Polymorphism of 2,5‐[(diphenylphosphanyl)methyl]‐1,1,2,4,4,5‐hexaphenyl‐1,4‐diphospha‐2,5‐diboracyclohexane

2,5‐[(Diphenylphosphanyl)methyl]‐1,1,2,4,4,5‐hexaphenyl‐1,4‐diphospha‐2,5‐diboracyclohexane shows polymorphism as two tetrahydrofuran (THF) disolvates [C₆₄H₅₈B₂P₄·2C₄H₈O, (Ia) and (Ib)] and pseudo‐polymorphism as its toluene monosolvate [C₆₄H₅₈B₂P₄·C₇H₈, (Ic)]. In each of polymorphs (Ia) and (Ib), the diphosphadiboracyclohexane molecule is located on a centre of inversion. The THF molecule of (Ib) is disordered over two sites, with a site‐occupation factor of 0.612 (8) for the major‐occupied site. Both structures crystallize in the same space group (P2₁/n), but they display a different crystal packing. For pseudo‐polymorph (Ic), although the space group is P2₁/c, which is just a different setting of the P2₁/n space group of (Ia) and (Ib), the crystal packing is completely different. Although the crystal packing in these three structures is significantly different, their molecular conformations are surprisingly the same.     

Two polymorphs of 4‐propyl‐3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐naphtho[1,2‐b]pyran‐5,6‐dione

Two polymorphs of the title compound, C₁₆H₁₆O₃, have been obtained from the same solution. One polymorph, (I_m), crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁, while the other, (I_o), crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁. The cell constants of the two polymorphs are surprisingly similar. Whereas the a and b axes are equal in the two structures, the c axis in (I_o) is twice as long as that in (I_m). The monoclinic angle β is 95.084 (9)° compared with 90° in the orthorhombic crystal system. The cell volume of (I_m) is almost exactly half of the cell volume of (I_o). The packing motifs are also very similar in the two structures. However, whereas the molecules in (I_m) are related by a twofold screw axis just in the direction of the b axis, in (I_o) there are twofold screw axes along all three directions of the unit cell.     

Two polymorphs of chlorido(cyclohexyldiphenylphosphine)gold(I)

The title compound, [AuCl(C₁₈H₂₁P)], a monomeric two‐coordinate gold(I) complex, has been characterized at 100 K as two distinct monoclinic polymorphs, one from a single crystal, (Is), and one from a pseudo‐merohedrally twinned crystal, (It). The molecular structures in the two monoclinic [P2₁/n for (Is) and P2₁/c for (It)] polymorphs are similar; however, the packing arrangements in the two lattices differ considerably. The structure of (It) is pseudo‐merohedrally twinned by a twofold rotation about the a* axis.     

An orthorhombic polymorph of a cyclization product of perindopril

Low‐temperature X‐ray diffraction experiments were employed to investigate the crystal structures of an orthorhombic polymorph of the intramolecular cyclization product of perindopril, a popular angiotensive‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, namely ethyl (2S)‐2‐[(3S,5aS,9aS,10aS)‐3‐methyl‐1,4‐dioxo‐5a,6,7,8,9,9a,10,10a‐octahydro‐3H‐pyrazino[1,2‐a]indol‐2‐yl]pentanoate, C₁₉H₃₀N₂O₄, (Io), and its tetragonal equivalent, (It), which was previously reported at ambient temperature [Bojarska et al. (2013). J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 58 , 1415–1417]. Polymorph (Io) crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁ with two molecules in the asymmetric unit, while tetragonal form (It) crystallizes in the space group P4₁2₁2 with one molecule in the asymmetric unit. The geometric parameters of (Io) are very similar to those of (It). The six‐membered rings in both polymorphs adopt a slightly deformed chair conformation and the piperazinedione rings are in a boat conformation. However, the proline rings adopt an envelope conformation in (Io), while in (It) the ring exists in a slightly deformed half‐chair conformation. The most significant difference between the two structures is the orientation of the ethyl pentanoate chain. Molecules associate in pairs in a head‐to‐tail manner forming infinite columns. In (Io), molecules are related by a twofold screw axis forming identical columns, while in (It), molecules in successive neighbouring columns are related by alternating twofold screw axes and fourfold screw axes. In both cases, the crystal packing is stabilized by weak intermolecular C—H...O interactions only.     

