Synthesis and characterization of poly(n‐butyl methacrylate)‐b‐polystyrene diblock copolymers by atom transfer radical emulsion polymerization

Poly(n‐butyl methacrylate) (PBMA)‐b‐polystyrene (PSt) diblock copolymers were synthesized by emulsion atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). PBMA macroinitiators that contained alkyl bromide end groups were obtained by the emulsion ATRP of n‐butyl methacrylate with BrCH₃CHCOOC₂H₅ as the initiator; these were used to initiate the ATRP of styrene (St). The latter procedure was carried out at 85°C with CuCl/4,4′‐di(5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine as the catalyst and polyoxyethylene(23) lauryl ether as the surfactant. With this technique, PBMA‐b‐PSt diblock copolymers were synthesized. The polymerization was nearly controlled; the ATRP of St from the macroinitiators showed linear increases in number‐average molecular weight with conversion. The block copolymers were characterized with IR spectroscopy, ¹H‐NMR, and differential scanning calorimetry. The effects of the molecular weight of the macroinitiators, macroinitiator concentration, catalyst concentration, surfactant concentration, and temperature on the polymerization were also investigated. Thermodynamic data and activation parameters for the ATRP are also reported. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2123–2129, 2005     

Amphiphilic diblock and crosslinked copolymers synthesized via metal‐free atom transfer radical polymerization

The use of metal‐free atom transfer radical polymerization (MF‐ATRP) was explored for the formation of diverse macromolecular structures to assess the versatility of this advanced polymerization process. In MF‐ATRP using an organic photocatalyst, 10‐phenylphenothiazine, the influences of various monomers, initiators and solvents were examined, showing that molecular weight and polydispersity could be tailored through appropriate selection of each component. Using this modern polymerization technology, metal‐free amphiphilic diblock and crosslinked copolymers were prepared successfully. Especially, demonstration of amphiphilic diblock copolymer synthesis provides a basis for further applications to biomedical materials. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Well‐defined diblock and triblock copolymers for KrF lithography

One of the major components of a photoresist formulation is polymer resin. Well‐defined diblock and random copolymer of tert‐butyl acrylate (tBA) and 4‐acetoxystyrene (StyOAc), as well as triblock and random tertpolymer of tBA, StyOAc, and Sty were prepared by reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer polymerization (RAFT) process. The polymers all possess M_w about ten thousand and PDI less than 1.23. After hydrolysis under basic condition, the hydroxystyrene (StyOH) analogs are obtained and then are formulated as photoresist. Lithographic evaluation under KrF excimer laser shows that random copolymer based photoresist exhibits better S/L patterns according to SEM images. However, the lithographic performance of the terpolymer based resists is similar. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Synthesis and characterization of diblock,triblock, and multiblock copolymers containing poly(3‐hydroxy butyrate) units

A poly[(R,S)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate] macroinitiator (PHB‐MI) was obtained through the condensation reaction of poly[(R,S)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate] (PHB) oligomers containing dihydroxyl end functionalities with 4,4′‐azobis(4‐cyanopentanoyl chloride). The PHB‐MI obtained in this way had hydroxyl groups at two end of the polymer chain and an internal azo group. The synthesis of ABA‐type PHB‐b‐PMMA block copolymers [where A is poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and B is PHB] via PHB‐MI was accomplished in two steps. First, multiblock active copolymers with azo groups (PMMA‐PHB‐MI) were prepared through the redox free‐radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) with a PHB‐MI/Ce(IV) redox system in aqueous nitric acid at 40°C. Second, PMMA‐PHB‐MI was used in the thermal polymerization of MMA at 60°C to obtain PHB‐b‐PMMA. When styrene (S) was used instead of MMA in the second step, ABCBA‐type PMMA‐b‐PHB‐b‐PS multiblock copolymers [where C is polystyrene (PS)] were obtained. In addition, the direct thermal polymerization of the monomers (MMA or S) via PHB‐MI provided AB‐type diblocks copolymers with MMA and BCB‐type triblock copolymers with S. The macroinitiators and block copolymers were characterized with ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, cryoscopic measurements, and thermogravimetric analysis. The increases in the intrinsic viscosity and fractional precipitation confirmed that a block copolymer had been obtained. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 1789–1796, 2004     

