18‐De­oxy‐13β,14‐dihydrolycoctam: the lycoctamone rearrangement confirmed

The structure of the title compound, C₂₃H₃₅NO₄, contains a unique penta­cyclic ring system wherein one cyclo­hexyl ring adopts a chair conformation, two cyclo­hexyl rings are in boat conformations, and a six‐membered heterocyclic ring and a cyclo­pentyl ring are in envelope conformations. The structures of the lycoctamones, α,β‐unsaturated aldehydes produced by acid‐catalyzed degradation of lactams of lycoctonine‐type alkaloids, previously deduced from the results of extensive chemical investigations have been proven to be correct by the determination of the crystal structure of this compound.     

Packing considerations of bis‐dimedone derivatives

We have determined the crystal structures of 2,2′‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₃H₂₇FO₄, (I), 2,2′‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hy­droxy‐5,5‐dimethyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₃H₂₇ClO₄, (II), 2,2′‐(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₃H₂₈O₅, (III), 2,2′‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₄H₃₀O₄, (IV), 2,2′‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hy­droxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₄H₃₀O₅, (V), and 2,2′‐(4‐N,N′‐di­methyl­amino­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₅H₃₃NO₄, (VI). Structures (III) to (VI) of these bis‐dimedone derivatives show nearly the same packing pattern irrespective of the different substituent in the para position of the aromatic ring. However, (II) does not fit into this scheme, although the Cl atom is a substituent not too different from the others. The different packing of the fluoro compound, (I), can be explained by the fact that it crystallizes with two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, which show a different conformation of the dimedone ring. On the other hand, (I) shows a similar packing pattern to bis(2‐hydroxy‐4,4‐di­methyl‐6‐oxo‐1‐cyclo­hexenyl)­phenyl­methane, a compound containing an aromatic ring without any substituent and with Z′ = 2.     

Absolute configuration and conformational disorder of a tricyclic thio­semicarbazone derivative

The title compound, (1S,3R,8R)‐2,2‐dichloro‐3,7,7,10‐tetra­methyl­tricyclo­[6.4.0.0^1,3]­dodecan‐11‐one thio­semicarbazone, C₁₇H₂₅Cl₂N₃S, has two disordered conformations of the cyclo­heptane moiety and a screw‐boat conformation for the cyclo­hexene ring. The absolute configuration was established.     

(1SR,2SR,3SR,4RS,5RS,6RS,7SR,8RS)‐7,8‐Dichloro­bicyclo­[4.2.0]octa‐2,3,4,5‐tetrayl tetra­acetate

In the title compound, C₁₆H₂₀Cl₂O₈, the bicyclic system contains a central non‐planar cyclo­hexane ring which is fused to a cyclo­butane moiety. The cyclo­hexane ring has a chair conformation and the whole system adopts a syn conformation. The structure provides information on the stereochemical course of the chlorination, photo‐oxidation and hydrox­ylation steps of the reaction.     

A silaproline‐containing dipeptide

The silaproline‐containing dipeptide N‐(3,3‐di­methyl‐1‐pivaloyl‐1‐aza‐3‐sila‐5‐cyclo­pentyl­carbonyl)‐l ‐alanine iso­propyl­amide, C₁₇H₃₃N₃O₃Si, has two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit and each adopts a β‐II folded conformation, where the amide on the terminal C interacts intramolecularly with the pivaloyl O atom. The five‐membered silaproline ring is C^β‐puckered, an infrequent conformation for the homol­ogous proline ring.     

Azido­[1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene](penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate

In the title compound, azido‐2κN‐bis­[μ‐(1η⁵:2κP)‐di­phenyl­phosphino­cyclo­penta­dienyl][2(η⁵)‐penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­di­enyl]­iron(III)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [{Rh(C₁₀H₁₅)(N₃)}{Fe(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂}]PF₆ or [FeRh(C₁₀H₁₅)(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂(N₃)]PF₆, the coordination sphere of Rh^III can be described as pseudo‐tetrahedral, composed of two P atoms from a 1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene (dppf) ligand, an azido N atom and the centroid of the ring of a C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ligand. The two cyclo­penta­dienyl rings in the dppf moiety adopt an eclipsed conformation. The Rh⋯Fe distance is 4.340 (2) Å.     

