Diflunisal compared with naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthrosis of hip or knee: a double-blind trial

Summary

A randomized double-blind trial was carried out in 20 patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip or knee to compare the efficacy and tolerance of treatment with diflunisal or naproxen. During the first 4 weeks, patients received either 250?mg diflunisal or 250?mg naproxen twice daily and this was increased by 250?mg daily in 5 patients on diflunisal and in 3 on naproxen for the second 4 weeks of the trial. The results of subjective assessments made before and at the end of Week 8 showed a trend in favour of diflunisal for improvement of symptoms, except for weight-bearing pain which was improved in only 1 patient in each group. More of the patients receiving diflunisal than naproxen considered treatment to have been satisfactory, and rated their response as equally as good as or better than previous medication. Diflunisal produced significantly fewer side-effects than naproxen, the use of which was associated with a relatively high incidence of gastro-intestinal upsets, leading to the withdrawal of 2 patients at Week 4.     

Diflunisal in general practice

Summary

A large-scale, double-blind comparative study was carried out in general practice to assess the relative efficacy and tolerance of diflunisal and aspirin in patients suffering from acute painful conditions such as sprains and strains, osteoarthritis, etc. Patients received either 250?mg or 500?mg diflunisal twice daily, or 600?mg aspirin 4-times daily for 5 days. The results of subjective assessments of pain relief from the daily records of 1902 patients (967 on diflunisal, 935 on aspirin), and the overall assessment of response by both doctors and patients, showed that diflunisal was significantly better than aspirin. Gastric side-effects were more common and more severe in patients receiving aspirin, and more often led to withdrawal of treatment.     

Diflunisal in the treatment of osteoarthrosis: a double-blind study comparing diflunisal with ibuprofen

Summary

A double-blind trial was carried out in 37 patients with osteoarthrosis to compare the efficacy and tolerance of 250?mg diflunisal twice daily with that of 400?mg ibuprofen 3-times daily over an 8-week period. Rating scale assessments were made, at the end of a preceding 1-week wash-out period on placebo and at regular fixed intervals, of weight-bearing pain, night pain, a specific functional activity, and of the duration of inactivity stiffness. Patients' and physician's overall evaluations of response, taking side-effects into account, were made on completion of the study. The data collected indicated that in 30 patients completing the trial both treatments produced similar overall results and, with the exception of weight-bearing pain which appeared to be improved more in the ibuprofen group, diflunisal provided equal therapeutic benefit with fewer side-effects.     

Comparative study of salsalate and aspirin in osteoarthrosis of the hip or knee

Summary

A short-term, double-blind controlled crossover study was carried out in 20 patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip or knee to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of salsalate and aspirin. After a 1-week placebo washout period, patients received either 3 g salsalate per day or 3.6 g soluble aspirin per day for 2 weeks before being crossed over to the alternative treatment. Paracetamol was used as a rescue analgesic. The results of clinical assessments of pain, stiffness and sleep disturbance, using visual analogue scales, showed that salsalate produced a comparable clinical improvement to that with aspirin, and similar serum salicylate levels. Salsalate, however, was significantly superior to aspirin with regard to side-effects and faecal occult blood loss.     

Two trials of diflunisal in osteoarthritis

Summary

Two double-blind inter-group trials were carried out in which diflunisal was compared for 12 weeks against aspirin in 30 patients with osteoarthritis of knees or hips, and against naproxen for 8 weeks in 20 patients with osteoarthritic knees. Diflunisal appeared to be somewhat better than aspirin in terms of both effectiveness and tolerance, whilst it was similar in both respects to naproxen.     

Diflunisal versus aspirin: a comparative study of their effect on faecal blood loss,in the presence and absence of alcohol

Summary

Faecal blood loss was measured in normal male volunteers using ⁵¹Cr-labelled red cells. In a double-blind parallel study in 10 subjects, the effect of 250?mg diflunisal twice daily was compared with 750?mg aspirin 4-times daily. Drugs were taken during two 7-day periods separated by a 1-week control period. Mean daily faecal blood loss during the two treatment periods was 0.32 ml and 0.53 ml in the diflunisal group versus 6.87 ml and 3.20 ml in the aspirin group. Diflunisal did not significantly increase blood loss, while aspirin had a significant effect. In a double-blind crossover study in 12 subjects, the effect of 250?mg diflunisal twice daily was compared with 600?mg aspirin 4-times daily. Alcohol (120 ml, 40%) was added during the last 2 days of each 6-day treatment period. Faecal blood loss was not significantly affected by diflunisal and there was also no significant effect on blood loss when alcohol was co-administered. Aspirin significantly increased faecal blood loss and this effect was significantly enhanced by the addition of alcohol.     

