Simultaneous versus staged liver resection of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Background and aims The surgical strategy for treatment of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer remains controversial. This retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the postoperative outcome and survival of patients receiving simultaneous resection of liver metastases and primary colorectal cancer to those receiving staged resection. Materials and methods Between January 1988 and September 2005, 219 patients underwent liver resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases, of whom, 40 patients received simultaneous resection of liver metastases and primary colorectal cancer, and 179 patients staged resections. Patients were identified from a prospective database, and records were retrospectively reviewed. Patient, tumor, and operative parameters were analyzed for their influence on postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as on long-term survival. Results Simultaneous liver resections tend to be performed for colon primaries rather than for rectal cancer (p = 0.004) and used less extensive liver resections (p < 0.001). The postoperative morbidity was comparable between both groups, whereas the mortality was significantly higher in patients with simultaneous liver resection (p = 0.012). The mortality after simultaneous liver resection (n = 4) occurred after major hepatectomies, and three of these four patients were 70 years of age or older. There was no significant difference in long-term survival after formally curative simultaneous and staged liver resection. Conclusion Simultaneous liver and colorectal resection is as efficient as staged resections in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. To perform simultaneous resections safely a careful patient selection is necessary. The most important criteria to select patients for simultaneous liver resection are age of the patient and extent of liver resection.     

Surgical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases in Patients with Expanded Indications: A Single-Center Experience with 501 Patients

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate survival after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases in patients with expanded indications. METHODS: A total of 501 patients had 545 liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer. There were no predefined criteria for resectability with regard to the number or size of the tumors, locoregional invasion, or extrahepatic disease, except that resection had potential to be complete and macroscopically curative. All patients who had curative hepatic resection were advised to start postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients had expanded indications (52 percent), including 14 with liver metastases >10 cm, 194 with bilateral deposits, 140 with four or more liver metastases, and 73 with extrahepatic disease. The overall actuarial survival rates at one, three, five, and ten years were 88, 67, 45, and 36 percent, respectively, for patients with classic indications and 84, 53, 34, and 24 percent, respectively, for patients with expanded indications (P = 0.0009). In the group of expanded indications, there were more patients who received preoperative than postoperative chemotherapy: 72 (28 percent) vs. 18 (7 percent; P < 0.0001), and 148 (70 percent) vs. 131 (61 percent; P = 0.0466). In a multivariate analysis, four or more liver metastases and extrahepatic disease were independent predictors of poor outcome. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved survival (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that liver resection should be indicated in patients with expanded indications. The extent of the benefits of preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy needs to be quantitated.     

Resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the indications for and value of liver resection for metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: From 1978 through 1991, 66 patients were operated on for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. All patients had had a curative resection of their colorectal cancer. Forty resections of the liver were major anatomic resections. RESULTS: Five patients died in the postoperative period. All resections were intended to be curative, but in 16 of the patients the resection became noncurative. None of these patients lived more than two years after liver resection. Fifty patients with a curative resection had a three-year survival rate of 36 percent, postoperative death included. Recurrence in the liver was observed in 30 patients (60 percent) from 3 to 33 (median, 11) months after the liver resection. Four patients had repeated resections performed. Two of them are alive without recurrences 34 and 60 months after the first liver resection, respectively. The difference in survival between curative and noncurative liver resection was highly significant (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Sex, age, Dukes stage of primary colorectal cancer, synchronous or metachronous appearance of metastases, or number of metastases could not predict long-term prognosis. The only factors of predictive value were tumor size less than 4 cm in diameter, a free resection margin, and no extrahepatic tumor. If it is possible to do a curative resection, there should be few contraindications against liver surgery as it is the only treatment that can demonstrate long-term survival for approximately one-third of the patients, and it is the only possibility of a cure.     

