Endoscopic release in carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis of clinical results in 200 cases.

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral neuropathy. Conventional carpal tunnel surgery has been performed as a primary procedure for the decompression of the median nerve at the wrist in patients who have idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. While the results have been excellent, this surgical procedure has been reported to be related to high postoperative morbidity and extended length of recovery time. Over the past decade, endoscopic release of the transverse carpal ligament has been developed as a new, alternative method to the open procedures. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has been reported to ensure less postoperative morbidity, more rapid recovery of strength, with earlier return to work, reduced disability time and a better cosmetic result. The authors present a surgical series of 200 hands in 164 patients (36 bilaterals) with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome, who underwent a single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release (Agee technique), with regards to the clinical outcome and complications occurred after 4-months follow-up.     

Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release : a prospective,randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common condition causing hand pain and numbness. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has been demonstrated to reduce recovery time, although previous studies have raised concerns about an increased rate of complications. The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare open carpal tunnel release with single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multicenter center study was performed on 192 hands in 147 patients. The open method was performed in ninety-five hands in seventy-two patients, and the endoscopic method was performed in ninety-seven hands in seventy-five patients. All of the patients had clinical signs or symptoms and electrodiagnostic findings consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome and had not responded to, or had refused, nonoperative management. Follow-up evaluations with use of validated outcome instruments and quantitative measurements of grip strength, pinch strength, and hand dexterity were performed at two, four, eight, twelve, twenty-six, and fifty-two weeks after the surgery. Complications were identified. The cost of the procedures and the time until return to work were recorded and compared between the groups. RESULTS: During the first three months after surgery, the patients treated with the endoscopic method had better Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scores, better Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Functional Status Scores, and better subjective satisfaction scores. During the first three months after surgery, they also had significantly (p < 0.05) greater grip strength, pinch strength, and hand dexterity. The open technique resulted in greater scar tenderness during the first three months after surgery as well as a longer time until the patients could return to work (median, thirty-eight days compared with eighteen days after the endoscopic release). No technical problems with respect to nerve, tendon, or artery injuries were noted in either group. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications or the cost of surgery between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Good clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction are achieved more quickly when the endoscopic method of carpal tunnel release is used. Single-portal endoscopic surgery is a safe and effective method of treating carpal tunnel syndrome.     

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis

This study evaluated the clinical results of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in carpal tunnel syndrome caused by long-term hemodialysis and compared the results with that of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Operations were done in 32 patients (60 hands) with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome and in eight patients (15 hands) with carpal tunnel syndrome resulting from long-term hemodialysis. There was no significant difference in findings of preoperative evaluations and postoperative clinical results between the two groups, except for a difference with the patient satisfaction score with surgery on a visual analogue scale. The mean satisfaction score was 9.0 at 6 months, 9.3 at 1 year, and 9.5 at the 2-year followup in the group of patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. However, in the group of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome resulting from long-term hemodialysis, the mean satisfaction score was 8.5 at 6 months, 8.2 at 1 year, and 6.5 at the 2-year followup. The score began to decrease at an average of 17.2 months after surgery. Long-term hemodialysis related carpal tunnel syndrome showed satisfactory short-term clinical results until approximately 1.5 years after the operation. After that time, the symptoms tended to deteriorate in 50% of the patients who received hemodialysis continuously.     

Failed endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Operative findings and results of open revision surgery.

From 1994 to 1997, 22 patients (24 wrists) underwent open revision carpal tunnel release for persistent carpal tunnel syndrome after a primary endoscopic release. The age range was from 21 to 77 years. At the time of revision surgery, 22 wrists had an incomplete release of the flexor retinaculum and two patients had median nerve transection (one partial and one complete). One patient had release of Guyon's canal and not the carpal tunnel. After the open revision carpal tunnel release, 20 patients returned to work with five patients returning to jobs of lighter duty. In addition, these 20 patients had significant improvement in symptoms. The remaining two patients had sustained a median nerve injury and did not return to work. One of these patients developed a painful neuroma in continuity of the median nerve which required vein wrapping with a saphenous vein graft. This study indicates that endoscopic release of the flexor retinaculum holds the same risks and complications as open release. Based on our study we believe that patients with persistent carpal tunnel syndrome after failed endoscopic flexor retinaculum release can be successfully treated with open release.     

Investigation of segmental carpal tunnel pressure in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome--is it necessary to release the distal aponeurotic portion of the flexor retinaculum in endoscopic carpal tunnel release surgery?

