Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection Associated with Retrograde Type A Intramural Hematoma

PurposeTo evaluate feasibility and efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) associated with retrograde type A intramural hematoma (IMH).Materials and MethodsFrom April 2013 to January 2017, 15 consecutive patients with TBAD associated with retrograde type A IMH who underwent TEVAR were reviewed retrospectively. There was no cardiac tamponade, aortic regurgitation, involvement of coronary artery, or sign of cerebral ischemia in these patients. Enhanced CT was used in 4 patients to diagnose malperfusion of abdominal visceral arteries or lower extremity artery and underwent emergent TEVAR. For the remaining 11 patients, repeated enhanced CT after initial medical treatment within 24 hours from onset of pain showed expansion of IMH in 8 patients or presence of periaortic hematoma in 3 patients. Delayed TEVAR was scheduled for these cases.ResultsSuccessful deployment of the stent graft was achieved in all patients. There were no severe postoperative complications, such as retrograde type A aortic dissection or aortic rupture. Sudden death occurred in 1 patient 3 months after the procedure. Thrombosis of the false lumen, shrinkage of the diameter of the aorta, and complete absorption of the IMH were observed in the remaining patients at a mean follow-up of 19.8 months ± 6.57.ConclusionsTEVAR for treatment of TBAD with retrograde type A IMH is feasible and effective. It represents a treatment option for patients with TBAD associated with type A IMH with a proximal entry tear located in the descending aorta.     

In Situ Laser Stent Graft Fenestration of the Left Subclavian Artery during Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection with Limited Proximal Landing Zones: 5-Year Outcomes

PurposeTo assess safety and feasibility of in situ laser stent graft fenestration to revascularize the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with limited proximal landing zones with 5 years of follow-up.Materials and MethodsIn a single-center retrospective study, 130 patients with TBAD with limited proximal landing zones (≤ 1.5 cm) underwent in situ laser stent graft fenestration revascularizing the LSA during TEVAR from April 2014 to April 2019. Outcomes were assessed by CT angiography and clinic visits, including technical success rate, operative time, LSA patency, ischemic events, and late aorta-related complications during follow-up.ResultsMean age of patients was 53 y (range, 33–73 y). Primary technical success rate was 96.9% (126/130). Three chimney stents were placed instead of fenestration, and 1 LSA fenestration was combined with a left common carotid artery (LCCA) chimney stent. Mean operative time was 53 min ± 28 with fluoroscopy time of 40 min ± 15. There were no neurologic complications and no deaths, with a mean duration of hospital stay of 9 d (range, 5–21 d). At a mean follow-up of 42 mo (range, 5–60 mo), there was a 97% primary LSA patency. Four patients had a type I endoleak, which disappeared during follow-up. One LCCA became occluded after 6 months. No type II or III endoleaks were found. Retrograde type A aortic dissection and stent graft–induced new distal entry were not found during follow-up.ConclusionsIn situ laser fenestration to revascularize the LSA during TEVAR of TBAD with limited proximal landing zones was efficient, safe, and feasible based on 5-year follow-up.     

Comparative Outcome Analysis of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Embolization of the False Lumen Versus Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Aortic Dissection

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) embolization for the treatment of aortic dissection.Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted from February 2003 to June 2019, NBCA embolization of an aortic false lumen was attempted in 12 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 41–68 y) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed in 53 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 37–70 y) for aortic dissection with one or more indications of persisting pain, malperfusion, rupture or impending rupture, maximal aortic diameter ≥ 55 mm, and/or rapid aortic enlargement. The main exclusion criterion for embolization was the presence of fast blood flow in the aortic false lumen on aortography. The efficacy of NBCA embolization and TEVAR was compared by evaluating technical and clinical outcomes, repeat intervention–free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsTechnical success was achieved in 11 of the 12 patients treated with NBCA embolization (91.7%), and clinical success was achieved in 9 of these 11 (81.8%). No significant difference was found between embolization and TEVAR in clinical success rates (embolization, 81.8%; TEVAR, 84.9%; P = .409) or procedure-related complications (embolization, 1 patient [8.3%]; TEVAR, 4 patients [7.5%]; P = .701). In addition, embolization showed comparable 5-y RFS (embolization, 82.5% ± 9.3; TEVAR, 85.5% ± 4.8; P = .641) and 5-y OS (embolization, 100%; TEVAR, 95.4% ± 3.2; P = .744) rates to TEVAR.ConclusionsNBCA embolization of the false lumen in aortic dissection seems to be a safe and effective treatment modality for the closure of false lumen in selected patients.     

