On constant discrete programming problems

Let H be a subset of the set S_n of all permutations

$\text{1}\text{2}\text{???}\text{n}\text{s(1)}\text{s(2)}\text{???}\text{s(n)}$

C=6c_ij6 a real n?n matrix L_c(s)=c_1s(1)+c_2s(2)+???+c_ns(n) for s ? H. A pair (H, C) is the existencee of reals a₁,b₁,a₂,b₂,…a_n,b_n, for which c_ij=a₁+b_j if (i,j)?D(H), where D(H)={(i,j):(?h?H)(j=h(i))}.For a pair (H,C) the specifity of it is proved in the case, when H is either a special cyclic class of permutations or a special union of cyclic classes. Specific pairs with minimal sets H are in some sense described.     

On monotone functions of tree structures

Let T be a rooted tree structure with n nodes a₁,…,a_n. A function f: {a₁,…,a_n} into {1 < ? < k} is called monotone if whenever a_i is a son of a_j, then f(a_i) ≥ f(a_j). The average number of monotone bijections is determined for several classes of tree structures. If k is fixed, for the average number of monotone functions asymptotic equivalents of the form c · ?^?nn^{?$\text{3}\text{2}$} (n → ∞) are obtained for several classes of tree structures.     

Some explicit formulae in simultaneous padé approximation

Using old results on the explicit calculation of determinants, formulae are given for the coefficients of P₀(z) and P₀(z)f_i(z) ? P_i(z), where P_i(z) are polynomials of degree σ ? ρ_i (i=0,1,…,n), P₀(z)f_i(z) ? P_i(z) are power series in which the terms with z^k, 0?k?σ, vanish (i=1,2,…,n), (ρ₀,ρ₁,…,ρ_n) is an (n+1)-tuple of nonnegative integers, σ=ρ₀+ρ₁+?+ρ_n, and {f_i}ⁿ_i=1 is the set of hypergeometric functions {₁F₁(1;c_i;z)}ⁿ_i=1$\text{(c}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{z.drule;}\text{N}\text{, c}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? c}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{)}$ or {₂F₀(a_i,1;z)}ⁿ_i=1$\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{?}\text{N}\text{, a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? a}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{)}$ under the condition ρ₀?ρ_i ? 1 (i=1,2,…,n).     

Affine and combinatorial binary m-spaces

Let V(n) denote the n-dimensional vector space over the 2-element field. Let a(m, r) (respectively, c(m, r)) denote the smallest positive integer such that if n ? a(m, r) (respectively, n ? c(m, r)), and V(n) is arbitrarily partitioned into r classes C_i, 1 ? i ? r, then some class C_i must contain an m-dimensional affine (respectively, combinatorial) subspace of V(n). Upper bounds for the functions a(m, r) and c(m, r) are investigated, as are upper bounds for the corresponding “density functions” $\text{a}\text{(m, ?)}$ and $\text{c}\text{(m, ?)}$.     

Construction of a Jacobi matrix from spectral data

A proof is given for the existence and uniqueness of a correspondence between two pairs of sequences {a},{b} and {ω},{μ}, satisfying b_i>0 for i=1,…,n?1 and ω₁<μ₁<?<μ_n?1<ω_n, under which the symmetric Jacobi matrices J(n,a,b) and J(n?1,a,b) have eigenvalues {ω} and {μ} respectively. Here J(m,a,b) is symmetric and tridiagonal with diagonal elements a_i (i=1,…,m) and off diagonal elements b_i (i=1,…,m?1). A new concise proof is given for the known uniqueness result. The existence result is new.     

A divided difference inequality for n-convex functions

For a₍₁₎ ? a₍₂₎ ? ··· ? a_(n) ? 0, b₍₁₎ ? b₍₂₎ ? ··· ? b_(n) ? 0, the ordered values of a_i, b_i, i = 1, 2,…, n, m fixed, m ? n, and p ? 1 it is shown that

$\text{∑}\text{1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m}\text{a}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m?k?1}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{+}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{[m?k]}}\text{(k+1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>q</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>q</mtext>}}$

where $\text{1}\text{p}\text{+}\text{1}\text{q}\text{= 1, b}{}_{\mathrm{[j]}}\text{= b}{}_{\mathrm{(j)}}\text{+ b}{}_{\mathrm{(j\; +\; 1)}}\text{+ ··· + b}{}_{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{,}\text{and}\text{k}$ is the integer such that $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k\; ?\; 1)}}\text{?}\text{b[m ? k]}\text{(k + 1)}$ and $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k)}}\text{<}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{[m\; ?\; k\; +\; 1]}}\text{k}$. The inequality is shown to be sharp. When p < 1 and a_(i)'s are in increasing order then the inequality is reversed.     

