No association between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes

BackgroundPregnant women are recommended to receive inactivated influenza vaccination anytime during pregnancy. Studies have investigated the impact of influenza vaccination during pregnancy on birth outcomes and results on preterm birth have been inconsistent.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study among children born at a gestational age ≥ 24 weeks from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California facilities (KPNC). We evaluated the association between maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth, small and large for gestational age, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), respiratory distress syndrome, low birth weight, and low Apgar score. We ascertained the dates of maternal influenza vaccination, conception, and delivery, as well as birth outcomes from KPNC inpatient and outpatient databases. Conditional multivariate Cox regression and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between maternal vaccination during pregnancy and risk of each birth outcome.ResultsThe study included 145,869 children. Maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with risk of small or large for gestational age births, preterm birth, need for mechanical ventilation at birth, respiratory distress syndrome, admission to the NICU, low birth weight, or low Apgar score. However, when we did not control for immortal time bias, the risk of preterm birth (odds ratio [OR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.72) was lower among infants of vaccinated mothers.ConclusionWe found no association between maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. When investigating preterm birth outcome in association with vaccination during pregnancy, immortal time bias should be taken into account in the analysis.     

Birth outcomes for Australian mother-infant pairs who received an influenza vaccine during pregnancy, 2012–2014: The FluMum study

IntroductionIn Australia, influenza vaccination is recommended for all women who will be pregnant during the influenza season. Vaccine safety and effectiveness are key concerns and influencers of uptake for both vaccine providers and families. We assessed the safety of receiving an influenza vaccination during any trimester of pregnancy with respect to preterm births and infant birthweight.MethodsWe conducted a nested retrospective cohort study of ‘FluMum’ participants (2012–2014). Our primary exposure of interest was influenza vaccination during pregnancy. The primary outcomes of interest were infant birthweight and weeks’ gestation at birth for live singleton infants. Analyses included comparisons of these birth outcomes by vaccination status and trimester of pregnancy an influenza vaccine was given. We calculated means, proportions, and relative risks and performed multivariable logistic regression for potential confounding factors.ResultsIn the 7126 mother-infant pairs enrolled in this study, mean maternal age at infant birth was 31.7 years. Influenza vaccine uptake in pregnancy was 34%. Most mothers with a known date of vaccination received a vaccine in the second trimester (51%). Those mothers with a co-morbidity or risk factor were 13% more likely to have influenza vaccine during pregnancy compared to other mothers (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.24, p = 0.007). Mean weeks’ gestation at birth was 38.7 for the vaccinated and 38.8 for the unvaccinated group (p = 0.051). Infants in the vaccinated group weighed 15 g less in birthweight compared to the unvaccinated infants (95% CI −12.8 to 42.2, p = 0.29).ConclusionResults arising from this large Australian cohort study are reassuring with respect to two critical safety outcomes; preterm births and low infant birthweights. Studies examining a broader range of birth outcomes following influenza vaccination during pregnancy are required, particularly now that maternal vaccination in pregnancy has expanded to include pertussis as well as influenza.     

Psychosocial determinants of pertussis and influenza vaccine uptake in pregnant women: A prospective study

