Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by lay rescuers for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to non-cardiac aetiologies

Objective

Bystander CPR improves survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). For adult sudden collapse, bystander chest compression-only CPR (COCPR) is recommended in some circumstances by the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council. However, adults who arrest from non-cardiac causes may also receive COCPR. Because rescue breathing may be more important for individuals suffering OHCA secondary to non-cardiac causes, COCPR is not recommended for these cases. We evaluated the relationship of lay rescuer COCPR and survival after OHCA from non-cardiac causes.

Methods

Analysis of a statewide Utstein-style registry of adult OHCA, during a large scale campaign endorsing COCPR for OHCA from presumed cardiac cause. The relationship between lay rescuer CPR (both conventional CPR and COCPR) and survival to hospital discharge was evaluated.

Results

Presumed non-cardiac aetiologies of OHCA accounted for 15% of all cases, and lay rescuer CPR was provided in 29% of these cases. Survival to hospital discharge occurred in 3.8% after conventional CPR, 2.7% after COCPR, and 4.0% after no CPR (p = 0.85). The proportion of patients receiving COCPR was much lower in the cohort of OHCA from respiratory causes (8.3%) than for those with presumed cardiac OHCA (18.0%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In the setting of a campaign endorsing lay rescuer COCPR for cardiac OHCA, bystanders were less likely to perform COCPR on OHCA victims who might benefit from rescue breathing.     

Do dispatcher instructions facilitate bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and improve outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A comparison of family and non-family bystanders

Objectives

Bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been reported to increase the possibility of survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA). We evaluated the effects of CPR instructions by emergency medical dispatchers on the frequency of bystander CPR and outcomes, and whether these effects differed between family and non-family bystanders.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study, using Utstein-style records of OHCA taken in a rural area of Japan between January 2004 and December 2009.

Results

Of the 559 patients with non-traumatic OHCA witnessed by laypeople, 231 (41.3%) were given bystander CPR. More OHCA patients received resuscitation when the OHCA was witnessed by non-family bystanders than when it was witnessed by family members (61.4% vs. 34.2%). The patients with non-family-witnessed OHCA were more likely to be given conventional CPR (chest compression plus rescue breathing) or defibrillation with an AED than were those with family-witnessed OHCA. Dispatcher instructions significantly increased the provision of bystander CPR regardless of who the witnesses were. Neurologically favorable survival was increased by CPR in non-family-witnessed, but not in family-witnessed, OHCA patients. No difference in survival rate was observed between the cases provided with dispatcher instructions and those not provided with the instructions.

Conclusions

Dispatcher instructions increased the frequency of bystander CPR, but did not improve the rate of neurologically favorable survival in patients with witnessed OHCA. Efforts to enhance the frequency and quality of resuscitation, especially by family members, are required for dispatcher-assisted CPR.     

Dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a metropolitan city: A before–after population-based study

Background

The goal of this study was to determine the effects of dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) on outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods

All EMS in a metropolitan city with a population of 10 million are dispatched by a single, centralized, and physician-supervised center. Data on patients with adult OHCA with cardiac etiology were collected from the dispatch center registry and from EMS run sheets and hospital medical record review from 2009 to 2011. A standardized DA-CPR protocol (aligned with the 2010 AHA guidelines) we implemented as an intervention in January 2011. The end points were survival to discharge, good neurological outcome, and bystander CPR rate. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to compare between intervention group (2011) and historical control group (2009–2010).

Results

Of 8.144 eligible patients, bystander CPR was performed for the patients in 5.7% (148/2600) of cases in 2009, 6.7% (190/2857) in 2010, and 12.4% (334/2686) in 2011 (p < 0.001). The survival to discharge rates was 7.1% (2009), 7.1% (2010), and 9.4% (2011) (p = 0.001). Good neurological outcomes occurred in 2.1% (2009), 2.0% (2010), and 3.6% (2011) of cases (p < 0.001). The adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for survival to discharge compared with 2009 were 1.33 (1.07–1.66) in 2011 and 1.12 (0.89–1.41) in 2010. The adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for good neurological outcomes were 1.67 (1.13–2.45) in 2011 and 1.13 (0.74–1.72) in 2010.

