A survey of staff attitudes to increasing medical undergraduate education in a district general hospital

INTRODUCTION: Medical student numbers in Britain are increasing rapidly, beyond the capacity of most teaching hospitals, with more clinical teaching taking place in district general hospitals (DGHs). Surveys show that students value the intensive clinical teaching, smaller student numbers and perceived greater friendliness in DGHs. This paper explores DGH staff attitudes to teaching--their level of initial enthusiasm, their attitudes to current teaching, its effect on the hospital and to the sustainability of DGH undergraduate teaching--as both student numbers and service workloads continue to rise. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 6 key informants were used to generate themes for a 19-question pre-piloted anonymous postal questionnaire sent to all 68 staff involved in undergraduate medical teaching in Northampton General Hospital. RESULTS: The total response included 85% of consultants. Responses in the 3 staff groups were similar. Most respondents felt enthusiastic at the prospect of medical students, although they realised that this would be intellectually challenging and increase time pressures. These predictions were largely fulfilled. Respondents felt that in comparison to teaching hospitals the DGH teaching was more clinically based and consultant-led, with more approachable staff. Currently 41 respondents (82%) felt that they had inadequate teaching time. A majority felt that the arrival of students had improved patient care and that their department had benefited. Thirty-seven responders (74%) felt that the planned doubling of student numbers would impose an unsustainable departmental load, and would compromise teaching quality. The change felt most necessary to support additional teaching was increased clinical medical staff. Better co-ordination between the DGH and the medical school was also felt necessary. The most popular choice for the distribution of extra teaching finance was to the teacher's directorate, i.e. speciality [33 (66%)]. Forty-four (86%) felt that increased student numbers would have a significant impact on the character of the hospital. The 108 free-text comments (2.1 per respondent) centred on hospital character and the benefits of students. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a considerable initial enthusiasm for teaching in DGH staff, which is persisting despite increasing student numbers. However, the current teaching load is seen to be substantial. Teaching more students is likely to produce major problems, based on lack of teaching time and increasingly heavy service commitments rather than lack of patients. This is likely to be a widespread problem for DGHs. Failure to ensure adequate teaching staff and facilities as well as co-ordination could threaten the sustainability of this potentially valuable teaching initiative.     

Students' views of reflective learning techniques: an efficacy study at a UK medical school

OBJECTIVE: To describe the effects of a voluntary intervention using reflective learning techniques on students' learning. DESIGN: An interventional study with reflective learning techniques offered to medical students. SETTING: Year 3 of undergraduate medicine at Cardiff University where the curriculum is integrated with early clinical contact. PARTICIPANTS: All 232 Year 3 students were invited to participate. A total of 65 attended an introductory lecture. After the lecture 35 students agreed to take part; 15 of these subsequently dropped out (some before attending tutorial groups, others after taking part for some weeks). INTERVENTIONS: Participants kept learning journals for 2 terms and attended fortnightly, facilitated tutorial groups where they discussed their reflective journal entries. Main outcome measures were qualitative interviews and examination results. RESULTS: Interviews were carried out with 19 full participants, 4 initial participants and 7 non-participants. Participants perceived that they gained a greater ability to identify learning objectives and to integrate learning. The tutorial groups encouraged students to compare progress with their peers. Some students did not take part because they thought that the large factual content of the curriculum would make reflective learning less useful. There were no differences between the groups in examination results. CONCLUSIONS: Students among the small, self-selected group of participants were better able to identify what they needed to learn although there was no improvement in examination results. Students appear unlikely to take up voluntary reflective learning if they do not think it relates to the curriculum and assessments. Student culture exerts a potent effect on willingness to attend extra tutorial groups.     