Synthesis and photoinduced surface‐relief grating of well‐defined azo‐containing polymethacrylates via atom transfer radical polymerization

A well‐defined photoresponsive polymethacrylate containing azo chromophores, poly[6‐(4‐phenylazophenoxy)hexylmethacrylate] [Poly(PPHM)], was prepared with azo‐based monofunctional and difunctional initiators via atom transfer radical polymerization in the presence of CuCl/1,1,4,7,10,10‐hexamethyltriethylenetetramine. The polymerizations with first‐order kinetics were well controlled with theoretical expected molecular weight and narrow molecular weight distributions in two initiation systems. The UV absorption intensities of the poly (PPHM)s increased with increasing molecular weight of the poly(PPHM)s in all cases. The 80‐nm surface‐relief gratings with 2.7% efficient diffraction formed on the poly (PPHM) film surface were obtained with a linearly polarized krypton laser with 10 min of irradiation at a recording beam intensity of 188 mW/cm² with a wavelength of 413.1 nm. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Synthesis of diblock and triblock copolymers from butyl acrylate and styrene by reverse iodine transfer polymerization

Well‐defined AB and BA diblock copolymers were obtained by a one‐pot two‐step sequential block copolymerization by reverse iodine transfer polymerization (RITP), A being a poly(styrene) block and B a poly(butyl acrylate) block. High monomer conversions during the formation of the first block avoided the purification steps before growing the second block. In a third sequential step, the diblock copolymers were further extended to synthesize ABA and BAB triblock copolymers. Furthermore, the synthesis of ABA and BAB copolymers in only two steps by RITP was investigated starting with the formation of the central block using 2,5‐di(2‐ethylhexanoylperoxy)‐2,5‐dimethylhexane as a difunctional initiator and then resuming the polymerization to grow the external blocks in a second step. The obtained copolymers were analyzed by size exclusion chromatography, transmission electron microscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Synthesis of a well‐defined chitosan graft poly(methoxy polyethyleneglycol methacrylate) by atom transfer radical polymerization

Graft copolymerization of vinyl monomers onto chitosan and other natural polymers using atom transfer radical polymerization has only recently attracted interest. This technique could potentially provide new ways to utilize this abundant natural polymer. It would enable a wide variety of molecular designs to afford novel types of tailored hybrid materials composed of natural polysaccharides and synthetic polymers. In this work, a chitosan macroinitiator was prepared by the reaction of chitosan with 2‐bromo‐isobutyryl bromide, after the chitosan amino group had been protected as the imine. The aqueous grafting of methoxy capped (PEG 350) methacrylate onto chitosan is described. The kinetic study revealed a first order polymerization reaction. Polydispersities of about 1.25 were obtained. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 901–912, 2003     

Nanoscale structure of SAN-PEO-SAN triblock copolymers synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization

Low molecular weight triblock copolymers (TBCs) with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) end-blocks and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(propylene oxide) (PPO) or polycaprolactone (PCL) mid-blocks were synthesized using atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The influence of molecular weight, composition (mid-block mole fraction), and interaction parameter on the crystallinity and on the formation of an ordered nanoscale phase-separated structure was investigated using thermal analysis, X-ray scattering, and electron microscopy. The TBCs with PEO mole fractions of over 0.5 exhibited PEO crystallinities of around 40% (compared to 72% for the PEO homopolymer) and lamellar nanoscale periodicities of around 176 Å (compared to 143 Å for the PEO homopolymer). The TBCs with PEO, PCL or PPO mole fractions of less than 0.5 exhibited relatively low crystallinities and did not exhibit ordered structures. These results emphasize the importance of the mid-block mole fraction in determining the ability to form an ordered nanoscale structure through mid-block crystallization. The ordered structure disappeared on heating the TBCs above the mid-block melting point, but below the SAN glass transition temperature. The crystallinity was reduced significantly in TBCs that were annealed or cast from a solvent.     