Factors affecting the prognosis of anatomical liver resection for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver resection has improved the survival of colorectal cancer patients with metastases. However, there are groups at high risk of recurrence after liver resection. This report reviews our results using anatomical liver resection and analyzes the prognostic factors. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed 78 patients who underwent anatomical liver resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer between June 1988 and March 2002. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had synchronous metastases, and 49 had metachronous. The 5-year overall survival rate was 43%. Patients with more than three metastatic tumors had a significantly poorer 5-year recurrence-free survival rate. There was no statistical difference in the 5-year overall survival rate between patients with metachronous metastases (41%) and those with synchronous (44%) metastases. The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly poorer for patients with an interval of 1 year or less between colorectal and liver resections than for patients with a longer interval. Recurrence after liver resection occurred in 38 patients (49%). The recurrences occurred in the lung in 18 patients, in remnant liver in 15 patients, in lymph nodes in 7 patients, and in other organs in 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that anatomical liver resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer improves survival. Liver metastases that occur within 1 year of colorectal resection may need an interval of observation before liver resection.     

Major liver resections in the elderly—is an aggressive approach justified?

Background and aims  As the mean life expectancy rises, the incidence of patients 75 years of age and older who present with colorectal liver metastases continues to increase. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcome of major hepatic resections in the elderly population. Patient and methods  From April 1998 to December 2006, 572 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases were treated at our Institution. Of these, 59 were 75 years or older. There was an intent to proceed with major liver resections in all cases. Data were analyzed according to diagnosis, comorbidities, extent of liver resection, postoperative complications, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Results  Surgical treatment included right hepatectomies (n = 8), left hepatectomies (n = 4), and sectionectomies (more than three segments; n = 33). Fourteen (n = 14) patients received an explorative laparotomy alone. Morbidity and hospital mortality were 10% and 3%, respectively. Overall survival of 1, 3, and 5 years was 90%, 64%, and 33%, respectively. The corresponding disease-free survival was 74%, 42%, and 32%. Resection margin (R class) was the only predictor of survival by both uni- and multivariate analyses. Conclusion  Hepatic resections can be performed safely in selected patients 75 years of age or older.     

Liver metastases with massive portal venous tumor thrombi from colorectal cancer: can be treated by surgical resection?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The surgical treatments for liver metastases from colorectal cancer with massive portal venous tumor thrombi were evaluated. METHODOLOGY: Five patients, among the 142 patients who underwent hepatic resection for liver metastases from colorectal cancer from 1989 to 1998, were included in this study. The tumor thrombi in the main portal vein were removed by the following procedures; (1) the circumferential incision of the first branch of the portal vein and removal of the exposed tumor thrombi with ring forceps and suction, (2) temporary clamping of the distal end, (3) dilatation of the round ligament and the venous cannula was inserted into the umbilical portion, (4) washing out of the residual tumor thrombi, (5) declamping of the distal end and closing suture of the cut end of the portal branch. RESULTS: All patients had metachronous metastases and underwent resections of the primary tumor within 2 years. The surgical procedures performed were as follows: two cases that underwent right hepatectomies with portal venous tumor thrombectomies, one right trisectionectomy with portal venous tumor thrombectomy, one right hepatectomy plus limited resection of the contralateral lobe, and one left lateral sectionectomy with limited resection of the right lobe. All patients had no major postoperative complications and returned to their social lives within 1 month after operation. The intra-arterial catheter devices were implanted in four patients in order to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. One patient survived the 36-month period after liver resection, although 4 patients died of liver recurrence within 12 months. The mean survival time was 14.4 months and the overall 1-year survival rate was 20.0 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection for this disease may bring longer survival rates for some patients, but not be an effective therapeutic option in our series. We should create other adjuvant therapies to improve these survival rates.     

Repeat liver resection for recurrent colorectal metastases: a single-centre, 13-year experience

Objectives: Isolated intrahepatic recurrence is noted in up to 40% of patients following curative liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aims of this study were to analyse the outcomes of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent CLM and to identify factors predicting survival.Methods: Data for all liver resections for CLM carried out at one centre between 1998 and 2011 were analysed.Results: A total of 1027 liver resections were performed for CLM. Of these, 58 were repeat liver resections performed in 53 patients. Median time intervals were 10.5 months between the primary resection and first hepatectomy, and 15.4 months between the first and repeat hepatectomies. The median tumour size was 3.0 cm and the median number of tumours was one. Six patients had a positive margin (R1) resection following first hepatectomy. There were no perioperative deaths. Significant complications included transient liver dysfunction in one and bile leak in two patients. Rates of 1-, 3-and 5-year overall survival following repeat liver resection were 85%, 61% and 52%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 23 months. R1 resection at first hepatectomy (P = 0.002), a shorter time interval between the first and second hepatectomies (P = 0.02) and the presence of extrahepatic disease (P = 0.02) were associated with significantly worse overall survival.Conclusions: Repeat resection of CLM is safe and can achieve longterm survival in carefully selected patients. A preoperative knowledge of poor prognostic factors helps to facilitate better patient selection.     

Surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer in elderly patients

Introduction The liver is the most frequent site of liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer. Because of short life expectances and improved nonoperative modalities, the role of liver resection in elderly patients with LM is unclear.Methods During a 15-year period, 197 patients underwent liver resection for colorectal metastases. This study was designed to compare morbidity, mortality, and long-term outcome after hepatic resection in patients aged 70 years and older and in patients younger than 70. According to the age at the time of operation, patients were divided into two groups. Group A included patients aged 70 years or older and group B included younger patients.Results The clinical and pathologic parameters of the two groups were compared and tested as factors affecting early and long-term outcomes after resection. A modified oncologic clinical risk score (CRS) was tested on this series of patients. Overall morbidity was 16.3% (group A 20.7% vs group B 14.6%; P=0.18). Hospital mortality was 3% (5.7% in group A and 2.1% in group B; P=0.19). Actuarial 5 years survival were 30% in group A and 38% in group B (P=ns).Discussion The presence of more than three Fong’s CRS parameters and microscopic involvement of resectional margin directly affected survival. Under meticulous preoperative assessment and postoperative care, liver resection for LM is justified in patients over 70 years of age; age by itself may not be a controindication to surgery.     

Surgical treatment of liver metastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The resection of colorectal liver metastases is currently a well accepted and effective treatment. In the past decade liver metastases of breast cancer have been treated more frequently by surgical intervention. METHODOLOGY: The authors retrospectively studied the data of 17 operated patients, and investigated the clinical features of liver metastases, lymph node involvement of primary tumor, the indications of operations, and early and late results of the treatment. RESULTS: The solitary metastasis and demarcated multiple metastases, which seemed (by CT scan) to be operable by Ro resection were among the surgical indications. Different segment resections, 3 laparoscopic resections and one hemihepatectomy were performed. There were no deaths in the perioperative period, though there were two minor postoperative complications in two cases. All patients received chemotherapy. By follow-up, three breast cancer patients died, whose average survival rate was 19.25 months. The other patients' average follow-up time was 15.17 months, without relapse. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion it appears that in selected cases resection of liver metastases can be safely performed and the survival rate is reasonable.     

Treatment outcomes of hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma

Background and Aim:  The resection of synchronous or metachronous pulmonary and liver metastasis is an aggressive treatment option for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and has been shown to yield acceptable long-term survival. We reviewed our experience with colorectal cancer patients with both liver and lung resections to determine the efficacy of surgical resections.
Methods:  We performed a single institution, retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent surgical hepatic and pulmonary resection for metastatic colorectal cancer between 1995 and 2004.
Results:  A total of 32 patients underwent resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases secondary to colorectal cancer. The 5-year overall survival from initial operation was 60.8%. The disease-free interval was 44.3 months (95% confidence interval: 24.7 and 63.8, respectively). Neither the number of pulmonary lesions nor the time interval between the primary surgery and the metastasectomy had a significant impact on survival ( P  = 0.134).
Conclusion:  An aggressive surgical treatment of selected colorectal cancer patients with lung and liver metastases resulted in prolonged survival. The 5-year survival rate of 60.8% with no perioperative mortality was observed in our study.     

Hepatic resections for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer

The present study was performed to assess survival benefits in patients who underwent a hepatic resection for isolated bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Thirty-eight patients underwent a curative hepatic resection for isolated colorectal liver metastasis. Among them, 11 patients had bilobar liver metastases and 19 had a solitary metastasis. The remaining 8 patients had unilobar multiple lesions. We investigated survival in two groups those with bilobar and those with solitary metastatic tumors. Survival and disease-free survival were 36% and 18% at 5 years, respectively, in the patients with bilobar liver metastases, while these survivals were 43% and 34% in the patients with solitary liver metastasis. In the 38 patients, repeated hepatic resections were performed in 15 patients with recurrent liver disease. The 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates for these patients were 38% and 27%, respectively, after the second hepatic resections. Of the 11 patients with bilobar liver metastases, 5 underwent a repeated hepatic resection, and they all survived for over 42 months. Based on our observations, a hepatic resection was thus found to be effective even in selected patients with either bilobar nodules or recurrence in the remnant liver.     

