Effect of shoulder pain on shoulder kinematics during weight-bearing tasks in persons with spinal cord injury

Nawoczenski DA, Riek LM, Greco L, Staiti K, Ludewig PM. Effect of shoulder pain on shoulder kinematics during weight-bearing tasks in persons with spinal cord injury.ObjectiveTo assess 3-dimensional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics between subjects with spinal cord injury and disease (SCI/D) with and without shoulder pain during a weight-relief raise and transfer task.DesignCase-control, repeated-measures analysis of variance.SettingMovement analysis laboratory.ParticipantsSubjects (N=43; 23 with clinical signs of impingement and 20 without) between 21 and 65 years of age, at least 1 year after SCI/D (range, 1–43y) resulting in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale T2 motor neurologic level or below, and requiring the full-time use of a manual wheelchair.InterventionsWeight-relief raises and transfer tasks.Main Outcome MeasuresAn electromagnetic tracking system acquired 3-dimensional position and orientation of the thorax, scapula, and humerus. Dependent variables included angular values for scapular upward and downward rotation, posterior and anterior tilt, and internal and external rotation relative to the thorax, and glenohumeral internal and external rotation relative to the scapula. The mean of 3 trials was collected, and angular values were compared at 3 distinct phases of the weight-relief raise and transfer activity. Comparisons were also made between transfer direction (lead vs trail arm) and across groups.ResultsKey findings include significantly increased scapular upward rotation for the pain group during transfer (P=.03). Significant group differences were found for the trailing arm at the lift pivot (phase 2) of the transfer, with the pain group having greater anterior tilt (mean difference ± SE, 5.7°±2.8°). The direction of transfer also influenced kinematics at the different phases of the activity.ConclusionsPotentially detrimental magnitude and direction of scapular and glenohumeral kinematics during weight-bearing tasks may pose increased risk for shoulder pain or injury in persons with SCI/D. Consideration should be given to rehabilitation strategies that promote favorable scapular kinematics and glenohumeral external rotation.     

Comparison of scapular kinematics between elevation and lowering of the arm in the scapular plane

Objective. To compare scapular orientation during both the concentric (elevation) and eccentric (lowering) phases of scapular plane abduction in subjects with and without shoulder impingement.

Design. Mixed model analysis of variance with one between-subjects factor (group) and within-subjects factors of phase, humeral angle, and trial.

Background. Abnormal scapular kinematics have been identified in shoulder impingement patients during the concentric phase of arm elevation, and under static conditions. Because abnormal scapular motion is observed clinically during the eccentric phase of arm elevation, analysis of this phase of motion is warranted.

Methods. Twenty-six symptomatic and 26 healthy subjects performed five repetitions of humeral scapular plane abduction. An electromagnetic tracking device described three-dimensional scapular kinematics during arm elevation and lowering. Angular values for scapular anterior/posterior tipping in the sagittal plane, upward/downward rotation in the scapular plane, and internal/external rotation in the transverse plane were calculated. Scapular orientation relative to the thorax at humeral angles of 40°, 60°, 80°, 100°, and 120° was statistically tested for effects of phase and trial, or for interactions of phase with group or humeral angle.

Results. Internal rotation was significantly increased in the eccentric phase for both groups at the 100° angle (P<0.05) and for the symptomatic group only at the 120° angle (P<0.05). Scapular anterior tipping was significantly decreased during the eccentric phase in both groups at the 80° (P<0.001), 100° (P<0.0001), and 120° (P<0.0001) angles.

Conclusions. Small but statistically significant differences in scapular tipping and internal rotation during the eccentric phase of arm elevation were identified at higher humeral angles in both subject groups, while no significant phase differences for scapular upward rotation or for scapular variables at lower humeral angles were found. Averaged across phases, the symptomatic group demonstrated significant reductions in upward rotation at lower humeral elevation angles, and significant increases in anterior tipping at higher elevation angles as compared to the healthy group.

Relevance Normal and abnormal scapular kinematics during varying types of motion need to be understood in order to optimally design rehabilitation programs for individuals with impingement syndrome.     

