CYP1A1和GSTMI基因多态性及其对个体肺癌易感性的联合效应:meta分析

背景与目的 谷胱甘肽转移酶M1(glutathione S-transferase MI,GSTM1)和细胞色素P4501A1(cytochrome P450A1,CYP1A1)均存在基因多态性,并且对肺癌发病风险有一定的影响,两者联合作用对肺癌发病风险的影响尚无确切定论.本研究旨在探讨CYPIAI和GSTMI基因多态性及其联合效应与肺癌危险性的关系.方法 在PubMed数据库、EMBASE数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库(china biology medicine,CBM)和中国知识基础设施工程数据库(china national knowledge infrastructure,CNKI)中查询文献,时间范围从各数据库建库至2011年3月.使用STATA 10软件进行meta分析统计,对于每篇入选的文献均计算肺癌发生危险性调整混杂因素后优势比(odd ratio,OR)及其95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI).结果 15篇文献最终被纳入本次研究.Meta分析显示GSTMI基因缺失时CYPIA1基因Ile/Val位点为纯合突变型时肺癌发病风险明显高于杂合型与纯合突变型联合,总体OR分别为3.18(95%CI:1.27-7.98)和1.45(95%CI:1.08-1.94).GSTMl基因缺失时CYPIA1基因MsPI位点为纯合突变型时肺癌发病风险也高于杂合型与纯合突变型联合,总体OR分别为1.90(95%CI:1.00-3.58)和1.57(95%CI:1.23-2.00).结论 CYPIA1和GSTM1基因多态性联合作用增加了单个基因多态性发生肺癌的危险性.CYPIA1纯合突变型基因对人群肺癌易感性的影响明显大于野生型和杂合突变型.     

CYP1A1 GSTM1基因多态性和吸烟与肺癌易感性关系的病例对照研究

目的:探讨天津市居民致癌物代谢酶CYP1A1和GSTM1基因多态性对肺癌易感性的影响。方法:利用限制性片断长度多态性-聚合酶链反应(RFLP-PCR)方法检测原发性肺癌患者和健康对照者细胞色素P450酶基因CYP1A1Msp位点和谷胱甘肽硫转移酶基因GSTM1的多态性情况。结果:肺癌组与对照组之间CYP1A1和GSTM1基因型分布差异均存在统计学显著意义(P<0.05)。携带CYP1A1变异基因型或GSTM1阴性基因型的个体患肺癌的危险性增高,比值比(OR)分别达到2.44(1.04～5.81)和1.84(1.03～3.29)。多因素分析结果显示具有CYP1A1变异基因型、GSTM1阴性基因型的吸烟个体患肺癌的风险较大。结论:CYP1A1Msp位点变异基因型和GSTM1阴性基因型可能是肺癌的易感因素,吸烟与肺癌易感基因之间具有协同作用。     

GSTM1和CYP2E1基因多态性与肺癌遗传易感性关系的研究

背景与目的肺癌是中国人群恶性肿瘤死因的首位，其发病可能与肺癌人群中某些肺癌相关基因的遗传多态性有关。本研究旨在探讨细胞色素P4502E1(CYP2E1)基因RsaⅠ／PstⅠ多态性和谷胱甘肽转移酶M1(GSTM1)基因多态性与肺癌易感性之间是否存在相关性。方法应用PCR-RFLP和PCR法检测99例人非小细胞肺癌患者和66例同期住院的肺良性疾病患者CYP2E1基因的RsaⅠ／PstⅠ多态性和GSTM1基因多态性，并分析其与肺癌遗传易感性的相关性。结果(1)CYP2E1基因RsaⅠ／PstⅠ多态性的三种基因型在肺癌组和对照组的频率差异没有统计学意义(χ^2=1．374，P=0．241)。(2)肺癌组GSTM1(-)基因型频率显著高于对照组(分别为57．6％和40．9％)(χ^2=4．401，P=0．036)。(3)携带GSTM1(-)基因型的个体患肺癌的危险性显著高于GSTM1( )基因型的个体(OR=1．96，95％CI=1．042～3．689，P=0．037)。(4)与携带c1／c2或c2／c2基因型的不吸烟个体比较，携带c1／c1基因型的吸烟者患肺癌的风险显著增加(OR=3．525，95％CI=1．168～10．638，P=0．025)。(5)联合分析CYP2E1基因RsaⅠ／PstⅠ多态性和GSTM1基因多态性，携带有c1／c1和GSTM1(-)基因型的个体患肺癌的风险显著高于携带GSTM1( )和c1／c2或c2／c2基因型的个体(OR=3．449，95％CO=1．001～11．886，P=0．050)。按照吸烟因素分层，携带有GSTM1(-)和c1／c1基因型的不吸烟个体患肺癌的风险显著高于携带GSTM1( )和c1／c2或c2／c2基因型的不吸烟个体(OR=11．553，95％CI=1．068-124．944，P=0．044)，携带有GSTM1(-)和c1／c2或c2／c2基因型的不吸烟个体患肺癌的风险同样显著高于携带GSTM1( )和c1／c2或c2／c2基因型的不吸烟个体(OR=13．374，95％CI=1．258～142．166，P=0．032)。结论(1)GSTM1(-)基因型增加人群患肺癌的风险；(2)CYP2E1的c1／c1基因型和GSTM1(-)基因型的联合可增加吸烟和不吸烟人群患肺癌的风险。     