Conformations and resulting hydrogen‐bonded networks of hydrogen {phosphono[(pyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl)amino]methyl}phosphonate and related 2‐chloro and 6‐chloro derivatives

In the crystal structures of the conformational isomers hydrogen {phosphono[(pyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl)amino]methyl}phosphonate monohydrate (pro‐E), C₆H₁₀N₂O₆P₂·H₂O, (Ia), and hydrogen {phosphono[(pyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl)amino]methyl}phosphonate (pro‐Z), C₆H₁₀N₂O₆P₂, (Ib), the related hydrogen {[(2‐chloropyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl)amino](phosphono)methyl}phosphonate (pro‐E), C₆H₉ClN₂O₆P₂, (II), and the salt bis(6‐chloropyridin‐3‐aminium) [hydrogen bis({[2‐chloropyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl(0.5+)]amino}methylenediphosphonate)] (pro‐Z), 2C₅H₆ClN₂⁺·C₁₂H₁₆Cl₂N₄O₁₂P₄²⁻, (III), chain–chain interactions involving phosphono (–PO₃H₂) and phosphonate (–PO₃H⁻) groups are dominant in determining the crystal packing. The crystals of (Ia) and (III) comprise similar ribbons, which are held together by N—H...O interactions, by water‐ or cation‐mediated contacts, and by π–π interactions between the aromatic rings of adjacent zwitterions in (Ia), and those of the cations and anions in (III). The crystals of (Ib) and (II) have a layered architecture: the former exhibits highly corrugated monolayers perpendicular to the [100] direction, while in the latter, flat bilayers parallel to the (001) plane are formed. In both (Ib) and (II), the interlayer contacts are realised through N—H...O hydrogen bonds and weak C—H...O interactions involving aromatic C atoms.     

2‐[4‐Phenyl‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl]nicotinic acid: a case of solvent‐dependent polymorphism

The title compound, C₁₉H₁₃N₅O₂, crystallizes in two monoclinic forms depending on the solvent used. From methanol or acetone, a yellow form [(Ia), m.p. 533 K] in the space group P2₁ is obtained, while with ethanol as the solvent, an orange form [(Ib), m.p. 541 K] in the space group Cc results. The conformers observed in the two polymorphs differ primarily in the relative orientation of pyridine/phenyl and triazole rings. Molecules of both polymorphs form chains through carboxyl O—H...N hydrogen bonding; however, in each crystal structure, a different group acts as acceptor, viz. a triazole and a pyridyl N atom for (Ia) and (Ib), respectively. This is the first case of polymorphism observed for crystals of a 3,4,5‐trisubstituted 1,2,4‐triazole derivative.     

Two polymorphs,with Z′ = 1 and 2, of 2‐amino‐4‐chloro‐6‐morpholino­pyrimidine in P21/c,and 2‐amino‐4‐chloro‐6‐piperidino­pyrimidine,which is isomorphous and almost isostructural with the Z′ = 2 polymorph

Crystallization of 2‐amino‐4‐chloro‐6‐morpholino­pyrimidine, C₈H₁₁ClN₄O, (I), yields two polymorphs, both with space group P2₁/c, having Z′ = 1 (from diethyl ether solution) and Z′ = 2 (from di­chloro­methane solution), denoted (Ia) and (Ib), respectively. In polymorph (Ia), the mol­ecules are linked by an N—H⋯O and an N—H⋯N hydrogen bond into sheets built from alternating R(8) and R(40) rings. In polymorph (Ib), one mol­ecule acts as a triple acceptor of hydrogen bonds and the other acts as a single acceptor; one N—H⋯O and three N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules in a complex chain containing two types of R(8) and one type of R(18) ring. 2‐Amino‐4‐chloro‐6‐piperidino­pyrimidine, C₉H₁₃ClN₄, (II), which is isomorphous with polymorph (Ib), also has Z′ = 2 in P2₁/c, and the mol­ecules are linked by three N—­H⋯N hydrogen bonds into a centrosymmetric four‐mol­ecule aggregate containing three R(8) rings.     