Three-dimensional scapulothoracic motion during active and passive arm elevation

BACKGROUND: Scapulothoracic muscle activity is believed to be important for normal scapulothoracic motion. In particular, the trapezius and serratus anterior muscles are believed to play an important role in the production and control of scapulothoracic motion. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different levels of muscle activity (active versus passive arm elevation) on three-dimensional scapulothoracic motion. METHODS: Twenty subjects without a history of shoulder pathology participated in this study. Three-dimensional scapulothoracic motion was determined from electromagnetic sensors attached to the scapula, thorax and humerus during active and passive arm elevation. Muscle activity was recorded from surface electrodes over the upper and lower trapezius, serratus anterior, anterior and posterior deltoid, and infraspinatus muscles. Differences in scapulothoracic motion were calculated between active and passive arm elevation conditions. FINDINGS: Scapular motion was observed during the trials of passive arm elevation; however, there was more upward rotation of the scapula, external rotation of the scapula, clavicular retraction, and clavicular elevation under the condition of active arm elevation. This was most pronounced for scapular upward rotation through the mid-range (90-120 degrees) of arm elevation. INTERPRETATION: The upper and lower trapezius and serratus anterior muscles have an important role in producing upward rotation of the scapula especially throughout the mid-range of arm elevation. Additionally, it appears that capsuloligamentous and passive muscle tension contribute to scapulothoracic motion during arm elevation. Assessment of the upper and lower trapezius and serratus anterior muscles and upward rotation of the scapula should be part of any shoulder examination.     

Effect of sitting posture on 3-dimensional scapular kinematics measured by skin-mounted electromagnetic tracking sensors

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of trunk sitting posture on scapular kinematics during humeral elevation by using skin-mounted electromagnetic tracking sensors. DESIGN: Repeated-measures design contrasting scapular kinematics in 2 different sitting postures. SETTING: A biomechanics laboratory in Hong Kong with a real-time, 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device for measuring movements of the scapula. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 16 healthy adults (12 women, 4 men; age, 21.6+/-3.92y) with full, pain-free shoulder range of motion and no history of shoulder pathology. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Movements of the scapula were measured while each subject performed humeral elevation in an upright seated position and a slouched seated position. RESULTS: In both postures, posterior tip, lateral and upward rotation of the scapula, and lateral rotation of the humerus were observed during humeral elevation. When the slouched posture was adopted, there were significant decreases in the posterior tip and lateral rotation of the scapula, but there was no significant change in the magnitude of the upward rotation of the scapula. CONCLUSION: Increased thoracic kyphosis significantly alters the kinematics of the scapula during humeral elevation.     

Quantification of shoulder tightness and associated shoulder kinematics and functional deficits in patients with stiff shoulders

Measurement of anterior/posterior shoulder tightness, humeral external/internal rotation range of motion (ROM), scapular upward rotation/tipping ROM, and functional limitations were made in 46 patients with unilateral stiff shoulders (SSs) using a clinical measurement (shoulder tightness), a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device (shoulder ROM), and self-reports of function. Patients with SSs in their dominant shoulder demonstrated statistically greater posterior shoulder tightness compared to nondominant shoulder. Control dominant shoulders demonstrated decreased internal ROM as compared with control nondominant shoulders (p=0.021). In SSs, significant relationships were found between humeral internal rotation ROM and posterior shoulder tightness (R=0.49, p<0.0005), humeral external rotation ROM and anterior shoulder tightness (R=0.59, p=0.0002), scapular tipping and anterior shoulder tightness (R=0.57, p=0.004). Specifically, in patients with dominant SSs, posterior shoulder tightness and functional limitation were related (R=0.56, p=0.002). In patients with dominant involved shoulders, emphasise on posterior tightness stretch may improve functional ability directly. In addition to stretching program in patients with SSs, internal rotation ROM of control dominant shoulder is also important to consider in the rehabilitation of patients with SSs.     

Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment of patients with impingement symptoms commonly includes exercises intended to restore "normal" movement patterns. Evidence that indicates the existence of abnormal patterns in people with shoulder pain is limited. The purpose of this investigation was to analyze glenohumeral and scapulothoracic kinematics and associated scapulothoracic muscle activity in a group of subjects with symptoms of shoulder impingement relative to a group of subjects without symptoms of shoulder impingement matched for occupational exposure to overhead work. SUBJECTS: Fifty-two subjects were recruited from a population of construction workers with routine exposure to overhead work. METHODS: Surface electromyographic data were collected from the upper and lower parts of the trapezius muscle and from the serratus anterior muscle. Electromagnetic sensors simultaneously tracked 3-dimensional motion of the trunk, scapula, and humerus during humeral elevation in the scapular plane in 3 handheld load conditions: (1) no load, (2) 2. 3-kg load, and (3) 4.6-kg load. An analysis of variance model was used to test for group and load effects for 3 phases of motion (31(-60(, 61(-90(, and 91(-120(). RESULTS: Relative to the group without impingement, the group with impingement showed decreased scapular upward rotation at the end of the first of the 3 phases of interest, increased anterior tipping at the end of the third phase of interest, and increased scapular medial rotation under the load conditions. At the same time, upper and lower trapezius muscle electromyographic activity increased in the group with impingement as compared with the group without impingement in the final 2 phases, although the upper trapezius muscle changes were apparent only during the 4.6-kg load condition. The serratus anterior muscle demonstrated decreased activity in the group with impingement across all loads and phases. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Scapular tipping (rotation about a medial to lateral axis) and serratus anterior muscle function are important to consider in the rehabilitation of patients with symptoms of shoulder impingement related to occupational exposure to overhead work. [Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement.     

Kinematic alterations in the ipsilateral shoulder of patients with hemiplegia due to stroke

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the assumption that shoulder kinematic patterns of the ipsilateral, nonparetic shoulder in hemiplegia are similar to kinematics recorded in a healthy population. DESIGN: Case control study of a convenience sample of ten patients with hemiplegia due to stroke in the subacute phase compared with a control group of similar age. Three-dimensional positions of the scapula and humerus were measured and expressed in Euler angles as a function of active arm elevation in the frontal and sagittal plane and during passive humeral internal/external rotation at an elevation angle of 90 degrees in the frontal and sagittal plane. RESULTS: Compared with controls, in the ipsilateral shoulder of patients, we found both a statistically significant diminished scapular protraction during elevation in the sagittal plane (35 +/- 5 vs. 51 +/- 8 degrees at 110 degrees of humeral elevation) and humeral external rotation during arm elevation in the frontal plane (51 +/- 7 vs. 69 +/- 14 degrees at 110 degrees of humeral elevation). Maximal passive humeral external rotation was found to be impaired in the frontal (64 +/- 13 vs. 98 +/- 14 degrees) and sagittal planes (65 +/- 11 vs. 94 +/- 12 degrees). In addition, there was significantly diminished anterior spinal tilt during humeral internal rotation (-5 +/- 10 vs. -20 +/- 9 degrees) and diminished posterior spinal tilt during external rotation in the frontal plane (-14 +/- 8 vs. -3 +/- 6 degrees). Maximal thoracohumeral elevation in patients was significantly impaired (126 +/- 12 vs. 138 +/- 8 degrees). CONCLUSION: Clear kinematic changes in the ipsilateral shoulder in patients with hemiplegia were found, indicating underlying alterations in muscle contraction patterns. The cause remains speculative. These results suggest that the ipsilateral shoulder should not be considered to function normally beforehand.     

Scapular kinematics during humeral elevation in adults and children

BACKGROUND: Appropriate motion of the scapula is important for dynamic positioning of the glenoid during humeral elevation. A number of studies have described the typical scapular kinematics during humeral elevation in adults. However, children and adults may have differences in scapulothoracic musculature and scapular osteology. To our knowledge, no study has been performed examining scapular kinematics in children with either typical or atypical development. Consequently in children the influence of age and development on scapular motion is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the kinematic patterns of the scapula during humeral elevation in children with typical development and healthy adults. METHODS: Fifteen adults, 7 females, 25-37 years of age, and 14 children, 8 females, 4-9 years of age, participated in this study. Kinematic data were collected using a magnetic tracking device. Subjects were asked to elevate their arm in the scapular plane (40 degrees anterior to the frontal plane) in a sequence of three trials. FINDINGS: Significant differences were seen between the two age groups in the dependent variables. During scapular plane rotation from 25 degrees to 125 degrees , children showed greater upward rotation (43.9 degrees SD 6.39 degrees ) than adults (29.1 degrees SD 10.1 degrees ). The mean glenohumeral to scapulothoracic ratio in the scapular plane was 2.4:1 for adults, 1.3:1 for children. INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates that there are significant differences in scapular kinematic patterns between children and adults. Children have a greater contribution from the scapulothoracic joint, specifically upward rotation toward humeral elevation. From a clinical perspective, these results can be used to help determine the incorporation of stabilization and mobilization of the scapulothoracic joint during exercises for a child with impairment at the shoulder for improving shoulder function.     

