Upfront use of eculizumab to treat early acute antibody-mediated rejection after kidney allotransplantation and relevance for xenotransplantation

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) early after transplant remains a challenge, both in allotransplantation and in xenotransplantation. We report the case of an early and severe acute AMR episode in a kidney transplant recipient that was successfully treated with upfront eculizumab. A 58-year-old woman had been on dialysis since 2014. She underwent a first kidney transplant in 2018 with primary non-function and received several blood transfusions. Postoperatively, she developed anti-HLA antibodies. One year later, she received a second allograft from a deceased donor. At day 0, there was only one preformed low-level donor-specific antibody (DSA) anti-DQ7. After initial excellent allograft function, serum creatinine increased on days 7-9, and this was associated with oligo-anuria. On day 7, there was an increase in her DSA anti-DQ7 and 4 de novo DSA had developed at high MFI values. Allograft biopsy showed severe active AMR with diffuse C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. The early acute AMR episode was treated with upfront eculizumab administration (2 doses) with efficient CH50 blockade (< 10% CH50). Rituximab was also administered on day 12, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was given over the following days. There was an excellent clinical response to eculizumab administration. Eculizumab administration rapidly reversed the acute AMR episode without the need for plasmapheresis. Rituximab and IVIG were also used as B-cell immunomodulators to decrease DSA. Blocking efficiently the terminal complement pathway may become a useful strategy to treat acute AMR in sensitized recipients of allografts, and possibly in recipients of discordant xenografts.     

Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in the prevention of antibody‐mediated rejection in living‐donor kidney transplant recipients requiring desensitization therapy: A randomized trial

We report results of a phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open‐label, two‐arm study evaluating the safety and efficacy of eculizumab in preventing acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized recipients of living‐donor kidney transplants requiring pretransplant desensitization (NCT01399593). In total, 102 patients underwent desensitization. Posttransplant, 51 patients received standard of care (SOC) and 51 received eculizumab. The primary end point was week 9 posttransplant treatment failure rate, a composite of: biopsy‐proven acute AMR (Banff 2007 grade II or III; assessed by blinded central pathology); graft loss; death; or loss to follow‐up. Eculizumab was well tolerated with no new safety concerns. No significant difference in treatment failure rate was observed between eculizumab (9.8%) and SOC (13.7%; P = .760). To determine whether data assessment assumptions affected study outcome, biopsies were reanalyzed by central pathologists using clinical information. The resulting treatment failure rates were 11.8% and 21.6% for the eculizumab and SOC groups, respectively (nominal P = .288). When reassessment included grade I AMR, the treatment failure rates were 11.8% (eculizumab) and 29.4% (SOC; nominal P = .048). This finding suggests a potential benefit for eculizumab compared with SOC in preventing acute AMR in recipients sensitized to their living‐donor kidney transplants (EudraCT 2010‐019630‐28).     

Antibody‐mediated rejection despite inhibition of terminal complement

Terminal complement blockade has been shown to decrease the incidence of early acute antibody‐mediated rejection (eAMR) in the first month after positive cross‐match kidney transplant recipients, yet some patients still develop eAMR. The current study investigated possible mechanisms of eAMR despite eculizumab treatment. Of the 26 patients treated with eculizumab, two developed clinical eAMR and another patient developed histologic signs of eAMR without graft dysfunction (‘subclinical eAMR’). Twenty‐three did not have histologic injury on early surveillance biopsies. All 26 patients had therapeutic levels of eculizumab and showed complete blockade of complement in hemolytic assays. High levels of donor‐specific alloantibody (DSA) including total IgG, IgG3, and C1q+ DSA were present in patients with and without eAMR, and none correlated well with eAMR. In contrast, IgM DSA was present in only four patients after transplantation: the two patients with clinical eAMR, one patient with subclinical AMR, and one patient without eAMR (P = 0.006 correlation with eAMR). Both clinical eAMR episodes were easily treated with plasma exchange which removed IgM more completely and rapidly than IgG, resulting in normalization of function and histology. These data suggest a possible role of antidonor IgM DSA in the pathogenesis of eAMR in patients treated with terminal complement blockade (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00670774).     

