调节L2增益抑制耦合发电机组的混沌现象

耦合发电机系统中一定条件下出现混沌, 它可能导致系统失控, 使系统彻底崩溃. 当系统存在不确定因素干扰时, 提出了L₂性能准则控制方法: 使耦合发电机系统渐进稳定和进行干扰抑制. 然后采用非线性系统无源化方法设计混沌系统的反馈控制律, 利用L₂增益进行干扰抑制. 最后计算机仿真证明该方法的有效性.     

基于时序逻辑证明编译优化程序变换的保义性

基于时序逻辑CTL(computation tree logic)的一种扩展CTL-FV对优化编译中的语句交换和变量替换这两种常见变换的保义性条件给出了形式刻画,采用含条件重写规则定义了保义语句交换T_exch和保义变量替换T_sub,并基于一种归纳证明框架对它们的保义性进行了证明.此外,基于变换Texch对程序基本块内保依赖语句重排的保义性也给出了一种构造性的证明.     

网格多处理机的一种改进的子网分配算法

子网分配问题是指识别并分配一个空闲的、满足指定大小要求的节点机.首先,提出了网格结构中一种新的具有O(N²_a·1og₂N_a)时间复杂度的空闲子网搜索算法,它优于现有的O(N³_a)时间复杂度的搜索算法.然后,用该算法对基于保留因子的最佳匹配类子网分配算法——RF(reservation factor)算法进行了改进,得到了     

行为时序逻辑中四级公平性下的活性推理规则

公平性是行为时序逻辑用于表达系统活性的形式,直接影响到系统描述的正确性与完整性,对其进行细化与完善能有效提高行为时序逻辑的系统描述能力。然而在对公平性进行细化的同时,却缺乏相应的、运用于性质验证的推理规则。针对这一问题,通过对公平性内涵的分析,给出了四级公平性体系下的活性推理规则,并分别进行了证明。作为示例,运用新的活性推理规则,对一个程序实例进行了推理验证。在建立起相应的活性推理规则后,四级公平性才能够被有效运用到实际的系统描述与验证中。     

随机时滞Lurie系统的鲁棒H∞和L2-L∞指数控制

针对一类具有范数有界不确定性和时变时滞的It^o型随机Lurie系统, 研究了鲁棒H_∞和L₂–L_∞指数控制问题. 利用Lyapunov-Krasovskii泛函方法和It^o微分公式, 得到了以线性矩阵不等式(LMIs)表示的控制器存在的充分条件. 对所有容许的参数不确定性, 设计的无记忆状态反馈控制器使闭环系统鲁棒指数均方稳定, 且具有给定的H_∞和L₂–L_∞干扰抑制度. 最后, 通过两个仿真例子说明了所提方法的有效性.     

一种基于多类型偏好的偏好逻辑

针对目前缺乏多类型偏好共存的偏好逻辑系统的现状,提出并构造了一个能够描述和推理多种类型偏好的逻辑系统MPL(logic of many kinds of preference).在进一步提出MPL语言L_MPL基于最粗糙/最细致描述原则的非单调语义基础上,通过分级知识库这种常用偏好表示方法的L_MPL重写,初步考察了L_MPL表示能力,最后进行总结并提出需要进一步研究解决的问题.     

行为时序逻辑与自反线性时序逻辑的关系

为了能够将哲学逻辑中的公理系统运用到行为时序逻辑的研究中。对行为时序逻辑公式的语义进行形式化定义．从语义和语法两方面研究行为时序逻辑公理系统和具有自反性质的线性时序逻辑公理系统之间的联系．提出并证明行为时序逻辑公式转换为自反线性时序逻辑公式的定理。按照集合论和模型论的思想,定义行为时序逻辑中项和行为时序逻辑原子公式的概念。定义Lesilie Lamport所提出的行为时序逻辑公式的语义。证明自反线性时序逻辑公理系统适用于行为时序逻辑公理系统．以此为基础证明行为时序逻辑的简单规则、基本规则和附加规则。     

描述逻辑εL混合循环术语集的LCS和MSC推理

分析了描述逻辑循环术语集的研究现状和存在的问题,在F.Baader工作的基础上进一步研究了描述逻辑εL混合循环术语集的LCS(least common subsumer)和MSC(most specific concept)推理问题.给出了εL混合循环术语集的语法和语义.针对εL混合循环术语集LCS和MSC推理的需要,提出了TBox-完全的概念,并重新定义了描述图.使用描述图和TBox-完全给出了最大不动点语义下εL混合循环术语集LCS和MSC的推理算法,证明了推理算法的正确性,并证明了推理算法是多项式时间复杂的.该推理算法为(L混合循环术语集的LCS和MSC推理提供了理论基础.     