“Cheese Wire” Fenestration of Dissection Intimal Flap to Facilitate Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Chronic Dissection

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aneurysmal chronic dissection is often complicated by retrograde filling of the false lumen and dissected distal landing zone. A “cheese wire”-style fenestration of the dissection intimal flap can create a landing zone facilitating TEVAR. This technique successfully aided TEVAR in 3 patients with an average age of 57.3 years. Complications included type III endoleak requiring relining and renal artery occlusion requiring stent placement. Average duration of clinical follow-up was 19 ± 4 months. Imaging follow-up was 8 ± 10 months. All patients have survived for more than 1 year without aneurysm enlargement.     

Endovascular Outcomes in Aortic Arch Repair with Double and Triple Parallel Stent Grafts

PurposeTo report early and midterm outcomes of treating thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and aortic dissection (AD) involving zone 1 and zone 0 with multiple parallel stent grafts (PSGs).Materials and MethodsFrom February 2011 to August 2018, 31 of 1,806 patients (1.7%) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with double PSGs (DPSGs) (n = 20) or triple PSGs (TPSGs) (n = 11) were retrospectively reviewed. Procedures were performed in high-risk patients who had TAA or AD involving zone 1 or zone 0.ResultsFifteen patients (48.4%) who presented with symptomatic or impending rupture underwent urgent or emergent TEVAR with DPSGs or TPSGs. Nineteen patients (61.3%) were treated for zone 0 disease. Technical and clinical success rates were 70.0% for DPSG cohort and 45.5% for TPSG cohort. Intraoperative type Ia endoleak was observed in 30% of DPSG cohort and 45.5% of TPSG cohort. One patient in the DPSG cohort died of aortic sinus rupture intraoperatively. Minor stroke during the 30-day postoperative period was more frequent in the TPSG cohort (P = .042). Mean duration of follow-up was 28.9 months ± 17.7. The TPSG cohort had a higher incidence of major adverse events (72.7% vs 25.0%, P = .021). The most common adverse events were endoleaks (12.9%), endograft migration (9.7%), PSG stenosis or occlusion (6.5%), retrograde dissection (6.5%), and stroke (3.2%). Endograft migrations were more common in TPSG cohort (27.3%, P = .037). Overall mortality rate was 16.1% (5/31) perioperatively and during follow-up. There were no statistical differences in overall survival and reintervention-free survival.ConclusionsIn the context of TEVAR with multiple PSGs for aortic arch repair, TPSGs may have a high risk of major complications.     

Percutaneous In Situ Microneedle Puncture Fenestration via the Left Subclavian Artery for branched Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

This study explored the feasibility of a totally percutaneous approach to perform in situ microneedle puncture fenestration during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) via access from the left subclavian artery (LSA). In total, 23 patients with either thoracic aortic dissection or thoracic aortic aneurysm were treated with in situ LSA fenestration during TEVAR. The procedure was technically successful in all the patients. No serious complications occurred during a mean 9-month follow-up period. In situ microneedle puncture fenestration during TEVAR via the LSA is a feasible and effective method for LSA reconstruction.     

