Carto系统标测和指导射频消融快速心律失常

目的　评价Carto系统电解剖标测和指导射频消融治疗快速心律失常应用价值。方法　选择各种快速心律失常患者共 5 6例 ,其中室上性心动过速 (室上速 ) 4 9例 [房室结双径路 8例 ,房性心动过速 (房速 ) 12例 ,心房扑动 (房扑 ) 10例 ,左、右房室旁道 19例 ],室性心动过速 (室速 ) 7例 ,在心动过速或窦性心律时应用Carto系统标测 ,从其电解剖传导图中判断心律失常起源和发生机制 ,并指导射频消融。结果　 5 3例消融成功 ,消融成功率 94 6 %。 1例右侧游离壁旁道、1例右房房速和 1例不典型房扑消融不成功。房室结双径路 8例。左、右房室旁道 19例。 12例房速中左房房速 4例 ,右房房速 8例。 7例典型房扑 ,3例不典型房扑。特发性右室流出道室速 3例 ,特发性左室室速 3例 ,心肌梗死后室速 1例。手术时间为 (12 8± 5 9)min ,曝光时间为 (14± 12 )min。 1例穿剌左锁骨下静脉时发生气胸并发症。随访 1～ 14个月 ,1例左房房速复发 ,经Carto系统再次标测和消融成功。结论　Carto系统可安全有效应用于各种快速心律失常的标测和消融 ,减少X线曝光时间。它将心内电图与三维解剖结构联系起来 ,判断不同心律失常机制及起源部位 ,对指导消融有较大价值。利用其定位记忆功能 ,可避免损伤传导系统及进行补充放电 ,减少并     

射频导管消融电学隔离心脏大静脉治疗阵发性心房颤动的临床应用

目的评价射频导管消融电学隔离心脏大静脉预防阵发性心房颤动(房颤)发作的疗效。方法83例患者,男性58例、女性25例,年龄15～76平均(605±185)岁,有阵发性房颤病史2～15年,曾服数种抗心律失常药物疗效不佳。41例患者合并有高血压病,所有患者均无明显器质性心脏病改变。常规行心脏大静脉造影,测量靶静脉直径,将10极肺静脉环状标测导管(Lasso导管)放置在靶静脉开口内05cm处,以Lasso导管为指导,把温控大头电极导管放置于靶静脉开口处行电学隔离。结果83例患者共电学隔离大静脉343条。包括左上肺静脉(LSPV)83条,右上肺静脉(RSPV)83条,左下肺静脉(LIPV)82条,右下肺静脉(RIPV)42条,上腔静脉(SVC)53条,其中2例LSPV与LIPV共同开口。每条肺静脉行1～4段消融(平均每条消融25段),即刻电学隔离成功大静脉337条。随访2～31个月,其中50例停服抗心律失常药物后无房颤发生,13例患者房颤发作明显减少,20例患者房颤发作消融前后无明显变化。并发症有2例术中出现左侧大量胸腔积血,1例心肺复苏5天后出现脑死亡。发现肺静脉狭窄21例,其中轻度狭窄15例,重度狭窄6例,无肺静脉闭塞。结论(1)成功的心脏大静脉电学隔离治疗阵发性房颤的总有效率达到75%左右;(2)由于很难确定靶肺静脉,成功电学隔离各心脏大静脉有可能提高治愈率;(3)此     

导管射频消融治疗持续性心房颤动的体会

目的研究持续性心房颤动(房颤)导管射频消融最佳手术方式及复发心律失常的处理策略。方法2005年3月~2007年8月共40例持续性房颤患者接受导管射频消融治疗,三维电解剖标测系统指导下行环同侧肺静脉左心房线性消融;2005年的12例患者部分附加左心房峡部、右心房峡部、左心房顶部线性消融;2006年的12例患者常规进行左心房峡部、右心房峡部射频消融,部分患者附加碎裂电位、左心耳或根据术中的房性心律失常附加其他部位射频消融;2007年的16例患者则在上述基础上进行冠状窦左心房心内膜面射频消融。结果2005年复发8例(66.7%),2006年复发3例(25.0%),2007年复发4例(25.0%)。复发的患者中8例接受第二次导管射频消融术,其中5例维持窦性心律。平均随访(17.6±10.4)个月,总治疗成功率82.5%。结论持续性房颤患者在以肺静脉口为核心的导管射频消融前提下,适当改进导管射频消融策略,可以显著提高成功率。     