ObjectiveTo identify the psychosocial factors influencing women’s uptake and willingness to receive pertussis and influenza vaccine during pregnancy.MethodsThe study population comprised 1364 healthy nulliparous pregnant women who participated in a prospective cohort study at two obstetric hospitals in South Australia between 2015 and 2017. Information on women's vaccination status, sociodemographic, lifestyle and psychological state were collected at 9–16 weeks’ gestation and medical case notes were checked post-delivery to verify the reported vaccination status. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) to identify psychosocial factors influencing uptake of vaccination during pregnancy.ResultsWillingness to receive the recommended maternal vaccines was high (90%). Overall, 79% and 48% received maternal pertussis and influenza vaccines respectively. There was no evidence to support the influence of psychosocial factors on women’s willingness to receive immunization during pregnancy. High levels of anxiety (aPR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.87–1.09) was not associated with uptake of maternal pertussis vaccine. However, elevated depressive symptoms (aPR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00–1.30) and very high-perceived stress during pregnancy were significantly associated with receipt of pertussis vaccination (aPR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76–0.99). Women with mild depressive symptoms (aPR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00–1.44) and mild anxiety symptoms (aPR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.99–1.48) were more likely to receive influenza vaccine during pregnancy (aPR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.08–1.49). A history of major depressive disorder was independently associated with receipt of pertussis (aPR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06–1.26) and influenza vaccination during pregnancy (aPR 1.32; 95% CI 1.14–1.58).ConclusionRegardless of psychosocial factors, most women reported a positive willingness to receive the recommended vaccinations during pregnancy. However, psychosocial factors influenced the uptake of pertussis and influenza vaccines during pregnancy. Psychosocial factors should be taken into consideration in designing interventions and implementation of maternal pertussis and influenza immunization programs.     

Effectiveness of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccination against hospital-attended acute respiratory infections in pregnant women: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundPregnant women are at risk of serious influenza infection. Although previous studies indicate maternal influenza vaccination can prevent hospitalisation in young infants, there is limited evidence of the effect in mothers.MethodsA cohort of 34,701 pregnant women delivering between 1 April 2012 and 31 December 2013 was created using birth records. Principal diagnosis codes from hospital emergency department (ED) and inpatient records were used to identify episodes of acute respiratory illness (ARI) during the 2012 and 2013 southern hemisphere influenza seasons. Cox regression models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) by maternal vaccination status, controlling for Indigenous status, socioeconomic level, medical conditions, and week of delivery.Results3,007 (8.7%) women received a seasonal influenza vaccine during pregnancy. Vaccinated women were less likely to visit an ED during pregnancy for an ARI (9.7 visits per 10,000 person-days vs. 35.5 visits per 10,000 person-days; aHR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05−0.68). Vaccinated women were also less likely to be hospitalised with an ARI compared to unvaccinated women (16.2 hospitalisations per 10,000 person-days vs. 34.0 hospitalisations per 10,000 person-days; aHR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.13−0.97).ConclusionsInfluenza vaccination during pregnancy was associated with significantly fewer hospital attendances for ARI in pregnant women.     

The association between maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in the United States: Pregnancy risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)

ObjectiveInfluenza vaccination during pregnancy is highly recommended. We examined the association between maternal influenza vaccination and adverse birth outcomes.MethodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) during 2012–2017. The primary exposure was the receipt of influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth (PTB), and small for gestational age (SGA) were the primary outcomes. We conducted multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Covariates used to adjust confounding included maternal age, marital status, education, race and ethnicity, insurance status before pregnancy, and smoking status. For a subgroup in 2012–2015, we analyzed the association between influenza vaccination in each trimester and adverse birth outcomes.ResultsDuring 2012–2017, compared with unvaccinated women, women vaccinated during pregnancy had a lower risk of LBW and PTB. During 2012–2015, maternal influenza vaccination in the 1st and 3rd trimesters was associated with a reduced risk of LBW and PTB, and vaccination in the 3rd trimester had a greater protective effect than in the 1st trimester. Influenza vaccination was not associated with SGA regardless of trimester.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that influenza vaccination during pregnancy is a safe and effective way to protect newborns.     

