Incidence of Marginal Ulcer 1 Month and 1 to 2 Years After Gastric Bypass: A Prospective Consecutive Endoscopic Evaluation of 442 Patients with Morbid Obesity

Background  Marginal ulcer (MU) is an occasional complication after gastric bypass. We studied the incidence of this complication by a prospective routine endoscopic evaluation. Methods  441 morbidly obese patients were studied prospectively. There were 358 women and 97 men, with mean age 41 years and mean BMI 43 kg/m². An endoscopic evaluation was performed in all 1 month after surgery, which was repeated in 315 patients (71%) 17 months after surgery, independent of the presence or absence of symptoms. Patients were submitted either to laparotomic resectional gastric bypass (360 patients), employing a circularstapler-25 or to laparoscopic gastric bypass (81 patients), in whom a hand-sewn anastomosis was performed. Results  One month after surgery, 15 patients (4.1%) of the 360 laparotomic gastric bypass and 10 (12.3%) of the 81 laparoscopic gastric bypass presented an “early” marginal ulcer (p < 0.02). Seven patients among the 25 with MU were asymptomatic (28%). Endoscopy was repeated 17 months after surgery. Among 290 patients with no early MU, one patient (0.3%) presented a “late” MU 13 months after surgery. From the 25 patients with “early” MU, one patient (4%) presented a “late” MU. All these patients were treated with PPIs. Conclusion  By performing prospective routine endoscopic study 1 month and 17 months after gastric bypass, two different behaviors were seen regarding the appearance MU: (a) “early” MU, 1 month after surgery in mean 6% and (b) “late” MU, in a very small proportion of patients (0.6%). Among patients with “early” MU, those who had undergone resectional gastric bypass showed significantly less ulcers compared to those patients in whom the excluded distal gastric segment had been left in situ. The operative method may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of MU after gastric bypass.     

Marginal Ulcer After Gastric Bypass: A Prospective 3-Year Study of 173 Patients

Background: Marginal ulceration (MU) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a well-recognized complication. Its incidence varies between 1% and 16%. Factors associated with the development of MU include pouch size, pouch orientation, staple line integrity, and mucosal ischemia. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori may also contribute to MU, but their mechanism of action in the RYGB patient has not been studied. Methods: In 1994 a prospective 3-year study was designed to document the incidence of MU after near-total gastric bypass (NTGB). In this procedure the transected pouch was limited to the cardia, and the gastrojejunostomy was made along the greater curvature. A total of 173 patients entered the study. All patients who experienced postoperative nausea, vomiting, or abdominal pain underwent endoscopic examination of the pouch, stoma, and proximal Roux-en-Y limb. Gastrograffin studies were used within the first 2 weeks of operation. Results: One year after operation, MU was not identified in any patient. At 3 years follow-up, MU was documented in one patient (0.6%) with a dilated gastric reservoir (60 cc). Conclusion: This study reviews the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of MU in the RYGB patient and offers specific recommendations to reduce its occurrence. It also confirms a preliminary impression that NTGB is an effective operation in preventing MU formation.     

Incidence and management of marginal ulceration after laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Marginal ulceration (MU) is a well-known complication after gastrojejunostomy; however, its incidence has rarely been reported in bariatric studies. We present 16 cases of documented MU after laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) that were successfully treated with proton pump inhibition (PPI). METHODS: All patients undergoing LGBP from October 2002 to August 2005 were entered into a prospective, longitudinal database. All patients who subsequently presented with MU were analyzed. MU was diagnosed when patients presented postoperatively with mid-epigastric pain and/or upper gastrointestinal bleeding that responded to PPI or endoscopic intervention. Analysis of variance and Student's t test were used for the statistical analyses. RESULTS: MU was diagnosed in 16 (4%) of 347 patients in whom LGBP was performed. An additional 10 patients had symptoms suggestive of MU, which raised the incidence as great as 7%. Of the 26 patients, 18 were women and 8 were men (age range 23-53 years), with a preoperative body mass index 37.1-63.9 kg/m2, similar to that of the patients who did not develop MU. Compared with the patients who did not develop MU, the operative times were longer in the MU group (180.5 versus 140.4 minutes, P <0.001). Of the 26 patients, 10 presented with abdominal pain and 16 with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The mean interval between the initial LGBP and subsequent MU was 6.3 months (range 1-13). After an initial history and physical examination, upper endoscopy confirmed the diagnosis of MU in 16 patients. Three patients who developed MU were receiving chronic anticoagulation medication. All patients who developed MU began high-dose PPI, which resulted in 100% resolution of MU within 8 weeks. Since January 2005, 73 patients were given prophylactic PPI therapy postoperatively, with no patients subsequently developing MU (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: We report 16 documented cases of MU occurring after LGBP. This underreported complication can be successfully treated with PPI, although MU complicated by gastrogastric fistula may require operative intervention. The institution of routine PPI therapy after LGBP lowered the short-term incidence of MU at our institution. Additionally, we recommend that all patients who undergo LGBP be given prophylactic PPI therapy postoperatively.     