Diflunisal in the management of sprains

Summary

A double-blind randomized trial was carried out in 31 patients suffering from acute, minor ligamentous injuries to compare the efficacy of diflunisal in the relief of pain with that of oxyphenbutazone. Patients received either 500?mg diflunisal twice daily or 200?mg oxyphenbutazone 3-times daily for 3 days. The results of subjective assessments showed that by Day 3 spontaneous pain had either completely resolved or markedly improved in all patients, and that diflunisal was significantly better than oxyphenbutazone on Days 1 and 3 in relieving pain on movement of the joint.     

HPLC法测定二氟尼柳原料药的含量

本文报道二氟尼柳原料药的高效液相色谱测定法。固定相为YWG-ODS,甲醇-水-乙腈-冰醋酸(50:35:17:2)为流动相,检测波长254nm,内标物为对羟基联苯。线性范围:2～400μg·ml(r=0.9999),回收率为99.07％,测定结果与英国药典法一致。     

Diflunisal compared with naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthrosis of hip or knee: a double-blind trial.

A randomized double-blind trial was carried out in 20 patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip or knee to compare the efficacy and tolerance of treatment with diflunisal or naproxen. During the first 4 weeks, patients received either 250 mg diflunisal or 250 mg naproxen twice daily and this was increased by 250 mg daily in 5 patients on diflunisal and in 3 on naproxen for the second 4 weeks of the trial. The results of subjective assessments made before and at the end of Week 8 showed a trend in favour of diflunisal for improvement of symptoms, except for weight-bearing pain which was improved in only 1 patient in each group. More of the patients receiving diflunisal than naproxen considered treatment to have been satisfactory, and rated their response as equally as good as or better than previous medication. Diflunisal produced significantly high incidence of gastro-intestinal upsets, leading to the withdrawal of 2 patients at Week 4.     

A double-blind comparison of diflunisal and aspirin in the treatment of post-operative pain after episiotomy

Summary

A double-blind randomized trial was carried out in 161 primiparous women suffering from moderate to severe post-episiotomy pain to compare the analgesic efficacy of single doses of diflunisal (125?mg, 250?mg, or 500?mg), aspirin (600?mg), and placebo. The results of pain rating assessments made before and at hourly intervals after drug administration showed that both the active drugs were more effective than placebo and produced similar pain relief over the first 4 hours. The analgesic efficacy of aspirin tailed off after 4 hours but pain relief with 500?mg diflunisal was still evident after 8 hours. Over 65% of patients in the diflunisal group had effective relief of pain at 8 hours whereas there was no significant difference between the aspirin and placebo-treated groups by the seventh and eighth hour.     

Comparative study of salsalate and aspirin in osteoarthrosis of the hip or knee.

A short-term, double-blind controlled crossover study was carried out in 20 patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip or knee to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of salsalate and aspirin. After a 1-week placebo washout period, patients received either 3 g salsalate per day or 3.6 g soluble aspirin per day for 2 weeks before being crossed over to the alternative treatment. Paracetamol was used as a rescue analgesic. The results of clinical assessments of pain, stiffness and sleep disturbance, using visual analogue scales, showed that salsalate produced a comparable clinical improvement to that with aspirin, and similar serum salicylate levels. Salsalate, however, was significantly superior to aspirin with regard to side-effects and faecal occult blood loss.     