Synthesis of Square‐Planar Aluminum(III) Complexes

The synthesis of two four‐coordinate and square planar (SP) complexes of aluminum(III) is presented. Reaction of a phenyl‐substituted bis(imino)pyridine ligand that is reduced by two electrons, Na₂(^PhI₂P^2?), with AlCl₃ afforded five‐coordinate [(^PhI₂P^2?)Al(THF)Cl] ( 1 ). Square‐planar [(^PhI₂P^2?)AlCl] ( 2 ) was obtained by performing the same reaction in diethyl ether followed by lyphilization of 2 from benzene. The four‐coordinate geometry index for 2 , τ₄, is 0.22, where 0 would be a perfectly square‐planar molecule. The analogous aluminum hydride complex, [(^PhI₂P^2?)AlH] ( 3 ), is also square‐planar, and was characterized crystallographically and has τ₄=0.13. Both 2 and 3 are Lewis acidic and bind 2,6‐lutidine.     

Two polymorphs of 2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐4‐methylchromenium perchlorate

Crystallization (from ethyl acetate solution) of 2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐4‐methylchromenium perchlorate, C₁₆H₁₂ClO⁺·;ClO₄⁻, (I), yields two monoclinic polymorphs with the space groups P2₁/n [polymorph (Ia)] and P2₁/c [polymorph (Ib)]; in both cases, Z = 4. Cations and anions, disordered in polymorph (Ib), form ion pairs in both polymorphs as a result of Cl—O...π interactions. Related by a centre of symmetry, neighbouring ion pairs in polymorph (Ia) are linked viaπ–π interactions between cationic fragments, and the resulting dimers are linked through a network of C—H...O(perchlorate) interactions between adjacent cations and anions. The ion pairs in polymorph (Ib), arranged in pairs of columns along the a axis, are linked through a network of C—H...O(perchlorate), C—Cl...π, π–π and C—Cl...O(perchlorate) interactions. The aromatic skeletons in polymorph (Ia) are parallel in the cationic fragments involved in dimers, but nonparallel in adjacent ion pairs not constituting dimers. In polymorph (Ib), these skeletons are parallel in pairs of columns, but nonparallel in adjacent pairs of columns; this is visible as a herring‐bone pattern. Differences in the crystal structures of the polymorphs are most probably the cause of their different colours.     

Concomitant but disappearing: two polymorphs of 1,4‐bis(tribromomethyl)benzene

The title compound, C₈H₄Br₆, (I), initially crystallized from deuterochloroform as the comcomitant polymorphs (Ia) (prisms, space group P2₁/n, Z = 2) and (Ib) (hexagonal plates, space group C2/c, Z = 4). The molecules in both forms display crystallographic inversion symmetry. All further attempts to crystallize the compound led exclusively to (Ib), so that (Ia) may be regarded as a `disappearing polymorph'. Surprisingly, however, the density of (Ia) is greater than that of (Ib). The only significant difference between the molecular structures is the orientation of the CBr<sub>3</sub> groups. The molecular packing of both structures is largely determined by Br...Br interactions, although (Ia) also displays a C—H...Br hydrogen bond and both polymorphs display one Br...π contact. For (Ia), six of the eight contacts combine to form a tube‐like substructure parallel to the a axis. For (Ib), the two shortest Br...Br contacts link `half' molecules consisting of C—CBr₃ groups to form double layers parallel to (001) in the regions z≃, .     