7,7‐Di­chloro‐1,6‐di­methyl‐2‐oxa‐5‐thia­bi­cyclo­[4.1.0]­heptane 5,5‐dioxide and 6‐chloro‐2,3‐di­hydro‐7‐methyl‐5‐methyl­ene‐2H,3H,5H‐1,4‐dithiepine 1,1,4,4‐tetraoxide

The structures of a 2‐oxa‐5‐thia­bi­cyclo­[4.1.0]­heptane derivative, C₇H₁₀Cl₂O₃S, (I), and a 2H,3H,5H‐1,4‐dithiepine derivative, C₇H₉ClO₄S₂, (II), are reported. The six‐membered ring in (I) has an envelope conformation and the seven‐membered ring in (II) adopts a chair conformation. There are no untoward intermolecular interactions in (I), but two Cl atoms make a short intermolecular contact across an inversion centre in (II), with a Cl?Cl distance of 3.2784 (9) Å, some 0.22 Å less than the sum of the van der Waals radii.     

Conformation of N‐methyl‐4‐piperidyl 2,4‐dinitrobenzoate

The crystal structure of N‐methyl‐4‐piperidyl 2,4‐di­nitro­benzoate, C₁₃H₁₅N₃O₆, (I), at 130 (2) K reveals that, in the solid state, the mol­ecule exists in the equatorial conformation, (Ieq). Thus, the through‐bond interaction present in the axial conformation, (Iax), is not strong enough to overcome the syn–diaxial interactions between the axial methyl substituent and the axial H atoms on the two piperidyl ring C atoms either side of the ester‐linked ring C atom. The carboxyl­ate group in (I) is orthogonal to the aromatic ring, in contrast with other 2,4‐di­nitro­benzoates, which are coplanar. The piperidyl–ester C—O bond distance is 1.467 (3) Å, which is actually shorter than other equatorial cyclo­hexyl–ester C—O distances. This shorter piperidyl–ester C—O bond distance is due to the reduced electron demand of the orthogonal ester group.     

Ferrocene compounds. XXXIX.

In the title compound, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₄H₁₃O)], the plane of the heterocyclic ring is almost perpendicular to the plane of the substituted cyclo­penta­dienyl ring, and the heterocyclic ring adopts a half‐chair conformation. The conformation of the nearly parallel cyclo­penta­dienyl (Cp) rings [the dihedral angle between their planes is 2.7 (1)°] is almost halfway between eclipsed and staggered, and the rings are mutually twisted by about 19.4 (2)° (mean value). The mean lengths of the C—C bonds in the substituted and unsubstituted cyclo­penta­dienyl ring are 1.420 (2) and 1.406 (3) Å, respectively, and the Fe—C distances range from 2.029 (2) to 2.051 (2) Å. The phenyl and unsubstituted cyclo­penta­dienyl rings are involved in C—H⃛π interactions, with intermolecular H⃛centroid distances of 2.85 and 3.14 Å for C—H⃛π(Ph), and 2.88 Å for C—H⃛π(Cp). In two of these interactions, the C—H bond points towards one of the ring bonds rather than towards the ring centroid. In the crystal structure, the C—H⃛π interactions connect the mol­ecules into a three‐dimensional framework.     

cis,cis,cis‐1,2,4,5‐Cyclo­hexane­tetra­carboxyl­ic acid and its dianhydride

cis,cis,cis‐1,2,4,5‐Cyclo­hexane­tetra­carboxyl­ic acid, C₁₀H₁₂O₈, (I), contains a mirror plane and the cyclo­hexane ring exhibits a chair conformation. Two crystallographically independent hydrogen bonds form (14), (16) and (16) ring motifs, and propagation of these two hydrogen bonds along the c and b axes generates (16) and (7) chains. cis,cis,cis‐1,2:4,5‐Cyclo­hexane­tetra­carboxyl­ic dianhydride, C₁₀H₈O₆, (II), was prepared by the reaction of (I) with acetic anhydride. The cyclo­hexane ring of (II) exhibits a boat conformation and the dihedral angle between the two an­hydro rings is 117.5 (1)°.     

