简易智力测试量表的效度及信度研究

目的　探讨简易智力测试量表 (AMT)的效度和信度 ,为临床应用提供客观依据。方法　 2组受试对象参加了测试 ,一组为病例组 (38例 ) ,另一组为对照组 (30例 )。 1周内对 2组对象用AMT和简易精神状态量表 (MMSE)进行 2次评估。将AMT结果与MMSE作相关性检验来验证AMT的效度 ;对 2次AMT结果作组间相关性分析来测试AMT的重复测试信度。结果　AMT和MMSE的总分和各分项分的Pearson相关系数r =0 .70 6～ 0 .833;AMT各项内容 2次重复测试结果的组间相关系数ICC =0 .810～ 0 .996;病例组和对照组的AMT总分分别为 (7.60± 2 .5 5 )分、(9.64± 0 .81)分 ,2者间差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论　AMT具有良好的效度和信度 ,可对受试者的认知功能进行快速筛选和初步评价     

斯坦福团体催眠感受性量表的信度与效度分析

目的：引进和分析斯坦福团体催眠感受性量表(Stanford group hypnotic susceptibility scale，SGHSS)的信度和效度。方法：将SGHSS译成中文，并回译。以196名正常大学生志愿者作为样本进行信度、效度评定。对前142名志愿者采用樟脑进行嗅觉测试，对后54名采用稀氨溶液测试。结果：SGHSS中文版的内部一致性信度α系数和库德一理查逊信度系数均为O．64，分半信度为0．70。因素效度分析显示了4个因子，它们决定了总方差的49．73％，剔除第9项(嗅觉丧失)后α系数与以前几乎相同，但因素分析显示4个因子决定的总方差达到52．39％，各因子的意义也更加明确。用前142名被试结果作为样本对量表进行信度和效度检验所得的结果与总样本非常接近。结论：SGHSS中文版经初步测度，信度和效度均在可以接受的范围内。该量表可以作为催眠感受性研究的一个工具。     

中国社会支持量表的研制及其信效度检验

目的 编制中国社会支持量表,并对其进行信、效度检验.方法 通过文献回顾、预测验等构建初问卷,并采用探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、相关分析等方法检验其信效度.结果 探索性因素分析抽取主观支持、客观支持和社会支持利用度3个因子,累计方差贡献率为55.918％,另有1个掩饰分量表（含4个条目）.验证性因素分析模型拟合优度指数显示：CMIn=310.256,DF=128,P＜0.01,CMIN/DF=2.424,AGFI=0.917,GFI=0.902,TLI=0.952,IFI=0.897,CFI=0.876,RMSEA=0.056.总量表Cronbach＇sα系数为0.821,各因子为0.631-0.685（P＜0.01）;总量表分半系数为0.875,各因子为0.547-0.709（P＜0.01）;总量表重测相关系数为0.829,各因子为0.645-0.756（P＜0.01）.中国社会支持量表各个因子之间及各因子与总量表存在显著相关,相关系数为0.486-0.796（P＜0.01）.中国社会支持量表总分与社会支持评定量表总分存在显著负相关（P＜0.01）,与中国心身健康量表总分呈显著正相关（P＜0.05或0.01）.结论 中国社会支持量表的信度、效度符合心理测量学要求,可作为中国人社会支持水平的评估工具.     

脑卒中影响量表的测试研究

目的探讨应用汉化的脑卒中影响量表（SIS）的可行性。方法使用汉化的SIS量表对130例中老年首发脑卒中患者发病后1个月时的生存质量进行评定，并对其中的105例患者在发病后进行为期3个月的随访评定。根据结果对该量表的信度、效度、反应度和可行性进行全面分析。结果SIS量表8个分量表和总量表中表示内部一致性的克朗巴赫α系数（Cronbach’s α）均〉0．8，重测结果的组内相关系数ICC（intraclasscorrelation coefficients，IOC）值均〉0．7（P〈0．05）。各分量表的Pearson相关系数均〉0．5（P〈0．05）。因子分析法提取的8个因子总共解释总体变量的80％。情绪、ADL／IADL、移动能力、参与4个方面及总分方面的变化差异有显著性（P〈0．05）。结论汉化SIS量表具有良好的信度、效度、反应度和可行性，可应用于临床和社区护士对中老年脑卒中患者的生存质量和护理效果的评定。     