Segmental carpal tunnel pressure was measured in 12 hands of 11 idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome patients before and after two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. We aimed to determine at which part of the carpal tunnel the median nerve could be compressed, and to evaluate whether carpal tunnel pressure could be reduced sufficiently at all segments of the carpal tunnel after the surgery. Pressure measurements were performed using a pressure guide wire. The site with the highest pressure corresponded to the area around the hamate hook; the pressure in the area distal to the flexor retinaculum could be pathogenically high (more than 30 mmHg) before the surgery. The two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release achieved sufficient pressure reduction in all segments of the carpal tunnel when the flexor retinaculum and the fibrous structure between the flexor retinaculum and the palmar aponeurosis were completely released.     

Early recovery after endoscopic vs. short-incision open carpal tunnel release

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has been claimed to offer improvement in recovery time and postoperative discomfort over open carpal tunnel release. Short-incision open carpal tunnel release has been claimed to offer recoveries comparable with endoscopic techniques. Patients receiving carpal tunnel surgery were randomized to short-incision open release or single-portal endoscopic release. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included grip and pinch strength measurements and patient completion of a questionnaire regarding symptoms and function. Thirty-six operated hands completed evaluation, including 22 endoscopic and 14 open releases. Early grip and pinch strength after endoscopic carpal tunnel release were improved significantly over short-incision open release (p < 0.05). Subjective evaluation indicated a trend toward improved symptoms and function with endoscopic over short-incision open carpal tunnel release. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release provides faster recovery of strength than short-incision open carpal tunnel release and improves early postoperative comfort and function to a small degree.     

Median nerve excursion during endoscopic carpal tunnel release

OBJECTIVE: Restriction of the excursion of the nerve has been accepted as a pathogenetic element in carpal tunnel syndrome. The goal of this article was to evaluate the median nerve excursion in the carpal tunnel measured as a function of wrist position before and after endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) on 28 hands of 22 patients. METHODS: The position of cylindrical stainless steel markers embedded within the median nerve was measured by a direct radiographic technique. Each upper extremity was examined in three wrist positions. Then, endoscopic release with Menon's technique was performed, and the measurements were repeated. RESULTS: In this prospective clinical study, most (93%) of the patients experienced resolution of their symptoms. Before and after ECTR, median nerve excursion was linear and was affected by wrist position. Before ECTR, when the wrist was moved from the end of dorsiflexion to the end of palmar flexion, the median nerve underwent a mean total excursion of 28.8 mm at the wrist. A comparison of the before and after ECTR excursion showed no statistical differences in the amount of motion. CONCLUSION: The single-portal ECTR does not seem to influence the median nerve excursion for the wrist positions studied in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The results from this in vivo study showed longitudinal gliding of the median nerve twice as great as in in vitro studies.     

Long-term outcomes following single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release

Background

There is limited published information about long-term outcomes and recurrence rates following single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Methods

We reviewed symptom and function outcomes from a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release at a minimum of 8 years follow-up. Out of 207 patients in the original database, we were able to confirm correct current contact information for 106 patients. Of these, 91 patients with 115 single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel releases agreed to participate. All of these patients were eligible for this long-term follow-up study based on documented preoperative and 6-month postoperative Levine-Katz questionnaire scores. Patients then completed a current update of the Levine-Katz questionnaires to assess function and symptom outcomes at latest follow-up.

Results

The average 6-month postoperative scores were significantly lower compared with the average preoperative scores and were maintained at long-term follow-up. There were no significant differences in average change in scores at long-term follow-up compared to 6-months postoperative.

Conclusions

Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release is an effective surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Low recurrence rates and maintenance of low symptom and function scores can be expected at 8 to 10 years following this technique.     

A potential complication of endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Complications of carpal tunnel release have been well documented in the literature. Recently, a procedure for endoscopic release of the transverse carpal ligament has been described. This case report demonstrates a potential complication of endoscopic carpal tunnel release, in which the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon to the ring finger was nearly cut when the arthroscopic trocar passed beneath it. The procedure was converted to an open carpal tunnel release when the transverse fibers of the carpal ligament were not seen after several passes of the trocar. This complication was related to the inability to fully extend the wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints because of arthritic contractures. This case underscores the need for accurate identification of endoscopic anatomy prior to release of the carpal tunnel. The surgeon should not hesitate to convert to open technique if it becomes necessary.     

Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome: long-term results using the Chow technique.

This report presents the author's experience with the Chow method for endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The report includes 116 cases (wrists) of 84 patients. The success rate for these cases is 93.3% and the recurrence rate is 0.96%. One temporary ulnar neuropraxia was reported in this group with spontaneous recovery. There were no permanent nerve injuries. Results of 5-year follow-up nerve conduction velocity tests are also included. This report shows that endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome, using the Chow method, is a reliable alternative to the open procedure and has produced good, long-term, results.     

Carpal arch alteration and related clinical status after endoscopic carpal tunnel release

One hundred eight endoscopic carpal tunnel releases were performed by a modification of the technique described by Chow. Eighty-seven of the 108 cases were evaluated for quantitative postoperative widening of the transverse carpal arch. The average postoperative widening of the transverse carpal arch was 0.17 cm (7%), with a range of 0 to 0.5 cm. Seventy percent of the patients showed 0% to 10% widening, 26% showed 10% to 20% widening, and 4% showed more than 20% widening of the transverse carpal arch. Preliminary findings show that 3 weeks after endoscopic carpal tunnel release, pinch strength was at 102% and grip strength at 86% of preoperative values. Six weeks after surgery, pinch strength was 106% and grip strength was 121% of preoperative values. The complication rate in this series was 3%. The transverse dimension of the carpal arch generally widens after endoscopic carpal tunnel release but to a lesser degree than has been reported for open carpal tunnel release. The rate of improvement of pinch and grip strength after endoscopic release is faster than that reported in the literature after open release.     

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release in the elderly.

The present study is aimed to clarify the postoperative outcome of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in elderly patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release was performed on 37 hands of 27 patients (2 men, 25 women) who were aged 70 years or older and clinically and electrophysiologically diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. Mean age at the time of surgery was 74.5 years (range: 70-85 years). Mean postoperative follow-up was 35.5 months (range: 12-114 months). Pain was present preoperatively in 20 hands, but quickly resolved postoperatively in all cases. Numbness completely disappeared in 13 of 37 hands (35.1%), but some degree of numbness remained in the remaining cases. Preoperative severity of thenar muscle atrophy was none in 4 hands, mild in 7 hands, moderate in 12 hands and severe in 14 hands. Postoperative severity of thenar muscle atrophy at final follow-up was none in 13 hands, mild in 16 hands, moderate in 2 hands and severe in 6 hands, confirming that thenar muscle atrophy improves even in elderly patients. However, moderate or severe thenar muscle atrophy remained in 8 hands (21.6%). Endoscopic carpal tunnel release should be considered in the elderly, even though clinical symptoms may not improve substantially in advanced cases.     

Persistent carpal tunnel syndrome after both endoscopic and open release: a rare case of a bifid median nerve in two separate compartments

We present a case of carpal tunnel syndrome in the presence of a bifid median nerve. The symptoms had not been relieved by two previous operations to decompress the median nerve, one endoscopic and one open. At the third operation the second half of the nerve was found in its own tunnel, and released. The literature on variations in the median nerve is reviewed. Open release is indicated in recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome and where anatomical variations are suspected.     

Two cases of endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome in macrodactyly patients.

Some cases of carpal tunnel syndrome in macrodactyly patients have been reported. We performed endoscopic carpal canal release on two unilateral macrodactyly patients suffering from bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. We measured carpal canal pressure before performing endoscopic surgery using the Universal Subcutaneous Endoscope system to confirm median nerve compression. We diagnosed median nerve compression in each patient due to the high preoperative carpal canal pressure. Carpal canal pressure immediately decreased to within normal range following release of both the flexor retinaculum and the distal holdfast fibres of the flexor retinaculum. One patient recovered to within normal in terms of sensory disturbances and abductor pollicis brevis muscle strength. The other patient showed improvement in terms of sensory disturbance, however, muscle power did not recover because this patient had suffered from carpal tunnel syndrome for ten years. Endoscopic carpal canal release and decompression surgery was effective for carpal tunnel syndrome in both macrodactyly patients.     