Complement inhibition for prevention of antibody-mediated rejection in immunologically high-risk heart allograft recipients

Allosensitization represents a major barrier to heart transplantation (HTx). We assessed the efficacy and safety of complement inhibition at transplant in highly sensitized heart transplant recipients. We performed a single-center, single-arm, open-label trial (NCT02013037). Patients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) ≥70% and pre–formed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were eligible. In addition to standard of care, patients received nine infusions of eculizumab during the first 2 months posttransplant. The primary composite endpoint was antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) ≥pAMR2 and/or left ventricular dysfunction during the first year. Secondary endpoints included hemodynamic compromise, allograft rejection, and patient survival. Twenty patients were included. Median cPRA and mean fluorescence intensity of immunodominant DSA were 95% (90%–97%) and 6250 (5000–10 000), respectively. Retrospective B cell and T cell flow crossmatches were positive in 14 and 11 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint occurred in four patients (20%). Survival at 1 year was 90% with no deaths resulting from AMR. In a prespecified analysis comparing treated patients to matched control patients, we observed a dramatic reduction in the risk of biopsy-proven AMR in patients treated with eculizumab (HR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.14–0.95, p = .032). Our findings support the prophylactic use of complement inhibition for heart transplantation at high immunological risk. ClinincalTrials.gov, NCT02013037.     

Splenic Irradiation for the Treatment of Severe Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

Patients requiring desensitization prior to renal transplantation are at risk for developing severe antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) refractory to treatment with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (PP/IVIg). We have previously reported success at graft salvage, long‐term graft survival and protection against transplant glomerulopathy with the use of eculizumab and splenectomy in addition to PP/IVIg. Splenectomy may be an important component of this combination therapy and is itself associated with a marked reduction in donor‐specific antibody (DSA) production. However, splenectomy represents a major operation, and some patients with severe AMR have comorbid conditions that substantially increase their risk of complications during and after surgery. In an effort to spare recipients the morbidity of a second operation, we used splenic irradiation in lieu of splenectomy in two incompatible live donor kidney transplant recipients with severe AMR in addition to PP/IVIg, rituximab and eculizumab. This novel approach to the treatment of severe AMR was associated with allograft salvage, excellent graft function and no short‐ or medium‐term adverse effects of the radiation therapy. One‐year surveillance biopsies did not show transplant glomerulopathy (tg) on light microscopy, but microcirculation inflammation and tg were present on electron microscopy.     

Significance of low-level DSA detected by solid-phase assay in association with acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection

We sought to clarify the controversial issue of whether detecting low‐level anti‐donor‐specific HLA antibody (HLA‐DSA) by single‐antigen flow‐bead assay (SAFB) may have a potential role in reducing acute and chronic antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). We retrospectively studied the preoperative serum of ABO‐compatible living kidney transplantation recipients transplanted between 2001 and 2004 by SAFB using a Luminex platform. HLA‐DSA was detected only by SAFB in 24 patients, although all of them showed negative T‐cell and B‐cell complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches. The HLA‐DSA patients went on to have surprisingly high levels of acute and chronic AMR despite being only weakly sensitized (acute AMR, 33.3%; chronic AMR, 41.7%). After 2005, we implemented SAFB routinely and any patient having a positive HLA‐DSA was considered to be a desensitization candidate. The 52 patients found to have HLA‐DSA underwent kidney transplantation after prior treatment with a single dose of rituximab (RIT) and three or four sessions of double‐filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in addition to regimens commonly used between 2001 and 2004. After 2005, there was a significant reduction in the occurrence of acute and chronic AMR (acute AMR, 4.7%, P < 0.001; chronic AMR, 4.7%, P < 0.001). The 5‐year graft survival rate also improved after implementing SAFB (83.3–98.1%, P = 0.032). The RIT/DFPP‐induction protocol may improve graft survival even in patients with low‐level DSA.     