CYP1A1和GSTM1基因多态性与内蒙古人群肺癌易感性的关系

背景与目的 肺癌是严重危害人类健康的恶性肿瘤之一，其发病与肺癌人群中某些肺癌相关基因的遗传多态性有关。本研究旨在探讨细胞色素P4501A1（CYP1A1）基因多态性和谷胱甘肽硫转移酶M1（GSTM1）基因多态性与内蒙古人群肺癌易感性的关系。方法 用PCR-RFLP技术分析了原发性肺癌组和住院对照组（各163例）的CYP1A1、GSTM1基因的多态性、基因型分布频率和交互作用。结果 CYP1A1突变型和GSTM1基因缺陷型EGSTM1（-）]频率分布分别为36．8％、65．0％（病例组）和19．0％、48．9％（对照组），二者经χ^2检验差异有显著性（χ^2=12．82，P=0．000；χ^2=9．78，P=0．002）。CYP1A1突变型患肺癌的风险显著增加（OR=2．48，95％CI为1．51～4．08）。GSTM1（-）者患肺癌的风险也显著增加（OR=2．03，95％CI为1．30～3．17）。基因突变的协同分析发现CYP1A1突变型／GSTM1（-）在肺癌组和对照组中的分布频率分别为28．8％和8．0％，二者经χ^2检验有显著性差异（χ^2=23．883，P=0．000）。CYP1A1突变型／GSTM1（-）患肺癌的风险显著增加（OR=4．90，95％CI为2．50～9．83）。无论是在肺癌组还是在对照组，CYP1A1突变型／GSTM1（-）和CYP1A1非突变型／GSTM1（-）在性别间分布频率的差异均无显著性（肺癌组χ^2=0．797，P=0．372；对照组χ^2=0．670，P=0．761）。吸烟与肺癌易感性的统计学分析，结果显示吸烟与肺癌易感性有关（χ^2=14．197，P=0．000），吸烟者患肺癌的风险显著增加（OR=2．33，95％CI为1.50～3．62）。CYP1A1突变型与吸烟关系的协同分析发现，携带CYP1A1突变型基因的吸烟者较携带CYP1A1突变型基因不吸烟者易患肺癌（OR=4．44，95％CI为2．40～8．32，χ^2=23．843，P=0．000）。GSTM1（-）与吸烟关系的协同分析中也发现，携带GSTM1（-）的吸烟者患肺癌的风险显著增加（OR=7．32，95％CI为3．39～15．50，χ^2=36．708，P=0．000）。结论 CYP1A1突变型和GSTM1（-）是内蒙古地区肺癌的易患因素，二者对肺癌的发生有协同作用，吸烟与肺癌的易感性也有关，CYP1A1突变型、GSTM1（-）与吸烟在肺癌的发生上也有相互促进作用。     