Novel poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polyurethane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) tri‐block copolymers through atom transfer radical polymerization

Poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polyurethane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) tri‐block copolymers have been synthesized successfully through atom transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate using telechelic bromo‐terminated polyurethane/CuBr/N,N,N,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine initiating system. As the time increases, the number‐average molecular weight increases linearly from 6400 to 37,000. This shows that the poly methyl methacrylate blocks were attached to polyurethane block. As the polymerization time increases, both conversion and molecular weight increased and the molecular weight increases linearly with increasing conversion. These results indicate that the formation of the tri‐block copolymers was through atom transfer radical polymerization mechanism. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectral results of the triblock copolymers show that the molar ratio between polyurethane and poly (methyl methacrylate) blocks is in the range of 1 : 16.3 to 1 : 449.4. Differential scanning calorimetry results show T_g of the soft segment at ?35°C and T_g of the hard segment at 75°C. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Solvent induced morphologies of poly(methyl methacrylate-b-ethylene oxide-b-methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization

Poly(methyl methacrylate-b-ethylene oxide-b-methyl methacrylate) (PMMA-PEO-PMMA) triblock copolymers were synthesized using atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and halogen exchange ATRP. PEO-based macroinitiators with molecular weight from M_n = 2000 to 35,800 g/mol were used to initiate the polymerization of MMA to obtain copolymers with molecular weight up to M_n = 82,000 g/mol and polydispersity index (PDI) less than 1.2. The macroinitiators and copolymers were characterized by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The melting temperature and glass transition temperature of the copolymers were measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Crystallinities of the PEO blocks were determined from the WAXS patterns of both homopolymers and block copolymers, which revealed the fragmentation of PEO blocks due to the folding of the PMMA chains. Interestingly, the fragmentation was less pronounced when cast on surfaces compared to that in bulk, as measured by GISAXS. Solvent casting was used to control the morphology of the copolymers, permitting the formation of various states including amorphous, induced micellar with a PMMA core and flower-like PEO arms, and a cross-linked gel. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to visualize the different copolymer morphologies, showing micellar and amorphous states.     

Graft copolymerization of methyl methacrylate with an N‐substituted maleimide–liquid‐crystalline copolymer by atom transfer radical polymerization

The synthesis of novel copolymers consisting of a side‐group liquid‐crystalline backbone and poly (methyl methacrylate) grafts were realized by the use of atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). In the first stage, the bromine‐functional copolymers 6‐(4‐cyanobiphenyl‐4′‐oxy)hexyl acrylate and (2,5‐dioxo‐2,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrrole‐1‐yl)methyl 2‐bromopropanoate were synthesized by free‐radical polymerization. These copolymers were used as initiators in the ATRP of methyl methacrylate to yield graft copolymers. Both the macroinitiator and graft copolymers were characterized by ¹H‐NMR, gel permeation chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermogravimetric analysis. The ATRP graft copolymerization was supported by an increase in the molecular weight of the graft copolymers compared to that of the macroinitiator and also by their monomodal molecular weight distribution. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

原子转移自由基聚合机理及其应用

原子转移自由基聚合(ATRP)是目前研究的热点之一。该文介绍了ATRP的反应机理及其应用。     

Synthesis of amphiphilic poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(methacrylic acid) diblock copolymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of 1‐(butoxy)ethyl methacrylate (BEMA) was carried out using CuBr/2,2′‐bipyridyl complex as catalyst and 2‐bromo‐2‐methyl‐propionic acid ester as initiator. The number average molecular weight of the obtained polymers increased with monomer conversion, and molecular weight distributions were unimodal throughout the reaction and shifted toward higher molecular weights. Using poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with a bromine atom at the chain end, which was prepared by ATRP, as the macro‐initiator, a diblock copolymer PMMA‐block‐poly [1‐(butoxy)ethyl methacrylate] (PMMA‐b‐PBEMA) has been synthesized by means of ATRP of BEMA. The amphiphilic diblock copolymer PMMA‐block‐poly(methacrylic acid) can be further obtained very easily by hydrolysis of PMMA‐b‐PBEMA under mild acidic conditions. The molecular weight and the structure of the above‐mentioned polymers were characterized with gel permeation chromatography, infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Methacrylate/acrylate ABA triblock copolymers by atom transfer radical polymerization; their properties and application as a mediator for organically dispersible gold nanoparticles