Anti‐huCD20 Antibody Therapy for Antibody‐Mediated Rejection of Renal Allografts in a Mouse Model

We have reported that B6.CCR5^?/? mice reject renal allografts with high serum donor‐specific antibody (DSA) titers and marked C4d deposition in grafts, features consistent with antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). B6.huCD20/CCR5^?/? mice, where human CD20 expression is restricted to B cells, rejected A/J renal allografts by day 26 posttransplant with DSA first detected in serum on day 5 posttransplant and increased thereafter. Recipient treatment with anti‐huCD20 mAb prior to the transplant and weekly up to 7 weeks posttransplant promoted long‐term allograft survival (>100 days) with low DSA titers. To investigate the effect of B cell depletion at the time serum DSA was first detected, recipients were treated with anti‐huCD20 mAb on days 5, 8, and 12 posttransplant. This regimen significantly reduced DSA titers and graft inflammation on day 15 posttransplant and prolonged allograft survival >60 days. However, DSA returned to the titers observed in control treated recipients by day 30 posttransplant and histological analyses on day 60 posttransplant indicated severe interstitial fibrosis. These results indicate that anti‐huCD20 mAb had the greatest effect as a prophylactic treatment and that the distinct kinetics of DSA responses accounts for acute renal allograft failure versus the development of fibrosis.

     

Outcome of Kidney Transplantations Performed With Preformed Donor‐Specific Antibodies of Unknown Etiology

The detection of preformed donor‐specific alloantibodies (DSA) with multiplex‐bead arrays has led to the common observation that individuals without a history of pregnancy, transfusion or transplantation can have circulating anti‐HLA antibodies of unknown etiology. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and graft outcome in 41 kidney transplant recipients with DSA of unknown etiology (DSA cause‐unk) at the time of transplantation. Twenty‐one patients received a posttransplantation desensitization protocol, and 20 received standard immunosuppressive therapy. The mean number of DSA was 1.4 ± 0.8, ranging from 1 to 5. Complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches were negative for all the patients. Flow cytometry crossmatches were positive in 47.6% of cases. The incidence of acute AMR was 14.6% at 1 year, regardless of the immunosuppressive regimen. No patients experienced graft loss following AMR. At month 12, across the entire population of patients with DSA cause‐unk, the outcomes were favorable: the measured glomerular filtration rate was 63.8 ± 16.4 mL/min/1.73 m², the screening biopsies showed low frequencies of microvascular inflammation and no transplant glomerulopathy, and graft and patient survival were 100%. In conclusion, patients with DSA cause‐unk are able to mount AMR but have favorable 1‐year outcomes.     

Eculizumab for Prevention of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Blood Group-Incompatible Renal Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is one of the leading causes of allograft failure especially in patients undergoing ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplantation. We hypothesized that complement inhibition with eculizumab, a C5 inhibitor, would protect against AMR and maintain graft function in ABOi renal transplant recipients. Four patients undergoing living donor kidney transplant from ABOi donors were treated with a 9-week eculizumab course without therapeutic plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, or splenectomy. All patients had successful transplants and have normal graft function at the time of last follow-up. There were no cases of AMR or acute cellular rejection. Of note, 2 patients were transplanted despite persistent ABO antibody titers of 1:32, conventionally considered a contraindication to proceed in standard protocols. Eculizumab is a promising option to prevent AMR with ABOi renal transplantation without the need for splenectomy, post-transplant therapeutic plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin. Future multicenter studies are needed to determine long-term efficacy and safety.     

The use of eculizumab in renal transplantation

The complement system plays a vital role in mediating disease processes within renal allografts. Eculizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets complement protein C5, inhibiting cleavage into C5a and C5b, and therefore preventing formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC). It has been used primarily within renal transplantation to treat atypical hemolytic‐uremic syndrome (aHUS) and antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) post‐transplant, and also as prophylaxis in transplants at high risk for these conditions. Eculizumab appears to be effective in protecting renal allografts when post‐transplant aHUS or AMR occur, although the published cases report relatively short follow‐up. It is unclear how long treatment should continue (a particularly important issue given the expense of the drug), or whether eculizumab contributes to the development of accommodation in humans. When used for prophylaxis, eculizumab also appears to be effective. Some highly sensitized patients have developed either acute AMR or features of chronic AMR despite administration of the drug – this suggests that complement activation is not the only mechanism responsible for AMR. All patients should receive vaccination against Neisseria meningitidis prior to receiving eculizumab. Clinical trials, predominantly in antibody‐incompatible renal transplantation, are ongoing to determine the optimal use of C5 inhibition.     