GSTM1和CYP1A1基因多态性与宫颈癌发生及发展的相关性

目的:探讨谷胱苷肽硫转移酶M1（GSTM1）和CYP1A1 Exon7基因多态性与宫颈癌发生发展的关系。方法:选取2013年5月至2015年5月我院收治的宫颈癌患者184例为宫颈癌组,203例进行体检的健康人群为参照组。用限制性片段长度多态性-聚合酶链反应（RFLP-PCR）检测所有受试者GSTM1和CYP1A1 Exon7基因型;记录无进展生存期（PFS）,并随访观察生存和死亡情况。结果:GSTM1分为野生型（wt）和突变缺失型（null）,CYP1A1 Exon7野生型为Ⅱe/Ⅱe,突变型包括突变纯合型（Val/Val）、突变杂合型（Ⅱe/Val）。宫颈癌组携带GSTM1突变型基因型比例与参照组间比较,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;宫颈癌组携带CYP1A1 Exon7突变型基因型比例显著高于参照组（P＜0.05）,且携带突变型基因型个体患宫颈癌的风险是携带野生型基因型个体的2.333倍。GSTM1、CYP1A1 Exon7基因型与宫颈癌患者年龄、病理分期、肿瘤分化程度、肿瘤直径及淋巴结转移均无关（P＞0.05）,与患者病理类型有关（P＜0.05）。GSTM1、CYP1A1 Exon7突变型宫颈癌患者PFS中位数与野生型患者比较,差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。GSTM1、CYP1A1 Exon7突变型宫颈癌患者基因型与宫颈癌患者预后无关（P＞0.05）。结论:GSTM1及CYP1A1 Exon7基因多态性是宫颈癌发生发展的危险因素,尤其是CYP1A1 Exon7突变型,为预防宫颈癌提供依据。     

CYP1A1、GSTM1基因多态性与肺癌易感性的研究

目的:探讨CYP1A1、GSTM1基因多态性与肺癌易感性之间的相关性。方法:利用RFLP-PCR(限制性片段长度多态性-聚合酶链反应)方法检测65例原发性肺癌和60例非肿瘤患者CYP1A1、GSTM1基因,再用NcoI及HinfI两种内切酶识别CYP1A1等位基因亚型。结果:1)肺癌组与对照组CYP1A1等位基因型Ile/Ile、Ile/Val、Val/Val的频率总体分布无显著性差异;但肺癌组CYP1A1(Val/Val)基因型频率(18.5%)明显高于对照组(8.3%),两组差异有显著性(P<0.05)。2)肺癌组GSTM1(-)基因型的频率(63.1%)明显高于对照组(45.0%),P<0.05。3)两种等位基因联合分析发现,与携带CYP1A1(Ile/Ile)/GSTM1(+)基因型的个体相比:CYP1A1(Ile/Ile)/GSTM1(-)以及CYP1A1(Ile/Val+Val/Val)/GSTM1(+)基因型个体患肺癌的风险度较高,OR分别为3.82(95.0%CI,1.27～11.45)和3.5(95.0%CI,1.18～10.41);而CYP1A1(Val/Val)/GSTM1(-)基因型个体患肺癌的风险度最高,OR为10.5(95.0%CI,1.70～64.73)。4)进一步分层分析发现,CYP1A1(Ile/Val+Val/Val)等位基因型主要增加鳞癌的危险性;而GSTM1基因型组织类型无明显的相关性。5)在分析吸烟对肺癌易感性的影响时发现,CYP1A1(Ile/Val+Val/Val)及GSTM1(-)等位基因型与吸烟有协同作用,并与至发病时的累积吸烟量有关。结论:CYP1A1(Val/Val     

CYP1A1、GSTM1基因多态性及其联合作用与食管癌的易感性

目的探讨CYP1A1、GSTM1基因多态性及其联合作用与新疆汉族人食管癌易感性的关系。方法采用聚合酶链式反应-连接酶检测反应分析方法检测107例食管癌患者和204例非食管癌患者的CYP1A1(rs1048943、rs4646421和rs4646903)和GSTM1(缺失型和rs2071487)的基因型。结果CYP1A1基因rs1048943位点的等位基因和基因型频率在病例组和对照组之间比较,总体分布差异有统计学意义(χ² =5.52,P=0.019)。与A/A基因型相比,GG+AG基因型可增加食管癌的发病风险(OR=1.79,OR95%CI:1.10~2.92);GSTM1基因缺失型和非缺失型在病例组和对照组中的分布频率分别为68.69%、31.31%和48.39%、51.61%,在两组间的分布差异有统计学意义(χ²=10.55,P=0.001;OR=2.34,OR95%CI:1.40~3.91)。结论CYP1A1基因rs1048943位点多态性和GSTM1基因缺失型与新疆地区汉族人食管癌易感性有相关性。     