Outcomes of Preventive Embolization of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of preemptive inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization on outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR).Materials and MethodsFrom January 2015 to July 2017, all patients undergoing elective EVAR or fenestrated EVAR (F-EVAR) for asymptomatic AAA in a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. Three groups of patients were defined: patients with a patent IMA who underwent embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 1), those with a patent IMA who did not undergo embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 2), and those with a chronically occluded IMA (group 3). Preoperative aortic morphology, demographics, and procedural details were recorded. Aneurysmal growth (≥5 mm), reintervention, and overall mortality rates were analyzed using multivariate proportional hazard multivariate modeling. Propensity scores were constructed, and inverse probability weighting was applied to a new set of multivariate analyses to perform a sensitivity analysis.ResultsA total of 266 patients (male, 95% [n = 249]) with a median age of 70 (65–77) years were included, with F-EVAR procedures comprising 87 (32.7%) of the interventions. There were 52, 142, and 72 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Changes in aneurysmal sac size did not differ between groups, nor did overall survival or reintervention rates at 24 months. IMA embolization was not identified as an independently protective factor for aneurysmal growth during follow-up (relative risk [RR] = 2.82/mm [0.96–8.28], P = .060), whereas accessory renal arteries (RR = 5.07/mm [1.72–14.96], P = .003) and a larger preoperative aneurysmal diameter (RR = 1.09/mm [1.03–1.15], P = .004) were independent risk factors for sac enlargement.ConclusionsPreventive embolization of the IMA during EVAR or F-EVAR did not promote aneurysmal sac shrinking or decrease the reintervention rate at 2-year follow-up.     

Risk Factors for Access-Related Adverse Events Related to the Preclose Technique in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

PurposeTo analyze the risk factors for access-related adverse events (AEs) of the preclose technique in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).Materials and MethodsNinety-one patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection who underwent the preclose technique in TEVAR between January 2013 and December 2021 were included. According to the occurrence of access-related AEs, the patients were divided into 2 groups: those with AE and those without AE. Age, sex, combined diseases, body mass index, skin depth, femoral artery diameter, access calcification, iliofemoral artery tortuosity, and sheath size were recorded for risk factor analysis. The sheath–to–femoral artery ratio (SFAR), the ratio of the femoral artery inner diameter (in millimeters) to the sheath’s outer diameter (in millimeters), was also included in the analysis.ResultsSFAR was identified as an independent risk factor for AEs using multivariable logistic analysis (odds ratio, 251.748; 95% CI, 7.004–9,048.534; P = .002). The cutoff value of SFAR was 0.85 and was related to a higher incidence of access-related AEs (5.2% vs 33.3%, P = .001), especially to a higher stenosis rate (0.0% vs 21.2%, P = .001).ConclusionsSFAR is an independent risk factor for access-related AEs of preclose in TEVAR with a cutoff value of 0.85. SFAR could be a new criterion for preoperative access evaluation in high-risk patients that may allow the detection and treatment of access-related AEs at the early stage.     

Response Findings after Treatment and Outcomes on CT after Endovascular Repair of Mycotic Aortic Aneurysm

PurposeTo demonstrate post-treatment computed tomography (CT) findings and outcomes of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for mycotic aortic aneurysm (MAA).Materials and MethodsClinical data of patients with MAA who underwent EVAR from June 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 22 patients were included (19 men and 3 women). The periaortic features of the MAA regression after EVAR were graded and evaluated by follow-up CT.ResultsThe median follow-up was 36.5 months (range, 0.5–97 months.). The cumulative survival rate at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 95.5%, 86.4%, 81.6%, and 73.4%, respectively. The early and late infection-related complication (IRC) rate was 18.2% and 13.6%, respectively. One patient died within 1 month from severe acidosis and shock. Of the other patients, the median time to stable response of the MAA was 6 months (range, 3–36 months). Fourteen patients (66.7%) showed early response of the MAA, while 7 patients (33.3%) showed delayed response. A significant association was observed between delayed response and late IRCs (P = .026).ConclusionsThe post-EVAR periaortic features on follow-up CT aid in monitoring the treatment response of the MAA. Early response of the MAA was associated with a low rate of late IRCs and might aid in adjusting the antibiotic duration after the patient has achieved complete or nearly complete regression of the MAA.     

