Clinician mental health,nursing shortages and the COVID‐19 pandemic: Crises within crises

Around the world, nurses are working under enormous pressure providing care to sick and dying patients during the pandemic. Many are faced with increased stress, and other negative effects on their mental health. They are also faced with the possibility of infection and death from COVID‐19. Before the pandemic there was a global shortage of nurses, but this is likely to be exacerbated by the increased demands of caring during COVID‐19 as well as the usual care of non‐COVID patients. One serious concern is that the pandemic and multitudinous effects on the nursing profession will exacerbate nursing attrition and their poor mental health into the future. Another serious concern is whether the profession will be able to attract sufficient numbers of nurses to care for populations into the future. Governments and health policymakers everywhere need to invest in nursing and health care and pay attention to the needs of health systems to ensure a healthy population. It is argued that without this, economies will not recover and prosper, and health systems will not be able to provide quality care.     

COVID‐19: The future of nursing will determine the fate of our health services

Preparing the world to manage future pandemics must take priority. It is clear that we were not prepared for the COVID‐19 pandemic which continues to cause great suffering around the world. Nurses and other health professionals everywhere must be involved in health policy planning and implementation of public health measures to combat this and future pandemics. Such preparation needs community policy involvement at grassroots levels and needs to be collaboratively instigated at international levels. The death so far of over 2000 nurses is unacceptable in this pandemic, and we need to better protect and sustain the workforce. The International Council of Nurses has been instrumental in data gathering of nurses' experiences during COVID‐19. Key points from analysis of this data have been included in Second Progress Report of the World Health Organization's Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response. This paper summarises the key messages from this report, as well as the nursing shortage. The International Council of Nurses resounds the call for massive investment in nursing education, leadership and jobs, as well as protection for our nurses on the frontlines of the pandemic.     

Protection procedures and preventions against the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 in healthcare settings for nursing personnel: Lessons from Taiwan

BackgroundSince coronavirus disease 2019 was first discovered, at the time of writing this article, the number of people infected globally has exceeded 1 million. Its high transmission rate has resulted in nosocomial infections in healthcare facilities all over the world. Nursing personnel account for nearly 50% of the global health workforce and are the primary provider of direct care in hospitals and long-term care facilities. Nurses stand on the front line against the spread of this pandemic, and proper protection procedures are vital.ObjectivesThe present study aims to share the procedures and measures used by Taiwan nursing personnel to help reduce global transmission.Review methodsCompared with other regions, where large-scale epidemics have overwhelmed the health systems, Taiwan has maintained the number of confirmed cases within a manageable scope. A review of various national and international policies and guidelines was carried out to present proper procedures and preventions for nursing personnel in healthcare settings.ResultsThis study shows how Taiwan's health system rapidly identified suspected cases as well as the prevention policies and strategies, key protection points for nursing personnel in implementing high-risk nursing tasks, and lessons from a nursing perspective.ConclusionsVarious world media have affirmed the rapid response and effective epidemic prevention strategies of Taiwan's health system. Educating nurses on procedures for infection control, reporting cases, and implementing protective measures to prevent nosocomial infections are critical to prevent further outbreaks.     

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on headache symptoms and drug withdrawal among patients with medication overuse headache: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) bring about a range of psychological distress and symptom deterioration to headache patients especially to some migraineurs. Compared to migraineurs or normal control, medication overuse headache (MOH) patients are more likely to experience a worse psychological distress and poorer outcome in non-COVID-19 time. However, in COVID-19 pandemic, whether MOH patients would have greater physical and mental symptom deterioration or worse relief of headache symptoms and medications overuse remained unclear. We aim to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on MOH patients to guide for a better management in this study.MethodsWe enrolled MOH patients who were diagnosed and treated at headache clinic of West China Hospital. Information of the pre-pandemic 3 months period and COVID-19 pandemic period was collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify independent factors associated with changes in headache symptoms and drug withdrawal.ResultsSeventy-eight MOH patients were enrolled into the study ultimately. In comparison to pre-pandemic period, fewer MOH patients reported decreased headache days, intensity and days with acute medications per month during the pandemic. Available access to regular prophylactic medications was significantly associated with a reduction of at least 50% in headache days and decrease in headache intensity per month with respective odds ratios of 39.19 (95% CI 3.75–409.15, P = 0.002) and 10.13 (95% CI 2.33–44.12, P = 0.002). Following abrupt withdrawal and high educational level were both significant factors in decreasing headache intensity. Male sex was significantly associated with decrease in days with acute medication per month during the pandemic (odds ratios 4.78, 95%CI 1.44–15.87, P = 0.011).ConclusionsOur findings reflect that MOH patients experienced a worse relief of headache symptoms and drug withdrawal during the pandemic. Available access to regular prophylactic medications was the significant independent factor for improvement of headache symptoms. Male sex was significantly associated with decreased days with acute medications per month.     