糖尿病自我管理量表的研制及信效度检验

[目的]研制糖尿病自我管理量表并检验其信效度。[方法]采用文献回顾、专家咨询及病人调查的方法构建糖尿病自我管理量表;应用该量表对符合条件的130例糖尿病病人进行问卷调查,收集数据进行信、效度分析。[结果]糖尿病自我管理量表包括5个维度,共22个条目,其中饮食管理4个条目、运动管理4个条目、药物管理4个条目、血糖监测6个条目、并发症及危险因素管理4个条目。量表总的Cronbath’sα系数为0.738,重测信度为0.891（P=0.00）;内容效度指数（CVI）为0.89,各维度与总量表呈正相关,Pearson相关系数在0.524~0.783之间。采用因子分析共提取公因子6个,累积解释变异量为79.652%,与量表最初构想基本一致。[结论]糖尿病自我管理量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评价糖尿病病人的自我管理状况。     

糖尿病自我管理量表的研制及信效度检验

[目的]研制糖尿病自我管理量表并检验其信效度。[方法]采用文献回顾、专家咨询及病人调查的方法构建糖尿病自我管理量表;应用该量表对符合条件的130例糖尿病病人进行问卷调查,收集数据进行信、效度分析。[结果]糖尿病自我管理量表包括5个维度,共22个条目,其中饮食管理4个条目、运动管理4个条目、药物管理4个条目、血糖监测6个条目、并发症及危险因素管理4个条目。量表总的Cronbath’sα系数为0.738,重测信度为0.891(P=0.00);内容效度指数(CVI)为0.89,各维度与总量表呈正相关,Pearson相关系数在0.524~0.783之间。采用因子分析共提取公因子6个,累积解释变异量为79.652%,与量表最初构想基本一致。[结论]糖尿病自我管理量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评价糖尿病病人的自我管理状况。     

“社区护士专业能力自评量表”的研制

目的 编制社区护士专业能力自评量表,为评价社区护士的专业能力、自我期望与教育需求提供量化工具.方法 参考台湾林绰娟研制的“公共卫生护理人员专业能力及教育需求量表”,以社区健康促进模式为理论框架编制量表,包括专业项目上的执行频率、自评能力、重要性、教育需求4个部分35个条目,对72名社区护士进行测试,检验信度和效度.结果...     

护理服务质量评价量表的初步研制

目的:探索研制适合我国现阶段综合医院的护理服务质量评价量表。方法:在住院患者护理服务需求调查的基础上,经小样本调查结合专家咨询形成正式量表,选取2所综合医院的700名住院患者进行调查。结果:调查量表回收率为98.71%,Cronbach’sα系数为0.881,证实性因子分析显示,5个因素与问卷设计的5个维度完全吻合,效标关联效度检验r=0.826。结论:所研制量表具有良好的信度和效度,对护理服务质量改进具有指导作用。     

育龄妇女生殖道健康相关信念量表的研制

目的 研制适用于测量育龄妇女的生殖道健康相关信念的评价工具,并进行信度和效度检验.方法 收集500例育龄妇女相关数据,以健康信念模式为框架编制量表,分析量表信度和效度.结果 量表由2个分量表组成,内容效度均为1.0.生殖道感染相关健康信念分量表提取出4个因子,累计解释变异量为75.91%;生殖道健康相关自我效能分量表提取出4个因子,累计解释变异量为68.19%,量表数据统计结构与设计结构相符.各维度Cronbach'sα系数、重测信度、折半信度均＞0.70.结论 本量表具有较好的信效度,可用于育龄妇女生殖道感染相关健康信念评估.

Abstract：

Objective To develop a suitable instrument for measuring health beliefs related to reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and testing its reliability and validity. Methods Within the framework of the Health Belief Model, 500 questionnaires of health beliefs related to RTIs were collected, its reliability and validity was analyzed. Results The instrument contained two subscales, all content validity index(CVI)were 1.0. RTIs-related health belief subscale extracted four factors, the cumulative variance was 75.91%;RTIs-related self-efficacy subscale extracted four factors,the cumulative variance was 68.19%. Scale statistics consisted with the structure and design structure. The dimensions Cronbach's α coefficient, test-retest reliability, split half reliability were greater than 0.70. Conclusions This scale has good reliability and validity and can be used for measuring health beliefs related to reproductive tract infections in women of childbearing age.     