Pregnancy outcomes among visually impaired women in Washington State, 1987–2014

BackgroundWomen with visual impairment may have reduced ability to access standard care resources, however, information on their pregnancy and neonatal outcomes is limited.ObjectiveTo assess risk of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among visually impaired women in Washington State from 1987 to 2014.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Washington State birth/fetal death hospital discharge records to compare outcomes among women with and without visual impairment noted at their delivery hospitalization. Pregnancy conditions and outcomes evaluated included gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, labor induction and cesarean delivery. Neonatal outcomes included preterm delivery and birth weight <2500 g. We assessed length of maternal and infant delivery hospitalization. We performed Poisson regression to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome, adjusting for year of delivery, maternal age, and parity.ResultsMost adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were similar for visually impaired (N = 232) and comparison women (N = 2362). However, visually impaired women had increased risks of severe pre-eclampsia (RR 3.77, 95% CI 1.69–8.43), labor induction (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10–1.61) and preterm delivery (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.06–2.42). They were also more likely to have delivery hospitalizations of 3 or more days following a vaginal (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.41–2.47). Among cesarean deliveries, infants of visually impaired women had increased risk (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02–1.51) of hospitalization for 3 or more days postpartum.ConclusionOur findings may be useful for obstetric providers in counseling their visually impaired patients.     

Pertussis and influenza immunisation coverage of pregnant women in New Zealand

BackgroundImmunisation is an important public health policy and measuring coverage is imperative to identify gaps and monitor trends. New Zealand (NZ), like many countries, does not routinely publish coverage of immunisations given during pregnancy. Therefore, this study examined pregnancy immunisation coverage of all pregnant NZ women between 2013 and 2018, and what factors affected uptake.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who delivered between 2013 and 2018 was undertaken using administrative datasets. Maternity and immunisation data were linked to determine coverage of pertussis and influenza vaccinations in pregnancy. Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate the odds of receiving a vaccination during pregnancy.ResultsFrom 2013 to 2018 data were available for 323,622 pregnant women, of whom 21.7% received maternal influenza immunisations and 25.7% maternal pertussis immunisations. Coverage for both vaccines increased over time, pertussis increased from 10.2% to 43.6% and influenza from 11.2% to 30.8%. The odds of being vaccinated, with either vaccine, during pregnancy increased with increasing age and decreasing deprivation. Compared to NZ European or Other women, Māori and Pacific women had lower odds of receiving a maternal pertussis (OR:0.55, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.57; OR:0.60, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.62, respectively) and influenza (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.71; OR:0.90, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.94, respectively) immunisations during pregnancy. Women were also more likely to be vaccinated against pertussis if they received antenatal care from a General Practitioner or Obstetrician compared to a Midwife. A similar pattern was seen for influenza vaccination.ConclusionGaps in maternal coverage for pertussis and influenza exist and work is needed to reduce immunisation inequities.     

Tetanus,diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccination during pregnancy and reduced risk of infant acute respiratory infections

BackgroundTo protect infants from pertussis infection, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends women receive the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine between 27 and 36 weeks of pregnancy. Here, we assessed the association between timing of maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy and acute respiratory infection (ARI) in infants <2 months of age.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 99,434 infants born to active duty military women in the Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Registry from 2006 through 2013. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy and infant ARI at <2 months of age.ResultsInfants of mothers who received Tdap vaccination during pregnancy vs those who did not were 9% less likely to be diagnosed with an ARI at <2 months of age (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84–0.99), and the risk was 17% lower if vaccination was received between 27 and 36 weeks of pregnancy (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74–0.93). Similar results were observed when comparing mothers who received Tdap vaccination prior to pregnancy in addition to Tdap vaccination between 27 and 36 weeks of pregnancy versus mothers who only received vaccination prior to pregnancy (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74–0.98).ConclusionsMaternal Tdap vaccination between 27 and 36 weeks of pregnancy was consistently protective against infant ARI in the first 2 months of life vs no vaccination during pregnancy, regardless of Tdap vaccination prior to pregnancy. Our findings strongly support current ACIP guidelines recommending Tdap vaccination in late pregnancy for every pregnancy.     