Ballots and rooks

The level code representation of the simplest ballot problem (weak lead lattice paths from (0, 0) to (n, n) is the set of sequences (b₁,…, b_n) defined by b₁ = 1, b_{i ?1} ≤ b_i ≤ i, 2 ≤ i ≤n. Each sequence is monotone non-decreasing, has a specification (c₁, c₂,…, c_n) with c_i the number of sequence elements equal to i (hence c₁ + c₂…+ c_n = n), and may be permuted in $\text{n!}\text{c}{}_1\text{!…c}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{!}$ ways. The set of permuted sequences, as noted in [4], is the set of parking functions, introduced by Konheim and Weiss in [1]. To count parking functions by number of fixed points, associate the rook polynomial for matching a deck of cards of specification (c₁,…,c_n), c_i cards marked i, with a deck of n distinct cards. The hit polynomial H_n(x) corresponding to the sum of such rook polynomials over all sequences (I am using the terminology of [2]) is the required enumerator and turns out to be simply

$\text{(n+1)}{}^2\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(x)=(x+n)}{}^{\mathrm{n+1}}\text{?(x?1)}{}^{\mathrm{n+1}}$

.     

On solutions of “equations in symmetric groups”

Let x?S_n, the symmetric group on n symbols. Let θ? Aut(S_n) and let the automorphim order of x with respect to θ be defined by

$\text{γθ(x)=}\text{min}\text{{k:x xθ xθ}{}^2\text{? xθ}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{=1}}$

where xθ is the image of x under θ. Let α_g? Aut(S_n) denote conjugation by the element g?S_n. Let where s and k are positive integers and $\text{a}\text{b}$ denotes a divides b. Further h(s, k : n) ≡ b(1; s, k : n), where 1 denotes the identity automorphim. If g?S_n let c = f(g, s) denote the number of symbols in g which are in cycles of length not dividing the integer s, and let g_s denote the product of all cycles in g whose lengths do not divide s. Then g_s moves c symbols. The main results proved are: (1) recursion: if n ? c + 1 and t = n ? c ? 1 then $\text{b(g; s, 1:n)=∑}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>i</mtext><mtext>s</mtext>}}\text{b(g; s, 1:n?1)(}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(i?1)!}$ (2) reduction: b(g; s, 1 : c)h(s, 1 : i) = b(g; s, 1 : i + c); (3) distribution: let D(θ, n) ≡ {(k, b) : k?Z⁺ and b = b(θ; 1, k : n) ≠ 0}; then D(θ, m) = D(φ, m) ∨ m ? N = N(θ, φ) iff θ is conjugate to φ; (4) evaluation: the number of cycles in g_s^s of any given length is smaller than the smallest prime dividing s iff b(g_s; s, 1 : c) = 1. If g = (12 … p^m)^t and $\text{sk}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ then $\text{b(g;s,k:p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{) {}{}^0{}_{\mathrm{\pm 1}}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{p)}$.     

Approximation of functions of finite variation by superpositions of a Sigmoidal function

The aim of this note is to generalize a result of Barron [1] concerning the approximation of functions, which can be expressed in terms of the Fourier transform, by superpositions of a fixed sigmoidal function. In particular, we consider functions of the type h(x) = ∫ℝ^d ƒ (〈t, x〉)dμ(t), where μ is a finite Radon measure on ℝ^d and ƒ : ℝ → ℂ is a continuous function with bounded variation in ℝ We show (Theorem 2.6) that these functions can be approximated in L₂-norm by elements of the set G_n = {Σ_i=0^staggeredn c_ig(〈a_i, x〉 + b_i) : a_iℝ^d, b_i, c_iℝ}, where g is a fixed sigmoidal function, with the error estimated by C/n^1/2, where C is a positive constant depending only on f. The same result holds true (Theorem 2.9) for f : ℝ → ℂ satisfying the Lipschitz condition under an additional assumption that ∫ℝ^d6t6e^d|u(t)| > ∞     

Extremal property of some surfaces in n-dimensional Euclidean space

A surface Γ=(f ₁(X₁,..., x_m),...,f _n(x₁,..., x_m)) is said to be extremal if for almost all points of Γ the inequality $$\parallel a_1 f_1 (x_1 , \ldots ,x_m ) + \ldots + a_n f_n (x_1 , \ldots ,x_m )\parallel< H^{ - n - \varepsilon } ,$$ , where H=max(¦a _i¦) (i=1, 2, ..., n), has only a finite number of solutions in the integersa ₁, ...,a _n. In this note we prove, for a specific relationship between m and n and a functional condition on the functionsf ₁, ...,f _n, the extremality of a class of surfaces in n-dimensional Euclidean space.     

A lower-bound for the number of productions required for a certain class of languages

W. Bucher, K. Culik II, H. Maurer and D. Wotschke (Theoretical Computer Science 14(1981), pp. 227–246) posed the problem of producing the language L_n = {ab: 1≤a,b≤n and a≠b} with a minimal number of productions. Later, W. Bucher, K. Culik II and H. Maurer showed that $\text{2n + O(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$ productions are sufficient. In this note we show that $\text{2n + ?2n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{?}$ productions are necessary for all n≥ 6.     

