Myeloma Responses and Tolerance Following Combined Kidney and Nonmyeloablative Marrow Transplantation: In Vivo and In Vitro Analyses

Six patients with renal failure due to multiple myeloma (MM) received simultaneous kidney and bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from HLA-identical sibling donors following nonmyeloablative conditioning, including cyclophosphamide (CP), peritransplant antithymocyte globulin and thymic irradiation. Cyclosporine (CyA) was given for approximately 2 months posttransplant, followed by donor leukocyte infusions. All six patients accepted their kidney grafts long-term. Three patients lost detectable chimerism but accepted their kidney grafts off immunosuppression for 1.3 to >7 years. One such patient had strong antidonor cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses in association with marrow rejection. Two patients achieved full donor chimerism, but resumed immunosuppression to treat graft-versus-host disease. Only one patient experienced rejection following CyA withdrawal. He responded to immunosuppression, which was later successfully withdrawn. The rejection episode was associated with antidonor Th reactivity. Patients showed CTL unresponsiveness to cultured donor renal tubular epithelial cells. Initially recovering T cells were memory cells and were enriched for CD4+CD25+ cells. Three patients are in sustained complete remissions of MM, despite loss of chimerism in two. Combined kidney/BMT with nonmyeloablative conditioning can achieve renal allograft tolerance and excellent myeloma responses, even in the presence of donor marrow rejection and antidonor alloresponses in vitro.     

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Hazardous Condition Before Kidney Transplantation

Long‐term survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is over 10 years, and such patients are thus potential kidney recipients in the case of superimposed end‐stage renal disease. However, the renal and patient outcome in this condition is unknown. We report the charts of four patients with CLL who were engrafted in France with a deceased‐donor kidney and underwent routine triple immunosuppressive therapy. The results show that these patients developed severe infectious episodes (fatal in one case) and tumoral complications including rapid progression of CLL in two cases. Moreover, the graft may be infiltrated and damaged by monoclonal B cells: one patient lost his graft 14 months after transplantation. Various therapeutic options (modifications of the immunosuppressive regimen, anti‐CD20 antibodies, irradiation of the graft) showed little (if any) efficacy. Therefore, we believe that CLL is a too hazardous condition to envisage solid organ transplantation with a routine immunosuppressive regimen, and we propose a more appropriate approach.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Kidney Transplantation: Comparison with Basiliximab Induction—Long-Term Results

This study examined alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and basiliximab (anti-CD 25, Simulect) as induction immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We used a single-center, nonrandomized, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate outcomes in kidney transplant recipients given either alemtuzumab (n = 123) or basiliximab (n = 155) induction in combination with a prednisone-free maintenance protocol using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent, donor source and recipient ethnicity. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function and the etiology of infectious complications. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and basiliximab. A lower rate of early (<3 months) rejection was observed in the alemtuzumab (4.1%) versus the basiliximab (11.6%) group, but the rates for both groups were equivalent at 1 year. Patient and kidney survival and rejection rates were nearly identical between Caucasians and African Americans that received alemtuzumab. Quality of renal function and incidence of infectious complications were similar in the two groups. Alemtuzumab induction therapy was similar in efficacy to basiliximab in a prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol for an ethnically diverse population of kidney transplant recipients.     

20-Year Analysis of Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center in Japan

Background

Patient and graft survival after successful kidney transplantation (KT) have improved despite an increase in the number of challenging cases. Various factors have evolved during the long history of kidney transplantation.