The first polymorph in the family of nucleobases: a second form of cytosine

A new polymorph of cytosine, C₄H₅N₃O, is reported half a century after the report of its first known crystal structure [Barker & Marsh (1964). Acta Cryst. 17 , 1581–1587]. Cytosine thus provides the first polymorphic example in the category of parent nucleobases. The new form, denoted (Ib), was observed unexpectedly during an attempt to cocrystallize cytosine with catechol. Form (Ib) crystallizes in the orthorhombic centrosymmetric space group Pccn with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. The previously known form, denoted (Ia), crystallizes in the orthorhombic noncentrosymmetric space group P2₁2₁2₁. The cytosine molecule is planar in both forms. Hydrogen‐bonding interactions are also similar for both forms. Infinite one‐dimensional ribbons composed of cytosine base‐pair dimers in R₂²(8) arrangements are observed in both (Ia) and (Ib). However, the way that the ribbons are packed differs in (Ia) and (Ib). This appears to guide the centrosymmetric versus noncentrosymmetric space‐group selection through the formation of an inversion‐related motif in polymorph (Ib) and a helical propagation in polymorph (Ia). A few selected polymorphic systems have been gathered from the Cambridge Structural Database to understand possible structural features responsible for achiral molecules adopting centro‐ and noncentrosymmetric space groups.     

1‐(β‐d‐Erythrofuranosyl)adenosine

The title compound, also known as β‐erythroadenosine, C₉H₁₁N₅O₃, (I), a derivative of β‐adenosine, (II), that lacks the C5′ exocyclic hydroxymethyl (–CH₂OH) substituent, crystallizes from hot ethanol with two independent molecules having different conformations, denoted (IA) and (IB). In (IA), the furanose conformation is ^OT₁–E₁ (C1′‐exo, east), with pseudorotational parameters P and τ_m of 114.4 and 42°, respectively. In contrast, the P and τ_m values are 170.1 and 46°, respectively, in (IB), consistent with a ²E–²T₃ (C2′‐endo, south) conformation. The N‐glycoside conformation is syn (+sc) in (IA) and anti (−ac) in (IB). The crystal structure, determined to a resolution of 2.0 Å, of a cocrystal of (I) bound to the enzyme 5′‐fluorodeoxyadenosine synthase from Streptomyces cattleya shows the furanose ring in a near‐ideal ^OE (east) conformation (P = 90° and τ_m = 42°) and the base in an anti (−ac) conformation.     

Ring-opening polymerization of 1-(p-substituted phenyl)-2-vinylcyclopropanes by Ziegler–Natta catalysts

1-(p-Substituted phenyl)-2-vinylcyclopropanes such as 1-phenyl-2-vinylcyclopropane (I_a), 1-(p-chlorophenyl)-2-vinylcyclopropane (I_b), 1-(p-anisyl)-2-vinylcyclopropane (I_c), and 1-(p-tolyl)-2-vinylcyclopropane (I_d) were prepared and polymerized radically, cationically and with Ziegler–Natta catalysts. I_a and I_b polymerized exclusively in 1,5-fashion with radical initiators. However, I_c and I_d polymerized in 1,5-fashion only with Ziegler–Natta catalysts. All polymers were soluble in ordinary organic solvent and solution-cast films were clear and flexible, showing T_g values in the range of 39–71°C. Spectral data indicated that the double bonds of the polymer chains were in trans form in all cases. The difference between the polymerizabilities of different monomers are interpreted in terms of electronic properties of substituents.     