Perceptions of and attitudes towards medical errors among medical trainees

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop a better understanding of how medical trainees define medical errors and what factors influence medical trainees' perceptions of medical errors. METHODS: We surveyed 423 medical students and house staff at an urban academic medical centre to learn about how they defined medical errors, their experiences with medical errors, their beliefs about when a patient should be informed of an error, and their attitudes towards medical errors with differing severity of outcomes. RESULTS: Trainees stated that an event could be considered an error regardless of outcome, negligence, intention or consent. Definitions did not vary according to gender or level of training. Trainees had increasing feelings of guilt and fear as the outcomes related to errors worsened. Respondents were more likely to feel guilty and angry at themselves, and be afraid of accusations of malpractice, losing their licence, damaging their reputation, or losing confidence when errors were made while working individually versus in a team setting. Female trainees were more likely than male trainees to feel guilty and angry at themselves, and were afraid of losing confidence if they made an error. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees' perceptions and attitudes towards errors vary depending on whether they are in their clinical years, the severity of outcome, and whether the error is attributable to an individual or a team. These factors will have to be explored in greater depth if we are adequately to prepare young doctors for the errors they will inevitably make.     

Quality of clinical supervision as perceived by attending doctors in university and district teaching hospitals

CONTEXT: Attending doctors (ADs) play important roles in the supervision of specialist registrars. Little is known, however, about how they perceive the quality of their supervision in different teaching settings. We decided to investigate whether there is any difference in how ADs perceive the quality of their supervision in university teaching hospital (UTH) and district teaching hospital (DTH) settings. METHODS: We used a standardised questionnaire to investigate the quality of supervision as perceived by ADs. Fifteen items reflecting good teaching ability were measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5: never-always). We investigated for factors that influenced the perceived quality of supervision using Likert scale items (1-5: totally disagree-totally agree) and open-ended questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 83 ADs (UTH: 51; DTH: 32) were eligible to participate in the survey. Of these, 43 (52%) returned the questionnaire (UTH: 25; DTH: 18). There was no difference in the overall mean of the 15 items between the UTH (3.67, standard deviation [SD] 0.35) and DTH (3.73, SD 0.31) ADs. Attending doctors in the DTH group rated themselves better at 'teaching technical skills' (mean 3.50, SD 0.70), compared with their UTH counterparts (mean 3.0, SD 0.76) (P = 0.03). Analysis of variance of the overall means revealed no significant difference between the different hospital settings. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that teaching hospital environments do not influence how ADs perceive the quality of their supervision. Lack of time for teaching was perceived as responsible for poor supervision. Other factors found to influence AD perceptions of good supervision included effective teaching skills, communication skills and provision of feedback.     

Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether peer-assisted learning (PAL) can enhance clinical examination skills training. METHODS: Three student trainers studied small-group theory and clinical examination and provided PAL as extra tuition for 86 trainees. Trainees watched an examination video, were videotaped practising the examination and, after constructive feedback, repeated the examination. Responses to PAL were evaluated to attain an overview of trainee and trainer performance using visual analogue and Likert scale analyses. Year-group review was undertaken using questionnaires. RESULTS: Trainees evaluated all aspects of PAL highly, including their post-training confidence in examination skills (mean > 7.7 on a 10-cm scale), indicating that the PAL was effective. Written comments confirmed the students perceived the sessions as well structured and of high quality. Compared with trainees in the first groups, those from later groups gave all parameters similar or higher gradings. Those for interest (P = 0.03) and appropriateness (P = 0.01) were significantly higher, suggesting that trainers may improve their technique with time. Students with previous degrees gave similar or lower gradings than standard entry students, with answers about post-training confidence and recommendation to friends being statistically lower (P < 0.006). Six months later, year-group analysis showed that 90% of trainees rated PAL highly, and 86% wished to become trainers. Of the trainers' year group, 79% perceived that PAL training could improve examination skills. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of clinical skills training, PAL was highly evaluated across many parameters, including confidence after training. Student interest and enthusiasm supports suggestions that PAL could be a useful adjunct to clinical skills training.     