Methods

Between 1988 and 2012, a total of 292 living donor and 56 deceased donor KTs were performed at Niigata University Hospital. Long-term patient and graft survival and changes in background during a 20-year period in a single center were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Excellent patient survival rates of 95.1% at 20 years for living donor KT and 96.2% at 15 years for deceased donor KT were observed. Graft survival rates at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 96.8%, 95.4%, 83.1%, 61.8%, and 56.2% in living donor KT, respectively. In contrast, graft survival rates at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years in deceased donor KT were 89.0%, 80.3%, 77.3%, and 33.8%, respectively. These survival rates have dramatically improved since 2002 (91.7% for living and 80.9% for deceased donor KT at 10 years post-transplantation). The number of elderly recipients (older than 60 years) and the percentage of grafts donated from spouses have increased. The rejection rate decreased and the cytomegalovirus antigenemia–positive rate increased during the 20-year period assessed. The percentage of pre-emptive KTs progressively increased, with graft survival in this group tending to be better than non-preemptive KTs. The causes of graft loss were chronic allograft dysfunction (54.7%), acute rejection (11.1%), and malignancies (9.4%). After living donor KT, the principal predictors of graft loss were if the recipient was younger than 30 years, if the donor was older than 50 years, and if the rejection episodes occurred after living donor KT. In contrast, the only risk factor in the case of deceased donor KT occurred after transplantation from donors who were older than 50 years.

Conclusions

A summary of the long-term outcome of KT over 20 years in a single center has been reported. Along with the changes in patient backgrounds, immunosuppressive drugs, and our knowledge of transplantation, patient and graft survival outcomes have also changed. Investigation into such outcomes during a different transplantation era is required to fully appreciate advances in KT.     

Renal transplantation for end-stage renal disease following bone marrow transplantation: A report of six cases, with and without immunosuppression

BACKGROUND. Over 12000 bone marrow transplantations (BMT) are performed in the USA each year. This procedure is associated with significant morbidity including acute and chronic renal failure (CRF). CRF after BMT is usually secondary to radiation nephropathy and,or cyclosporine (CsA) toxicity. Survival on dialysis therapy for patients with radiation nephropathy is poor and renal transplantation may be a preferable form of renal-replacement therapy. METHODS: We report our experience with renal transplantation in 6 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) following BMT: 4 as a result of radiation nephropathy; one secondary to hemolytic uremic syndrome; and 1 as a result of antitubular basement membrane nephritis. Ages at the time of BMT ranged from 26 to 40 yr. ESRD developed after a mean period of 94 months (range 42-140 months) after BMT. The kidney source was from a living donor in 5 patients, and a cadaveric donor (CAD) in 1 patient. In 3 recipients, the bone marrow and kidney were from the same donor. They are managed without any immunosuppressive therapy. The other 3 were initiated on triple therapy (prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil/azathioprine and cyclosporine/tacrolimus). RESULTS: These patients have been followed for up to 31 months (range 3-30 months) after kidney transplant, and 5 out of 6 are alive with functioning bone marrow and renal transplants. Their plasma creatinines range from 70 to 160 micromol/L (mean 97 micromol/L). One patient died following metastatic squamous cell cancer of the genital tract. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Renal transplant is a feasible alternative for patients with ESRD following BMT: 2) if bone marrow and kidney are from the same donor, the recipient requires little or no maintenance immunosuppression; 3) short-term results show good survival, but long-term follow-up is needed: 4) infections and malignancy post-renal transplantation were seen in recipients who needed immunosuppression; and 5) reduction in immunosuppression may be needed in such post-BMT patients who undergo kidney transplants.     

Emergency living related liver transplantation for fulminant reactivation of hepatitis B virus after unrelated marrow transplantation

We report a unique case of emergency living related donor orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for late fulminant reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) after matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Cessation of lamivudine after BMT for HBV positive patients may carry risks of late fatal HBV reactivation. Similar to fulminant HBV reactivation in the general population, OLT under resumption of lamivudine can be life saving. In our case, concomitantly molecular relapse of CML at the time of liver failure was also cleared by OLT, possibly via a 'liver-graft vs. leukemia' effect. Liver rejection (graft vs. graft disease) was mild due to inherent immunocompromise of the marrow graft. Hence BMT recipients in stable remission should not be denied the opportunity for life-saving solid organ transplantation. A choice of marrow and liver donors with innate HBV immunity may be needed to give the additional advantage of long-term HBV clearance.     