Conclusions

An EMS intervention using the DA-CPR protocol was associated with a significant increase in bystander CPR and an improved survival and neurologic outcome after OHCA.     

Aspects on the increase in bystander CPR in Sweden and its association with outcome

Aim

To describe changes in the proportion of bystanders performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Sweden and to study the impact of bystander CPR on ventricular fibrillation and on survival during various times.

Patients and methods

All patients who suffered from OHCA in Sweden in whom CPR was attempted and who were included in the Swedish cardiac arrest register (SCAR) between 1992 and 2005. Crew witnessed cases were excluded.

Results

In all 34,125 patients were included in the survey. Among witnessed OHCA the proportion of patients receiving bystander CPR increased from 40% in 1992 to 55% in 2005 (p < 0.0001). In non-witnessed OHCA the corresponding proportion increased from 22% to 44% (p < 0.0001). There was a significant increase in bystander CPR regardless of age, sex and place. The increase was only found when CPR was performed by lay persons (21% in 1992 to 40% in 2005; p < 0.0001). Bystander CPR was associated with an increased proportion of patients found in a shockable rhythm and a lower number of shocks to receive return of spontaneous circulation. Bystander CPR was associated with a similar increase in survival early and late in the evaluation.

Conclusion

There was a marked increase in bystander CPR in OHCA, when performed by lay persons, during the last 14 years in Sweden. Bystander CPR was associated with positive effects both on ventricular fibrillation and survival.     

Bystander-initiated CPR in an Asian metropolitan: Does the socioeconomic status matter?

Objectives

To determine the association of neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) with bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and patient outcomes of out of hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) in an Asian metropolitan area.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study in a prospectively collected cohort from the Utstein registry of adult non-traumatic OHCAs in Taipei, Taiwan. Average real estate value was assessed as the first proxy of SES. Twelve administrative districts in Taipei City were categorized into low versus high SES areas to test the association. The primary outcome was bystander-initiated CPR, and the secondary outcome was patient survival status. Factors associated with bystander-initiated CPR were adjusted for in multivariate analysis. The mean household income was assessed as the second proxy of SES to validate the association.

Results

From January 1, 2008 to December 30, 2009, 3573 OHCAs received prehospital resuscitation in the community. Among these, 617 (17.3%) cases received bystander CPR. The proportion of bystander CPR in low-SES vs. high-SES areas was 14.5% vs. 19.6% (p < 0.01). Odds ratio of receiving bystander-initiated CPR in low-SES areas was 0.72 (95% confidence interval: [0.60–0.88]) after adjusting for age, gender, witnessed status, public collapse, and OHCA unrecognized by the online dispatcher. Survival to discharge rate was significantly lower in low-SES areas vs. high-SES areas (4.3% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.01). All results above remained consistent in the analyses by mean household income.

Conclusions

Patients who experienced an OHCA in low-SES areas were less likely to receive bystander-initiated CPR, and demonstrated worse survival outcomes.     

Cardiac arrest due to drowning—Changes over time and factors of importance for survival

Aim

To evaluate changes in characteristics and survival over time in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to drowning and describe factors of importance for survival.

Method

Retrospectively reported and treated drowning cases reported to the Swedish OHCA registry between 1990 and 2012, n = 529. The data were clustered into three seven-year intervals for comparisons of changes over time.

Results

There were no changes in age, gender, witnessed status, shockable rhythm or place of OHCA during the time periods. Bystander CPR increased over time, 59% in interval 1992–1998, versus 74% in interval 2006–2012 (p = 0.005). There was a decrease in delay between OHCA and calling for the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) over the years, while calling for the EMS to arrival increased in terms of time. Survival to hospital admission appears to have increased over the years (p = 0.009), whereas survival to one month did not change significantly over time. In a multivariate analysis, witnessed status, female gender, bystander CPR, place–home and EMS response time were associated with survival to hospital admission. For survival to one month, place, age, shockable rhythm and logarithmised delay from calling for an ambulance to arrival were of significance for survival.