Nitrosyltechnetium(I) Complexes with 2‐(Diphenylphosphanyl)aniline

[Tc^I(NO)Cl(H₂L1)₂]⁺ cations (H₂L1 = 2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)aniline) are formed during reactions of H₂L1 with (NBu₄)[Tc(NO)Cl₄(MeOH)] or (NH₄)TcO₄/HCl/NH₂OH mixtures. Different isomers were isolated depending on the counterions and solvents used. The technetium(I) complexes cis‐NO,Cl,trans‐P,P‐[Tc^I(NO)Cl(H₂L1)₂]Cl, trans‐NO,Cl,cis‐P,P‐[Tc^I(NO)Cl(H₂L1)₂]₂(TcCl₆), and trans‐NO,Cl,trans‐P,P‐[Tc^I(NO)Cl(H₂L1)₂](PF₆) were isolated in crystalline form and studied by spectroscopic methods and X‐ray crystallography. DFT calculations show that there are only minor energy differences between the three isomers and the formation of the individual compounds is most probably strongly influenced by interactions with solvents and counterions.     

Methyl 2‐acetamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐glucopyranoside dihydrate and methyl 2‐formamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐glucopyranoside

Methyl 2‐acetamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside (β‐GlcNAcOCH₃), (I), crystallizes from water as a dihydrate, C₉H₁₇NO₆·H₂O, containing two independent molecules [denoted (IA) and (IB)] in the asymmetric unit, whereas the crystal structure of methyl 2‐formamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside (β‐GlcNFmOCH₃), (II), C₈H₁₅NO₆, also obtained from water, is devoid of solvent water molecules. The two molecules of (I) assume distorted ⁴C₁ chair conformations. Values of ϕ for (IA) and (IB) indicate ring distortions towards B_C2,C5 and ^C3,O5B, respectively. By comparison, (II) shows considerably more ring distortion than molecules (IA) and (IB), despite the less bulky N‐acyl side chain. Distortion towards B_C2,C5 was observed for (II), similar to the findings for (IA). The amide bond conformation in each of (IA), (IB) and (II) is trans, and the conformation about the C—N bond is anti (C—H is approximately anti to N—H), although the conformation about the latter bond within this group varies by ∼16°. The conformation of the exocyclic hydroxymethyl group was found to be gt in each of (IA), (IB) and (II). Comparison of the X‐ray structures of (I) and (II) with those of other GlcNAc mono‐ and disaccharides shows that GlcNAc aldohexopyranosyl rings can be distorted over a wide range of geometries in the solid state.     

A new polymorph of 1,4‐dibromo‐2,5‐dimethylbenzene: H...Br and Br...πversus Br...Br interactions

A new polymorph, (Ib), of the title compound, C₈H₈Br₂, crystallizes in the space group P2₁/n, the same as the known polymorph (Ia) but with Z = 2 (imposed inversion symmetry) rather than Z = 4. The molecular structures are closely similar because the molecule has no degrees of torsional freedom except for methyl groups, but the packing arrangements are completely different. Polymorph (Ia) is characterized by linked trapezia of Br...Br interactions, whereas polymorph (Ib) features H...Br and Br...π interactions.     

Two concomitant polymorphs of N,N′‐bis[4‐(diethylamino)phenyl]terephthaldiamide

The title compound, C₂₈H₃₄N₄O₂, crystallizes simultaneously as a monoclinic, (Im), and a (twinned) triclinic polymorph, (It), from d₆‐dimethyl sulfoxide. Polymorph (It) (P, Z = 1) displays the standard `ladder' packing for this group of compounds, with neighbouring inversion‐symmetric molecules related by translation and connected by hydrogen bonds of the form N—H...O=C. Polymorph (Im) (Cc, Z = 4) has no imposed symmetry; there are three independent hydrogen bonds, one classical N—H...O=C and a bifurcated system with N—H...O=C augmented by a short C—H...O=C interaction. Each molecule is thereby linked to four neighbouring molecules, two lower and two higher, so that a crosslinked three‐dimensional pattern is formed rather than the standard ladder.     