Staged liver resection for colorectal metastases:a valuable strategy or a waste of time?

BACKGROUND:The use of staged liver resections for colorectal metastases has been increasing in recent times.The aim of this study was to determine the practices and outcomes of those surgeons attending the Australia and New Zealand Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Association(ANZHPBA)meeting in 2008 who perform staged resections. METHODS:A questionnaire was sent to all members of the ANZHPBA and the international faculty who were invited to attend the annual meeting held in Coolum,Queensland, Australia in October 2008. RESULTS:There were 30 responses from 7 centres across the UK,Germany and Australia.Twenty-eight patients completed treatment.The study population was predominantly male (n=20,67%),with an average age of 59.4 years.All patients had bilobar disease.A right-sided first resection was planned in 39%of cases.Seventeen percent of patients underwent portal vein embolization prior to first resection.A second operation was performed at an average of 2.8 months from the first resection.Overall,50%(n=14)of patients eventually achieved a complete(R0)staged procedure.Twelve complications after the first resection were seen in 32%patients(n=9).Twenty- three patients underwent a second liver resection.Twenty-five complications after the second resection were present in 57% (n=13). CONCLUSIONS:Two-stage liver resections are beneficial if both stages are completed and an R0 resection is achieved. While there is increased morbidity and mortality,we believe that staged liver resection for colorectal metastases is a valuable strategy in selected cases.     

Complications following liver resection for colorectal metastases do not impact on longterm outcome

Background

It has been suggested that adverse postoperative outcomes may have a negative impact on longterm survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Objectives

This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic impact of postoperative complications in patients submitted to a potentially curative resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of outcomes in 199 patients submitted to hepatic resection with curative intent for metastatic colorectal cancer during 1999–2008 was conducted.

Results

The overall complication rate was 38% (n = 75). Of all complications, 79% were minor (Grades I or II). There were five deaths (3%). The median length of follow-up was 39 months. Rates of 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 44% and 27%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that an elevated preoperative level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), intraoperative blood loss of >300 ml, multiple metastases, large (≥35 mm) metastases and resection margins of <1 mm were associated with poor overall and disease-free survival. In addition, male sex and synchronous metastases were associated with poor disease-free survival. Postoperative complications did not have an impact on either survival measure. The multivariate model did not include complications as a predictive factor.

Conclusions

Postoperative complications were not found to influence overall or disease-free survival in the present series. The number and size of liver metastases were confirmed as significant prognostic factors.     

Descriptive analysis of and overall survival after surgical treatment of lung metastases

OBJECTIVE:

To describe demographic characteristics, surgical results, postoperative complications, and overall survival rates in surgically treated patients with lung metastases.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective analysis of 119 patients who underwent a total of 154 lung metastasis resections between 1997 and 2011.

RESULTS:

Among the 119 patients, 68 (57.1%) were male and 108 (90.8%) were White. The median age was 52 years (range, 15-75 years). In this sample, 63 patients (52.9%) presented with comorbidities, the most common being systemic arterial hypertension (69.8%) and diabetes (19.0%). Primary colorectal tumors (47.9%) and musculoskeletal tumors (21.8%) were the main sites of origin of the metastases. Approximately 24% of the patients underwent more than one resection of the lesions, and 71% had adjuvant treatment prior to metastasectomy. The rate of lung metastasis recurrence was 19.3%, and the median disease-free interval was 23 months. The main surgical access used was thoracotomy (78%), and the most common approach was wedge resection with segmentectomy (51%). The rate of postoperative complications was 22%, and perioperative mortality was 1.9%. The overall survival rates at 12, 36, 60, and 120 months were 96%, 77%, 56%, and 39%, respectively. A Cox analysis confirmed that complications within the first 30 postoperative days were associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.09-3.06; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS:

Surgical treatment of lung metastases is safe and effective, with good overall survival, especially in patients with fewer metastases.     