Conclusion

In OHCA due to drowning, over a period of 20 years, bystanders have called for help at an earlier stage and administered CPR more frequently in the past few years. Survival to hospital admission has increased, while shockable rhythm and early arrival of the EMS appear to be the most important factors for survival to one month.     

Implementation of the ALERT algorithm,a new dispatcher-assisted telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocol,in non-Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS) Emergency Medical Services centres

Objectives

Early bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a key factor in improving survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The ALERT (Algorithme Liégeois d’Encadrement à la Réanimation par Téléphone) algorithm has the potential to help bystanders initiate CPR. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the implementation of this protocol in a non-Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System area.

Methods

We designed a before and after study based on a 3-month retrospective assessment of victims of OHCA in 2009, before the implementation of the ALERT protocol in Liege emergency medical communication centre (EMCC), and the prospective evaluation of the same 3 months in 2011, immediately after the implementation.

Results

At the moment of the call, dispatchers were able to identify 233 OHCA in the first period and 235 in the second. Victims were predominantly male (59%, both periods), with mean ages of 64.1 and 63.9 years, respectively. In 2009, only 9.9% victims benefited from bystander CPR, this increased to 22.5% in 2011 (p < 0.0002). The main reasons for protocol under-utilisation were: assistance not offered by the dispatcher (42.3%), caller physically remote from the victim (20.6%). Median time from call to first compression, defined here as no flow time, was 253 s in 2009 and 168 s in 2011 (NS). Ten victims were admitted to hospital after ROSC in 2009 and 13 in 2011 (p = 0.09).

Conclusion

From the beginning and despite its under-utilisation, the ALERT protocol significantly improved the number of patients in whom bystander CPR was attempted.     

Extracorporeal life support associated with hypothermia and normoxemia in refractory cardiac arrest

Aim

We describe a 1-year experience with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for in-hospital (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) associated with intra-arrest hypothermia and normoxemia.

Methods

Since January 1st 2012, ECPR has been applied in our hospital to all patients less than 65 years of age and without major co-morbidities who develop refractory cardiac arrest (CA) with bystander CPR. Over a 1-year period of observation, we recorded 28-day survival with intact neurological outcome and the rate of organ donation.

Results

During the observational period, 24 patients were treated with ECPR, with a median age of 48 years. Ten patients had IHCA. Acute coronary syndrome and/or major arrhythmias were the main cause of arrest. Intra-arrest cooling was used in 17 patients; temperature on ECMO initiation in these patients was 32.9 °C [32–34]. The time from collapse to ECPR was 58 min [45–70] and was shorter in survivors than in non-survivors (41 min [39–58] vs. 60 min [55–77], p = 0.059). Non-survivors were more likely to have coagulopathy and received more blood transfusions. Six patients (25%) survived with good neurological outcome at day 28. Four patients with irreversible brain damage had organ function suitable for donation.

Conclusion

ECPR provided satisfactory survival rates with good neurologic recovery in refractory CA for both IHCA and OHCA. ECMO may help rapidly stabilise systemic haemodynamic status and restore organ function.     

Chest compression depth and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Aim

Outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may improve if rescuers perform chest compressions (CCs) deeper than the previous recommendation of 38–51 mm and consistent with the 2010 AHA Guideline recommendation of at least 51 mm. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between CC depth and OHCA survival.

Methods

Prospective analysis of CC depth and outcomes in consecutive adult OHCA of presumed cardiac etiology from two EMS agencies participating in comprehensive CPR quality improvement initiatives. Analysis: Multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for survival to hospital discharge and favorable functional outcome.