A new polymorph of physcion

The structure of the title compound, 7‐methoxy‐2‐methyl‐4,5‐dihydroxyanthracene‐9,10‐dione, C₁₆H₁₂O₅, was originally reported by Ulickýet al. [Acta Cryst. (1991). C 47 , 1879–1881] in the space group P2₁2₁2₁ [polymorph (Io)]. The new polymorph, (Im), crystallizes in the space group P2₁/c. The molecular structures are closely similar, with both –OH groups forming intramolecular hydrogen bonds to one of the neighbouring quinone O atoms, thus slightly lengthening this C=O bond; the pattern of C—C bond lengths in the ring system is consistent with some contribution from a resonance form with a negative charge at the hydrogen‐bonded quinone O atom and an aromatic region around its neighbouring C atoms. The packing of (Im) is simpler than the extensively crosslinked pattern of (Io), with molecular tapes connected by classical (but three‐centre) and `weak' hydrogen bonds, parallel to [20].     

Pseudopolymorphs of chelidamic acid and its dimethyl ester

Different tautomeric and zwitterionic forms of chelidamic acid (4‐hydroxypyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylic acid) are present in the crystal structures of chelidamic acid methanol monosolvate, C₇H₅NO₅·CH₄O, (Ia), dimethylammonium chelidamate (dimethylammonium 6‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐carboxylate), C₂H₈N⁺·C₇H₄NO₅⁻, (Ib), and chelidamic acid dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C₇H₅NO₅·C₂H₆OS, (Ic). While the zwitterionic pyridinium carboxylate in (Ia) can be explained from the pK_a values, a (partially) deprotonated hydroxy group in the presence of a neutral carboxy group, as observed in (Ib) and (Ic), is unexpected. In (Ib), there are two formula units in the asymmetric unit with the chelidamic acid entities connected by a symmetric O—H...O hydrogen bond. Also, crystals of chelidamic acid dimethyl ester (dimethyl 4‐hydroxypyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylate) were obtained as a monohydrate, C₉H₉NO₅·H₂O, (IIa), and as a solvent‐free modification, in which both ester molecules adopt the hydroxypyridine form. In (IIa), the solvent water molecule stabilizes the synperiplanar conformation of both carbonyl O atoms with respect to the pyridine N atom by two O—H...O hydrogen bonds, whereas an antiperiplanar arrangement is observed in the water‐free structure. A database study and ab initio energy calculations help to compare the stabilities of the various ester conformations.     

Five pseudopolymorphs and a cocrystal of nitrofurantoin

The antibiotic nitrofurantoin {systematic name: (E)‐1‐[(5‐nitro‐2‐furyl)methylideneamino]imidazolidine‐2,4‐dione} is not only used for the treatment of urinary tract infections, but also illegally applied as an animal food additive. Since derivatives of 2,6‐diaminopyridine might serve as artificial receptors for its recognition, we crystallized one potential drug–receptor complex, nitrofurantoin–2,6‐diacetamidopyridine (1/1), C₈H₆N₄O₅·C₉H₁₁N₃O₂, (I·II). It is characterized by one N—H...N and two N—H...O hydrogen bonds and confirms a previous NMR study. During the crystallization screening, several new pseudopolymorphs of both components were obtained, namely a nitrofurantoin dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C₈H₆N₄O₅·C₂H₆OS, (Ia), a nitrofurantoin dimethyl sulfoxide hemisolvate, C₈H₆N₄O₅·0.5C₂H₆OS, (Ib), two nitrofurantoin dimethylacetamide monosolvates, C₈H₆N₄O₅·C₄H₉NO, (Ic) and (Id), and a nitrofurantoin dimethylacetamide disolvate, C₈H₆N₄O₅·2C₄H₉NO, (Ie), as well as a 2,6‐diacetamidopyridine dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₁₁N₃O₂·C₃H₇NO, (IIa). Of these, (Ia), (Ic) and (Id) were formed during cocrystallization attempts with 1‐(4‐fluorophenyl)biguanide hydrochloride. Obviously nitrofurantoin prefers the higher‐energy conformation in the crystal structures, which all exhibit N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen‐bond interactions. The latter are especially important for the crystal packing. 2,6‐Diacetamidopyridine shows some conformational flexibility depending on the hydrogen‐bond pattern.