广州地区汉族人群肺癌易感性标记物CYP1A1、CYP2E1和GSTM1与肺癌关系的病例对照研究

[目的]探讨广州地区汉族人群谷胱苷肽硫转移酶（GSTM1）、细胞色素P4501A1（CYP1A1）和细胞色素P4502E1（CYP2E1）基因多态性与肺癌易感性的关系。[方法]选取中山大学附属第一医院、广州市肿瘤医院、广州市红十字会医院等医院的广州籍新发肺癌病人91例及同期上述各医院的同性别非肺部疾患病人91例作对照，采用聚合酶链式反应（PCR）和限制性片段长度多态性（RFLP）技术检测CYP1A1、CYP2E1和GSTM1的基因多态性。[结果]与野生型的CYP1A1相比，突变型肺癌OR为1．51（0．76～3．011。CYP2E1C2C2基因型与C1C1基因型比较，其OR为5．48（1．21～25．23）．GSTM1基因缺失型的OR值为1．26（0．69～2.30）．而三者联合作用时．则可增加患肺癌的危险，其OR值为3．97（0．94-16．791，但无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。[结论]CYP1A1、CYP2E1和GSTM1的某些基因型增加了患肺癌的危险性，但尚未达到统计学的显著性水平，说明它们均不是肺癌个体易感性的主效基因．而是次效基因。     

细胞色素P450 1A1和谷胱苷肽硫转移酶基因多态性与肺癌关系的病例对照研究

目的　探讨细胞色素P4 5 0 1A1(CYP 1A1)和谷胱苷肽硫转移酶 (GST) M1基因多态性与肺癌易感性的关系。方法　选取新发肺癌患者 91例及同期非肺部疾患同性别患者 91例作匹配 ,另选取体检正常者 4 7例做频数对照 ,采用聚合酶链式反应 (PCR)和限制性片段长度多态性 (RFLP)技术检测CYP 1A1和GST M1的基因多态性。结果　单独分析CYP 1A1和GST M1基因多态性与肺癌的关系 ,其OR值分别为 1.5 3和 1.4 2 ,与对照组比较 ,差异均无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,表明与肺癌的发生无相关性。而将二者联合分析时 ,其OR值为 2 .4 7,95 %CI为 1.0 3～ 5 .90 ,与对照组比较 ,差异有显著性(P <0 .0 5 ) ,表明与肺癌的发生有一定相关性。结论　CYP 1A1和GST M1的单一基因多态性不增加患肺癌的危险 ,而两者联合作用时 ,则可增强患肺癌的风险。     

CYP1A1和GSTM1基因多态性与肺癌易感性的Meta分析

目的探讨CYP1A1和GSTM1基因多态性与个体肺癌易感性的关系。方法全面检索相关文献,应用Meta分析方法对各研究进行数据的合并与分析。结果共8篇文献入选,累计肺癌病例1067人,对照1416人,分别对CYP1A1*A和GSTM1-、CYP1A1*B/C和GSTM1+、CYP1A1*B/C和GSTM1-联合基因型进行统计分析。异质性检验χ2值分别为6.43、8.83与9.63,P>0.05,文献有同质性,各合并OR及95%CI分别为1.36(1.09~2.77)、1.65(1.26~2.15)和2.01(1.57~2.59)。结论CYP1A1和GSTM1突变基因型为罹患肺癌的易感基因型,且两者存在协同作用,在肿瘤防治方案中应加以重视从而采取相应措施达到有效预防肿瘤的目的。     

Risk modification by CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms in the association of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a case-control study in Japanese nonsmoking women