The Natural History of Clinical Operational Tolerance After Kidney Transplantation Through Twenty‐Seven Cases

We report here on a European cohort of 27 kidney transplant recipients displaying operational tolerance, compared to two cohorts of matched kidney transplant recipients under immunosuppression and patients who stopped immunosuppressive drugs and presented with rejection. We report that a lower proportion of operationally tolerant patients received induction therapy (52% without induction therapy vs. 78.3%[p = 0.0455] and 96.7%[p = 0.0001], respectively), a difference likely due to the higher proportion (18.5%) of HLA matched recipients in the tolerant cohort. These patients were also significantly older at the time of transplantation (p = 0.0211) and immunosuppression withdrawal (p = 0.0002) than recipients who rejected their graft after weaning. Finally, these patients were at lower risk of infectious disease. Among the 27 patients defined as operationally tolerant at the time of inclusion, 19 still display stable graft function (mean 9 ± 4 years after transplantation) whereas 30% presented slow deterioration of graft function. Six of these patients tested positive for pre‐graft anti‐HLA antibodies. Biopsy histology studies revealed an active immunologically driven mechanism for half of them, associated with DSA in the absence of C4d. This study suggests that operational tolerance can persist as a robust phenomenon, although eventual graft loss does occur in some patients, particularly in the setting of donor‐specific alloantibody.     

Induction immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: does basiliximab make the difference?

The optimal prophylactic induction immunosuppressive therapy to prevent renal transplant rejection remains controversial. Recently, basiliximab efficiency has been reported in several studies. We sought to evaluate the efficiency of induction immunosuppressive therapy with basiliximab in renal transplantation in our unit based upon the acute rejection rate, patient and graft survivals, first hospital admission length, and incidence of infectious or malignant complications during 4 years of follow-up. We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of two groups of renal transplant recipients treated with triple immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone) without (group 1, 149 patients) or with (group 2, 104 patients) induction immunosuppression with basiliximab. The two groups did not differ in demographic characteristics, number of hypersensitized patients, cold ischemia time, or donor age. The group receiving basiliximab displayed a significantly lower acute rejection rate (7.6% vs 24%, P = .001) and shorter first hospital admission (14.4 +/- 8 vs 19.5 +/- 11 days). There was no difference in graft or patient survival, death due to sepsis, or incidence of posttransplant malignancies. Although there was no difference in graft or patient survival, immunosuppressive induction therapy with basiliximab yielded a significant reduction in the acute rejection rate.     

Use of cryopreserved donor bone marrow in cadaver kidney allograft recipients

Donor-specific unresponsiveness to organ allografts remains an elusive goal in clinical transplantation, as most successful experimental protocols for the production of antigen-specific immunosuppression require lengthy recipient pretreatment. The use of an induction course of antilymphocyte serum (ALS) beginning at the time of transplantation, followed by the transfusion to the recipient of donor-specific bone marrow, has been shown in animals to induce prolonged allograft survival and is applicable for use in cadaver donor clinical transplantation. Our preliminary data in humans suggest that the transfusion of cryopreserved cadaver donor bone marrow following a short course of ALS is safe and does not induce graft-versus-host disease or allograft rejection. Twenty patients have been included in the protocol and 19 have been discharged from the hospital with functioning kidney transplants. One graft failed at 3 months. Eight patients have been withdrawn entirely from prednisone immunosuppression 3-6 months following transplantation. The contralateral kidneys from the marrow donors were transplanted into an additional 20 patients who received sequential immunosuppressive therapy without marrow transfusion. Three of these grafts have failed within 3 months due to acute rejection. Donor marrow transfusion may give rise to improved allograft and patient survival in clinical transplantation while at the same time allow for reduced requirements for nonspecific immunosuppressive agents with their undesirable side effects.     