风湿性心脏病瓣膜置换术后心房颤动的导管消融病例总结

目的：评价风湿性心脏病瓣膜置换术后心房颤动（房颤）消融的效果和安全性。方法入选2008年至2013年在广东省人民医院心内科接受房颤导管消融治疗的风湿性心脏病瓣膜置换术患者,分析其临床特征、消融策略及消融成功率。结果共纳入23例患者,男8例,女15例,平均年龄（51.0＆#177;9.2）岁。单纯二尖瓣置换术患者13例（56.5%）,二尖瓣、主动脉瓣双瓣置换术10例（43.5%）,其中5例同时进行三尖瓣置换或整形术。外科术后阵发性房颤患者14例（60.9%）,非阵发性房颤9例（39.1%）;这些患者在外科术前心律情况为9例窦性心律,4例阵发性房颤,10例非阵发性房颤。导管消融距离外科手术时间为（6.9＆#177;5.8）年,外科术后发生房颤病程（3.1＆#177;3.2）年,左、右心房内径分别为（44.1＆#177;5.9）mm、（48.1＆#177;9.0）mm,左心室射血分数64.0%＆#177;8.3%。平均消融手术时间（156.8＆#177;46.6）min,X线曝光时间（27.3＆#177;11.2）min。随访（29.7＆#177;21.2）个月,其中4例（17.4%）患者接受再次消融术;14例（60.9%）维持窦性心律（6例服用胺碘酮）,1例死亡,2例失访,6例复发（包括2例持续性房颤,1例阵发性房颤,2例偶发性心房扑动,1例阵发性房性心动过速）。结论风湿性心脏病瓣膜置换术后房颤导管消融有效、安全,步进式导管消融策略可能较为合适。     

Ensite非接触标测系统在室性心律失常患者射频消融中的应用

目的探讨Ensite系统标测室性心律失常的方法,并评价其指导射频消融的有效性和安全性。方法入选症状性室性期前收缩(室早)或室性心动过速(室速)患者98例,年龄(42±16)岁,其中男43例,女55例。经外周血管进非接触多极球囊导管至右心室或左心室三维重建心腔。心室激动时根据虚拟单极电位的等电位图,结合起搏和激动标测对起源点和突破口及优势传导通道进行消融。结果消融即时成功率95%(93/98)。起源于右心室流出道占96种,间隔部和游离壁各82、14种,起源于其他不典型部位21种,三尖瓣环8种。起源后传导突破呈快反应点爆发方式占78%(91/117),采用点消融覆盖相近的起源点和突破口;呈慢反应突破方式占22%(26/117),采用线性或片状消融策略。随访(6±3)个月,3例复发,1例经再次消融成功。结论 Ensite心内非接触式标测系统用于室性心律失常的三维标测有效安全。室速或室早自最早起源点后经优势传导通道向突破口传导有两种传导方式。     

环肺静脉射频消融治疗慢性心房颤动

4 背景 1994年Haisaguerre等首先报道了经导管消融治疗心房颤动。近几年来，随着对心房颤动发生和维持机制研究的深入，各种各样的心房颤动消融策略不断涌现出来并应用于临床，导管消融的适应证也从阵发性心房颤动扩展到所有类型的心房颤动。三维标测系统指导下的环肺静脉消融术（circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation，CPVA）是目前治疗持续性心房颤动的最常用术式，取得了较好的疗效。但患者术后常需要接受短期的抗心律失常药物治疗和一次或多次的电复律以恢复窦性心律，而且有无症状性心房颤动复发存在。这些混杂的因素可能会使手术疗效被高估。     

无左心房和肺静脉三维重建的阵发性心房颤动导管消融术

Objective To investigate the differences between modeling and non-modeling left atrium in Carto XP system guided catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods Thirty-one cases of par-oxysmal atrial fibrillation treated by the same electrophysiologist with guidance of Carto XP during Jan to Dec in 2008 were enrolled. Catheter ablation was accomplished without left atrium and pulmonary veins modeling in 17 patients (non-modeling group) and with left atrium modeling in 14 patients (modeling group). The detailed ablation method was based on circumferential pulmonary veins isolation (CPVI). And linear ablation of tricus-pid valvular isthmus was selectively proceeded individually. The ablation endpoint was set to complete isolation of pulmonary vein potential from left atrium and no continuous fast atrial arrhythmia including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia could be induced. Comparisons for each step during procedure and the fol-low-up outcomes had been done. Results The male: female ratio of the 2 groups were 10:4 and 11 : 6 (P >0.05). The average age were (54.64 ± 15.58) and (59.41 ± 10.59) (P >0.05) ,the diseased courses were (5.05 ±10.4) years and (7.34±7.74)years(P >0.05),the left atrial sizes were (35.29±4.73) mm and (36.47 ±6.15)mm (P > 0.05), the total procedure time was (107.23±28.92) rain and (93.47 ±26.09) win (P>0.05). The X-ray exposure time was (21.09 ±6.49)min (modeling group) and (14.16±5.35)min (non-modeling group,P < 0.05). The CPVI time of fight pulmonary veins was (27.29±18.53) rain (model-ing group) and 18.00 ±4.51 min (non-modeling group, P < 0.05). The CPVI time of left pulmonary veins was (28.14 ±9.26) rain (modeling group) and (23.94±7.10) rain (non-modeling group, P < 0.05). The successful rates was 85.7% (modeling group) and 82.4% (non-modeling group, P > 0.05) over follow-up for 2 to 13 months. Conclusion Carto system guided catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation without modeling of left atrium and pulmonary veins could take less time in X-ray exposure and ablation steps, compa-ring with left atrium modeling one.     