On differences and sums of integers,I

A set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} ? {1,2,…,N} is said to be a difference intersector set if {a₁,a₂,…,a_s} ? {1,2,…,N}, j > ?N imply the solvability of the equation a_x ? a_y = b′; the notion of sum intersector set is defined similarly. The authors prove two general theorems saying that if a set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} is well distributed simultaneously among and within all residue classes of small moduli then it must be both difference and sum intersector set. They apply these theorems to investigate the solvability of the equations ($\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{p}\text{= + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{u}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{p}\text{) = + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{z}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$ (where ($\text{a}\text{p}$) denotes the Legendre symbol) and to show that “almost all” sets form both difference and sum intersector sets.     

Selection principle for pointwise bounded sequences of functions

For a number ? > 0 and a real function f on an interval [a, b], denote by N(?, f, [a, b]) the least upper bound of the set of indices n for which there is a family of disjoint intervals [a _i , b _i ], i = 1, …, n, on [a, b] such that |f(a _i ) ? f(b _i )| > ? for any i = 1, …, n (sup Ø = 0). The following theorem is proved: if {f _j } is a pointwise bounded sequence of real functions on the interval [a, b] such that n(?) ≡ lim sup _j→∞ N(?, f _j , [a, b]) < ∞ for any ? > 0, then the sequence {f _j } contains a subsequence which converges, everywhere on [a, b], to some function f such that N(?, f, [a, b]) ≤ n(?) for any ? > 0. It is proved that the main condition in this theorem related to the upper limit is necessary for any uniformly convergent sequence {f _j } and is “almost” necessary for any everywhere convergent sequence of measurable functions, and many pointwise selection principles generalizing Helly’s classical theorem are consequences of our theorem. Examples are presented which illustrate the sharpness of the theorem.     

Enumeration of pairs of permutations

Let π = (a₁, a₂, …, a_n), ? = (b₁, b₂, …, b_n) be two permutations of $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {1, 2, …, n}}$. A rise of π is pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i < a_i+1; a fall is a pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i > a_i+1. Thus, for i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1, the two pairs a_i, a_i+1; b_i, b_i+1 are either both rises, both falls, the first a rise and the second a fall or the first a fall and the second a rise. These possibilities are denoted by RR, FF, RF, FR. The paper is concerned with the enumeration of pairs π, p with a given number of RR, FF, RF, FR. In particular if ω_n denotes the number of pairs with RR forbidden, it is proved that $\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}\text{=}\text{1}\text{?(z)}$, $\text{?(z) = ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{(-1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$. More precisely if ω(n, k) denotes the number of pairs π, p with exactly k occurences of RR(or FF, RF, FR) then $\text{1 + ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$$\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}{}_{\mathrm{k=0}}\text{ω(n, k)x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(1 ? x)}\text{(?(z(1 ? x)) ? x)}$.     

Note on lower bounds for the rank of a matrix

The following results are proved: Let A = (a_ij) be an n × n complex matrix, n ? 2, and let k be a fixed integer, 1 ? k ? n ? 1.(1) If there exists a monotonic G-function f = (f₁,…,f_n) such that for every subset of S of {1,…,n} consisting of k + 1 elements we have

$\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(A)<}\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{|a}{}_{\mathrm{ii}}\text{|,}$

then the rank of A is ? n ? k + 1. (2) If A is irreducible and if there exists a G-function f = (f₁,…,f_n) such that for every subset of S of {1,…,n} consisting of k + 1 elements we have

$\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(A)<}\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{|a}{}_{\mathrm{ii}}\text{|,}$

then the rank of A is ? n ? k + 1 if k ? 2, n ? 3; it is ? n ? 1 if k = 1.     

On a problem of Oppenheim concerning “factorisatio numerorum”

Let f(n) denote the number of factorizations of the natural number n into factors larger than 1 where the order of the factors does not count. We say n is “highly factorable” if f(m)<f(n) for all m < n. We prove that f(n)=n·L(n)^?1+0(1) for n highly factorable, where $\text{L(n)=}\text{exp}\text{{}\text{log}\text{n}\text{logloglog}\text{n}\text{loglog}\text{n}\text{}}$. This result corrects the 1926 paper of Oppenheim where it is asserted that f(n)=n·L(n)^?2+0(1). Some results on the multiplicative structure of highly factorable numbers are proved and a table of them up to 10⁹ is provided. Of independent interest, a new lower bound is established for the function Ψ(x, y), the number of n≤x free of prime factors exceeding y.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

On a class of relatively prime sequences

For each natural number n, let a₀(n) = n, and if a₀(n),…,a_i(n) have already been defined, let a_i+1(n) > a_i(n) be minimal with (a_i+1(n), a₀(n) … a_i(n)) = 1. Let g(n) be the largest a_i(n) not a prime or the square of a prime. We show that g(n) ～ n and that $\text{g(n) > n + cn}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{log}\text{(n)}$ for some c > 0. The true order of magnitude of g(n) ? n seems to be connected with the fine distribution of prime numbers. We also show that “most” a_i(n) that are not primes or squares of primes are products of two distinct primes. A result of independent interest comes of one of our proofs: For every sufficiently large n there is a prime $\text{p < n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ with [$\text{n}\text{p}$] composite.