Results

Among 593 OHCAs, 136 patients (22.9%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation, 63 patients (10.6%) survived and 50 had favorable functional outcome (8.4%). Mean CC depth was 49.8 ± 11.0 mm and mean CC rate was 113.9 ± 18.1 CC min⁻¹. Mean depth was significantly deeper in survivors (53.6 mm, 95% CI: 50.5–56.7) than non-survivors (48.8 mm, 95% CI: 47.6–50.0). Each 5 mm increase in mean CC depth significantly increased the odds of survival and survival with favorable functional outcome: aORs were 1.29 (95% CI 1.00–1.65) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.00–1.70) respectively.

Conclusion

Deeper chest compressions were associated with improved survival and functional outcome following OHCA. Our results suggest that adhering to the 2010 AHA Guideline-recommended depth of at least 51 mm could improve outcomes for victims of OHCA.     

The impact of partial resuscitation attempts on the reported outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Victoria,Australia: Implications for Utstein-style outcome reports

Background

Success rates from cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are often quantified by Utstein-style outcome reports in populations who receive an attempted resuscitation. In some cases, evidence of futility is ascertained after a partial resuscitation attempt has been administered, and these cases reduce the overall effectiveness of CPR. We examine the impact of partial resuscitation attempts on the reported outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Victoria, Australia.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2012, 34,849 adult OHCA cases of presumed cardiac aetiology were included from the Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry. Resuscitation attempts lasting ≤10 min in cases which died on scene were defined as a partial resuscitation. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with a partial resuscitation attempt in the emergency medical service (EMS) treated population. Survival outcomes with and without partial resuscitations were compared across included years.

Results

The proportion of partial resuscitations in the overall EMS treated population increased significantly from 8.6% in 2002 to 18.8% in 2012 (p for trend < 0.001), and were largely supported by documented evidence of irreversible death. Partial resuscitations were independently associated with older age, female gender, initial non-shockable rhythm, prolonged downtime, and lower skill level of EMS personnel. Selectively excluding partial resuscitations increased event survival by 7.6% (95% CI 4.1–11.2%), and survival to hospital discharge increased by 3.1% (95% CI 0.5–5.7%) in 2012 (p < 0.001 for both).

Conclusion

In our EMS system, evidence of futility was often identified after the commencement of a partial resuscitation attempt. Excluding these events from OHCA outcome reports may better reflect the overall effectiveness of CPR.     

Compressions during defibrillator charging shortens shock pause duration and improves chest compression fraction during shockable out of hospital cardiac arrest

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated significant relationships between shock pause duration and survival to hospital discharge from shockable out-of hospital (OHCA) cardiac arrest. Compressions during defibrillator charging (CDC) has been proposed as a technique to shorten shock pause duration.

Objective

We sought to determine the impact of CDC on shock pause duration and CPR quality measures in shockable OHCA.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all treated adult OHCA occurring over a 1 year period beginning August 1, 2011 after training EMS agencies in CDC. We included OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm, available CPR process data and shock pause data for up to the first three shocks of the resuscitation. CDC by EMS personnel was confirmed by review of impedance channel measures. We evaluated the relationship between CDC and shock pause duration as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures investigated the association between CDC and CPR quality measures.

Results

Among 747 treated OHCA 149 (23.4%) presented in a shockable rhythm of which 129 (81.6%) met study inclusion criteria. Seventy (54.2%) received CDC. There was no significant difference between the CDC and no CDC group with respect to Utstein variables. Median pre-shock pause (15.0 vs. 3.5 s; Δ 11.5; 95% CI: 6.81, 16.19), post-shock pause (4.0 vs. 3.0 s; Δ 1.0; 95% CI: −2.57, 4.57), and peri-shock pause (21.0 vs. 9.0 s; Δ 12.0; 95% CI: 5.03, 18.97) were all lower for those who received CDC. Mean chest compression fraction was significantly greater (0.77 vs. 0.70, Δ 0.07; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.11) with CDC. No significant difference was noted in compression rate or depth with CDC. Clinical outcomes did not differ between the two approaches (return of spontaneous circulation 62.7% vs. 62.9% p = 0.98, survival 25.4% vs. 27.1% p = 0.82), although the study was not powered to detect clinical outcome differences.