Combined tetanus-diphtheria and pertussis vaccine during pregnancy: transfer of maternal pertussis antibodies to the newborn

Background and objectivesPertussis is currently an emerging public health concern in some countries with high vaccination coverage. It is expected that maternal pertussis immunization could provide newborn protection. We compared pertussis toxin antibody (anti-PT) levels in women during pregnancy (pre- and post-vaccination) with respect to levels in the newborn at delivery in women vaccinated during pregnancy. We also estimated anti-PT titers at primary infant vaccination.MethodsObservational study of pregnant women vaccinated with Tdap (≥20 weeks gestation) and their newborns between May 2012 and August 2013. Anti-PT levels were determined by ELISA in maternal (pre- and post-vaccination) and newborn blood.ResultsPre-vaccination, post-vaccination maternal and newborn samples were available in 132 subjects. Mean maternal age was 34.2 (SD 4.3) years. Median weeks of gestation at vaccination were 27.2 (Q1–Q3 21.7–30.8). Anti-PT (≥10 IU/ml) levels were found in 37.1% of maternal pre-vaccination samples (geometric mean titer (GMT) 7.9 IU/ml (95% CI 6.8–9.2)), 90.2% of post-vaccination samples (GMT 31.1 IU/ml (95% CI 26.6–36.3)) and 94.7% of newborns (GMT 37.8 IU/ml (95% CI 32.3–44.1)). The Lin concordance index between post-vaccination maternal and newborn samples was 0.8 (95% CI 0.8–0.9). Transplacental transfer ratio was 146.6%. At two months of age, 66% of newborns had estimated anti-PT levels ≥10 IU/ml.ConclusionsThere was a high correlation between anti-PT levels in mothers and newborns, with higher levels in newborns, which should be sufficient to provide protection against pertussis during the first months of life. Vaccination of pregnant women seems to be an immunogenic strategy to protect newborns until primary infant immunization.     

Pertussis Immunisation in Pregnancy Safety (PIPS) Study: A retrospective cohort study of safety outcomes in pregnant women vaccinated with Tdap vaccine

BackgroundNew Zealand has funded the administration of tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy to prevent infant pertussis since 2013. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of Tdap vaccine administered to pregnant women as part of a national maternal immunisation programme.MethodsWe conducted a national retrospective observational study using linked administrative New Zealand datasets. The study population consisted of pregnant women eligible to receive funded Tdap vaccination from 28 to 38 weeks gestation in 2013. Primary study outcomes were based on prioritised adverse events for the assessment of vaccine safety in pregnant women, as defined by WHO and Brighton Collaboration taskforces. We examined the effect of Tdap vaccination on prioritised maternal outcomes using Cox proportional hazard models. Adjusted hazard ratios controlled for key confounding variables.ResultsIn the cohort of 68,550 women eligible to receive funded antenatal Tdap vaccination during 2013, 8178 (11.9%) were vaccinated and 60,372 (88.1%) were unvaccinated. The use of Tdap in pregnancy was not associated with an increase in the rate of primary outcomes, including preterm labour; pre-eclampsia; pre-eclampsia with severe features; eclampsia; gestational hypertension; fetal growth restriction; or post-partum haemorrhage. Tdap also did not increase secondary outcomes, including gestational diabetes mellitus; antenatal bleeding; placental abruption; premature rupture of membranes; preterm delivery; fetal distress; chorioamnionitis; or, maternal fever during or after labour. Lactation disorders was the only secondary maternal outcome with a significantly increased hazard ratio. Tdap vaccine had a protective effect on pre-eclampsia with severe features, preterm labour, preterm delivery, and antenatal bleeding.ConclusionWe did not detect any biologically plausible adverse maternal outcomes following Tdap vaccination during pregnancy. This study provides further assurance that Tdap administration during pregnancy is not associated with unexpected safety risks.     