Poor graft outcome in recipients with de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after living related kidney transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now widely recognized as a major problem in organ transplantation. This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between newly developing anti-HLA antibodies post-transplantation (de novo Abs) and the outcome of living related kidney transplantation (LRKT). The subjects included 87 patients who had received living donor kidney allografts at our institution. Panel reactive Ab assay (Flow-PRA) and graft biopsies were performed in all the recipients before and 6 months after the LRKT. The incidence of AMR, the donor specificity and time of appearance of the de novo Abs were retrospectively studied. Among the 87 LRKT recipients, 47 (54%) showed negative/negative (N/N) results, 15 (17%) showed positive/positive (P/P) results, 12 (14%) showed positive/negative results (P/N), and 13 (15%) showed negative/positive (N/P) results (de novo Abs) in the pre-/post-transplant Flow-PRA analysis. Among the 13 cases with de novo Abs, 5 (38%) had donor-specific Abs (DSA) and the remaining 8 (62%) had nondonor-specific Abs, as determined by LAB single antigen analysis. Eighty percent of the recipients with DSA showed evidence of AMR in the graft biopsies. The 5-year graft survival rate of the recipients with de novo Abs (N/P) was 69%, as compared with 96% in the N/N, 88% in the P/N and 93% in the P/P recipient groups (P = 0.009). LRKT recipients developing de novo Abs, especially those with DSA, showed a much higher incidence of AMR and a worse prognosis. Cautious monitoring for the appearance of anti-HLA Abs should be adopted after transplantation, even in patients without anti-HLA Abs prior to the transplantation.     

Lack of Efficacy and Safety of Eculizumab for Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Rejection Following Renal Transplantation

BackgroundWe evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab in comparison with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in renal transplant recipients diagnosed with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).MethodsThis was a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized analysis. The patients were randomized by therapy type (eg, eculizumab infusions or standard of care [SOC]: plasmapheresis/intravenous immunoglobulin). The patients (ie, eculizumab arm: 7 patients, SOC arm: 4 patients) were evaluated for the continued presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and C4d (staining on biopsy), as well as histologic evidence, using repeat renal biopsy after treatment.ResultsThe allograft biopsies revealed that eculizumab did not prevent the progression to transplant glomerulopathy. Only 2 patients in the SOC arm experienced rejection reversal, and no graft losses occurred in either group. After AMR treatment, the DSA titers generally decreased compared to titers taken at the time of AMR diagnosis. There were no serious adverse effects in the eculizumab arm.ConclusionsEculizumab alone cannot treat AMR effectively and does not prevent acute AMR from progressing to chronic AMR or transplant glomerulopathy. However, it should be considered as a potential alternative therapy because it may be associated with decreased DSA levels.     

Safety and efficacy of eculizumab for the prevention of antibody‐mediated rejection after deceased‐donor kidney transplantation in patients with preformed donor‐specific antibodies

The presence of preformed donor‐specific antibodies in transplant recipients increases the risk of acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). Results of an open‐label single‐arm trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eculizumab in preventing acute AMR in recipients of deceased‐donor kidney transplants with preformed donor‐specific antibodies are reported. Participants received eculizumab as follows: 1200 mg immediately before reperfusion; 900 mg on posttransplant days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28; and 1200 mg at weeks 5, 7, and 9. All patients received thymoglobulin induction therapy and standard maintenance immunosuppression including steroids. The primary end point was treatment failure rate, a composite of biopsy‐proved grade II/III AMR (Banff 2007 criteria), graft loss, death, or loss to follow‐up, within 9 weeks posttransplant. Eighty patients received transplants (48 women); the median age was 52 years (range 24‐70 years). Observed treatment failure rate (8.8%) was significantly lower than expected for standard care (40%; P < .001). By 9 weeks, 3 of 80 patients had experienced AMR, and 4 of 80 had experienced graft loss. At 36 months, graft and patient survival rates were 83.4% and 91.5%, respectively. Eculizumab was well tolerated and no new safety concerns were identified. Eculizumab has the potential to provide prophylaxis against injury caused by acute AMR in such patients (EudraCT 2010‐019631‐35).     