Endovascular Exclusion of Concomitant Aortic Ruptures at the Proximal and Distal Anchoring Zones of a Previous Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair

1. Download : Download high-res image (172KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Outpatient Percutaneous Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Single-Center Experience

PurposeTo evaluate the safety of outpatient percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic repair (PEVAR) versus inpatient PEVAR without or with adjunct procedures.Materials and MethodsBetween January 2012 and June 2019, a cohort of 359 patients comprising 168 (46.8%) outpatients and 191 (53.2%) inpatients who had undergone PEVAR were enrolled. All the patients were asymptomatic but had indications for endovascular aortic repair, ie, fit for intravenous anesthesia and anatomically feasible with standard devices. Patient sex, age, comorbidities, smoking status, type of anesthesia, adjunct procedures, type of graft device, operative times, mortality, complications, and readmissions were analyzed.ResultsMedian follow-up period was 16.5 months (interquartile range, 9–31 months). Except for a higher percentage of tobacco use (42.6% vs 28.8%; P = .04), dyslipidemia (39.7% vs 19.2%; P < .01), and use of local anesthesia (99.4% vs 82.2%; P < .01) in the outpatients, there was no significant difference in the type of graft and adjunct procedures used. No outpatient mortality occurred. There was no difference in the number, severity, and onset of complications (all P > .05). Outpatient unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were 4.8%, 2.4% (P = .13), and 10% (P < .01), respectively. Operative times for outpatient PEVAR without adjunct procedures were shorter (P < .01).ConclusionsOutpatient PEVAR can be performed with a safety profile similar to that of inpatient PEVAR. The unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were low. The outpatient PEVARs without adjunct procedures took less time.     

Computed Tomography Angiography Prediction of Successful Trasnscatheter Embolization for Type II Endoleak of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

PurposeTo evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT) angiography before transarterial embolization (TAE) in predicting TAE’s technical success for type II endoleaks (T2ELs).Materials and MethodsFifty-eight patients (mean age, 74.4 years; range, 46–89 years) who underwent attempted TAE for T2EL from July 2014 to August 2019 and underwent CT angiography before the procedure were included. Each CT angiography result was assessed for a feeding artery that was traceable over its entire course from either the superior mesenteric artery or the internal iliac artery to the endoleak cavity. TAE was performed using coils and was considered technically successful if embolization of the endoleak cavity and feeding artery was performed. The technical success rates were compared between patients with and without traceable feeding arteries.ResultsA fully traceable feeding artery supplying 75% (44/59) of endoleaks in the cohort was identified. TAE was technically successful in 95% (42/44) of these cases but only in 13% (2/15) of the cases without a fully traceable feeding artery (P < .001). When the inferior mesenteric artery was the feeding artery, it was always fully traceable, and TAE was technically successful in 100% (33/33) of the cases. When a lumbar artery was the feeding artery, it was fully traceable in only 42% (11/26) of the cases. When the lumbar artery was not fully traceable, TAE was technically successful in only 13% (2/15) of the cases.ConclusionsThe traceability of a feeding artery over its entire course to an endoleak cavity using CT angiography was associated with TAE’s technical success. Lumbar feeding arteries were less likely to be fully traceable. TAE’s high failure rate when the feeding artery was not fully traceable suggests that translumbar embolization can be considered as an initial approach for theses patients.     

Radiation-Free Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Fiberoptic and Electromagnetic Guidance: A Phantom Study

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a radiation-free implantation of a thoracic aortic stent graft employing fiberoptic and electromagnetic tracking in an anthropomorphic phantom.Materials and MethodsAn anthropomorphic phantom was manufactured based on computed tomography (CT) angiography data from a patient. An aortic stent graft application system was equipped with a fiber Bragg gratings and 3 electromagnetic sensors. The stent graft was navigated in the phantom by 3 interventionalists using the tracking data generated by both technologies. One implantation procedure was performed. The technical success of the procedure was evaluated using digital subtraction angiography and CT angiography (before and after the intervention). Tracking accuracy was determined at various anatomical landmarks based on separately acquired fluoroscopic images. The mean/maximum errors were measured for the stent graft application system and the tip/end of the stent graft.ResultsThe procedure resulted in technical success with a mean error below 3 mm for the entire application system and <2 mm for the position of the tip of the stent graft. Navigation/implantation and handling of the device were rated sufficiently accurate and on par with comparable, routinely used stent graft application systems.ConclusionsThe study demonstrates successful stent graft implantation during a thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedure employing advanced guidance techniques and avoiding fluoroscopic imaging. This is an essential step in facilitating the implantation of stent grafts and reducing the health risks associated with ionizing radiation during endovascular procedures.     

