a possible new and non-invasive means of diagnosing SS. Methods: Cut off points were selected from receiver operating characteristic curves of gland-specific sialometrical and sialochemical variables, which have proved to be potentially relevant for diagnosing SS in a previous study—that is, sodium, chloride, and phosphate concentration in stimulated parotid and submandibular/sublingual (SM/SL) saliva, unstimulated and stimulated SM/SL flow rates, and lag phase of parotid secretion, respectively. By combining the most discriminating variables, two different diagnostic approaches for SS were applied in a group of 100 patients and subsequently evaluated in a second group of 20 patients. The first approach was to combine variables by applying their cut off points into sets of criteria for a positive diagnosis of SS. The second approach was to construct a logistic regression model that predicts the true state of a patient (SS or non-SS). From both approaches, the tests with highest likelihood ratio combined with the smallest number of rejected cases were selected for clinical use. Results: The most accurate test combined the stimulated SM/SL flow rate and parotid sodium and chloride concentration as salivary variables for diagnosing SS; it had a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.96. The selected tests proved equally accurate in the second group of patients. Conclusions: Because the proposed non-invasive diagnostic tools can be easily applied, do not need a laboratory other than for routine blood testing, and are very accurate, gland-specific sialometry and sialochemistry may eventually replace other, more invasive, diagnostic techniques for diagnosing SS.     

Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial

Currently, 3 treatment options are available for patients with denture complaints and an edentulous mandible with a height of at least 15 mm: meticulous construction of a new set of dentures (CD), construction of a new set of dentures following preprosthetic surgery to enlarge the denture-bearing area (PPS), and construction of an implant-retained mandibular overdenture (IRO). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and subjective chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with one of these treatment modalities. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class IV and V, mean mandibular height 20.7 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of these 3 groups. Denture satisfaction and chewing ability were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and problems chewing different types of food were assessed before treatment, and 1- and 5-years after treatment. At the 1-year evaluation, significantly better scores were observed in the 2 surgical groups (IRO, PPS) than in the CD group. At 5-year evaluation the "complaints of the lower denture" showed a significantly better score in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. No significant differences were observed between the PPS and CD group. From this study it is concluded that both in the short and long term denture satisfaction appears most favourable in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. Implant-retained overdentures are therefore a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous patients with problems with their lower denture, even in cases of not severely resorbed mandibles.     

Secondary retention of permanent molars: a report of five families.

The aetiopathogenesis of secondary retention is not fully understood, but heredity is involved in at least some cases. In this study first-degree relatives of 52 patients with secondary retention of permanent molars were screened for the presence of the same phenomenon in their dentition. Familial occurrence could be shown in five families. The pedigrees are compatible with autosomal dominant inheritance. HLA phenotypes and blood groups ABO, rhesus and P1 were studied in two families. The lod scores for linkage with secondary retention were added to previously reported information. The lod score for linkage for blood group system P increased from +0.940 to +1.475 at a recombination fraction of 5 per cent. It is concluded that secondary retention of permanent molars is an aetiologically heterogeneous condition in which some cases are caused by the presence of an abnormal autosomal dominant gene.     

Effect of the application of a mucin-based saliva substitute on the oral microflora of xerostomic patients

A cross-sectional study among 46 xerostomic patients was carried out to determine the influence of a mucin-based artificial saliva on the microflora of standardized oral washings. Patient and non-xerostomic control groups were formed according to the use of saliva substitute ( ad libitum or from an intraoral reservoir) and dentition (dentate, edentulous, full dentures). Only few differences were observed among the subgroups based on dentition within a specified salivary group. However, the total number of microorganisms and the proportions of veillonellae, actinomycetes, streptococci and S. salivarius were significantly reduced in xerostomic patients not using artificial saliva, whereas lactobacilli, Candida and S. mitior were significantly increased compared to the control groups. Ad libitum use of artificial saliva had little effect, but semi-continuous wetting of the oral cavity through an intra-oral reservoir reversed the xerostomia-induced shifts in the indigenous microflora. However, no significant effect was observed on the proportions of lactobacilli and yeasts, leaving a potentially acidogenic flora.     

Secondary retention of permanent molars: an assessment of ankylosis by scanning electron and light microscopy.

Secondary retention refers to the cessation of eruption of a tooth after emergence. This may be the result of pathological changes in the periodontal ligament. The aim of this study was to describe the morphological and histological aspects of the radicular surface of secondarily retained permanent molars. The roots of 12 secondarily retained molars and two control molars, were examined by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and light microscopy (LM) in order to analyse the occurrence and localisation of ankylosis. With SEM it was observed that the root surface of retained molars showed local areas covered with bonelike tissue. LM of these areas showed that this tissue was bone in direct contact with the root surface (ankylosis). In 11 cases, the areas of ankylosis were observed in the bifurcation area and at the interradicular root surface. In the remaining case, ankylosis was located at the outer root surface. The results of this study endorse the assumption that focal ankylosis is an important factor in secondary retention. Treatment recommendations must be based on this fundamental principle, because orthodontic movement of ankylotic molars is not possible.     

Treatment outcome of bone-anchored craniofacial prostheses after tumor surgery.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endosseous implants have acquired an important place in the prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with craniofacial defects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the use of endosseous implants in the orbital and auricular region as well as to assess the satisfaction of patients with implant-retained craniofacial prostheses after tumor surgery. METHODS: The clinical outcome and patient satisfaction of implant-retained prostheses in the auricular and orbital region were evaluated in a group of 26 patients with facial defects after tumor surgery by using standardized questionnaires and a clinical assessment. Twelve patients (n = 31 implants) received the implants during ablative tumor surgery, from which 7 patients (n = 20 implants) were treated with radiation therapy after surgery (mean, 65 grays [Gy]). Fourteen patients (n = 44 implants) received the implants after the tumor surgery, from which 5 patients (n = 21 implants) were irradiated after ablative surgery (mean, 54.4 Gy), but before implant placement. RESULTS: No implants were lost in patients who had not undergone irradiation (100%), whereas 5 implants were lost in the irradiated group (87.8%). The overall implant survival rate was 93.3%. The peri-implant tissues had a healthy appearance, and no cases of osteoradionecrosis occurred. When compared with patients treated with conventional adhesive retained facial prostheses, satisfaction was higher in patients treated with implant-retained facial prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: From this study, it is concluded that implant-retained facial prostheses are better tolerated than adhesive retained prostheses and offer an improvement in the quality of life. Radiotherapy is not a contraindication for the use of osseointegrated implants in the maxillofacial region, but the loss of implants is higher than in nonirradiated sites.