This investigation reports the preparation of a series of well-defined Poly(methyl methacrylate)-b-poly(hexyl acrylate)-b-poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA-b-PHA-b-PMMA) triblock copolymers by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP). Their morphology, dynamic mechanical and tensile properties are thoroughly investigated. Phase separation is observed for all the above-mentioned triblock copolymers, which contain PMMA outer blocks in the molecular weight (M_n) range of 10,000-80,000 and PHA inner blocks with M_n in the range 20,000-40,000. The dynamic mechanical measurements essentially reveal two glass transitions and an intermediate flat rubbery plateau in between. Tensile studies indicate that as the PMMA content increases, there is an increase in tensile strength and decrease in elongation at break, which is the case for most of the thermoplastic elastomers (TPE). Eventually, the as prepared block copolymers (with PMMA content 50-80%) offer to be an effective stabilizer for preparing gold nanoparticle aggregates, the shape and size of which can be modulated by tuning the block copolymer composition. The formation of nanoparticle aggregates and their possible non-covalent interaction with the base polymer has been substantiated by UV-vis analysis, transmission electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.     

Synthesis and characterization of PMMA‐b‐PBMA block copolymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

The synthesis of diblock copolymers using atom transfer radical polymerization, ATRP, of n‐butyl methacrylate, BMA, and methyl methacrylate, MMA, is reported. These copolymers were prepared from 2‐bromoisobutyryl‐terminated macroinitiators of poly(MMA) and poly(BMA), using copper chloride, CuCl,/N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetretramine, PMDETA, as the catalyst system, at 100°C in bulk and in benzonitrile solution. The block copolymers were characterized by means of size‐exclusion chromatography, SEC, and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy. The SEC analysis of the synthesized diblock copolymers confirmed important differences in the molecular weight control depending on the reaction medium (solvent effect) and the chemical structure of the macroinitiator used. In addition, differential scanning calorimetry, (DSC) measurements were performed, showing for all the copolymers a phase separation. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 2683–2691, 2002     

Environmentally responsive amphiphilic cationic block copolymers synthesized by 2,2,6,6‐Tetramethylpiperidinyloxy mediated living free‐radical polymerization

Polychloromethylstyrene (PCMS)‐block‐polystyrene (PS) copolymers were prepared by controlled free‐radical polymerization in the presence of 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidinooxy and 2,2′‐azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) initiator. The PCMS‐b‐PS copolymers had narrow molecular weight distributions, and the block lengths were controlled by the reaction time and the molar ratios of chloromethylstyrene/AIBN and styrene/PCMS macroinitiator. The block copolymers were further quaternized with triethylamine. The amphiphilic cationic block copolymers formed colloidal particles; the effects of the pH value, salt concentration, and solvent polarity on the particle size were investigated with a dynamic light scattering analyzer. The average colloid size increased with increasing pH value and salt concentration. This implied that the colloid formed a protonated hydrophilic shell and hydrophobic styrene core in water. Furthermore, with the addition of tetrahydrofuran to the aqueous solution, the styrene segments in the core could be inverted to the outside of the colloid. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Synthesis and characterization of pH/temperature-sensitive block copolymers via atom transfer radical polymerization

In order to prepare well-defined pH-sensitive block copolymers with a narrow molecular weight distribution (MWD), we synthesized a pH-sensitive block copolymer via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of sulfamethazine methacrylate monomer (SM) and amphiphilic diblock copolymers by the ring-opening polymerization of d,l-lactide/?-caprolactone (LA/CL), and their sol-gel phase transition was investigated. SM, which is a derivative of sulfonamide, was used as a pH responsive moiety, while PCLA-PEG-PCLA was used as a biodegradable, as well as a temperature sensitive one, amphiphilic triblock copolymer. The pentablock copolymer, OSM-PCLA-PEG-PCLA-OSM, was synthesized using Br-PCLA-PEG-PCLA-Br as an ATRP macroinitiator. The number average molecular weights of SM were controlled by adjusting the monomer/initiator feed ratio. The macroinitiator was synthesized by the coupling of 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide with PCLA-PEG-PCLA in the presence of triethyl amine catalyst in dichloromethane. The resultant block copolymer shows a narrow polydispersity. The block copolymer solution shows a sol-gel transition in response to a slight pH change in the range of 7.2-8.0. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and NMR were used for the characterization of the polymers that were synthesized.     