Longitudinal,population-based cohort study of prenatal influenza vaccination and influenza infection in childhood

BackgroundInfluenza vaccination is recommended to protect mothers and their infants from influenza infection. Few studies have evaluated the health impacts of in utero exposure to influenza vaccine among children more than six months of age.MethodsWe used probabilistically linked administrative health records to establish a mother–child cohort to evaluate the risk of influenza and acute respiratory infections associated with maternal influenza vaccination. Outcomes were laboratory-confirmed influenza (LCI) and hospitalization for influenza or acute respiratory infection (ARI). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) accounted for child’s Aboriginal status and were weighted by the inverse-probability of treatment.Results14,396 (11.5%) children were born to vaccinated mothers. Maternally vaccinated infants aged < 6 months had lower risk of LCI (aHR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.85), influenza-associated hospitalization (aHR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.94) and ARI-associated hospitalization (aHR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77, 0.94) compared to maternally unvaccinated infants. With the exception of an increased risk of LCI among children aged 6 months to < 2 years old following first trimester vaccination (aHR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.41, 3.69), there were no other differences in the risk of LCI, influenza-associated hospitalization or ARI-associated hospitalization among children aged > 6 months.ConclusionStudy results show that maternal influenza vaccination is effective in preventing influenza in the first six months and had no impact on respiratory infections after two years of age.     

Pregnancy course,infant outcomes,rehospitalization, and mortality among women with intellectual disability

BackgroundPregnant women with intellectual disability (ID) may have greater levels of comorbidity and decreased care access, social support, or ability to monitor their status and communicate needs, but few studies have examined their pregnancy course and outcome, and little is known about their longer-term maternal and infant health.ObjectiveWe compared pre-pregnancy characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and rehospitalization <2 years after delivery among women with and without ID.MethodWe identified all women with ID and randomly selected a 10:1 comparison group of women without ID with singleton live birth deliveries in Washington State population-based linked birth-hospital discharge data 1987–2012. Multivariable regressions estimated adjusted odds ratios comparing pre-pregnancy characteristics. In cohort analyses, we estimated relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes.ResultsWomen with ID (N = 103) more often had gestational diabetes (RR 3.39, 95% CI 1.81–6.37), preeclampsia (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.03–3.42), and inadequate prenatal care (RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.67–3.70). Their infants more often were small for gestational age (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.10–2.89). Need for rehospitalization postpartum was not increased among women with ID or their infants.ConclusionReasons for increased preeclampsia and gestational diabetes among pregnant women with ID are unclear. Barriers to inadequate prenatal care are multifactorial and warrant further study, with consideration that wellness during pregnancy and other times involves social, familial and clinical support systems responsive to each woman's needs.     

Coverage of recommended vaccines during pregnancy in Flanders,Belgium. Fairly good but can we do better?

BackgroundIn Flanders, Belgium, pertussis vaccination is recommended since 2013 and available free-of-charge in every pregnancy between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation. Influenza vaccination is recommended for more than 10 years with a co-payment system in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, when pregnancy coincides with the influenza season. This study aims to estimate the coverage of pertussis and influenza vaccination during pregnancy in 2016 and to determine predictors for missing vaccination.MethodsPostpartum women were visited at home for a vaccination coverage survey using an Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI)-based two-stage cluster sampling design. Predictors for missed vaccination were identified using a multiple logistic regression model.ResultsAmong 481 participating women, 69.3% were vaccinated against pertussis and 47.2% were vaccinated against influenza. Moreover, 65.3% of pertussis vaccine recipients and 96.9% of influenza vaccine recipients were vaccinated within the recommended gestational window.Surprisingly, among women who were completely informed (i.e. on disease-associated risks, maternal vaccination costs and recommendations), still 12.4% were unvaccinated against pertussis and 23.9% against influenza.In the final models, the only common predictor of missing maternal pertussis and influenza vaccination was multiparity. Significant predictors of maternal pertussis vaccination were family income (less likely if unknown or low (< €3000) than if moderate (€3001-€4000)) and hospital of delivery (less likely if >800 annual deliveries than <800). Significant predictors of maternal influenza vaccination, though with less straight-forward associations, were maternal ethnicity and educational level, involvement of a gynaecologist in pregnancy follow-up, and characteristics of the hospital of delivery.ConclusionIn Flanders, more than two-third of pregnant women receives pertussis vaccination but less than half of them receives the influenza vaccine. Further improvement for both maternal vaccination programs can be achieved by targeting the underserved populations and diminishing vaccination hurdles.     