Peritransplant Immunoadsorption for Positive Crossmatch Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Various desensitization protocols were shown to enable successful living donor kidney transplantation across a positive complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM). Positive crossmatch transplantation, however, is less well established for deceased donor transplantation. We report a cohort of 68 deceased donor renal allograft recipients who, on the basis of broad sensitization (lymphocytotoxic panel reactivity ≥40%), were subjected to a protocol of peritransplant immunoadsorption (IA). Treatment consisted of a single session of immediate pretransplant IA (protein A) followed by posttransplant IA and antilymphocyte antibody therapy. Twenty‐one patients had a positive CDCXM, which could be rendered negative by pretransplant apheresis. Solid phase HLA antibody detection revealed preformed donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) in all 21 CDCXM‐positive and in 30 CDCXM‐negative recipients. At 5 years, overall graft survival, death‐censored graft survival and patient survival were 63%, 76% and 87%, respectively, without any differences between CDCXM‐positive, CDCXM‐negative/DSA‐positive and CDCXM‐negative/DSA‐negative recipients. Furthermore, groups did not differ regarding rates of antibody‐mediated rejection (24% vs. 30% vs. 24%, p = 0.84), cellular rejection (14% vs. 23% vs. 18%, p = 0.7) or allograft function (median 5‐year serum creatinine: 1.3 vs. 1.8 vs. 1.7 mg/dL, p = 0.62). Our results suggest that peritransplant IA is an effective strategy for rapid desensitization in deceased donor transplantation.     

Eculizumab for the treatment of de novo thrombotic microangiopathy post simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation--a case report

A 34-year-old female recipient of a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant presented 7 days posttransplant with acute renal allograft dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Renal biopsy revealed acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and acute thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Clinical and laboratory manifestations, which had only partly responded to treatment with daily plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin, resolved rapidly and completely to eculizumab (Soliris, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cheshire, Conn), a complement factor C5 antibody. De novo posttransplant TMA is a rare and serious complication that can lead to graft loss in up to one third of cases. This is the first report of successful treatment of de novo TMA with eculizumab, which has previously shown benefit in recurrent atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome as well as in refractory acute AMR. Targeted complement inhibition offers the promise of a safe and effective therapeutic strategy in de novo TMA, especially in light of recent evidence suggesting that genetic mutations in complement regulatory proteins may predispose transplant recipients to this serious disease.     

High Risk of Sensitization After Failed Islet Transplantation

Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) antibodies posttransplant have been associated with an increased risk of early graft failure in kidney transplants. Whether this also applies to islet transplantation is not clear. To achieve insulin independence after islet transplants multiple donor infusions may be required. Hence, islet transplant recipients are at risk of sensitization after transplantation. Islet transplant recipients were screened for HLA antibodies posttransplant by flow-based methods. A total of 98 patients were studied. Twenty-nine patients (31%) developed de novo donor specific antibodies (DSA) posttransplant. Twenty-three patients developed DSA while on immunosuppression (IS). Among recipients who have discontinued IS, 10/14 (71%) are broadly sensitized with panel reactive antibody (PRA) >or=50%. The risk of becoming broadly sensitized after transplant was 11/69 (16%) if the recipient was unsensitized prior to transplant. The majority of these antibodies have persisted over time. Appearance of HLA antibodies posttransplant is concerning, and the incidence rises abruptly in subjects weaned completely from IS. This may negatively impact the ability of these individuals to undergo further islet, pancreas or kidney transplantation and should be discussed upfront during evaluation of candidates for islet transplantation.     

Kidney Transplantation in Patients with Antibodies against Donor HLA Class II

The immunologic risk associated with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against Class II human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of KTx when DSA was detected only against HLA Class II. To isolate the impact of anti-Class II DSA, we retrospectively analyzed 12 KTx recipients who at baseline had a positive B-cell flow cytometric crossmatch (FXM) and a negative T-cell FXM. Using alloantibody specification analysis, 58.3% (7/12) had DSA against donor Class II and 41.7% had no demonstrable DSA. Biopsy-proven AMR occurred in 57% (4/7) in the Class II(+) group and 0% in the Class II(-) group (p > 0.05). Peritubular capillaries stained positive for C4d in 86% (6/7) of the Class II(+) patients and in 40% (2/5) of the Class II(-) patients (p > 0.05). One patient in the Class II(+) group lost their graft at 3 months to accelerated transplant glomerulopathy, while all other grafts were functioning 3-37 months posttransplant despite the persistence of anti-Class II DSA. We conclude that KTx recipients with clearly defined anti-Class II DSA are at risk for humoral rejection suggesting that desensitization and/or close posttransplant monitoring may be needed to prevent AMR.     