Di­methyl 6‐methoxy‐4aβ‐methyl‐9‐oxo‐1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10aβ‐octa­hydro­phenanthrene‐1,1‐di­carboxyl­ate

In the title tricyclic keto‐diester, C₂₀H₂₄O₆, a potential intermediate in the synthesis of bioactive podocarpic acid, the outer cyclo­hexane ring (in a chair conformation) is cis fused to the central cyclo­hexanone ring (in a half‐chair conformation). The conformational analysis of the compound, investigated by semi‐empirical quantum mechanical AM1 calculations, shows a good agreement with the X‐ray structure, except for the orientation of the methyl, methoxy­phenyl and methoxy­carbonyl substituents.     

Precursor of a β‐lactamase inhibitor: allyl (4S,8S,9R)‐10‐[(E)‐ethyl­idene]‐4‐methoxy‐11‐oxo‐1‐aza­tri­cyclo­[7.2.0.03,8]­undec‐2‐ene‐2‐carboxyl­ate

The molecular structure of the title tricyclic compound, C₁₇H₂₁NO₄, which is the immediate precursor of a potent synthetic inhibitor {Lek157: sodium (8S,9R)‐10‐[(E)‐ethyl­idene]‐4‐methoxy‐11‐oxo‐1‐aza­tri­cyclo­[7.2.0.0^3,8]­undec‐2‐ene‐2‐carboxyl­ate} with remarkable potency, provides experimental evidence for the previously modelled relative position of the fused cyclo­hexyl ring and the carbonyl group of the β‐lactam ring, which takes part in the formation of the initial tetrahedral acyl–enzyme complex. In this hydro­phobic mol­ecule, the overall geometry is influenced by C—H?O intramolecular hydrogen bonds [3.046 (4) and 3.538 (6) Å, with corresponding normalized H?O distances of 2.30 and 2.46 Å], whereas the mol­ecules are interconnected through intermolecular C—H?O hydrogen bonds [3.335 (4)–3.575 (5) Å].     

trans‐[N,N′‐Bis­(salicyl­idene)­cyclo­hexane‐1,2‐diaminato]­nickel(II)–chloro­form (1/1)

In the title complex, trans‐{2,2′‐[cyclo­hexane‐1,2‐diyl­bis­(ni­t­rilo­methyl­idyne)]­di­phenol­ato‐κ⁴O,N,N′,O′}­nickel(II)–chloro­form (1/1), [Ni(C₂₀H₂₀N₂O₂)]·CHCl₃, the Ni atom has a square‐planar geometry, slightly tetrahedrally distorted. The Ni—N and Ni—O bonding distances are within the expected ranges for Ni–Schiff base derivatives. The di­imine bridge has a gauche conformation with the cyclo­hexyl ring almost coplanar with the NiN₂O₂ plane. The complex mol­ecules pack in dimers with an Ni?Ni distance of 3.59 (1) Å and form a three‐dimensional structure displaying a herring‐bone configuration. Channels are occupied by solvent mol­ecules, which are involved in C—H?O hydrogen bonds with the ligand O atoms.     

16‐(4‐Iso­propyl­benzyl­idene)­androst‐4‐ene‐3,17‐dione

In the title compound, C₂₉H₃₆O₂, the outer cyclohexene ring of the steroid nucleus has a conformation that lies about half‐way between a half‐chair and an envelope, while the central and outer cyclo­hexane rings of the steroid nucleus have slightly distorted chair conformations. The steroidal cyclo­pentane ring adopts a 13β,14α‐half‐chair conformation. The benzyl­idene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the carbonyl group on the cyclo­pentane ring. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the steroid nucleus and the benzyl­idene moiety is 35.54 (9)°. The packing of the mol­ecules is assumed to be dictated mainly by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O interactions.     

Di­spiro­[fluorene‐9,5′‐[1,2,3,4]­tetra­thia­ne‐6′,9′′‐fluorene]

The tetra­thia­ne ring of the title compound, C₂₆H₁₆S₄, has a chair conformation and the mol­ecule has approximate C₂ symmetry. Each of the two fluorene ring systems is virtually planar, with the ring planes intersecting at an angle of 67.58 (5)°. This novel compound has been formed as a side product from the treatment of 9H‐fluorene‐9‐thione with methyl N‐[(benzyl­idene)­phenyl]­glycinate in the presence of LiBr and 1,6‐di­aza­bi­cyclo­[5.4.0]­un­decane.     