护士职业成功感量表的研制

目的 编制护士职业成功感量表并检验其信效度。方法 基于文献回顾的结果构建护士职业成功感量表条目池,通过德尔菲法进行2轮专家咨询形成初始量表。采用方便抽样法,选择2020年12月-2021年1月广东省某三甲综合医院的426名护士进行调查,并检验量表的信效度。结果 护士职业成功感量表包括4个维度,共24个条目。探索性因子分析结果表明：4个公因子累积解释76.52%的方差变异量。验证性因子分析结果表明：护士职业成功感修正模型与数据适配良好,主要适配指标χ²/df为2.44,RMSEA为0.08,CFI为0.94,IFI为0.94,TLI为0.93。总量表的内容效度指数为0.92,效标关联效度为0.73,Cronbach′s α系数为0.96,折半信度为0.86,重测信度为0.94。结论 本研究编制的护士职业成功感量表具有良好的效度和信度,可用于评估护士职业成功感水平。     

Development of competence scale for senior clinical nurses

Aim: The aim of this study was to develop a new scale, the Competence Scale for Senior Clinical Nurses (CS‐SCN), to assess and evaluate senior clinical nurses in hospitals, and to confirm the validity and reliability of the scale. Method: A cross‐sectional questionnaire survey was undertaken at a hospital in Japan, using an anonymous self‐administered questionnaire administered to clinical nurses (n = 374). A useable sample of 218 was achieved, which was used in the analysis. Statistical analysis examined exploratory/confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, and construct validity. Results: A five factor solution with 22 items was extracted for nursing competence in senior clinical nurses, which was the interpretable questionnaire. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the indices of fitness supported these results. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.93 for the total score and varied between 0.63 and 0.90 in the five factors. Five factors emerged from an oblique factor analysis, with a cumulative variance of 66.7%: “role accomplishment”; “self‐management”; “research”; “practice and coordination”; and “work implementation”. The five factors had only a moderate correlation (0.30–0.77, P < 0.001) with each other, which indicated construct validity. Conclusion: The CS‐SCN, a concise scale to measure and evaluate the competence of senior clinical nurses, was developed. Results suggest initial support for the new instrument as a measure of competence of senior clinical nurses, but it must be further refined, tested, and evaluated. Both the validity and reliability of the scale were verified. Future studies using the CS‐SCN might lead to improvement in the competence of senior clinical nurses.     

Emotional intelligence: Part 1: The development of scales and psychometric testing

Abstract   This article, the first in a series of four, describes the development of two scales for deductive and inductive measurement of emotional intelligence (EI), based on the literature and the identification of the psychometric properties of the scales. The data collection comprised two parts: (i) a literature search on the subject of emotional intelligence; and (ii) psychometric testing of the scales. The Emotional Intelligence Scale, comprising 23 items, and the Emotional Reactions and Thoughts Scale, containing 25 items, were tested on a sample of 250 postnatal mothers. The response rate was 80%. An explorative factor analysis was used to investigate the construct validity of the underlying dimensions of emotional intelligence and yielded a three-factor solution for the Emotional Intelligence Scale and a four-factor solution for the Emotional Reactions and Thoughts Scale. The internal consistency of the scales was satisfactory. How well the factor solutions fit in clinical practice remains to be validated.     

The Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale: reliability and validity in Spanish patients with vestibular disorders

Purpose: To examine the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC-S), and its ability to discriminate between patients with and without a history of falls among a Spanish population with vestibular disorders. Method: A total of 84 participants completed the ABC-S. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability and construct validity (exploratory factor analysis) were analysed. Concurrent validity was evaluated using the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). To determine the accuracy of the ABC total score in discriminating patients with and without a history of falls, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. Results: The ABC-S showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α?=?0.916) and substantial test–retest reliability (ICC?=?0.86, 95% CI: 0.74–0.93), with standard error and minimal detectable change values of 8.64 and 16.94, respectively. Factor analyses suggested a three-factor structure (explained variance was 62.24%). The ABC total score significantly correlated with the physical component summary score of the SF-12 and with the DHI-P, DHI-E, DHI-F and DHI total scores (p?p?Conclusions: The ABC-S is a valid and reliable instrument, suitable to assess balance confidence in Spanish patients with vestibular disorders.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Spanish version of the ABC scale is a valid and reliable measure of balance confidence in patients with vestibular disorders.

• In persons with vestibular disorders, the Spanish version of the ABC scale has shown the ability to discriminate between patients with and without a history of falls in the last year.