False Lumen Stent-Grafts for Repair of Postdissection Aortic Aneurysms

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of false lumen (FL) stent-grafts in the treatment of postdissection aortic aneurysms.Materials and MethodsEleven patients who underwent endovascular repair using FL stent-grafts from January 2016 to June 2019 were included. Among them, 2 patients had a prior history of type A aortic dissection, whereas 9 had undergone a prior endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection. Computed tomography angiography was performed to evaluate the reintervention and technical success rate, aortic remodeling, and other related aortic complications.ResultsThe mean age of patients was 55.6 ± 10.4 years. Technical success was achieved in all patients, and neither early mortality nor paralysis occurred. In total, 8 visceral branch arteries originating from the FL were reconstructed. The true lumen areas at the celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, renal artery, and abdominal aortic bifurcation were significantly increased from 230.1 mm² to 312.3 mm², 212.1 mm² to 277.5 mm², 209.1 mm² to 291.6 mm², and 214.4 mm² to 300.6 mm², respectively (P < .05). The total diameter of the aorta at the 4 designated levels was stable or had shrunk in all patients. At a mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 7.6 months, 1 patient received re-intervention owing to iliac stent-graft occlusion. No aortic-related mortality occurred.ConclusionsFL stent-grafts can safely and effectively treat patients with postdissection aortic aneurysms. This strategy can be used to promote thrombosis of the FL and aortic remodeling. A larger sample and an extended follow-up period are needed to produce more conclusive results.     

Association of Aortic Arch Calcification with Acute Ischemic Stroke Subtypes and Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes

PurposeTo analyze the aortic arch calcification (AAC) on computed tomography (CT) scans, with the goal of predicting the subtypes of patients with ischemic stroke and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) outcomes.Materials and MethodsAutomated analysis was used to quantify AAC on CT scans. From January 2020 to March 2021, 119 patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke were analyzed, and the feasibility of EVT was assessed; 43 underwent the procedure.ResultsAAC was present in 117 (98.3%) of 119 patients. There was a significant difference (P <.001) in AAC severity among all patients with ischemic stroke according to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification. In patients who underwent EVT, AAC severity was significantly related to the thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade, thrombectomy procedure time, and modified Rankin scale at discharge (P =.002, P =.035 and P =.015, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis also showed that severe AAC (volume, ≥1,000 mm³) (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 12.1; adjusted 95% confidence interval [CI]), 2.1–36.4; P =.001) and intracranial atherosclerotic disease (adjusted OR, 9.5; adjusted 95% CI, 2.3–33.7; P =.001) were both independently associated with poor thrombolysis reperfusion rate.ConclusionsA high proportion of patients with ischemic stroke have AAC, the severity of which is a potential imaging marker of ischemic stroke subtypes and the outcome of EVT.     

Effects of Antithrombotic Therapy on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Size after Endovascular Repair in Patients with Favorable Neck Anatomy

PurposeTo evaluate the influence of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy on sac behavior after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).Materials and MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed data from patients with favorable neck anatomy who underwent EVAR between 2007 and 2019. Patients with ruptured AAA and ≤1 year of sac behavior evaluation were excluded. Sac shrinkage after 1 year, persistent type II endoleak, and late sac expansion were examined.ResultsIn total, 182 patients with favorable neck anatomy were included in this study. A multivariable analysis identified an occluded inferior mesenteric artery (IMA; P = .049), the presence of a posterior thrombus (P = .009), and no antiplatelet therapy (P = .012) as factors positively associated with sac shrinkage at 1 year. Persistent type II endoleak was detected in 56 (30.8%) patients, with patent IMA (P = .006), the lack of a posterior thrombus (P = .004), the number of patent lumbar arteries (P = .004), and antiplatelet therapy (P = .039) being identified as significant risk factors. The multivariable analysis identified a larger initial AAA diameter (P < .001), the lack of a posterior thrombus (P = .038), and antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies (P = .038 and P = .003, respectively) as risk factors for late sac expansion.ConclusionsAfter EVAR in patients with favorable neck anatomy, antiplatelet therapy is associated with the lack of sac regression at 1 year, whereas antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies are risk factors for late sac expansion.     