Genetic backgrounds may modify the association of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) with lung cancer risk. Polymorphisms of both the activating and detoxifying enzymes, cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) and glutathione-S-transferase M1 (GSTM1), may be important as genetic factors. We conducted a multicenter case-control study in Japanese nonsmoking women. Cases were women aged 30-89 years and newly diagnosed as having lung cancer from November 1997 to March 2001 in 4 study areas. We also recruited age-matched (5-year strata) and hospital-matched nonsmoking controls. A total of 158 cases and 259 hospital controls supplied blood for genotyping. Detailed information on ETS exposure from husbands and that in other situations and on potential confounders was collected by interview. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by using conditional logistic models. We found no increase in the risk of lung cancer for CYP1A1 Msp I genotypes. For the GSTM1 null genotype vs. nonnull genotype, the OR was 1.37 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-2.09], which indicated a somewhat increased risk for the GSTM1 null genotype. A gene-environment interaction was suggested, with combined GSTM1 null genotype and high-dose ETS exposure (>/=40 pack-years by husbands) conferring significantly higher risk (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.13-4.57) compared to the GSTM1 nonnull genotype and low-dose ETS exposure (<40 pack-years). Our results do not support a major role of Msp I polymorphism of the CYP1A1 gene as a risk factor for lung cancer among nonsmoking women. In contrast, the GSTM1 null genotype posed an increased, although not significant, risk among them. Additional studies are warranted to confirm the ETS-GSTM1 polymorphism interaction suggested in our present study.     

CYP1A1 (Ile462Val), CYP1B1 (Ala119Ser and Val432Leu), GSTM1 (null), and GSTT1 (null) Polymorphisms and Bladder Cancer Risk in a Turkish Population

We aimed to investigate bladder cancer risk with reference to polymorphic variants of cytochrome p450 (CYP)1A1, CYP1B1, glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1, and GSTT1 genes in a case control study. Polymorphismswere examined in 114 bladder cancer patients and 114 age and sex-matched cancer-free subjects. Genotypes weredetermined using allele specific PCR for CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genes, and by multiplex PCR and melting curveanalysis for GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes. Our results revealed a statistically significant increased bladder cancerrisk for GSTT1 null genotype carriers with an odds ratio of 3.06 (95% confidence interval=1.39-6.74, p=0.006).Differences of CYP1A1, CYP1B1 and GSTM1 genotype frequencies were not statistically significant betweenpatients and controls. However, the specific combination of GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null, and CYP1B1 codon 119risk allele carriers and specific combination of GSTM1 present, GSTT1 null, and CYP1B1 432 risk allele carriersexhibited increased cancer risk in the combined analysis. We did not observe any association between differentgenotype groups and prognostic tumor characteristics of bladder cancer. Our results indicate that inheritedabsence of GSTT1 gene may be associated with bladder cancer susceptibility, and specific combinations ofGSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP1B1 gene polymorphisms may modify bladder cancer risk in the Turkish population,without any association being observed for CYP1A1 gene polymorphism and bladder cancer risk.     

Associations of CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 Polymorphisms with Lung Cancer Susceptibility in a Northern Indian Population

Background: Susceptibility to lung cancer has been shown to be modulated by inheritance of polymorphicgenes encoding cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and glutathione S transferases (GSTM1 and GSTT1), which areinvolved in the bioactivation and detoxification of environmental toxins. This might be a factor in the variation inlung cancer incidence with ethnicity. Materials and Methods: We conducted a case-control study of 218 northernIndian lung cancer patients along with 238 healthy controls, to assess any association between CYP1A1, GSTM1and GSTT1 polymorphisms, either separately or in combination, with the likelihood of development of Lungcancer in our population. Results: We observed a significant difference in the GSTT1 null deletion frequency in thispopulation when compared with other populations (OR=1.87, 95%CI: 1.25-2.80–0.73, P=0.002). However, GSTM1null genotype was found associated with lung cancer in the non-smoking subgroup. (P=0.170). Conclusions: Ourstudy showed the GSTT1 null polymorphism to be associated with smoking-induced lung cancer and the GSTM1null polymorphism to have a link with non-smoking related lung cancer.     