The relevance of the moment arm of shoulder muscles with respect to axial rotation of the glenohumeral joint in four positions

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the efficiency of the shoulder girdle muscles during axial humeral rotation based on measurements of the moment arms. DESIGN: The instantaneous muscle moment arms of 10 shoulder muscles, including the three portions of the deltoid, the rotator cuff muscles, teres major, and the thoracohumeral muscle group, were measured during four specified glenohumeral rotations. BACKGROUND: Axial humeral rotation is a commonly performed movement during activities of daily living and is a targeted motion of shoulder rehabilitation, particularly in those protocols emphasizing rotator cuff strengthening. An understanding of the function of the movers and stabilizers of the shoulder requires such basic information of muscle moment arms. METHODS: The instantaneous moment arm values of the muscles were derived from the slope of the plot of tendon excursion versus glenohumeral joint rotation angle. Motion studied included axial rotation with the humerus elevated 90 degrees in the coronal, scapular, and sagittal planes, as well as in the neutral position with the arm at the side. RESULTS: Based on the findings, with the humerus in both neutral and elevated positions, the infraspinatus is potentially the most powerful external rotator, followed by teres minor and posterior deltoid. Subscapularis and possibly pectoralis major are the most effective internal rotators in this position. CONCLUSIONS: The moment arm in providing axial humeral rotation of 10 shoulder muscles in four planes were obtained. In general, the teres minor and infraspinatus had the largest moment arms in external rotation, and the subscapularis had the largest moment arm in internal rotation. The muscle function for axial humeral rotation was found to be modified by the plane of arm elevation. RELEVANCE: The data could be used for developing exercise programs in physical therapy.     

Stretching and strengthening exercises: their effect on three-dimensional scapular kinematics.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate the effects of commonly used shoulder exercises on shoulder kinematics and resting posture. STUDY DESIGN: A repeated-measures design was used with measurements performed before and after a 6-week exercise program. METHOD: Twenty asymptomatic subjects with forward shoulder posture were recruited. Stretching exercises for the pectoral muscles and resisted strengthening exercises for the scapular retractors and elevators and the glenohumeral abductors and external rotators were performed three times per week for 6 weeks. A three-dimensional electromechanical digitizer was used to measure thoracic inclination and scapular orientation and position. These measurements were taken with the arm (1) at the side, (2) abducted to 90 degrees, and (3) at maximal abduction. The isometric force of glenohumeral external and internal rotation and horizontal abduction and adduction were measured with a hand-held dynamometer. All subjects were tested before and after the 6-week exercise program. Hotelling's T2 and paired t tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The strength of horizontal abduction and internal and external rotation increased after exercise (p < .01). The anterior inclination of the thoracic spine decreased, and the glenohumeral contribution to arm elevation increased (p < .01). Resting scapular posture did not change. As the arm was abducted to 90 degrees, the scapula showed less upward rotation and less superior translation after the exercise program (p < .01). CONCLUSION: The exercise program improved muscle strength, produced a more erect upper trunk posture, increased scapular stability, and altered scapulohumeral rhythm.     

Effects of muscle fatigue on 3-dimensional scapular kinematics

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of fatigue during an external rotation task on 3-dimensional scapular kinematics. DESIGN: A single-group, pretest-posttest measurement design. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty healthy subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures: Three-dimensional scapular kinematics were recorded with a Polhemus magnetic tracking device during arm elevation in the scapular plane. RESULTS: There was a significant fatigue effect for all scapular rotations in the early to middle phases of humeral elevation. Significantly less posterior tilting (up to 90 degrees of elevation), external rotation (up to 120 degrees of elevation), and upward rotation (up to 60 degrees of elevation) were observed. Additionally, there were fair to good correlations (r range,.39-.60) between the changes in scapular posterior tilting and the amount of muscle fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue in shoulder external rotation altered the scapular resting position and the movement of posterior tilting in the early range during arm elevation in the scapular plane. Observed changes in scapular kinematics may affect the amount of area in the subacromial space and facilitate impingement. Data regarding changes produced by fatigue of the external rotators may also help with the development of a model of diminished rotator cuff function.     