Medical student attitudes to risk taking and self-perceived influence on medical practice

CONTEXT: Little has been published on medical student risk-taking attitudes and behaviours and whether students think these attributes will affect how they treat patients. OBJECTIVES: Our aims were to assess for an association between risk-taking attitudes and behaviours, such as problematic substance use, self-reported risky behaviours, and self-reported accidents, and to test for an association between risk-taking attitudes and student perceptions of the influence of these attitudes on future clinical practice. METHODS: Three consecutive classes of Year 2 medical students (n=315) completed a self-administered, 29-item questionnaire. Risk-taking attitudes were evaluated using a 6-question, risk-taking scale adapted from the Jackson Personality Inventory (JPI). RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was demonstrated between risk-taking attitudes (JPI) and problematic substance use (r=0.34; P<0.01), self-reported risky behaviours (r=0.47; P<0.01), and self-reported accidents (r=0.33; P<0.01). Students who did not think their attitudes toward risk would affect their clinical decision making scored significantly higher on our measure of risk-taking attitudes (t306=-4.60; P<0.01). Students who did not think that their drinking, drug taking or sexual behaviour would affect how they counselled patients on these matters scored significantly higher on our measure of problematic substance use (t307=-2.51; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although risk-taking attitudes have been associated with significant differences in clinical decision making among doctors, in our sample students with high risk-taking attitudes and behaviours were significantly less likely than their colleagues to think their attitudes would affect their clinical practice. Implications for medical education are discussed.     

Hostile teaching hospitals and friendly district general hospitals: final year students' views on clinical attachment locations

Context The NHS Plan has indicated the need to increase the number of doctors in the NHS. To accommodate the substantial increase in student numbers in Birmingham, clinical teaching will need to expand from its traditional base within established teaching hospitals (THs) to district general hospitals (DGHs). Previous studies elsewhere have suggested the experience of students who undertake clinical attachments in DGHs is different from that of students attached to THs. We sought to investigate whether such differences exist in the West Midlands region and to explore the opportunities and problems such differences may present to educators and students alike. Methods A questionnaire‐based survey of the TH and DGH experiences of all medical students in their final year (2000/01) of undergraduate training at the University of Birmingham Medical School was carried out. Results A total of 80% of students responded. Respondents indicated that both the identification of learning objectives and the provision of teaching to meet such objectives were likely to occur in TH and DGH settings equally. However, other differences emerged, suggesting that DGHs offer a friendlier and more supportive learning environment, with greater opportunities for the acquisition of hands‐on practical experience. Conclusions At present, the popularity of DGHs derives from the attitudes of staff and the opportunities for hands‐on experience. However, as student numbers increase, DGHs may be required to take on additional teaching commitments. Will DGHs be able to retain their existing educational characteristics or will they take on those associated with established THs?     

Measuring the effect of interprofessional problem-based learning on the attitudes of undergraduate health care students

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to measure the improvement in attitudes towards interprofessional collaboration of undergraduate health care students who have a single module of interprofessional problem-based learning (PBL) using real patients as triggers integrated into their curricula. DESIGN: A dedicated module, consisting of 5 PBL seminars, was integrated into the undergraduate medical, nursing and physiotherapy curricula at the participating institutions. Seminar groups consisted of students from a single profession in the control group, and of evenly distributed students from the participating professions in the intervention group. The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale was used to measure improvements in attitudes towards interprofessional co-operation. Patients, faculty members and students were included in the evaluation of the interprofessional module and their comments examined for indications of adverse effects of the use of patients in this setting. RESULTS: A total of 177 students were recruited into the study and assigned to 1 of 16 seminar groups, all of which attended the complete module, 8 in control mode and 8 in intervention mode. Statistically significant improvements could be identified in the overall attitudes of male students in the intervention group, and in attitudes pertaining to the competence and autonomy of individuals in one's own profession in the intervention group as a whole. No significant improvements were detected in the control group. No adverse effects of the use of real patients came to light. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of an interprofessional educational module that requires limited student and faculty time in undergraduate health care curricula may be proven to have an effect. The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale may be suitable for measuring such effect. Real patients may continue to contribute to education in this setting.     