Conclusions

Compressions during defibrillator charging may shorten shock pause duration and improves chest compression fraction in shockable OHCA. Given the impact on shock pause duration, further study with a larger sample size is required to determine the impact of this technique on clinical outcomes from shockable OHCA.     

Association between angiographic culprit lesion and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

Background

Factors related to the occurrence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are still poorly understood. The current study sought to compare STEMI patients presenting with and without OHCA to identify angiographic factors related to OHCA.

Methods

This multicenter registry consisted of consecutive STEMI patients, including OHCA patients with return-of-spontaneous circulation. Patients were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and therapeutic hypothermia when indicated. Outcome consisted of in-hospital neurological recovery, scored using the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scale, and 1-year survival. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with OHCA and survival was displayed with Kaplan–Meier curves and compared using log rank tests.

Results

In total, 224 patients presented with OHCA and 3259 without OHCA. Average age was 63.3 years and 75% of patients were male. OHCA occurred prior to ambulance arrival in 68% of patients and 48% required intubation. Culprit lesion was associated with OHCA: risk was highest for proximal left coronary lesions and lowest for right coronary lesions. Also, culprit lesion determined the risk of cardiogenic shock and sub-optimal reperfusion after PCI, which were strongly related to survival after OHCA. Neurological recovery was acceptable (CPC ≤ 2) in 77.1% of OHCA patients and did not differ between culprit lesions.

Conclusions

In the present STEMI population, coronary culprit lesion was associated with the occurrence of OHCA. Moreover, culprit lesion influenced the risk of cardiogenic shock and success of reperfusion, both of which were related to prognosis of OHCA patients.     

A 5-year experience with cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal life support in non-postcardiotomy patients with cardiac arrest

Background

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using extracorporeal life support (ECLS) system has been successfully used to support patients with in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA, OHCA) when conventional measures have failed. The purpose of the current study is to report on our experience with extracorporeal CPR in non-postcardiotomy patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed a total of 85 consecutive adult patients, who have been treated with ECLS between January 2007 and January 2012.

Results

The mean CPR duration was 40 min (20–70 min). The mean ECLS support duration was 49 h (12–92 h). Twenty-eight patients (33%) had ECLS related complications. Forty patients (47%) were successfully weaned and 29 patients (34%) survived to hospital discharge. Among survivors, 93% were without severe neurologic deficit. Duration of CPR was shorter for survivors than for non-survivors [(25: 20–50 min) vs. (50: 25–86 min); p = 0.003]. Immediately after ECLS start, the mean blood lactate level was lower (p = 0.003), and the mean pH value was higher in the survivors’ group (p < 0.0001) compared to the non-survivors’ group. The CPR duration for the IHCA group (25: 20–50 min) was shorter compared to the OHCA group (70: 55–110 min; p < 0.0001). The survival rate in this group was higher compared to the OHCA group (42% vs. 15%; p < 0.02).

Conclusions

CPR using modern miniaturized ECLS systems should be established in the treatment of prolonged cardiac arrest and unsuccessful conventional CPR in selected patients. CPR with ECLS for OHCA has worse outcomes compared to IHCA. Duration of CPR was independent risk factor for mortality after extracorporeal CPR.     

Persisting effect of community approaches to resuscitation

Background

On the Danish island of Bornholm an intervention was carried out during 2008–2010 aiming at increasing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. The intervention included mass media focus on resuscitation and widespread educational activities. The aim of this study was to compare the bystander BLS rate and survival after OHCA on Bornholm in a 3-year follow-up period after the intervention took place.

Methods

Data on OHCA on Bornholm were collected from September 28th, 2010 to September 27th, 2013 and compared to data from the intervention period, September 28th, 2008 to September 27th, 2010.