Functional activities characteristics of shoulder complex movements: Exploration with a 3-D electromagnetic measurement system

The high prevalence of shoulder-related dysfunction has focused increased attention on functional activity assessment. This study (1) tested the reliability of three-dimensional shoulder complex movements during four functional tasks representing different levels of task difficulty, (2) characterized the four functional tasks, and (3) examined the relationships between age and shoulder movements. Twenty-five asymptomatic subjects, all veterans aged 30-82, performed the four functional tasks. Good within-session reliability was found (movement pattern: similarity index = 0.81 to 0.97, peak values: intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.88 to 0.99). The raising arm to overhead height task (hard task) placed the greatest demand on scapular motions and humeral elevation (p < 0.005). During the functional tasks, significant correlations existed between age and scapular tipping, humeral elevation, and scapular upward rotation (r = -0.62 to 0.50, p < 0.05). Correlation results indicated that elderly subjects have a greater potential for serratus anterior muscle weakness and shoulder capsule tightness.     

A Comparison of 3-D Shoulder Kinematics to Perform ADLs Between Older and Younger Adults

ABSTRACT

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the 3-D kinematics of older and younger adults during activities of daily living. Twenty-five older and 27 younger asymptomatic participants were evaluated. The MotionMonitor was used to collect humerus, scapula, and trunk kinematic data. Multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) were used to analyze kinematic differences. Significant differences between groups were found. In several comparisons, the older participants had significantly less shoulder joint complex motion than the younger participants. For feeding, the older participants had 16.3° less glenohumeral external rotation, 5.0° less scapular upward rotation, and 8.6° less scapular internal rotation. For reaching an overhead shelf, the older group had 8.1° less glenohumeral flexion, 11.8° less external rotation and 16.0° less scapular internal rotation. For hair combing, the older participants had 13.3° less glenohumeral external rotation, and 6.6° less scapular internal rotation. For washing the contralateral axilla, the older group had 7.7° less scapular internal rotation. In several other comparisons, the older group had significantly more shoulder complex motion than the younger participants. For hair combing, the older group had 14.6° more glenohumeral flexion. For washing the contralateral axilla, the older group demonstrated 7.8° more glenohumeral flexion and 13.0° more glenohumeral internal rotation. Overall, older and younger participants demonstrated significantly different shoulder joint complex kinematics. Age specific values should be considered when interacting with a patient presenting with shoulder dysfunction.     

Scapulohumeral rhythm and associated spinal motion

BACKGROUND: To investigate the coordination of humeral, scapular and thoracolumbar spine motions during a number of unilateral and bilateral upper limb movements in a range of movement conditions. METHODS: Thirty-two healthy women performed unilateral and bilateral arm elevations in three planes-sagittal, coronal and scapular. Scapular, humeral and spinal orientations were measured at 100 Hz using a multi-sensor, 6-degree-of-freedom electromagnetic tracking system. Segmental displacements were computed following International Society of Biomechanics recommendations. FINDINGS: Humeral, scapular and thoracic segments demonstrate consistent, synchronous interactions. Scapular upward rotation is significantly greater on the non-dominant side than the dominant in all planes of movement and in both unilateral and bilateral arm movement. Unilateral and bilateral arm movements produce significantly different ranges and patterns of spinal motion and ranges of scapular external rotation. There does not appear to be any effect of age, height or weight on the ranges or patterns of motion of the shoulder girdle and spine during arm elevation. INTERPRETATION: Movement of the arm into elevation, irrespective of the plane of motion, has significant implications for the shoulder girdle and the thoracic spine. Clinical assessment of the shoulder should include the thoracic spine.     