Genetic Susceptibility to Oral Cancer due to Combined Effects of GSTT1, GSTM1 and CYP1A1 Gene Variants in Tobacco Addicted Patients of Pashtun Ethnicity of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan

Associations of GSTT1, GSTM1 and CYP1A1 gene variants with risk of developing oral cancer were evaluatedin this study. A case-control study was conducted in Pashtun population of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province ofPakistan in which 200 hospital based oral cancer cases and 151 population based healthy controls exposed tosimilar environmental conditions were included. Sociodemographic data were obtained and blood samples werecollected with informed consent for analysis. GSTM1 and GSTT1 were analysed through conventional PCRmethod while specific RT-PCR method was used to detect CYP1A1 polymorphisms. Results were analyzed forconditional logistic regression model by SPSS version 20. The study shows that patients with either GSTM1 orGSTT1 null genotypes have significantly higher risk of oral cancer (adjusted odds (OR): (3.019 (1.861-4.898)and 3.011(1.865-4.862), respectively), which further increased when either one or both null genes were present incombination (adjusted odds (OR): (3.627 (1.981-6.642 and 9.261 (4.495-19.079), respectively). CYP1A1 rs4646903gene variants individually showed weak association OR: 1.121 (0.717-1.752); however, in the presence of GSTM1and/or GSTT1 null genotypes further increasing the association (adjusted odds (ORs): 4.576 (2.038-10.273), 5.593(2.530-12.362) and 16.10 (3.854-67.260 for GSTM/GSTT null and CYP1A1 wild type, GSTM/GSTT either nulland CYP1A1 variant alleles, and all 3 gene polymorphisms combinations, respectively). Our findings suggestthat presence of GSTM1 and/or GSTT1 null genotypes along with variant alleles of CYP1A1 may be the riskalleles for oral cancer susceptibility in Pashtun population.     

应用等位基因特异性PCR和多重差别PCR检测肺癌患者CYP1A1和GSTM1的遗传多态性

本文对等位基因特异性ＰＣＲ（Ａｌｅｌｅｓｐｅｃｉｆｉｃ,ＡＳ）和多重差别（Ｍｕｌｔｉｐｌｅｘｄｉｆｅｒｅｎｔｉａｌ,ＭＤ）ＰＣＲ技术进行了优化,并用此法联合检测了１０５例江苏地区健康人群及６８例肺癌患者ＣＹＰ１Ａ１、ＧＳＴＭ１的等位基因型。结果表明：ＡＳＰＣＲ及ＭＤＰＣＲ采用的设立双参照扩增体系,可一次同时检测ＣＹＰ１Ａ１和ＧＳＴＭ１的等位基因型。在肺癌患者组中,ＣＹＰ１Ａ１的突变型Ｖａｌ／Ｖａｌ的频率１２／６８（１７．６％）约为健康组９／１０５（８．５７％）的２０５倍,而ＧＳＴＭ１纯合缺失的频率,肺癌组为３９／６８（５７３％）,与健康对照组４２／１０５（４０％）相比,亦有显著增加（Ｐ＜０．０５）。     

58. Susceptibility to lung cancer is associated with genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1、GSTM1

Objective: To investigate the association of lung cancer susceptibility with genetic Polymorphism of CYP1A1 and GSTM1. Methods: The study was conducted on 65 lung cancer cases and 60 no-cancer controls. The genetic polymorphism both CYP1A1 and GSTM1 were performed in cancer tissues of all patients and peripheral blood leukocytes of no-cancer controls. First by RFLP-PCR, then after incubating with restriction enzyme Ncol and Hinfl. Results: ①There were no significant differences in the frequency distribution of CYP1A1 polymorphisms between lung cancer patients and controls, but the frequency of CYP1A1(Val/Val) was significant higher than that controls (P<0.05). ②If OR for CYP1A1 (Ile/Ile) genotype was 1.0, the OR of CYP1A1 (Ile/VaL)、CYP1A1 (Val/Val) was 1.68 (95%CI, 0.79～3.59) and 3.2 (95%CI, 1.06～10.26), respectively. ③The significant difference were observed that GSTM1(-) became markedly expressed (63.1%, 41/65) in elung cancer patients than in the corresponding controls (45%, 27/60) (P<0.05), OR was 2.09 (95%CI, 1.02～4.26); ④When analysis combined CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotype, we found that individual who take along CYP1A1 (Ile/Ile)/GSTM1 (-) or CYP1A1 (Ile/Val+Val/Val)/GSTM1 (+) genotype had higher odds ratio than CYP1A1 (Ile/Ile)/GSTM1 (+) genotype, the OR was 3.82 (95%CI, 1.27～11.45) and 3.5 (95%CI 1.18～10.41), respectively, but the CYP1A1 (Val/Val) / GSTM1 (-) genotype was the hightest odds ratio, the OR was 10.5 (95%CI, 1.70～64.73). ⑤We observed that the individual who carry CYP1A1(Val/Val) genotype can increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of lung (P<0.05), OR was 2.75 (95%CI, 1.24～6.17), there was no significant associated of pathologic with GSTM1 genotype. ⑥Stratified analysis suggested an interaction between cigarettes smoking and CYP1A1 (Ile/Val+Val/Val)、GSTM1 (-) genotype. Conclusion: ①The individuals who carried genotype of CYP1A1 (Val/Val) and GSTM1 (-) were susceptible to lung cancer. ②the individuals who carried CYP1A1 (Ile/Ile) /GSTM1 (-) or CYP1A1 (Ile/Val+Val/Val) /GSTM1 (+) genotype with higher risk of developing lung cancer than that CYP1A1 (Ile/Ile)/GSTM1 (+) genotype. ③There were interaction between smoking and CYP1A1 (Ile/Val+Val/Val)、GSTM1 (-)     