Excellent Long-term Outcome of ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Japan

Owing to the severe shortage of cadaveric grafts in Japan, we have performed ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation since 1989. This study assessed short- and long-term outcomes in 441 patients who received ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplants between January 1989 and December 2001. We compared our results with historical data from 1055 recipients of living kidney transplantation. Overall patient survival rates 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years after ABO-incompatible transplantation were 93%, 89%, 87%, 85%, and 84%, respectively. Corresponding overall graft survival rates were 84%, 80%, 71%, 65%, and 59%. After ABO-incompatible transplantation, graft survival rates were significantly higher in patients 29 years or younger than in those 30 years or older and in patients who received anticoagulation therapy than in those who did not receive such therapy. There were no significant differences between A-incompatible and B-incompatible recipients with respect to clinical outcomes. The graft survival rate at 1 year in the historical controls was slightly but not significantly higher than that in our recipients of ABO-incompatible transplants. We conclude that long-term outcome in recipients of ABO-incompatible living kidneys is excellent. Transplantation of ABO-incompatible kidneys from living donors is a radical, but effective treatment for end-stage renal disease.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Comparison With Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction – Long-Term Results

This study compared the effects of using two T-cell depleting antibodies, alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin), as induction immunosuppression for recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation given a prednisone-free maintenance regimen. We used a single-center, nonrandomised, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab (n = 50) or antithymocyte globulin (n = 38) induction in combination with a prednisone-free, tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression protocol. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function, incidence of infectious and malignant complications, and cost considerations. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and antithymocyte globulin. Rejection rates were also nearly equivalent at 1 and 2 years. Viral infectious complications were statistically significantly lower in the alemtuzumab group. The cost of alemtuzumab induction was lower than antithymocyte globulin. Alemtuzumab induction followed by steroid-free maintenance therapy with a tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression regimen provided an effective, safe and cost-conscious approach to SPK transplantation.     

Retinoic acid may increase the risk of bone marrow transplant nephropathy

Bone marrow transplant nephropathy (BMTN) classically presents more than 100 days after transplantation as an acute nephritis with hypertension, azotaemia and anemia that usually results in end stage renal failure (ESRF). The risk of developing BMTN may be greater with the use of more intensive chemotherapy and higher total body and tumor bed irradiation. Cis-retinoic acid (RA) may further increase the risk of developing BMTN. Here, we report the cases of two children who developed typical clinical and biochemical features of BMTN. They were both treated for stage IV neuroblastoma with chemotherapy, bone marrow transplant (BMT) conditioning that included total body irradiation and RA therapy after BMT, although the patient in case 1 had established renal insufficiency prior to the commencement of RA. Renal biopsy of these children showed classical BMTN histology, and the renal manifestations progressed quickly; the patient in case 1 became dialysis dependent by 1 year post-bone marrow transplant. Recently, RA has been added to the post-BMT therapy in children with stage IV neuroblastoma. The occurrence of BMTN in two children treated with RA in our unit is unlikely to be coincidental. Although RA has been shown to confer a significant survival advantage in this disease, animal studies and a previous case report have suggested it could increase the toxic effects of chemotherapy and renal irradiation. It is likely that RA contributed to the deterioration in renal function in these patients.     

Clinical issues in renal transplantation in the elderly

Kidney transplantation is the best renal replacement therapy option and is superior to dialysis in elderly end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Furthermore, the outcome of transplantation in the elderly is comparable to younger patients in terms of allograft survival. The exact nature of this phenomenon is not completely clear. As the elderly population continues to grow, it becomes more important to identify specific issues associated with kidney transplantation. In particular, elderly transplant recipients might have a lower chance of acute rejection as their immune systems seem to be less reactive. This might predispose elderly recipients to greater risk of post‐transplant infectious complications or malignancies. Furthermore, due to differences in pharmacokinetics, elderly recipients might require lower doses of immunosuppressive medication. As the main cause of graft failure in the elderly is death with a functioning graft and also considering the scarcity of donor organs, it might make sense to recommend transplanting elderly recipients with extended criteria donor kidneys. This approach would balance shorter patient survival compared to younger recipients. In conclusion, old age should not preclude ESRD patients from kidney transplantation. However, specific differences that have to do with immunosuppression and other aspects of managing elderly transplant recipients should be considered.     