Results

The bystander BLS rate for non-EMS witnessed OHCAs with presumed cardiac aetiology was significantly higher in the follow-up period (70% [95% CI 61–77] vs. 47% [95% CI 37–57], p = 0.001). AEDs were deployed in 22 (18%) cases in the follow-up period and a shock was provided in 13 cases. There was no significant change in all-rhythm 30-day survival for non-EMS witnessed OHCAs with presumed cardiac aetiology (6.7% [95% CI 3–13] in the follow-up period; vs. 4.6% [95% CI 1–12], p = 0.76).

Conclusion

In a 3-year follow-up period after an intervention engaging laypersons in resuscitation through mass education in BLS combined with a media focus on resuscitation, we observed a persistent significant increase in the bystander BLS rate for all OHCAs with presumed cardiac aetiology. There was no significant difference in 30-day survival.     

Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Beijing,China

Aim

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) in Beijing, China.

Methods

In this prospective study, data were collected according to the Utstein style on all cases of OHCA that occurred between January and December 2012 in urban areas covered by Beijing Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The cases were followed-up for 1 year.

Results

Out of the 9897 OHCAs recorded, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated in 2421 patients (24.4%). Among the CPR-receivers (n = 2421), 1804 patients (74.5%) had collapsed at home, while 375 patients (15.5%) at a public place. The average time interval from call to EMS arrival at the collapse location was 16 min (range, 4–43 min). Of the 1693 OHCA cases with cardiac aetiology, 1246 cases (73.6%) were witnessed, and basic CPR was performed by bystanders before arrival of the EMS personnel in 193 patients (11.4%). Of the OHCAs with cardiac aetiology, 1054 patients (62.3%) had asystole, 131 patients (7.7%) had shockable rhythms, restoration of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 85 patients (5.0%), 71 patients (4.2%) were admitted to the hospital alive, and of the 22 patients (1.3%) who were discharged alive, 17 patients (1%) had good neurological outcomes. At 1 year post-OHCA, 17 patients were alive.

Conclusion

In the urban areas of Beijing with EMS services, survival rate after OHCA was unsatisfactory. Improvements are required in every link of the ‘chain of survival’.     

Long-term prognosis after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with/without ST elevation myocardial infarction

Aim

To describe the 3-year survival of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) taking into account the presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and evaluating prognostic factors associated with pre-hospital and hospital care.

Patient group

Over a period of 29 months and with the aid of a questionnaire supplied to 24 rescue stations, we prospectively included 560 individuals (415 men; aged 16–97 years, median 68) for whom cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for OHCA of confirmed cardiac etiology was attempted.

Results

Of 149 hospitalized individuals, 28.2% survived 1 year and 25.5% survived 3 years after OHCA. In the subgroup of patients with STEMI (26 individuals; 17.5%), 57.7% survived 1 year and 53.9% survived 3 years. In the subgroup of patients without STEMI (n = 123), 22% survived 1 year and 19.5% survived 3 years. The strongest predictors for long-term survival by logistic regression analysis were: age under 70 years, ventricular fibrillation as initial rhythm, CPR without atropine, and STEMI. OHCA occurrence at a public place was an indicator of better survival in the subgroup with STEMI. In the subgroup of patients without STEMI, long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment, CPR without atropine, a Glasgow Coma Scale upon hospital admission over 3, no presence of cardiogenic shock, and no manifestations of postanoxic encephalopathy (Fisher's exact test, χ² test) were indicators of better survival.

Conclusion

Among 560 individuals with “primary cardiac” etiology OHCA and initiation of professional CPR, 8% survived 1 year and 7% survived 3 years. A higher survival rate among patients with STEMI was documented.     

Improved outcome of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest – A comparison with that for extracorporeal rescue for in-hospital cardiac arrest

Purpose

The aim was to investigate the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and compare the results with those of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).

Methods

We analyzed our extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) results for patients who received ECPR for OHCA or IHCA in the last 5 years. Pre-arrest, resuscitation, and post-resuscitative data were evaluated.