Learning human anatomy: student preferences of methods in a Nigerian medical school

The present study evaluates the usefulness, as perceived by students, of the various methods by which anatomical information is presented during the preclinical part of the medical course. Assessments of these learning methods were elicited from a cohort of medical students at the University of Benin by a questionnaire based on their selection of questions to attempt in Anatomy Paper 2 (Essays) of the First Professional examination (= 2nd MB). An algorithm was provided to enable the quantification of the preferences expressed and hence the derivation of a utility index for each learning method. The results showed that reading/private study, formal lectures, informal discussions with peers and practical work were the learning methods from which the students had benefited, in descending order of usefulness. These findings are discussed in the context of the teaching and learning of human anatomy in the particular circumstances studied.     

Teaching undergraduate psychiatry in primary care: the impact on student learning and attitudes

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of undergraduate psychiatry placements in primary care settings on students' learning and attitudes to mental illness. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey and qualitative in-depth interviews. SETTING: A primary care-based psychiatry undergraduate teaching programme at Royal Free and University College Medical School, London. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 145/183 (79.2%) students attending the primary care-based programme over 2 academic years completed a questionnaire survey. In-depth interviews were conducted with 14 students, 12 general practitioner (GP) tutors and 20 patients participating in the course. RESULTS: In the questionnaire survey, 121/144 (84.0%) students valued the primary care-based teaching highly. In total, 87/139 (62.6%) students felt their attitudes to mental illness had changed as a result of the course. In-depth interviews demonstrated 4 key benefits of the teaching programme: increasing breadth of experience, understanding the patients' experience, learning about mental illness from a GP's perspective and changing students' attitudes towards mental illness. The students' attitudinal shift comprised 2 main dimensions; 'normalisation' of mental illness and increased empathy. CONCLUSIONS: Learning psychiatry in primary care settings offers students a broader experience of a range of patients than in hospital settings and encourages a 'person-centred' approach, which in turn can have a positive impact on their attitudes to mental illness, reducing stereotyping and increasing empathy.     

The need for teaching in medical audit: a survey in one medical school

Summary: Summary. A questionnaire survey was carried out among senior clinical teachers at Newcastle upon Tyne Medical School, UK about their current practice and attitudes toward the teaching of medical audit in the undergraduate curriculum. A response rate of 88% was achieved. Less than a fifth of respondents provided such teaching, but the majority were in favour of seeing the topic introduced. A variety of teaching methods were used, and feedback from students was generally favourable. A number of concerns were expressed, including the problem of curriculum overload, the timing of the teaching, and the need to ensure that the learning was experiential with a minimum of theoretical teaching. Those who were in favour of introducing such teaching, or who were unsure, were also concerned about pressures on curricular time, but some felt in addition that the topic was more appropriately a postgraduate one. A short attitude scale demonstrated a skew towards favourable attitudes among the whole group. The implications of the survey for teaching about audit and quality are discussed.     

Students teaching students: a medical school peer tutorial programme

A peer tutorial programme which is available to all first- and second-year medical students has been in operation at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine since 1972. A retrospective study of the classes of 1982, 1983 and 1984 was undertaken to assess the participation levels in the tutorial programme and to compare the participation level to available performance parameters. The analysis revealed that 54% of the first-year classes and 22% of the second-year classes participated in the peer tutorial programme. X2 analysis of the data demonstrated that the relationship between participation in the tutorial programme and performance on examinations reached statistical significance. The results suggested that an open peer tutorial programme responded to the needs, both cognitive and affective, of medical students.     