Alloantibody Levels and Acute Humoral Rejection Early After Positive Crossmatch Kidney Transplantation

We examined the course of donor ‐ specific alloantibody (DSA) levels early after transplant and their relationship with acute humoral rejection (AHR) in two groups of positive crossmatch (+XM) kidney transplant recipients: High DSA group—41 recipients with a baseline T‐ or B‐cell flow crossmatch (TFXM, BFXM) channel shift ≥300 (molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome units (MESF) of approximately 19 300) who underwent pretransplant plasmapheresis (PP), and Low DSA group—29 recipients with a baseline channel shift <300 who did not undergo PP. The incidence of AHR was 39% (16/41) in the High DSA group and 31% (9/29) in the Low DSA group. Overall, mean DSA levels decreased by day 4 posttransplant and remained low in patients who did not develop AHR. By day 10, DSA levels increased in patients developing AHR with 92% (23/25) of patients with a BFXM >359 (MESF of approximately 34 000) developing AHR. The BFXM and the total DSA measured by single antigen beads correlated well across a wide spectrum suggesting that either could be used for monitoring. We conclude that AHR is associated with the development of High DSA levels posttransplant and protocols aimed at maintaining DSA at lower levels may decrease the incidence of AHR.     

Donor‐Specific HLA Antibodies in a Cohort Comparing Everolimus With Cyclosporine After Kidney Transplantation

Donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSA) have a negative impact on kidney graft survival. Therefore, we analyzed the occurrence of DSA and antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in patients from two prospective randomized trials in our center. At 3–4.5 months posttransplant 127 patients were randomized to continue cyclosporine or converted to everolimus therapy. The presence of DSA was prospectively assessed using Luminex assays. AMR was defined according to the Banff 2009 classification. Antibody screening was available in 126 patients with a median follow‐up of 1059 days. Seven out of 65 (10.8%) patients on cyclosporine developed DSA after a median of 991 days. In comparison, 14/61 patients (23.0%) randomized to everolimus developed DSA after 551 days (log‐rank: p = 0.048). Eight patients on everolimus compared to two patients on cyclosporine developed AMR (log‐rank: p = 0.036). Four of 10 patients with AMR—all in the everolimus group—lost their graft. A multivariate regression model revealed everolimus, >3 mismatches and living donor as significant risk factors for DSA. Acute rejection within the first year, >3 mismatches, everolimus and living donor were independent risk factors for AMR. This single center analysis demonstrates for the first time that everolimus‐based immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk for the development of DSA and AMR.     

Renal Transplantation in Patients With Pre-Transplant Donor-Specific Antibodies and Negative Flow Cytometry Crossmatches

The clinical significance of pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA), despite negative cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatches (FCXMs), is unknown. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 60 living donor renal transplant recipients, all with pre-transplant cytotoxicity and T-cell and B-cell FCXMs that were negative. Twenty recipients had pre-transplant DSA detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and/or microbead methods. Forty contemporaneous DSA-negative controls were selected. In the DSA-positive group, after a median follow-up of 8.2 months (25-75% range, 5.4-22.8 months), patient survival was 100% and allograft survival was 95.0%. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) developed in four patients (20.0%). Three of the AHR episodes occurred within the first month post-transplant. Median serum creatinine at last follow-up was 1.3 mg/dL (25-75% range, 1.0-1.6 mg/dL), versus 1.1 mg/dL (25-75% range, 0.9-1.4 mg/dL) in the DSA-negative controls (p = 0.29). Only one of the 40 controls developed AHR (2.5%). Pre-transplant DSA was associated with a significantly increased incidence of AHR (p = 0.02 by log-rank test). In conclusion, despite negative pre-transplant cytotoxicity and FCXMs, renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant DSA detected by solid-phase methods may have an increased incidence of AHR and require close monitoring post-transplant.