Results

In the last 5 years, ECPR was used 230 times for OHCA (n = 31) and IHCA (n = 199). The basic demographic data showed significant differences in age, cardiomyopathy, and location of the initial CPR. Duration of ischemia was shorter in the IHCA group (44.4 ± 24.7 min vs. 67.5 ± 30.6 min, p < 0.05). About 50% of each group underwent a further intervention to treat the underlying etiology. ECMO was maintained for a shorter duration in the OHCA patients (61 ± 48 h vs. 94 ± 122 h, p < 0.05). Survival to discharge was similar in the two groups (38.7% for OHCA vs. 31.2% for IHCA, p > 0.05), as was the favorable outcome rate (25.5% for OHCA vs. 25.1% for IHCA, p > 0.05). Survival was acceptable (about 33%) in both groups when the duration of ischemia was no longer than 75 min.

Conclusions

In addition to having a beneficial effect in IHCA, ECPR can lead to survival and a positive neurological outcome in selected OHCA patients after prolonged resuscitation. Our results suggest that further investigation of the use of ECMO in OHCA is warranted.     

Treatment of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus an impedance threshold device

Background

A recent out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) clinical trial showed improved survival to hospital discharge (HD) with favorable neurologic function for patients with cardiac arrest of cardiac origin treated with active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus an impedance threshold device (ACD + ICD) versus standard (S) CPR. The current analysis examined whether treatment with ACD + ITD is more effective than standard (S-CPR) for all cardiac arrests of non-traumatic origin, regardless of the etiology.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized, prospective, multicenter, intention-to-treat, OHCA clinical trial. Adults with presumed non-traumatic cardiac arrest were enrolled and followed for one year post arrest. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge (HD) with favorable neurologic function (Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 3).

Results

Between October 2005 and July 2009, 2738 patients were enrolled (S-CPR = 1335; ACD + ITD = 1403). Survival to HD with favorable neurologic function was greater with ACD + ITD compared with S-CPR: 7.9% versus 5.7%, (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.04, 1.95, p = 0.027). One-year survival was also greater: 7.9% versus 5.7%, (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04, 1.96, p = 0.026). Nearly all survivors in both groups had returned to their baseline neurological function by one year. Major adverse event rates were similar between groups.

Conclusions

Treatment of out-of-hospital non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients with ACD + ITD resulted in a significant increase in survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurological function when compared with S-CPR. A significant increase survival rates was observed up to one year after arrest in subjects treated with ACD + ITD, regardless of the etiology of the cardiac arrest.     

Use of automated external defibrillators in patients with traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background

Because out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) due to a major trauma rarely present with shockable rhythms, the potential benefits of using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) at the scene of traumatic OHCAs have not been examined.

Methods

We conducted an observational, retrospective cohort study using an Utstein-style analysis in Tainan city, Taiwan. The enrollees were adult patients with traumatic OHCAs accessed by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2010. The exposure was the use or non-use of AEDs at the scene, as determined by the clinical judgment of the EMTs. The primary outcome evaluated was a sustained (≥2 h) return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and the secondary outcomes were prehospital ROSC, overall ROSC, survival to hospital admission, survival at one month and favorable neurologic status at one month.

Results

A total of 424 patients (313 males) were enrolled, of whom 280 had AEDs applied, and 144 did not. Only 25 (5.9%) patients had received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and merely 21 (7.5%) patients in the AED group presented with shockable rhythms. Compared to the non-AED group, the primary and secondary outcomes of the AED group were not significantly different, except for a significantly lower prehospital ROSC rate (1.1% vs 4.9%, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed no significant interactions between the use of AEDs and other key variables. Use of the AED was not associated with sustained ROSC (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.75–2.38, p = 0.33).

Conclusions

In a community with a low prevalence of shockable rhythms and administration of bystander CPR in patients with traumatic OHCA, we found no significant differences in the sustained ROSC between the AED and the non-AED groups. Considering scene safety and the possible interruption of CPR, we do not encourage the routine use of AEDs at the scene of traumatic OHCAs.