Junior medical students' notions of a 'good doctor' and related expectations: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE: To explore junior medical students' notions of a 'good doctor', given their ideas about: success in Year 1, house jobs, and their attraction to medicine. METHODS: Study participants were junior medical students (1999 and 2001 entry cohorts studied thrice and twice, respectively) and prospective students of the University of Liverpool's 5-year, problem-based, community-orientated curriculum. Data collection and analysis used a 'mixed methods' approach, cross-sectional design, and brief questionnaire surveys. In an index survey, open questions (analysed inductively) explored house jobs and Year 1 success. They also generated 'good doctor' themes, which a second survey confirmed and 3 surveys ranked. A sixth survey explored motivation for choosing medicine (open question). Good doctor rankings were analysed by postcode for prospective medical students classified as school-leaver residents of England and Wales. RESULTS: Response rates were: 91.4% (973) of the 2001-02 admission candidates, on interview days; 68.0% (155), 61.2% (137) and 77.9% (159) of the 1999 cohort (at entry, end-Year 1 and mid-Year 3, respectively), and 71.0% (201) and 71.0% (198) of the 2001 cohort (at entry and end-Year 1, respectively). From 9 themes generally compatible with self-reported motivations and expectations, junior and prospective medical students consistently valued a good doctor as a 'compassionate, patient-centred carer' and a 'listening, informative communicator' over an 'exemplary, responsible professional'. Prospective students from less affluent English and Welsh postcodes valued 'efficient, organised self-manager' very slightly more highly (r(s) = - 0.140, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This research provided empirical evidence to support ongoing commentary about patients mostly seeking qualities related to communication, caring, and competence in doctors. Weak evidence that socio-economic status might affect notions of a good doctor is worth pursuing.     

Changes in attitudes towards psychiatry among medical students: correlation of attitude shift with academic performance

This study investigates the changes in attitudes to psychiatry and level of psychiatric knowledge among medical students before and after formal teaching on psychiatry. Teaching led to the development of more favourable attitudes (particularly among women) towards psychiatry, but doubt remained after teaching about the 'scientific' status of the discipline. Initial attitudes did not relate to academic performance but, those developed after teaching showed a significant positive correlation with it.     

Student attitudes towards anatomy teaching and learning in a multiprofessional context

CONTEXT: We carried out a survey of attitudes to learning anatomy amongst students from a range of health care disciplines in a multiprofessional context. SETTING: A joint course called the Common Foundation Programme (CFP) presented by a hospital medical school and a joint university faculty of health and social care sciences in the UK in the first term of the students' courses. PARTICIPANTS: Students following degree courses in biomedical science, medicine, nursing, physiotherapy, diagnostic radiography and therapeutic radiography. OBJECTIVES: To assess student attitudes to cadaveric work, learning anatomy and multiprofessional learning, and to compare student performance between degree courses in an anatomy assessment. DESIGN: A questionnaire was designed that requested demographic information and the students' attitudes to cadaveric work, anatomy learning and multiprofessional learning on a Likert scale. All students sat the same anatomy assessment at the end of the first term. RESULTS: The biomedical science and medical students were the most apprehensive about entering the dissecting room. The biomedical science students enjoyed working in a multidisciplinary group the most. Assessment results varied widely and the physiotherapy and medical students scored more highly than students in other disciplines, although all students had participated in the same course. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to teach anatomy in the context of the shared learning experience of the CFP, although performance varied widely. Reasons for the differences are discussed and suggestions for the design of multiprofessional courses involving anatomy are made.     

The effect of medical education on the attitudes of medical students towards disabled people

The negative attitudes of society towards disability and the resulting prejudicial behaviour affects the lives of disabled people. One of the declared aims of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Southampton is to improve attitudes. Hence, an attempt has been made to assess differences in the attitudes held by first- and fourth-year medical students, senior house officers and members of the general public towards disabled people. The measurement instrument used was the 'Attitudes Towards Disabled Persons (ATDP) Scale'. The total number of subjects in the survey was 428, of whom 263 (61%) responded. No significant differences were found between the attitudes of the four groups studied. However, a subpopulation of subjects who agreed with the statement that 'Disabled people cause more problems to doctors than non-disabled people' had attitudes which were significantly more negative.     