Synthesis of diblock and triblock copolymers containing dendrons via ‘living’ controlled radical polymerization

The dendritic Fréchet‐type polyarylether 2‐bromoisobutyrates (Gn‐Br, n = 1–3) as macroinitiators for the ‘living’/controlled radical polymerization of styrene (St) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) were investigated. The atom transfer radical polymerization of St and MMA carried out with CuBr/bpy (2,2′‐bipyridine) catalyst in bulk yielded well‐defined dendritic–linear diblock copolymers (Gn–PSt and Gn–PMMA). The use of G3–PSt for the block copolymerization of MMA and G3–PMMA for the chain extension polymerization of MMA in the presence of CuBr/bpy catalyst is also described. The triblock copolymers obtained were of predetermined molecular weights and relatively low polydispersities, which indicates the living nature of the reaction system. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Uniform star‐polystyrene nanoparticles prepared by emulsion atom transfer radical polymerization

Pentaerythritol (PT) was converted into four‐arm initiator pentaerythritol tetrakis(2‐chloropropionyl) (PT‐Cl) via reaction with 2‐chloropropionyl chloride. Uniform (monodisperse) star‐polystyrene nanoparticles were prepared by emulsion atom transfer radical polymerization of styrene, using PT‐Cl/CuCl/bpy (bpy is 2,2′‐dipyridyl) as the initiating system. The structures of PT‐Cl and polymer were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance. The morphology, size and size distribution of the star‐polystyrene nanoparticles were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and photon correlation spectroscopy. It was found that the average diameters of star‐polystyrene nanoparticles were smaller than 100 nm (30–90 nm) and monodisperse; moreover, the particle size could be controlled by the monomer/initiator ratio and the surfactant concentration. The average hydrodynamic diameter (D_h) of the nanoparticles increased gradually on increasing the ratio of styrene to PT‐Cl and decreased on enhancing the surfactant concentration or increasing the catalyst concentration. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic block copolymers of methyl methacrylate with poly(ethylene oxide) macroinitiators formed by atom transfer radical polymerization

Amphiphilic ABA triblock copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with methyl methacrylate (MMA) were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization in bulk and in various solvents with a difunctional PEO macroinitiator and a Cu(I)X/N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine catalyst system at 85°C where X=Cl or Br. The polymerization proceeded via controlled/living process, and the molecular weights of the obtained block copolymers increased linearly with monomer conversion. In the process, the polydispersity decreased and finally reached a value of less than 1.3. The polymerization followed first‐order kinetics with respect to monomer concentration, and increases in the ethylene oxide repeating units or chain length in the macroinitiator decreased the rate of polymerization. The rate of polymerization of MMA with the PEO chloro macroinitiator and CuCl proceeded at approximately half the rate of bromo analogs. A faster rate of polymerization and controlled molecular weights with lower polydispersities were observed in bulk polymerization compared with polar and nonpolar solvent systems. In the bulk polymerization, the number‐average molecular weight by gel permeation chromatography (M_n,GPC) values were very close to the theoretical line, whereas lower than the theoretical line were observed in solution polymerizations. The macroinitiator and their block copolymers were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ¹H‐NMR, matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry, thermogravimetry (TG)/differential thermal analysis (DTA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). TG/DTA studies of the homo and block copolymers showed two‐step and multistep decomposition patterns. The DSC thermograms exhibited two glass‐transition temperatures at ?17.7 and 92°C for the PEO and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blocks, respectively, which indicated that microphase separation between the PEO and PMMA domains. SEM studies indicated a fine dispersion of PEO in the PMMA matrix. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 989–1000, 2005