Prognostic factors following liver resection for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

AIM: To determine the impact of prognostic factors on survival of patients with metastases from colorectal cancer that underwent liver resection. METHODS: The records of 28 patients that underwent liver resection for metastases from colorectal cancer between April 1992 and September 2001 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-eight resections were performed (more than one resection in eight patients and two patients underwent re-resections). The primary tumor was resected in all the patients. A screening protocol for liver metastases including clinical examinations every three months, ultrassonography and CEA level until 5 years of follow-up and after every 6 months, was applied. The prognostic factors analyzed regarding the impact on survival were: Dukes C stage of primary tumor, size of metastasis >5 cm, a disease-free interval from primary tumor to metastasis < 1 year, CEA level > 100 ng/mL, resection margins < 1 cm and extrahepatic disease. The Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank and Cox regression were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Perioperative morbidity and mortality were 39.3% and 3.6%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 35%. The independent prognostic factors were: disease-free interval from primary tumor to metastasis < 1 year and extrahepatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: The liver resection for metastases from colorectal cancer is a safe procedure with more than 30% 5-year survival. Disease-free interval from primary tumor to metastasis < 1 year and extrahepatic disease were independent prognostic factors.     

Impact of age-related comorbidity on results of colorectal cancer surgery

AIM: To analyze the correlation between preexisting comorbidity and other clinicopathological features, short-term surgical outcome and long-term survival in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: According to age, 403 patients operated on for CRC in our department were divided into group A (< 70 years old) and group B (≥ 70 years old) and analyzed statistically.RESULTS: Rectal localization prevailed in group A (31.6% vs 19.7%, P = 0.027), whereas the percentage of R0 resect ions was 77% in the two groups.Comorbidity rate was 46.2% and 69.1% for group A and B, respectively ( P < 0.001), with a huge difference as regards cardiovascular diseases. Overall, postoperative morbidity was 16.9% and 20.8% in group A and B,respectively ( P = 0.367), whereas mortality was limited to group B (4.5%, P = 0.001). In both groups, patients who suffered from postoperative complications had a higher overall comorbidity rate, with preexisting cardiovascular diseases prevailing in group B ( P = 0.003).Overall 5-year survival rate was significantly better for group A (75.2% vs 55%, P = 0.006), whereas no significant difference was observed considering diseasespecific survival (76.3% vs 76.9%, P = 0.674).CONCLUSION: In spite of an increase in postoperative mortality and a lower overall long-term survival for patients aged ≥ 70 years old, it should be considered that, even in the elderly group, a significant number of patients is alive 5 years after CRC resection.     

Short- and-long term results of intraoperative radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the only therapeutic option with curative effect on malignant liver tumours, but in over 70% of cases, this is not a feasible option. A prospective study was performed to assess the short- and long-term effects of intraoperative radiofrequency ablation on unresectable liver metastases. PATIENTS: Between 1997 and 2001, 57 patients (mean age 61.9 years; range 31-83 years) with 297 unresectable liver metastases (colorectal adenocarcinoma, n=38; carcinoid tumour, n=4; malignant melanoma, n=3; other metastases, n=12) underwent intraoperative radiofrequency ablation. RESULTS: No mortality was observed in patients managed solely with radiofrequency ablation. Eight postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (14%). Three occurred when radiofrequency ablation was combined with resection. Of the 33 patients completely ablated, 30 patients are still alive and 21 are disease-free after a median follow-up of 18.1 months (range 2-43). Ten patients underwent more than one intraoperative radiofrequency ablation episode. Overall survival was 72.5% at 1 year and 52.5% at 3 years. Complete ablation and the number of lesions were significant independent prognostic factors for survival, with p<0.001 and p<0.0001, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation is a safe and effective option for patients with inoperable liver metastases without extra hepatic disease. Prospective controlled trials comparing the results of different treatments are required to assess which patients will benefit best from this emerging new treatment.     

