共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 265 毫秒
1.
转基因食品安全性评价研究进展 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
自1996年以来,转基因作物的大规模商业化生产为人们带来了巨大的社会经济效益,但是转基因技术存在一定的风险性,因此加强转基因食品的安全性评价和标准化管理显得尤为迫切和重要。本文从营养学、毒理学、过敏性等方面综述了转基因食品的食用安全性评价,并多角度探讨了转基因食品安全性评价的关键问题,包括用不同动物实验评价转基因食品的食用安全性,新型转基因植物的安全性评价,以及转基因食品的食用安全标准化等,以期使读者对转基因食品的食用安全性有更加系统、全面的了解。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
随着越来越多的转基因作物被批准商业化生产 ,转基因作物的安全性引起了人们极大的关注。文中扼要介绍转基因作物及其副产品作为食品或饲料资源的现状、可能存在的安全性问题、安全性评价及各国政府对转基因食品或饲料的态度与管理。 相似文献
6.
食品中转基因表达蛋白的危险性评估 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
随着转基因技术的商业化发展,直接或间接来源于转基因作物的食品日益增多。对食品中外源性基因表达蛋白质的研究是转基因食品安全性评价工作中的重要部分。本文从安全食用历史、生物信息学分析、体外稳定性研究、作用方式研究、毒理学试验等方面,对目前常见转基因表达蛋白的危险性评估进行了综述。 相似文献
7.
《农村实用工程技术(绿色食品)》2010,(3):52-53
食用安全评价是转基因作物商业化种植前重要的评价内容,我国政府十分重视转基因作物的食用安全评价,农业部依据《农业转基因生物安全管理条例》和《农业转基因生物安全评价管理办法》,并参考国际食品法典委员会、世界卫生组织、联合国粮农组织和经济合作与发展组织等颁布的转基因作物食用安全评价指南,制定了我国的《转基因植物安全评价指南》。评价内容涵盖了国际食品法典委员会等组织颁布的转基因作物食用安全评价指南里的所有内容。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
周则卫 《食品安全质量检测学报》2014,5(6):1899-1904
本文围绕转基因食品的"实质等同"原则下的食用安全性评价方式存在的问题进行深入讨论,并从实验动物饲料配方的高营养性及动物体质因素与人类的差异,以及评价定位不准和标准过于宽松等方面,对"实质等同"评价的"严谨性"和"科学性"进行质疑。并对评价方式不科学带来的严重后果进行剖析和阐述。通过逆向思维,创新建立的损益指数及累计积分(BDI-GS)食品功效及安全性评价新体系具有明显的科学性和实用价值,并为转基因作物及食品的研究和发展指明方向。相信只有超越"实质等同"的评价原则,我国的转基因事业才会迎来灿烂的明天。 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
Comparative analysis of genetically modified brown rice with conventional rice varieties for the safety assessment 下载免费PDF全文
Seonwoo Oh Soo‐Yun Park Yunsoo Yeo Soon Ki Park Hee‐Yun Kim 《International Journal of Food Science & Technology》2015,50(5):1244-1254
Compositional analysis of genetically modified (GM) rice (OsCK1), non‐GM comparator and reference rice as commercial rice was conducted for the safety assessment. The tolerance intervals (TI) of commercial rice were also set to illustrate compositional variability. GM rice, non‐GM rice and reference rice were compared using principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares‐discriminant analysis (PLS‐DA) to assess the impact of genetic modification vs. environmental influence on the rice component. Seventeen components in forty‐six analysed components were significantly different between GM rice and non‐GM rice. But, the mean ranges of the seventeen components were all within those of the reference TIs. These results demonstrate that the nutrition components of GM rice (OsCK1) fell within the range of natural variability and were biologically equivalent to non‐GM rice. In addition, multivariate analysis by PCA and PLS‐DA revealed that environmental factors such as growing locations were important due to the variability of the rice metabolite profiles. These comparisons lead to the conclusion that disease‐resistant transgenic rice (OsCK1) is compositionally equivalent to and as safe and nutritious as conventional rice varieties grown commercially. 相似文献
14.
Toxicity studies of genetically modified plants: a review of the published literature 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Domingo JL 《Critical reviews in food science and nutrition》2007,47(8):721-733
According to the information reported by the WHO, the genetically modified (GM) products that are currently on the international market have all passed risk assessments conducted by national authorities. These assessments have not indicated any risk to human health. In spite of this clear statement, it is quite amazing to note that the review articles published in international scientific journals during the current decade did not find, or the number was particularly small, references concerning human and animal toxicological/health risks studies on GM foods. In this paper, the scientific information concerning the potential toxicity of GM/transgenic plants using the Medline database is reviewed. Studies about the safety of the potential use of potatoes, corn, soybeans, rice, cucumber, tomatoes, sweet pepper, peas, and canola plants for food and feed were included. The number of references was surprisingly limited. Moreover, most published studies were not performed by the biotechnology companies that produce these products. This review can be concluded raising the following question: where is the scientific evidence showing that GM plants/food are toxicologically safe? 相似文献
15.
Michael S. Koch John M. DeSesso Amy Lavin Williams Suzanne Michalek Bruce Hammond 《Critical reviews in food science and nutrition》2016,56(3):512-526
To determine the reliability of food safety studies carried out in rodents with genetically modified (GM) crops, a Food Safety Study Reliability Tool (FSSRTool) was adapted from the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods’ (ECVAM) ToxRTool. Reliability was defined as the inherent quality of the study with regard to use of standardized testing methodology, full documentation of experimental procedures and results, and the plausibility of the findings. Codex guidelines for GM crop safety evaluations indicate toxicology studies are not needed when comparability of the GM crop to its conventional counterpart has been demonstrated. This guidance notwithstanding, animal feeding studies have routinely been conducted with GM crops, but their conclusions on safety are not always consistent. To accurately evaluate potential risks from GM crops, risk assessors need clearly interpretable results from reliable studies. The development of the FSSRTool, which provides the user with a means of assessing the reliability of a toxicology study to inform risk assessment, is discussed. Its application to the body of literature on GM crop food safety studies demonstrates that reliable studies report no toxicologically relevant differences between rodents fed GM crops or their non-GM comparators. 相似文献
16.