Less Maintenance Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation From the Same Living Donor

Living‐donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is one of the final options for saving patients with pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We retrospectively investigated 19 patients who had undergone LDLLT after HSCT in Japan. Eight patients underwent LDLLT after HSCT in which one of the donors was the same living donor as in HSCT (SD group), while 11 received LDLLT from relatives who were not the HSCT donors (non‐SD group). In the SD group, three patients underwent single LDLLT. The 5‐year survival rate was 100% and 58% in the SD and non‐SD groups, respectively. In the SD group, postoperative immunosuppression was significantly lower than in the non‐SD group. Two patients died of infection and one died of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in the non‐SD group, while only one patient died of PTLD 7 years after LDLLT in the SD group. Hematologic malignancy relapsed in two patients in the non‐SD group. For the three single LDLLTs in the SD group, immunosuppression was carefully tapered. In our study, LDLLT involving the same donor as for HSCT appeared to have advantages related to lower immunosuppression compared to LDLLT from relatives who were not the HSCT donors.     

Transplantation of ABO-incompatible and living unrelated donor-recipient combinations

INTRODUCTION: According to the Japanese renal transplant registry 2005, 834 transplantations were performed using living donors. Among them 199 (23.9%) kidneys were donated from spouses (husband/wife) and 174 (20.9%) from ABO-incompatible donors. This study summarized our experience of ABO-incompatible and living unrelated, especially spousal kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed 44 cases of living donor kidney transplantation (LKT) between April 2003 and July 2007, including 14 (31.8%) from spouses (unrelated donor) who were divided into two groups: six patients (group 1; G1) from ABO-incompatible donors and eight patients (group 2; G2) from ABO-compatible donors. During the induction phase, tacrolimus or cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone were used for immunosuppression. Basiliximab was administered on postoperative days 0 and 4. In all G1 patients plasmapheresis was performed to remove anti-AB antibodies prior to LKT, and splenectomy performed at the time of or before LKT. RESULTS: Among G1, no patient died. Among G2, one patient died with a functioning graft due to a traumatic subdural hematoma. Graft survival rate was 100% in both groups. The incidence of acute rejection was 33.3% and 25.0% in G1 and G2, respectively. No patient experienced a lethal infectious complication. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that transplantation from an ABO-incompatible spousal donor was equivalent to transplantation from an ABO-compatible spousal donor. In response to the shortage of deceased donors, LKT between married couples and from ABO-incompatible donors will spread in Japan.     

Impact of Bone Marrow Transplantation on Type I Diabetes

Type I diabetes is a systemic autoimmune disease. Evidence is accumulating that autoimmune diseases such as type I diabetes are linked to the bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) itself rather than its derivatives. HSC chimerism achieved through bone marrow transplantation (BMT) may affect type I diabetes in two ways: first, to induce tolerance to pancreas and islet cell transplants; and second, to reverse the autoimmune process prior to the development of terminal complications. Transplantation of bone marrow from normal donors into patients with hematologic malignancy and coexistent type I diabetes has reversed the systemic diabetic autoimmune process. Donor HSCs can also be utilized for the induction of donor-specific tolerance to islet cell transplants. Islet or whole pancreas transplantation is the most physiologic approach to treating type I diabetes. Currently, this is limited by the requirement for high-dose chronic nonspecific immunosuppression to prevent rejection. Despite these agents, chronic rejection remains the primary cause for late graft loss. Donor-specific tolerance eliminates the requirement for immunosuppression and prevents the development of chronic rejection. Bone marrow transplantation does have limitations. In particular these limitations include the morbidity associated with lethal conditioning, graft-versus-host disease, and failure of engraftment. Currently the morbidity and mortality associated with lethal conditioning could not be justified for tolerance induction or interruption of the autoimmune state in type I diabetes. The goal of current research is to identify those factors in both recipient and donor that optimize engraftment to reverse the risk/benefit ratio associated with BMT. This article reviews the state of the art for HSC chimerism affecting diabetes.     