Survival after repeat hepatic resection for recurrent colorectal metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This is a retrospective study examining survival of patients undergoing repeat hepatic resection for recurrent colorectal metastases. METHODOLOGY: The records of 41 patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer were reviewed. Curative resections (negative resection margin and no extrahepatic disease) were attempted in all patients. Recurrence developed in 26 (63%) patients, with disease being confined to the liver in 16 (39%) patients. Ten of them (24%) underwent hepatic resection and make up the study population. RESULTS: Ten patients (4 women, 6 men; mean age: 62 years, range: 50-82 years) developed recurrence confined to the liver at the median interval of 16 months (range: 5-34 months) after the first hepatectomy. In 6 patients the recurrent cancer(s) involved both the area near the resection line and remote sites from the site of the first hepatic resection. In 3 patients recurrent cancer(s) was located at sites remote from the first liver resection. In 1 patient the recurrent cancer was located in the same area as the original hepatic resection. Three formal hepatectomies and seven non-anatomical (wedge) resections were performed. The mean blood loss was 900 cc (range: 100-2700 cc); the mean hospital stay was 19 days (range: 8-34 days). There was no perioperative mortality. Morbidity was 20%. Four patients died of recurrent disease, with a mean disease-free survival of 13 months (range: 5-21 months). Two patients had a second recurrence resected at 10 and 24 months, respectively, after the second hepatic resection. One of these 2 patients had a fourth hepatic resection for hepatic recurrence and is still alive with no evidence of disease. Six patients are alive, 4 of them without evidence of disease, with a median follow-up time of 30 months (range: 22-64 months). Actuarial 4-year specific survival was 44%. Actuarial disease-free survival at 4 years was 18%. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected patients, repeat hepatic resection for colorectal metastases is a worthwhile treatment. Mortality, morbidity, and survival are similar to those following the initial resection.     

Laparoscopic resection of hepatic colorectal metastases

BackgroundLiver resection for secondary malignancy has become the standard of care in appropriately staged patients, offering 5-year survival rates of >40%. Reports of laparoscopic liver resection have been published with increasing frequency over the last few years. In these small series approximately one-third of all operations have been for malignancy, but survival figures cannot be assessed yet.MethodsA retrospective review of all laparoscopic liver resections performed by four surgeons in Brisbane between 1997 and 2004 was done. Follow-up was by regular patient review and telephone confirmation.ResultsOf 84 laparoscopic liver resections, 33 (39%) were for malignancy; 28 of these were for metastases (22 colorectal). Thirteen patients had left lateral sectionectomy with minimal morbidity; nine right hepatectomies were attempted and six cases of segmental or subsegmental resection were performed. Survival rates in 12 patients followed for 2 years with colorectal secondaries were 75% with 67% disease-free.DiscussionLaparoscopic liver resection is feasible in highly selected cases of malignant disease. Patients need to be appropriately staged and surgeons need a broad experience of open liver surgery and advanced laparoscopic procedures.     

Short-term postoperative outcomes after liver resection in the elderly patient: a nationwide population-based study

BackgroundLiver resection is high-risk surgery in particular in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to explore postoperative outcomes after liver resection in elderly patients.MethodsIn this nationwide study, all patients who underwent liver resection for primary and secondary liver tumours in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019 were included. Age groups were composed as younger than 70 (70-), between 70 and 80 (septuagenarians), and 80 years or older (octogenarians). Proportion of liver resections per age group and 30-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality were assessed.ResultsIn total, 6587 patients were included of whom 4023 (58.9%) were younger than 70, 2135 (32.4%) were septuagenarians and 429 (6.5%) were octogenarians. The proportion of septuagenarians increased during the study period (aOR:1.06, CI:1.02–1.09, p < 0.001). Thirty-day major morbidity was higher in septuagenarians (11%) and octogenarians (12%) compared to younger patients (9%, p = 0.049). Thirty-day mortality was higher in septuagenarians (4%) and octogenarians (4%) compared to younger patients (2%, p < 0.001). Cardiopulmonary complications occurred more frequently with higher age, liver-specific complications did not. Higher age was associated with higher 30-day morbidity and 30-day mortality in multivariable logistic regression.ConclusionThirty-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality are higher after liver resection in elderly patients, attributed mainly to non-surgical cardiopulmonary complications.