Impact of maternal characteristics on the effect of maternal influenza vaccination on fetal outcomes

Background

Maternal infections during pregnancy have been associated with adverse fetal and infant health outcomes, and vaccination against influenza is the most effective tool to prevent morbidity and mortality due to seasonal and pandemic influenza. We evaluated the association between receipt of the inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine on preterm and small for gestational age (SGA) births, with the aim to assess racial and socioeconomic variations in vaccine effect.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of state-wide surveillance data from Georgia for the most recent four years available at the beginning of the study, a total of 8393 live births in Georgia from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008. We constructed multivariable logistic regression models and calculated odds ratios (OR) estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) to evaluate the effect of maternal influenza vaccination on SGA (birth weight <10th percentile for gestational age) and preterm (gestational age at birth <37 weeks) births while controlling for potential confounders.

Results

Among all women, we found significant strong associations between maternal influenza vaccination and reduced odds of a preterm birth during the widespread influenza activity period [OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.83]. In this period, vaccination was protective against SGA births among women at higher risk for influenza related morbidity – women enrolled in the Women, Infant and Child (WIC) program [OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.98] and Black women [OR = 0.15 95% CI: 0.02, 0.94]; maternal influenza vaccination was associated with reduced odds of a preterm birth among white women [OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.91] and women of higher socio-economic status [OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.74].

Conclusion

Influenza vaccination during pregnancy was significantly associated with reduced odds of small for gestational age and preterm births during the widespread influenza activity period. Vaccination effects varied by socio-demographic characteristics.     

The effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in protecting newborn infants in Brazil: A case-control study

IntroductionIn 2014, the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH) recommended Tdap to pregnant women in response to a significant increase in the incidence of pertussis among infants. The present study assessed the effectiveness of maternal immunization in preventing pertussis in infants.MethodsAn unmatched case-control study was undertaken in São Paulo State, Brazil from February 2015 to July 2016. Cases were infants aged <8 weeks at onset of pertussis reported to the Surveillance System and confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction or culture. Four to six healthy infants were selected as controls per case from birth certificates in the Information System on Live Births database. General characteristics and mother’s vaccination status were compared between cases and controls. The vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated as 1 – odds ratio (OR). For the adjusted VE, the OR was calculated using logistic regression analysis.ResultsForty-two cases and 248 controls were enrolled in the study. Mothers of 8 cases (19.1%) and 143 controls (57.4%) were vaccinated during pregnancy, resulting in an unadjusted VE of 82.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.8–92.3%). The VE was unchanged after adjusting for maternal age and monthly household income.ConclusionMaternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy was effective in protecting infants aged <8 weeks from pertussis.     

History of pandemic H1N1-containing influenza vaccination and risk for spontaneous abortion and birth defects

BackgroundOne recent study suggested an association between receipt of pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1)-containing vaccines in consecutive influenza seasons and spontaneous abortion, but corroborating scientific evidence is limited. In the present study, we leveraged a population of vaccine-compliant pregnant military women to examine history of pH1N1-containing influenza vaccination and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Because seasonal influenza vaccination is compulsory for military service, safety concerns regarding repeat vaccination are particularly relevant in this population.MethodsPregnancies and live births from Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research program data were linked with military personnel immunization records to identify women vaccinated with a pH1N1-containing vaccine in pregnancy prior to 21 6/7 weeks’ gestation, October 2009–April 2015. Cox and modified Poisson regression models estimated associations between vaccination with pH1N1- versus non–pH1N1-containing influenza vaccine in the season prior to the index pregnancy, and spontaneous abortion and birth defects, respectively. Cox models were calculated for two periods of follow-up: through (1) 21 6/7 weeks’ gestation and (2) 28 days postvaccination.ResultsOf 26,264 pregnancies, 21,736 (82.8%) were among women who received a dose of pH1N1-containing vaccine in the prior influenza season and 4,528 (17.2%) were among women who received non–pH1N1-containing vaccine in the prior influenza season. Among 23,121 infants, 19,365 (83.8%) and 3,756 (16.2%) had mothers exposed and unexposed to pH1N1-containing vaccine in the prior influenza season, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for spontaneous abortion approximated 1.0 across the complete follow-up period (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–1.13) and was slightly elevated when censored at 28 days postvaccination, though the CI was imprecise (aHR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.97–1.46). No associations with birth defects were observed.ConclusionThis work lends additional safety evidence and support for vaccination against pH1N1 in pregnancy, regardless of the vaccine received in the prior influenza season.     