The first house officer year: views of graduate and non-graduate entrants to medical school

Objective  To determine whether graduate and non-graduate entrants to medical school differ in their views on the first year spent in medical practice as a pre-registration house officer.
Methods  We carried out postal questionnaire surveys of medical qualifiers of 1999, 2000 and 2002 from all UK medical schools, 1 year after qualification. The timing of the study slightly pre-dates the recent major expansion in graduate entry fast-track courses.
Results  Differences between graduate and non-graduate entrants were few and, even when statistically significant, were small in scale. Graduate entrants viewed their working hours, pay and living conditions at work, such as hospital accommodation and food, a little less favourably than did non-graduate entrants. Graduate entrants were also less satisfied than non-graduates with time available for family, social and recreational activities. However, graduate entrants were more likely than non-graduate entrants to feel positive about their future career prospects. There were no differences between graduate and non-graduate entrants in whether they felt they had been well prepared by their medical schools for the jobs they undertook as house officers. Levels of job satisfaction expressed by graduate and non-graduate entrants were similar, as were their responses to most other statements about attitudes to clinical work.
Conclusions  'Quality of life' issues, a sense of being fairly rewarded, and expectations about one's physical working environment seem a little more important to graduate than to non-graduate entrants. Apart from these, the findings suggest that graduate status, at entry to medical school, has no appreciable influence on attitudes to the work of a junior hospital doctor.     

Simulation in undergraduate medical education: bridging the gap between theory and practice

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of simulation-based teaching in the medical undergraduate curriculum in the context of management of medical emergencies, using a medium fidelity simulator. DESIGN: Small groups of medical students attended a simulation workshop on management of medical emergencies. The workshop was evaluated in a post-course questionnaire. SUBJECTS: All Year 4 medical students allocated to the resuscitation rotation during the first half of 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Student perceptions of learning outcomes, the value of the simulation in the undergraduate curriculum and their self-assessed improved mastery of workshop material. RESULTS: A total of 33 students attended the workshop and all completed questionnaires. Students rated the workshop highly and found it a valuable learning experience. In all, 21 (64%) students identified teamwork skills as key learning points; 11 (33%) felt they had learnt how to approach a problem better, particularly in terms of using a systematic approach, and 12 (36%) felt they had learnt how to apply their theoretical knowledge in a clinical setting better. All 33 students were positive about the use of simulation in their training; 14 students wrote that simulation should be used more or should be mandatory in training; 5 students commented positively on the realism of the learning experience and a further 5 said they valued the opportunity to learn new skills in a safe environment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that medical students value simulation-based learning highly. In particular, they value the opportunity to apply their theoretical knowledge in a safe and realistic setting, to develop teamwork skills and to develop a systematic approach to a problem. A medium fidelity simulator is a valuable educational tool in medical undergraduate education.     

Characteristics of doctors and nurses as perceived by students entering medical school: implications for shared teaching

INTRODUCTION: Debate continues with respect to when to introduce interprofessional education for maximal potential benefit. One perspective is that interprofessional education should be introduced early in the undergraduate curriculum before students develop stereotyped impressions of other professional groups. However, it may be that students at entry to medical school have already developed these stereotypical impressions. This study examines perceived professional characteristics of doctors and nurses by students entering medical school. METHODOLOGY: Year 1 medical students in 4 consecutive years completed a questionnaire on their perceptions of the characteristics and backgrounds of nurses and doctors and on their attitudes to shared teaching. RESULTS: Year 1 medical students were found to perceive the characteristics of doctors and nurses differently. They considered nurses to be more caring and doctors to be more arrogant. They considered nurses to have lower academic ability, competence and status, although comparable life experience. They were generally very positive about beginning shared learning at an early stage of training. DISCUSSION: Whilst it is encouraging that medical students are positive about shared teaching, it is of concern that they have a poor perception of the academic ability, status in society and professional competence of the nurse at entry to medical school. These perceived impressions, which may reflect societal misconceptions regarding the roles and responsibilities of nurses within a modern health care system, may have an impact on the success of early interprofessional teaching initiatives in undergraduate curricula.