Susceptibility of Lung Cancer with Polymorphisms of CYP1A1, GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTT1 and GSTP1 Genotypes in the Population of Inner Mongolia Region

Background: To study the relationship of susceptibility to lung cancer with the gene polymorphisms of CYP1A1, GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTT1, GSTP1 and smoking status in Han and Mongolian populations of Inner Mongolia, an autonomous region of China. Materials and Methods: PCR-RFLP, allele-specific and multiplexPCR were employed to identify the genotypes of CYP1A1, GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTT1 and GSTP1 in a case-control study of 322 lung cancer patients diagnosed by bronchoscopy and 456 controls free of malignancy. Results: There is a significant difference in genotypic frequency of GSTT1 of healthy Mongolian and Han subjects. A statistically prominent association was found between CYP1A1 Msp1 (vt/vt) (OR=4.055, 95%CI:2.107-7.578, p=0.000), GSTM1 (-) (OR=2.290, 95%CI:1.467-3.573, p=0.000) and lung cancer in Mongolians. Similarly, in the Han population, CYP1A1 Msp1 (vt/vt) (OR=3.194, 95%CI:1.893-5.390, p=0.000) and GSTM1 (-) (OR=1.884, 95%CI:1.284-2.762, p=0.001) carriers also had an elevated risk of lung cancer. The smokers were more susceptibleto lung cancer 2.144 fold and 1.631 fold than non-smokers in Mongolian and Han populations, respectively. The mokers who carried with CYP1A1 Msp1 (wt/vt+vt/vt), exon7 (Val/Val+Ile /Val), GSTM1 (-), GSTM3 (AB+BB),and GSTT1 (-) respectively were found all to have a high risk of lung cancer. Conclusions: CYP1A1 Msp1 (vt/vt) and GSTM1 (-) are risk factors of lung cancer in Han and Mongolian population in the Inner Mongolia egion. The smokers with CYP1A1 Msp1 (wt/vt+vt/vt), CYP1A1 exon7 (Val/Val+Ile /Val), GSTM1 (-), GSTM3(AB+BB), and GSTT1 (-) genotypes, respectively, are at elevated risk of lung cancer.     

CYP2D6、GSTM1遗传多态性与肺癌易感性关系

目的探讨中国汉族广东籍人群中ＣＹＰ２Ｄ６、ＧＳＴＭ１的遗传多态性与肺癌易感性关系。方法采用病例—对照研究方法,用ＰＣＲ检测ＣＹＰ２Ｄ６、ＧＳＴＭ１的基因型,限制性酶切电泳鉴定ＣＹＰ２Ｄ６点突变。结果病例组与对照组间未发现ＣＹＰ２Ｄ６多态性分布差异,而ＧＳＴＭ１多态性存在分布差异,病例组为５８．７％,对照组为３５．７％（Ｐ＜０．０５）,ＯＲ值为２．５６（１．１１－２．４４）。结论ＣＹＰ２Ｄ６Ｇ－Ａ突变与肺癌易感性未见有联系,ＧＳＴＭ１－／－型个体患肺癌易感性增高