Technical Considerations and Clinical Outcomes in the Endovascular Management of Celiac Arterial Aneurysms

This retrospective case series details a single-center experience of 8 patients (mean age, 54.4 years) with celiac artery aneurysms (CAAs) who underwent 1 parent vessel-sparing, 5 partial parent vessel-sparing, and 2 non-parent vessel-sparing procedures. Technical success was achieved in 6 of 8 (75%) patients. Both technical failures arose from type II endoleaks, which spontaneously resolved, resulting in clinical success of all cases. In-stent restenosis requiring reintervention complicated 3 of 5 (60%) partial parent vessel-sparing techniques, with 2 of 3 developing complete thrombosis. Two Society of Interventional Radiology grade C complications were recorded, none of which resulted in permanent sequelae. The endovascular management of CAAs is safe and amenable to various techniques.     

Endovascular Assessment of Liver Hemodynamics in Patients with Cirrhosis Complicated by Portal Hypertension

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently considered the gold standard to assess portal hypertension (PH) in patients with cirrhosis. A meticulous technique is important to achieve accurate and reproducible results, and values obtained during measurement are applied in risk stratification of patients with PH, allocating treatment options, monitoring follow-up, and deciding management options in surgical patients. The use of portosystemic pressure gradients in patients undergoing placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts has been studied extensively and has great influence on decisions on shunt diameter. The purpose of this study was to describe the recommended technique to measure HVPG and portosystemic pressure gradient and to review the existing literature describing the importance of these hemodynamic measurements in clinical practice.     

Endovascular Preservation of Segmental Arteries during Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Fenestrated/Branched Stent Grafts: Feasibility and Outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the technical success, feasibility, and outcomes of endovascular preservation of segmental arteries (SAs) during fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR).Materials and MethodsA multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in consecutive patients treated with F/B-EVAR and a branch or fenestration for SA preservation. Eleven patients (median age, 57 years; range, 45–73 years; 7 men) were included.ResultsTwelve SAs were preserved. Stent grafts were custom made with fenestrations, branches, or a combination of both in 1, 2, and 5 patients, respectively. A t-Branch stent graft was used in 2 patients, and a physician-modified thoracic stent graft with a branch was used in 1 patient. Eight branches and 4 fenestrations were used for the preservation of 12 SAs. Four fenestrations and 1 branch for the SAs were not bridged and were left for perfusion of the corresponding SAs. Technical success was achieved in 10 of 11 (91%) patients. No early mortality occurred. Early morbidities included renal insufficiency without dialysis in 1 patient and partially delayed paraplegia in 1 patient. Before discharge, computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed patency of all the SAs. The median follow-up duration was 30 months (range, 10–88 months). Late death occurred in 1 patient. Two SAs were occluded in 1 patient with 2 unstented fenestrations, as determined using 1-year follow-up CTA. This patient did not develop spinal cord ischemia (SCI). Other SAs remained patent during follow-up. One patient with a type IIIc endoleak was treated by relining of bridging stents.ConclusionsEndovascular preservation of SAs with F/B-EVAR for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm is feasible and safe in select patients and may add to preventive measures for SCI.     

Minimally Invasive Repair of Ascending Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: An Alternative to Open Surgical Repair in High-Risk Patients

Development of a pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta is an uncommon complication of aortic surgery. Several nonsurgical techniques are available for treatment of ascending aortic pseudoaneurysms (AAPs). This report outlines a single-center retrospective experience with 14 nonsurgical procedures for treatment of AAPs in 10 patients. Modified stent grafts, septal defect occlusion devices, coil embolics, and liquid embolics were deployed by transthoracic and endovascular approaches. Complete stasis of the AAP was achieved in 7 of 10 patients (70%). Mean postprocedural recoveries occurred within 3.5 days. Nonsurgical techniques for repair of AAPs offer a comparatively safe and effective alternative to open surgical repair.