并发系统中谓词行为图的行为时序逻辑表达

行为时序逻辑(TLA)组合时序逻辑与行为逻辑, 可以对并发系统进行描述与验证, 它引入动作和行为的概念, 使得系统和属性可用它的规约公式表示, 但存在用TLA描述复杂系统时TLA公式复杂且难以理解的不足。类似于状态转移图, 对于并发转移可以用谓词行为图进行图形化表示, 谓词行为图与行为时序逻辑规约具有相同的表达能力。介绍行为时序逻辑的语法、语义及简单推理规则, 用一个简单的实例说明使用谓词行为图去描述并发转移系统的有效性, 并用系统规约的TLA公式对谓词行为图表达能力进行证明, 表明两者具有等价性, 为描述和分析并发转换系统提供了一种可行的方法。     

A Natural Deduction System of Temporal Logic

This paper will present a natural deduction system of temporal logic,which includes two collections ofinference rules called “horizontal inference rules” and “vertical inference rules” respectively.It is alsoproved that the system is both sound and complete under an appropriate interpretation.Very natural andgenerally short,each proof in the system can be represented by a matrix whose entries serve to record theinference process.     

Natural Deduction for First-Order Hybrid Logic

This is a companion paper to Braüner (2004b, Journal of Logic and Computation 14, 329–353) where a natural deduction system for propositional hybrid logic is given. In the present paper we generalize the system to the first-order case. Our natural deduction system for first-order hybrid logic can be extended with additional inference rules corresponding to conditions on the accessibility relations and the quantifier domains expressed by so-called geometric theories. We prove soundness and completeness and we prove a normalisation theorem. Moreover, we give an axiom system first-order hybrid logic.     

启发式方法生成命题逻辑可读证明

探讨了自动生成命题逻辑系统R的可读证明.采用试探法和自然推理法分别从前推和后推模拟人类思维求证,试探法根据推理规则将待证公式反向分解,自然推理法从假设出发根据推理规则生成新的公式.两种方法都实现了相干命题逻辑系统R的可读证明,并结合实现了混合证明.试探法和自然推理法是生成可读证明的有效方法,前推和后推两种思维方法也适用于其他逻辑系统的自动证明.     

Dual Systems of Tableaux and Sequents for PLTL

On one hand, traditional tableau systems for temporal logic (TL) generate an auxiliary graph that must be checked and (possibly) pruned in a second phase of the refutation procedure. On the other hand, traditional sequent calculi for TL make use of a kind of inference rules (mainly, invariant-based rules or infinitary rules) that complicates their automatization. A remarkable consequence of using auxiliary graphs in the tableaux framework and invariants or infinitary rules in the sequents framework is that TL fails to carry out the classical correspondence between tableaux and sequents. In this paper, we first provide a tableau method TTM that does not require auxiliary graphs to decide whether a set of PLTL-formulas is satisfiable. This tableau method TTM is directly associated to a one-sided sequent calculus called TTC. Since TTM is free from all the structural rules that hinder the mechanization of deduction, e.g. weakening and contraction, then the resulting sequent calculus TTC is also free from this kind of structural rules. In particular, TTC is free of any kind of cut, including invariant-based cut. From the deduction system TTC, we obtain a two-sided sequent calculus GTC that preserves all these good freeness properties and is finitary, sound and complete for PTL. Therefore, we show that the classical correspondence between tableaux and sequent calculi can be extended to TL. Every deduction system is proved to be complete. In addition, we provide illustrative examples of deductions in the different systems.     

Constructive linear-time temporal logic: Proof systems and Kripke semantics

In this paper we study a version of constructive linear-time temporal logic (LTL) with the “next” temporal operator. The logic is originally due to Davies, who has shown that the proof system of the logic corresponds to a type system for binding-time analysis via the Curry-Howard isomorphism. However, he did not investigate the logic itself in detail; he has proved only that the logic augmented with negation and classical reasoning is equivalent to (the “next” fragment of) the standard formulation of classical linear-time temporal logic. We give natural deduction, sequent calculus and Hilbert-style proof systems for constructive LTL with conjunction, disjunction and falsehood, and show that the sequent calculus enjoys cut elimination. Moreover, we also consider Kripke semantics and prove soundness and completeness. One distinguishing feature of this logic is that distributivity of the “next” operator over disjunction “?(A∨B)⊃?A∨?B” is rejected in view of a type-theoretic interpretation.     