腕管综合征治疗研究进展

目的对腕管综合征(carpal tunnel syndrome,CTS)的治疗研究现状作一综述。方法查阅近年来国内外CTS治疗的相关文献,进行分析总结。结果腕夹板、类固醇适用于轻、中度CTS患者,近期效果显著;治疗后复发的CTS患者需采取手术治疗。主要术式为腕管松解术,包括腕管切开松解减压术(传统型和小切口型)、内镜下腕管松解减压术等。结论 CTS的最佳治疗方法尚无定论,部分学者推荐首选手术治疗。     

腕管切开松解减压术

腕管切开松解减压术一直被认为是外科治疗腕管综合征的经典方法，于1913年由Marie和Foix最先提出。其术式甚多，优、缺点各异，操作也有简有繁。现结合腕部神经解剖特点，将每一种术式归纳复述如下。     

Simultaneous carpal tunnel release and Dupuytren's fasciectomy

Simultaneous operations for carpal tunnel syndrome and Dupuytren's disease have been reported in only one study which recommended staged treatment because there was an 87% complication rate with simultaneous treatment. The present study reviewed simultaneous treatment of 30 patients during a 20-year period. Complications and unfavourable results were compared to similar groups of patients who underwent either Dupuytren's fasciectomy or carpal tunnel release as sole procedures. Early complications (13%) were far less than in previous studies and were easily corrected. The incidence of recurrence and extension (20%) was lower than in the Dupuytren's fasciectomy group and much lower than in previous reports. Simultaneous carpal tunnel release and Dupuytren's fasciectomy are strongly recommended when these conditions are both present in the same hand.     

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: Development of a new device

The carpal tunnel syndrome is traditionally treated through an open incision. To reduce scar formation and postoperative recovery time, endoscopic methods were developed. These methods have one major problem in common, as cadaver studies show, which is the incomplete release of the transverse carpal ligament. To avoid this severe complication, we started to develop an instrument which allows to perform complete releases. Therefore we worked from the very beginning with a pair of basket forceps, which divides ligament tissue safely, completely and additionally performs partial resection of the ligament during the procedure. The new device is based on a standard 4.0 mm, 30° angled scope. Subligamental, dorsal tissue is bluntly dissected from the transverse carpal ligament by an 80 mm cannula that has a longitudinal notch. Λ 2.5 mm basket forceps is introduced and securely guided within this notch. Using the basket forceps endoscopic carpal tunnel release was performed in a uni-portal approach on 7 cadaver hands followed by a duo-portal approach on 7 additional cadaver hands. Succeeding endoscopic carpal tunnel release, the transverse carpal ligament and adjoining structures were exposed and scrutinized for unintended injuries. In the duo-portal approach all ligaments were completely divided. There were no complications (laceration of nerves, vessels, tendons) found after endoscopic carpal tunnel release in all cadaveric hands. Conclusion: The developed device seems in its technique and potential for prevention of iatrogenic injuries superior to other endoscopic systems, since it not only permits endoscopic carpal tunnel release under direct visualization but also results in the partial resection of the ligament during the procedure, thus reducing the risk of later recurrencies.     

Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective,randomised, blinded assessment

The advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic compared with open carpal tunnel release are controversial. We have performed a prospective, randomised, blinded assessment in a district general hospital in order to determine if there was any demonstrable advantage in undertaking either technique. Twenty-five patients with confirmed bilateral idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were randomised to undergo endoscopic release by the single portal Agee technique to one hand and open release to the other. Independent preoperative and postoperative assessment was undertaken by a hand therapist who was blinded to the type of treatment. Follow-up was for 12 months. The operating time was two minutes shorter for the open technique (p < 0.005). At all stages of postoperative assessment, the endoscopic technique had no significant advantages in terms of return of muscle strength and assessment of hand function, grip strength, manual dexterity or sensation. In comparison with open release, single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release has a similar incidence of complications and a similar return of hand function, but is a slightly slower technique to undertake.     

Carpal tunnel syndrome caused by a fibrolipomatous hamartoma of the median nerve treated by endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel

Fibrolipomatous hamartoma has up to now been considered a rare anomaly that most commonly affects the median nerve. Its pathogenesis is controversial. The magnetic resonance (MR) appearance is pathognomonic and precludes the necessity for a diagnostic biopsy. Its reported incidence is likely to increase as a result of the increased use of MRI. There is no definitive treatment, although carpal tunnel syndrome caused by fibrolipomatous hamartoma has been noted to respond to open release of the carpal tunnel. We describe a case of carpal tunnel syndrome caused by fibrolipomatous hamartoma of the median nerve that responded to a two-port endoscopic technique of release. Provided that a safe, distinct surgical plane can be established between the median nerve and the flexor retinaculum, the two-port technique of endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel is both safe and effective.