A dinuclear uranium(IV) complex of the chelating ligand 1,2,3,4‐tetra­methyl‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)­cyclo­penta­diene

The ligand 1,2,3,4‐tetra­methyl‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)­cyclo­penta­diene (cp*py) forms a dinuclear complex with U^IV, i.e. di‐μ‐oxo‐bis­{chloro­(diethyl ether‐κO)[(η⁵,κN)‐1,2,3,4‐tetra­methyl‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)­cyclo­penta­dienyl]uranium(IV)}, [U₂Cl₂O₂(C₁₄H₁₆N)₂(C₄H₁₀O)₂], in which cp*py acts as a chelating ligand, being bound to the metal atom by the cyclo­penta­dienyl unit and also by the N atom of the pyridyl ring.     

Imino Diels–Alder adducts. II. Two pyrano[3,2‐c]quinolines

8‐Chloro‐9‐fluoro‐5‐phen­yl‐3,4,4a,5,6,10b‐hexa­hydro‐2H‐pyrano[3,2‐c]quinoline and 10‐chloro‐9‐fluoro‐5‐phen­yl‐3,4,4a,5,6,10b‐hexa­hydro‐2H‐pyrano­[3,2‐c]quinoline, both C₁₈H₁₇ClFNO, are diastereo­isomers, formed as the result of the imino Diels–Alder reactions of N‐benzyl­ideneanilines with 3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐pyran. The crystal structures reveal the stereochemistry of the pyran ring, which is endo/exo to the quinoline ring system formed in the cyclo­addition step. In both structures, the pyran ring adopts a chair conformation, while the nitrogen‐containing heterocyclic ring prefers a half‐chair conformation. The structures differ essentially in the relative orientation of the ring junction H atoms.     

Rotenone α‐oxime

The structure determination of the title compound, rotenone α‐oxime [systematic name: 1,2,12,12a‐tetra­hydro‐8,9‐di­meth­oxy‐2‐(1‐methyl­ethenyl)‐[1]­benzo­py­rano­[3,4‐b]­furo­[2,3‐h][1]benzo­pyran‐6(6H)‐one oxime], C₂₃H₂₃NO₆, confirms that the mol­ecule has an approximately V‐shaped structure. One of the rings has a typical cyclo­hexene‐like monoplanar conformation and the central ring adopts a 1,2‐diplanar conformation.     

(4R,4aR,6S,7S,7aS)‐6‐Hydro­xy‐7‐hy­droxy­methyl‐4‐methyl­per­hydro­cyclo­penta­[c]­pyran‐1‐one chloro­form solvate from Valeriana laxiflora

The structure of an iridolactone isolated from Valeriana laxiflora was established as (4R,4aR,6S,7S,7aS)‐6‐hydroxy‐7‐hydroxy­methyl‐4‐methyl­per­hydro­cyclo­penta­[c]­pyran‐1‐one chloro­form solvate, C₁₀H₁₆O₄·CHCl₃. The two rings are cis‐fused. The δ‐lactone ring adopts a slightly twisted half‐chair conformation with approximate planarity of the lactone group and the cyclo­pentane ring adopts an envelope conformation. The hydroxy group, the hydroxymethyl group and the methyl group all have β orientations. The absolute configuration was determined using anomalous dispersion data enhanced by the adventitious inclusion of a chloro­form solvent mol­ecule. Hydro­gen bonding, crystal packing and ring conformations are discussed in detail.     

A pimpinellin monomer and dimer isolated from the roots of Esenbeckia grandiflora

X‐ray diffraction studies carried out on single crystals of the monomeric, viz. 5,6‐di­methoxy‐2H‐furo­[2,3‐h][1]benzo­pyran‐2‐one, C₁₃H₁₀O₅, and dimeric, viz. 5,5′,6,6′‐tetra­methoxy‐3,3′,4,4′‐tetra­hydro‐2H,2′H‐3,3′:4,4′‐bi­(furo­[2,3‐h][1]benzo­pyran)‐2,2′‐dione, C₂₆H₂₀O₁₀, forms of pimpinellin have revealed that, following cyclo­dimerization, the carbonyl groups are head‐to‐head with respect to one another. In the monomer, the heterocyclic ring is planar, but it exhibits a twisted‐boat conformation in the dimer. Both the monomer and the dimer interact through C—H⋯O interactions.