     

A Dutch version of the modified reasons for smoking scale: factorial structure, reliability and validity

Aims The Modified Reasons for Smoking Scale (MRSS) is a widely accepted scale that measures psychological functions of smoking. The scale has been translated in Dutch and has been validated, in order to be used in clinical smoking cessation practice in the Dutch‐speaking part of Belgium. This study examined the factorial structure, reliability and validity of the scale in a sample of smokers, who are characterized by a high level of dependence and an explicit motivation to stop smoking. Method The participants were 383 smokers, who volunteered at the stop‐smoking clinic of a Belgian university hospital, and completed the translated scale. They were administered the translated MRSS, the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). Through a clinical interview, smoking behaviour and smoking history was assessed (daily smoking consumption, years smoking, number of quit attempts, weeks stopped, alcohol and coffee consumption, CO level). Exploratory factor analysis was performed. Internal consistency was studied in order to examine the reliability. The concurrent validity was assessed by means of manova , anova and correlation analysis. Results Factor analysis identified four factors, named stimulation, pleasure of smoking, social smoking and automatism of smoking. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.65 (automatism) to 0.72 (stimulation). manova indicated the influence of the variables age, sex, daily consumption and the FTND (the latter two variables showed a dose‐dependent association with each subscale). Regression analysis revealed a relationship with dependence indicators, namely: the daily consumption, the number and duration of previous quit attempts, FTND, CO level and daily coffee intake. Conclusions The Dutch translation of the MRSS identified four factors and revealed acceptable validity and reliability. The adapted version of the translated scale as a component of the psychological assessment procedure in a smoking cessation treatment in Dutch‐speaking areas should be implemented.     

正畸患者口腔健康素养综合量表的编制及信效度检验

目的 编制正畸患者口腔健康素养综合评估工具,并对其信效度进行检验。方法 根据成人口腔健康素养问卷、牙科畏惧调查量表及改良牙科焦虑量表,通过访谈和研究组讨论筛选量表条目,通过专家函询和测试修订条目,形成正畸患者口腔健康素养综合量表(Comprehensive Oral Health Literacy Adults Questionnaire for Orthodontic Patients,COHL-OAQ)。选取2022年9月~2022年12月于某省三级口腔专科医院接受口腔正畸治疗的362例患者为调查对象,对量表信效度进行检验。结果 探索性因子分析提取5个公因子,累积方差贡献率为51.293%。验证性因子分析显示χ2/df=1.509,RMSEA =0.031,CFI=0.948,TLI=0.939,模型适配度良好。最终形成包含阅读理解和知识能力、决策能力、计算能力、倾听能力、心理状态5个维度,共25个条目的量表。结论 正畸患者口腔健康素养综合量表可靠性较好,可作为评估正畸患者口腔健康素养综合水平的工具。     

社区老年人抑郁筛查量表的初步编制及信度效度检验

目的编制社区老年人抑郁筛查量表。方法经文献复习、小组讨论和专家咨询确定了60个条目组成的条目池,在93名社区老年人和59名老年抑郁症患者中测试,并进行项目分析形成正式量表。然后在200名社区老年人和68名老年抑郁症患者中检验量表的信度和效度。结果量表最终纳入30个条目,所有条目在病例组的发生率明显高于社区组,内部一致性Cronbach’sα系数为0.98,一周后重测信度为0.68(P<0.05),与抑郁自评量表(SDS)标准分的相关系数为0.71(P<0.05),探索性因素分析揭示了量表单维的因素结构。在量表分数取临界值14时,灵敏度为91.20%,特异度为93.00%。结论本次研究编制的社区老年人抑郁筛查量表具有较好的信度和效度。     

肿瘤患者阿片类药物相关性便秘评估量表的编制

[目的] 编制肿瘤患者阿片类药物相关性便秘评估量表并验证其信效度。[方法]采用文献回顾、半结构式访谈和德尔菲法形成初始量表。然后选取276例阿片类药物相关性便秘的肿瘤病人进行问卷调查,检验量表信效度。[结果] 初步形成3个维度15个条目的初始量表。探索性因子分析提取3个公因子,累计贡献率为58.862%。总量表Cronbach"sα为系数0.852,重测信度系数为0.850。[结论]肿瘤患者阿片类药物相关性便秘评估量表具有良好的信效度,可作为临床肿瘤阿片类药物相关性便秘的有效测评工具。