Renal transplantation after myeloablative and non-myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation from the same donor

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is a key treatment to prolong patient survival for many hematological disorders. Renal impairment is well recognized as a significant complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation, which can progress to end-stage renal disease. Herein, we report our experience of two patients who underwent renal transplantation from the same donor who provided cells for the preceding hematopoietic cell transplantation. One patient had undergone peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen, whereas the other had received bone marrow transplantation with a myeloablative regimen. Chronic immunosuppressive therapy was not needed in either one to maintain the kidney graft function. Not only bone marrow transplantation with a myeloablative conditioning regimen, but also peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with a non-myeloablative regimen can confer immunological tolerance.     

Chimerism induction in vascularized bone marrow transplants augmented with bone marrow cells

Composite tissue allografts (CTAs) are currently accepted in the clinic; however, long-term immunosuppression is still needed for allograft survival. The presence of donor-specific chimerism may induce tolerance. Thirty-six vascularized bone marrow transplantation (VBMT) allotransplantation were performed across MHC barrier under short-term protocol of 7-day alphabeta-TCRmAb and Cyclosporin A therapy to determine the efficacy of VBMT alone and VBMT augmented with donor bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in chimerism induction. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that VBMT supported with donor BMT directly into the bone resulted in chimerism augmentation and maintenance compared to VBMT. In vivo and in vitro tolerance testing showed prolonged survival of donor skin graft up to 35 days and moderate reactivity in MLR assay that suggests only tolerance induction. Transplantation of vascularized bone without chronic immunosuppression provides a substantial source of bone marrow cells, leading to the development of stable donor-specific chimerism.     

Renal Transplantation

Summary BACKGROUND: Clinical renal transplantation has been performed successfully since 1955. With the introduction of Cyclosporin A to the market, 1982, results markedly improved, and allogeneic renal transplantation became a standard therapy in the treatment of end stage kidney failure. Life expectancy and quality of life is superior in kidney recipients in comparison with patients on dialysis. METHODS: In our center 699, renal transplantations have been performed since 1968. 98.1 % of the transplanted kidneys were from cadaveric donors, 1.9 % from living related donors. Mean age of the recipients was 30.7 ± 13.9 years from 1968 to 1983, and is now 45.9 ± 13.1 (1999 to 2002). The kidneys are normally transplanted to the common iliac vessels in end-to-side fashion. A Politano-Leadbetter antirefluxive implantation of the ureter is obligatory. RESULTS: 5-year graft survival was 19.4 % from 1968 to 1983, 74.3 % from 1984 to 1995, and 81.2 % from 1995 to 1998. Typical surgical complications are hematoma, lymphocele, ureter stenosis and ureter necrosis. The rate of necessary reoperations is 3.9 %. 5-year patient survival is 90 %. Heart disease (50 %), cancer (16 %), and sepsis (15 %) are the most frequent causes of death after renal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation continues to be the optimal treatment of terminal kidney failure. New immunosuppressive agents have improved the outcome after kidney transplantation. Enlargement of the donor pool is being attempted by the acceptance of older organs and by the acceptance of pediatric organs for adult recipients, too.     

Long-term follow-up ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation is usually contraindicated. The presence in the recipient of preformed anti-A/B antibodies located on endothelial cells raises the risk of antibody-mediated humoral rejection of the graft. We describe four successful cases of steroid withdrawal in adult patients who had living-donor liver transplantation from ABO-incompatible donors. Antirejection therapy included multiple perioperative plasmapheresis, splenectomy, and a triple immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus, methylprednisolone (MPSL), and cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The maintenance dose of immunosuppression did not differ from that of ABO-identical cases. After transplantation, intrahepatic arterial infusion therapy with prostaglandin E1 (PG E1) was used. As a result, all four patients were able to achieve long-term graft survival without steroid use. They all have good liver function and are leading normal lifestyles. Our experience with these four patients suggests the feasibility of controlling humoral rejection and other complications in adult ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantations with intrahepatic arterial infusion of PGE1, splenectomy, and plasmapheresis with a regular base of immunosuppression protocol to prevent antibody-mediated humoral rejection.