无左心房和肺静脉三维重建的阵发性心房颤动导管消融术

Objective To investigate the differences between modeling and non-modeling left atrium in Carto XP system guided catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods Thirty-one cases of par-oxysmal atrial fibrillation treated by the same electrophysiologist with guidance of Carto XP during Jan to Dec in 2008 were enrolled. Catheter ablation was accomplished without left atrium and pulmonary veins modeling in 17 patients (non-modeling group) and with left atrium modeling in 14 patients (modeling group). The detailed ablation method was based on circumferential pulmonary veins isolation (CPVI). And linear ablation of tricus-pid valvular isthmus was selectively proceeded individually. The ablation endpoint was set to complete isolation of pulmonary vein potential from left atrium and no continuous fast atrial arrhythmia including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia could be induced. Comparisons for each step during procedure and the fol-low-up outcomes had been done. Results The male: female ratio of the 2 groups were 10:4 and 11 : 6 (P >0.05). The average age were (54.64 ± 15.58) and (59.41 ± 10.59) (P >0.05) ,the diseased courses were (5.05 ±10.4) years and (7.34±7.74)years(P >0.05),the left atrial sizes were (35.29±4.73) mm and (36.47 ±6.15)mm (P > 0.05), the total procedure time was (107.23±28.92) rain and (93.47 ±26.09) win (P>0.05). The X-ray exposure time was (21.09 ±6.49)min (modeling group) and (14.16±5.35)min (non-modeling group,P < 0.05). The CPVI time of fight pulmonary veins was (27.29±18.53) rain (model-ing group) and 18.00 ±4.51 min (non-modeling group, P < 0.05). The CPVI time of left pulmonary veins was (28.14 ±9.26) rain (modeling group) and (23.94±7.10) rain (non-modeling group, P < 0.05). The successful rates was 85.7% (modeling group) and 82.4% (non-modeling group, P > 0.05) over follow-up for 2 to 13 months. Conclusion Carto system guided catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation without modeling of left atrium and pulmonary veins could take less time in X-ray exposure and ablation steps, compa-ring with left atrium modeling one.     

起源于肺静脉的阵发性心房颤动导管射频消融治疗

目的　探讨环状电极 (Lasso电极 )标测指导起源于肺静脉的阵发性心房颤动 (房颤 )导管射频消融治疗的安全性和有效性。方法与结果　 2 0 0 1年 5～ 12月 ,12例药物治疗无效的阵发性房颤患者 ,男 8例 ,女 4例 ,平均年龄 (47 8± 14 9)岁 ,行心内电生理检查和射频消融术。在Lasso电极指导下标测肺静脉 ,以确定诱发房颤的房性早搏起源处。确定房性早搏的消融靶点后 ,在有房性早搏或冠状窦远端起搏或右心耳起搏下寻找优势肺静脉电位 (PVP)放电消融 ,或肺静脉口环状消融。消融终点设定为 :①肺静脉电位振幅明显减低或消失 ;②肺静脉自律性电位与心房电活动无关 ;③诱发房颤的房早消失。结果成功隔离 2 6条肺静脉 ;其中左上肺静脉 12条 ,右上肺静脉 8条 ,左下肺静脉 5条 ,右下肺静脉1条。有 2例仅消融 1条肺静脉 ,均为左上肺静脉 ;8例消融2条肺静脉 ,消融 3条与 4条肺静脉者各 1例。术程 (196 4±6 5 8)min ,X线曝光时间 (5 2 0± 14 4 )min。术后随访 2～ 8个月 ,有 1例频发房早发生 ,经口服胺碘酮后房早消失 ;4例有房颤短阵发作 ,其中 3例接受口服药物 (2例服用胺碘酮 ,1例服用索他洛尔 ) ,1例植入有抗房颤程序的DDDR起搏器 ,能够有效抑制房颤发作。术中选择性肺静脉造影发现 6例有轻度肺静脉狭窄 ,其     

Lasso电极导管指导下标测与射频消融局灶性房性心动过速

目的 探讨10极Lasso电极导管对局灶性房性心动过速(房速)标测及射频消融的指导作用.方法 局灶性房速病人5例,接受电生理检查,初步判断房速起源于左心房或右心房;应用Lasso电极标测心房,指导消融导管寻找局灶性房速最早心房激动(A波)点,于最早心房激动点处消融.结果 局灶性房速病人5例均在房速持续发作时进行Lasso电极标测;消融导管在Lasso电极指导下分别于左心房耳部(2例)、左上肺静脉口部(1例)、上腔静脉(1例)、右心房侧壁(1例)标测到最早A波;较P波提早30～40 ms;Lasso电极记录的A波顺序均呈离心性;在上述最早激动点处消融,均成功终止房速,放电次数为1～3次;未出现并发症;随访2～20个月,无复发;手术时间40～60 min,X线照射时间8～12 min.结论 应用Lasso电极指导标测与射频消融局灶性房速,快速、准确,可提高消融成功率,减少X线照射时间,缩短手术时间,特别对病灶位于心内大静脉、心房耳部病例尤有帮助.