The <Emphasis Type="Italic">λ</Emphasis>-Calculus and the Unity of Structural Proof Theory

In the context of intuitionistic implicational logic, we achieve a perfect correspondence (technically an isomorphism) between sequent calculus and natural deduction, based on perfect correspondences between left-introduction and elimination, cut and substitution, and cut-elimination and normalisation. This requires an enlarged system of natural deduction that refines von Plato’s calculus. It is a calculus with modus ponens and primitive substitution; it is also a “coercion calculus”, in the sense of Cervesato and Pfenning. Both sequent calculus and natural deduction are presented as typing systems for appropriate extensions of the λ-calculus. The whole difference between the two calculi is reduced to the associativity of applicative terms (sequent calculus = right associative, natural deduction = left associative), and in fact the achieved isomorphism may be described as the mere inversion of that associativity. The novel natural deduction system is a “multiary” calculus, because “applicative terms” may exhibit a list of several arguments. But the combination of “multiarity” and left-associativity seems simply wrong, leading necessarily to non-local reduction rules (reason: normalisation, like cut-elimination, acts at the head of applicative terms, but natural deduction focuses at the tail of such terms). A solution is to extend natural deduction even further to a calculus that unifies sequent calculus and natural deduction, based on the unification of cut and substitution. In the unified calculus, a sequent term behaves like in the sequent calculus, whereas the reduction steps of a natural deduction term are interleaved with explicit steps for bringing heads to focus. A variant of the calculus has the symmetric role of improving sequent calculus in dealing with tail-active permutative conversions.     

Decidable metric logics

The common metric temporal logic for continuous time were shown to be insufficient, when it was proved that they cannot express a modality suggested by Pnueli. Moreover no finite temporal logic can express all the natural generalizations of this modality. It followed that if we look for an optimal decidable metric logic we must accept infinitely many modalities, or adopt a different formalism.Here we identify a fragment of the second order monadic logic of order with the “+1” function, that expresses all the Pnueli modalities and much more. Its main advantage over the temporal logics is that it enables us to say not just that within prescribed time there is a point where some punctual event will occur, but also that within prescribed time some process that starts now (or that started before, or that will start soon) will terminate. We prove that this logic is decidable with respect to satisfiability and validity, over continuous time. The proof depends heavily on the theory of compositionality. In particular every temporal logic that has truth tables in this logic is automatically decidable. We extend this result by proving that any temporal logic, that has all its modalities defined by means more general than truth tables, in a logic stronger than the one just described, has a decidable satisfiability problem. We suggest that this monadic logic can be the framework in which temporal logics can be safely defined, with the guarantee that their satisfiability problem is decidable.     

A Framework for Proof Systems

Linear logic can be used as a meta-logic to specify a range of object-level proof systems. In particular, we show that by providing different polarizations within a focused proof system for linear logic, one can account for natural deduction (normal and non-normal), sequent proofs (with and without cut), and tableaux proofs. Armed with just a few, simple variations to the linear logic encodings, more proof systems can be accommodated, including proof system using generalized elimination and generalized introduction rules. In general, most of these proof systems are developed for both classical and intuitionistic logics. By using simple results about linear logic, we can also give simple and modular proofs of the soundness and relative completeness of all the proof systems we consider.     

Theory of truth degrees of propositions in the logic system Ln*

By means of infinite product of uniformly distributed probability spaces of cardinal n the concept of truth degrees of propositions in the n-valued generalized Lukasiewicz propositional logic system L _n ^* is introduced in the present paper. It is proved that the set consisting of truth degrees of all formulas is dense in [0, 1], and a general expression of truth degrees of formulas as well as a deduction rule of truth degrees is then obtained. Moreover, similarity degrees among formulas are proposed and a pseudo-metric is defined therefrom on the set of formulas, and hence a possible framework suitable for developing approximate reasoning theory in n-valued generalized Lukasiewicz propositional logic is established.     

Sur la confection d'un lexique pour l'analyse automatique

The goodness of the results to be obtained from a system for syntactic analysis of a natural language by computer (with French as an example) depends crucially on the way the lexicon is constructed. To avoid incorrect parses of a correct sentence, verbal selection rules are required. These rules are just the acceptability constraints observed between verb and subject and between verb and object in sentences of the formN ₁ tV N ₂ andN ₁ tV N ₂ P N ₃. It is well known that not every noun subclass is an acceptable subject (or object) for every verb in such sentences; those that are constitute the selection of the verb. By a careful definition of each subclass of nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc., these rules can be incorporated into Harris' string grammar, which is used here. The definitions should, insofar as possible, be based on formal distributional criteria, so that the classification will be independent of intuitive judgments. The main conclusions are that both the lexicon and the grammar must be very detailed if one wishes to eliminate all incorrect parses; that no automatic word classification is possible, for example, via a dialogue with the computer; and finally, that the computer can be used fruitfully to investigate distributional phenomena in as-yet-unexplored subdomains, for example, by analyzing scientific text.

---

---

Morris Salkoff is on the staff of the Laboratoire d'Automatique Documentaire et de Linguistique (E.R.A. 247 du C.N.R.S.), in Paris.