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of pertussis vaccine in pregnancy on the risk of chorioamnionitis,non-pertussis infectious diseases and other adverse pregnancy outcomes

BackgroundSeveral countries have introduced maternal immunisation with pertussis vaccine to provide protection against pertussis in early infancy. There is increasing interest in non-specific effects of vaccines including that non-live vaccines may enhance susceptibility to non-targeted infections in females. Some studies have shown increased risk of chorioamnionitis among women receiving pertussis vaccine during pregnancy. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of maternal pertussis immunisation on the risk of chorioamnionitis, as well as the secondary outcomes of non-pertussis infections in women, non-pertussis infections in infants, spontaneous abortion or stillbirth, maternal death and infant death.MethodsWe searched PubMed and Embase for articles published until January 14, 2021. We screened articles for eligibility and extracted data using Covidence. Quality was assessed using Cochrane RoB tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were imported into RevMan for pooling and conduction of a meta-analysis stratified by study type. Outcomes are presented as risk ratios.ResultsWe identified 13 observational studies and six randomized controlled trials eligible for inclusion. We pooled data on chorioamnionitis from six observational studies and found maternal pertussis vaccine (mostly compared with other maternal immunizations with non-live vaccines) to be associated with an increased risk among the pertussis vaccinated women, RR = 1.27 [CI 95%: 1.14–1.42]. We found no difference in the analysis of our secondary outcomes of non-pertussis infections, spontaneous abortion or stillbirth and death.ConclusionWe found an increased risk of chorioamnionitis among women who received pertussis vaccine in pregnancy. The large number of women receiving pertussis vaccine during pregnancy, as well as the growing evidence of non-live vaccines causing increased susceptibility to infections, indicates a need for further randomised trials to assess potential adverse effects of maternal immunisation with pertussis-containing vaccines.     

Safety of tetanus,diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccination among pregnant active duty U.S. military women

BackgroundThe tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine was approved for U.S. adults in 2005 and recommended for administration in every pregnancy in 2012, with optimal timing between 27 and 36 weeks’ gestation. In the military, however, a current Tdap vaccination status is compulsory for service, and active duty women may be inadvertently exposed in early pregnancy. Safety data in this population are limited.ObjectivesTo assess safety of inadvertent (0–13 weeks’ gestation) and recommended (27–36 weeks’ gestation) exposure to the Tdap vaccine in pregnancy.MethodsPregnancies and live births from Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research program data were linked with military personnel immunization records to determine pregnancy Tdap vaccine exposure among active duty women, 2006–2014. Multivariable Cox and generalized linear regression models estimated associations between Tdap vaccine exposure and adverse pregnancy or infant outcomes.ResultsOf 145,883 pregnancies, 1272 were exposed to the Tdap vaccine in the first trimester and 9438 between 27 and 36 weeks’ gestation. Neither inadvertent nor recommended vaccine exposure were associated with spontaneous abortion, preeclampsia, or preterm labor. Among 117,724 live born infants, 984 were exposed to the Tdap vaccine in the first trimester and 9352 between 27 and 36 weeks’ gestation. First trimester exposure was not associated with birth defects, growth problems in utero, growth problems in infancy, preterm birth, or low birth weight. Tdap vaccine exposure between 27 and 36 weeks’ gestation was not associated with any adverse infant outcome.ConclusionsAmong a population of active duty women in the U.S. military who received the Tdap vaccine during pregnancy, we detected no increased risks for adverse maternal, fetal, or infant outcomes. Our findings corroborate existing literature on the safety of exposure to the Tdap vaccine in pregnancy.     

Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes Among Deaf and Hard of Hearing Women: Results From Nationally Representative Data

BackgroundAlthough the literature suggests that women with disabilities are at increased risk for pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes, there are few population-based studies of pregnancy outcomes among deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) women in the United States.ObjectiveTo compare pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes between deliveries to DHH and non-DHH women using national hospitalization discharge record data.Study DesignWe used the 2007–2016 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample to compare pregnancy complications and outcomes among deliveries to DHH women with deliveries to non-DHH women using bivariate and Poisson regressions, controlling for sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics.ResultsDHH women had an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and chronic medical conditions, including preexisting diabetes (relative risk [RR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.68–2.42; p < .001), gestational diabetes (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.19–1.44; p < .001), chronic hypertension (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.33–1.72; p < .001), preeclampsia and eclampsia (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.21–1.51; p < .01), placenta previa (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.22–2.16; p < .01), placental abruption (RR, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.78; p < .01), labor induction (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05–1.27; p < .01), chorioamnionitis (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22–1.69; p < .001), cesarean delivery (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04–1.14; p < .001), premature rupture of membranes (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.20–1.50; p < .001), antepartum hemorrhage (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13–1.64; p < .001), and postpartum hemorrhage (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13–1.49; p < .001). After adjustment for socioeconomic and hospital characteristics, the risk for gestational diabetes, preeclampsia and eclampsia, placenta previa, and chorioamnionitis remained unexplained.ConclusionsDHH women are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy, fetal, and neonatal outcomes, illuminating the need for awareness among obstetric and primary care providers as well as the need for systematic investigation of outcomes and evidence-based guidelines.     

Maternal pertussis and influenza immunization coverage and attitude of health care workers towards these recommendations in Flanders,Belgium

In Belgium, pertussis vaccination is recommended for all pregnant women in every pregnancy. Adults in close contact with young infants are equally advised to receive a pertussis containing booster dose. Maternal influenza vaccination is likewise recommended in Belgium in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, within the influenza season.A quantitative multicenter survey study has been performed between October 2014 and May 2015 in both postpartum women (N = 823, response rate = 89.2%) and health care workers (HCWs) (N = 261) to assess the coverage of both vaccines during pregnancy along with the coverage of the pertussis cocoon strategy, and to evaluate the knowledge and recommending attitude of HCWs towards the maternal vaccination strategies and the cocoon strategy among surveyed women and HCWs.Overall coverage of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy was 64.0%. Most women were vaccinated by their general practitioner (GP) (82.4%), and most often in the third trimester (74.0%) of pregnancy. Overall coverage of influenza vaccination during pregnancy was 45.0%. Again the GP administered most vaccines (67.6%); vaccines were equally administered in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Educational level had a significant influence on both the pertussis and influenza vaccination coverage during pregnancy while working situation and parity had only an influence on the maternal pertussis vaccination coverage and country of birth only on the maternal influenza vaccination coverage.Overall, 78.4% of gynecologists and GPs recommends both maternal pertussis and influenza vaccination and 67.0% recommends both maternal vaccination strategies and the cocoon strategy. Within the group of the midwives, only 23.7% recommends both maternal pertussis and influenza vaccination and 10.5% recommends both maternal vaccination strategies and the cocoon strategy.High coverage is reached among pregnant women for pertussis and influenza vaccination. Several underserved populations of pregnant women regarding maternal immunization, are identified.