Validated Stability-Indicating HPLC-DAD Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Diclofenac Sodium and Diflunisal in Their Combined Dosage Form

A simple, rapid, and highly selective HPLC-DAD method was developed for the simultaneous determination of diclofenac sodium (DIC) and diflunisal (DIF) in pure form and in their combined formulation. Effective chromatographic separation was achieved using a Zorbax SB-C8 (4.6×250 mm, 5 μm particle size) column with a mobile phase composed of 0.05 M phosphoric acid, acetonitrile, and methanol in the ratio of 40:48:12 (by volume). The mobile phase was pumped isocratically at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, and quantification of the analytes was based on measuring their peak areas at 228 nm. The retention times for diflunisal and diclofenac were about 7.9 and 9.5 min, respectively. The reliability and analytical performance of the proposed HPLC procedure were statistically validated with respect to system suitability, linearity, ranges, precision, accuracy, specificity, robustness, detection, and quantification limits. Calibration curves were linear in the ranges of 5–100 μg/mL for both drugs with correlation coefficients >0.9998. The proposed method proved to be selective and stability-indicating by the resolution of the two analytes from four of their related substances and potential impurities as well as from forced-degradation (hydrolysis, oxidation, photolysis, and dry heat) products. The validated HPLC method was successfully applied to the analysis of DIC and DIF in their combined dosage form (suppositories). The proposed method made use of the diode array detector (DAD) as a tool for peak identity and purity confirmation.     

The use of diflunisal in post-operative pain: a report of double-blind Comparative trials in patients after meniscectomy

Summary

A series of double-blind randomized trials was carried out in patients suffering from moderate to severe pain after meniscectomy to assess the analgesic effectiveness of diflunisal. In a single-dose study, 150 patients received either diflunisal (125?mg, 250?mg or 500?mg), aspirin (600?mg), or placebo, and hourly assessments were made of pain severity over an 8-hour period. The results showed that 500?mg diflunisal produced comparable relief to aspirin within 3 to 4 hours, but the analgesic effect continued for longer and was still very marked after 8 hours. A multi-dose study in 120 patients receiving doses of diflunisal (375?mg or 500?mg) or placebo confirmed the overall effectiveness of twice daily treatment with diflunisal. In a comparative study against oxyphenbutazone (200?mg t.i.d.), hourly pain scores made on the first postoperative day showed that a single dose of 500?mg diflunisal produced comparable relief over a 12-hour period to that with 2 doses of 200?mg oxyphenbutazone. Overall response to multiple doses was assessed as excellent or good by all the patients receiving diflunisal. Preliminary results are reported on the use of diflunisal in other painful conditions.     

Nephrotoxicity studies on aspirin and diflunisal

Summary

Some of the difficulties encountered in investigations of long-term drug nephrotoxicity are reviewed, and the evidence for acute and chronic renal damage induced by aspirin is discussed. Two studies were carried out to investigate the acute effects of diflunisal on the kidney, and to compare its effects with those of aspirin. Measurements were made before, during and after drug intake, of epithelial cells and lysosomal enzyme (β-d-n-acetyl glucosaminidase) excretion in urine. Diflunisal caused no change in cell excretion and no increase in enzyme excretion in 6 normal volunteers. In a comparative study against aspirin, two groups of 12 patients being treated for osteoarthrosis were observed over an 8-week period. Enzyme excretion increased in both groups and appeared to be dose related. The increase, however, was relatively greater in the aspirin group. The possible significance of these findings is discussed.     

Relationship of plasma salicylate levels to pain relief with two different Salicylates

Summary

In a preliminary open study of salsalate (3 g daily for 4 weeks) in 61 patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthrosis, it was found that although the drug produced satisfactory analgesia in 64% of patients, the incidence of side-effects was high (57% of patients): most were symptoms of salicylism and probably related to the high plasma salicylate levels achieved. In a second open study, 20 patients with osteoarthrosis were treated for 4 weeks with 250?mg diflunisal twice daily and then crossed over to salsalate (3 g daily) for a further 2 weeks. The results of subjective assessments of pain relief showed that both drugs produced satisfactory analgesia, and neither was associated with a significant level of gastro-intestinal bleeding. During the diflunisal treatment period there were no reports of salicylism, and plasma salicylate levels were very much lower than those measured after salsalate. The pain-relieving effects of both drugs, assessed from patient preference for one or the other treatment, were unrelated to the plasma salicylate levels and it is suggested that plasma levels may have more relationship to the incidence of side-effects than with therapeutic effects.