Women’s perception of postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction and their help‐seeking behaviour: a qualitative interview study

Scand J Caring Sci; 2013; 27; 406–413 Women’s perception of postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction and their help‐seeking behaviour: a qualitative interview study Aims: To explore women’s perception of postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction and their help‐seeking behaviour. Methods: We interviewed 26 patients from two family practitioners’ populations in the Netherlands 1 month to 1 year after their vaginal delivery. The semi‐structured interviews were independently encoded and analysed by three researchers according to a scoring list on determined topics. Three researchers independently coded themes discussed by the interviewees that matched main topics from the interview guide. In the case of encoding differences, the researchers deliberated on them until consensus was reached. Findings: All women suffered from pelvic floor dysfunction such as urinary incontinence, pelvic floor pain, prolapse, haemorrhoids, anal fissure, constipation and dyspareunia. Midwives and gynaecologists did not prepare them for postpartum pelvic floor problems. The women did not expect the problems to be that severe. They hoped their problems would improve by themselves. The women talked to close initiates (female relatives and friends who had had deliveries themselves), who confirmed that the problems were an inevitable consequence of vaginal delivery and that there were no real treatment options. The women indicated they needed professional information about their pelvic floor problems but were ashamed to talk about them outside their inner circle. Conclusions: These women are uninformed about postpartum pelvic floor problems. They discuss their pelvic floor dysfunction with close initiates who feed their hope that the problems will resolve spontaneously. The women are not stimulated to seek professional help. However, the women do indicate they need professional information. They want to understand their problems and know how to deal with them. It is time for doctors and midwives to focus on the mother’s health after delivery so that mothers will suffer less from pelvic floor problems, have more awareness of what they can do about them and call in medical aid.     

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on ultrasound screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip and follow-up imaging: a report from southeastern Turkey

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 restrictions on ultrasound (US) screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in a children’s hospital.MethodsThe records of US screening of DDH were retrospectively evaluated in the pandemic period (April 2020 to July 2021) and the pre-pandemic period (January 2019 to February 2020). The monthly US number, sex, radiologist number, and age at the initial examination were recorded.ResultsA total of 6107 US scans were performed during the pre-pandemic period, which significantly decreased to 3340 during the pandemic. The number of monthly US scans performed did not change between the pre-pandemic (142.7/month) and pandemic (128.2/month) periods. The number of delayed examinations in the total population did not significantly change between the two periods. However, the number of delayed examinations in patients with abnormal hips was significantly increased during the pandemic compared with that in the pre-pandemic period.ConclusionsCoronavirus disease 2019 restrictions decreased the US screening rate of DDH by almost half, but the number of US scans performed by each radiologist was unchanged. The compliance with follow-up recommendations was reduced by half, which may lead to an increase in the incidence of delayed and untreated DDH cases.     

COVID‐19 case of ventilator‐induced lung injury on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Physicians' clinical struggle and ethical conflict in a novel pandemic

Resource scarcity was concerned in the initial surge of the COVID‐19 pandemic. To open slots for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), we tried ECMO weaning allowing invasive ventilation in a 66‐year‐old male with severe COVID‐19, backfiring as ventilator‐induced lung injury. We will discuss ethical conflict in pandemics in this report.     

Informal caregivers’ judgements on sharing care with home care professionals from an intersectional perspective: the influence of personal and situational characteristics

The European policy emphasis on providing informal care at home causes caregivers and home care professionals having more contact with each other, which makes it important for them to find satisfying ways to share care. Findings from the literature show that sharing care between caregivers and professionals can be improved. This study therefore examines to what degree and why caregivers’ judgements on sharing care with home care professionals vary. To improve our understanding of social inequities in caregiving experiences, the study adopts an intersectional perspective. We investigate how personal and situational characteristics attached to care judgements are interwoven. Using data of the Netherlands Institute for Social Research, we conducted bivariate and multivariate linear regression analysis (N = 292). We combined four survey questions into a 1–4 scale on ‘caregiver judgement’ (α = 0.69) and used caregivers’ personal (such as gender and health status) and situational characteristics (such as the care recipient's impairment and type of care) as determinants to discern whether these are related to the caregivers’ judgement. Using a multiplicative approach, we also examined the relationship between mutually constituting factors of the caregivers’ judgement. Adjusted for all characteristics, caregivers who provide care to a parent or child with a mental impairment and those aged between 45 and 64 years or with a paid job providing care to someone with a mental impairment are likely to judge sharing care more negatively. Also, men providing care with help from other caregivers and caregivers providing care because they like to do so who provide domestic help seem more likely to be less satisfied about sharing care. This knowledge is vital for professionals providing home care, because it clarifies differences in caregivers’ experiences and hence induce knowledge how to pay special attention to those who may experience less satisfaction while sharing care.     

Erythrodermic flare‐up of psoriasis with COVID‐19 infection: A report of two cases and a comprehensive review of literature focusing on the mutual effect of psoriasis and COVID‐19 on each other along with the special challenges of the pandemic

The COVID‐19 pandemic has been extra challenging for patients with chronic diseases. Psoriasis is one of the chronic conditions that its treatment mostly relies on immunosuppressants. In this study, we report two cases with a long history of psoriasis that COVID‐19 infection caused them to undergo erythrodermic psoriasis.     

The ‘values journey’ of nursing and midwifery students selected using multiple mini interviews: Evaluations from a longitudinal study

Values‐based practice is deemed essential for healthcare provision worldwide. In England, values‐based recruitment methods, such as multiple mini interviews (MMIs), are employed to ensure that healthcare students’ personal values align with the values of the National Health Service (NHS), which focus on compassion and patient‐centeredness. However, values cannot be seen as static constructs. They can be positively and negatively influenced by learning and socialisation. We have conceptualised students’ perceptions of their values over the duration of their education programme as a ‘values journey’. The aim of this hermeneutic longitudinal focus group study was to explore the ‘values journey’ of student nurses and midwives, recruited through MMIs, across the 3 years of their education programme. The study commenced in 2016, with 42 nursing and midwifery students, originally recruited onto their programmes through multiple mini interviews. At the third and final point of data collection, 25 participants remained. Findings indicate that students' confidence, courage and sense of accountability increased over the 3 years. However, their values were also shaped by time constraints, emotional experiences and racial discrimination. We argue that adequate psychological support is necessary as healthcare students embark on and progress through their values journey, and propose a framework for this.