Patterns of motion loss in subjects with idiopathic loss of shoulder range of motion

BACKGROUND: Subjects with idiopathic loss of shoulder motion have difficulty sleeping, performing overhead activities, and completing activities of daily living. Treatment has been variable in approach and success. Cyriax's proposed shoulder capsular pattern was external rotation most limited followed by abduction followed by internal rotation. This investigation was performed to determine if a consistent pattern of motion loss was present in subjects with idiopathic loss of shoulder motion. METHODS: Repeated measurement of 25 (22 female) subjects' bilateral shoulder patterns of motion were compared. The three-dimensional position of the scapula and humerus throughout active shoulder abduction, external rotation, flexion, internal rotation, and scapular plane abduction was evaluated with an electromagnetic motion capture system. Patterns of motion loss were determined for both shoulders. The proportions of peak shoulder motion to mean maximum non-involved shoulders abduction, external, and internal rotation were utilized to determine the pattern of motion loss. FINDINGS: There was a significant difference in motion loss patterns between the involved and non-involved shoulders with the arm at the side. The internal rotation less than abduction less than external rotation pattern was demonstrated in 14 of 25 (56%) involved shoulders. No pattern was present in 14 of 21 (67%) non-involved shoulders. With the arm abducted, internal rotation was the most limited motion in 23 of 25 (92%) involved shoulders. INTERPRETATION: The results did not support Cyriax's proposed glenohumeral capsular pattern. Defining the pattern of motion loss in subjects with idiopathic loss of shoulder motion may assist in diagnosis and treatment.     

Three-dimensional in vivo comparative analysis of the kinematics of normal shoulders and shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears with successful conservative treatment

BackgroundThis study used in vivo three-dimensional to two-dimensional image registration techniques to compare the glenohumeral kinematics of shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears that were successfully treated conservatively and those of normal shoulders.MethodsTen patients (age, 67.4 ± 3.63 years) with massive rotator cuff tears on one side and without contralateral tears were enrolled. We performed computed tomography and fluoroscopy on both shoulder joints and created three-dimensional bone models of the humerus and scapula using image registration techniques. We measured the humeral superoinferior translation, angle of humeral external rotation, scapular upward rotation, scapular anteroposterior tilt, and scapular external rotation of the torn shoulders with good range of motion after effective conservative treatment and compared these measurements to those of the contralateral normal shoulders.FindingsThere was a significant difference in the initial position of the humeral head relative to the glenoid in the tear group; it was 2.0 mm higher than that in the normal group (p < .05). This difference disappeared in the range from 40° to full elevation. The scapular motion of the tear group was significantly more upwardly rotated than that of the normal group: by 9.9° at rest (p < .05) and by 11.6° at terminal elevation (p < .05). No significant differences were detected for humeral head external rotation, scapular anteroposterior tilt, and scapular external rotation between the two groups.InterpretationKinematics of shoulders with massive cuff tears could not be recovered completely even though the patients had no significant symptoms after successful conservative treatment.     

Concurrent validity of inclinometer measures of scapular and clavicular positions in arm elevation

Objective: To assess concurrent validity, between and within-day reliability of scapular and clavicular digital inclinometer measures. Design: Test–retest and concurrent validity. Setting: Laboratory. Participants: Twenty-three participants with and without shoulder symptoms. Main Outcome Measures: Static positions of scapular upward rotation, anterior/posterior tilting and clavicular elevation were measured between days with an inclinometer and compared to a 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking system in different positions of sagittal plane humeral elevation (neutral, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°). The two methods were compared using a two-way Analysis of Variance. Linear regressions at each arm position were also performed to further assess concurrent validity. Results: Between-day reliability demonstrated Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ≥ 0.50 for all comparisons. There were statistically significant differences between methods or interactions of method and arm position for clavicle elevation (p = 0.004, maximum offset between methods 7.7º in the neutral position), and scapular upward rotation (p = 0.001). For scapular upward rotation, the maximum difference between methods was less than 2° across all humeral positions. Clavicle elevation (r = 0.67–0.82) and scapular upward rotation (r = 0.57–0.81) demonstrated higher correlations between measurement methods than scapular anterior/posterior tilt (r = 0.10–0.67). Conclusions: Concurrent validity in assessing scapular upward rotation and clavicle elevation with an inclinometer was shown when compared with electromagnetic tracking. However, the inclinometer method may not have adequate concurrent validity to clinically measure scapular anterior/posterior tilting.