Late Marginal Ulcers after Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity. Clinical and Endoscopic Findings and Response to Treatment

Marginal ulcer (MU) is an occasional complication after gastric bypass which can occur early or late after surgery. In this study, we evaluated the incidence, clinical presentation, and endoscopic behavior of patients with late MU. Five hundred fifty morbidly obese patients were evaluated prospectively performing an endoscopic study 1-8 years after surgery. They were submitted either to laparotomic (n?=?392) or laparoscopic (n?=?158) approach. Six patients (1%) presented late MU 12 to 84 months after surgery. Four patients had single ulcer, while two patients had multiple ulcers. All were treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Several endoscopic evaluations were performed in each patient showing healing and no recurrence of the ulcer. Late MU occurs in a small proportion (1%) of patients submitted to gastric bypass. It can be single or multiple. Medical treatment with PPIs achieves healing at a mean time of 7 months. Several endoscopic evaluations should be performed in these patients in order to demonstrate healing of the ulcer and no recurrence.     

Development of Ulcer Disease After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Incidence, Risk Factors, and Patient Presentation: A Systematic Review

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the gold standard in bariatric surgery. A long-term complication can be marginal ulceration (MU) at the gastrojejunostomy. The mechanism of development is unclear and symptoms vary. Management and prevention is a continuous subject of debate. The aim was to assess the incidence, mechanism, symptoms, and management of MU after LRYGB by means of a systematic review. Forty-one studies with a total of 16,987 patients were included, 787 (4.6 %) developed MU. The incidence of MU varied between 0.6 and 25 %. The position and size of the pouch, smoking, and nonsteroidal inflammatory drugs usage are associated with the formation of MU. In most cases, MU is adequately treated with proton pump inhibitors, sometimes reoperation is required. Laparoscopic approach is safe and effective.     

Small Bowel Obstruction and Internal Hernias after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a recognized complication of open bariatric surgery; however, the incidence after laparoscopic procedures is not clearly established. This paper reviews our experience with small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Methods: Between 1995 and 2001, 711 (246 antecolic, 465 retrocolic) patients underwent a laparoscopic proximal divided Roux-en-Y gastric bypass via the linear endostapler technique. 13 patients (1.8%) developed SBO requiring surgical intervention.There were 11 females and 2 males, ages 29-60 (mean 38), with mean weight 126 kg (range 105-188), and mean BMI 50 (range 41-59). 7 obstructive patients (55%) had undergone previous open abdominal surgery. Median time to obstruction was 21 days (range 5-1095). Mean follow-up of all patients is 43 months (range 3-79). Results: Etiology of obstruction was internal hernia - 6, adhesive bands - 5 (only 2 were related to prior open surgery), mesocolon window scarring - 1, and incarcerated ventral hernia - 1. The incidence of SBO was 4.5% (11/246) in the retrocolic group, and 0.43% (2/465) in the antecolic group, which was highly significant (P=.006). 1 adhesive patient required an open bowel resection for ischemia. There was 1 death. Conclusion: SBO occurred with an overall incidence of 1.8% in a large series of laparoscopic gastric bypass patients, and was associated with a high morbidity. A significant decrease in occurrence was found after adoption of antecolic placement of the Roux limb.     

Management of gastrogastric fistula after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Gastrogastric fistula (GGF) secondary to marginal ulceration (MU) is a reported complication of open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; however, its frequency after laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) is likely underreported. We present five cases of GGF and detail the management algorithm, including medical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic interventions. METHODS: Data from 282 patients undergoing LGBP from October 2002 to January 2005 were entered into a prospective, longitudinal database. All patients who subsequently presented with GGF were analyzed. Patients who developed GGF were compared with those who did not using Student's t-test. RESULTS: Five patients (1.8%) subsequently developed GGF. Upper gastrointestinal radiographic evaluation documented the presence of a GGF in these patients, and upper endoscopy confirmed the diagnosis of MU. The mean interval between initial LGBP and subsequent diagnosis of GGF was 8.8 months. Patients who developed GGF were significantly younger (32.4 years vs 41.2 years; P = .007) and had lost significantly more weight 1 year after surgery (82.7% excess weight loss vs 70.0% excess weight loss; P = .003). No difference was noted when comparing operative time (164 minutes vs 148 minutes) or preoperative BMI (45.6 kg/m2 vs 51.4 kg/m2). All MU/GGF patients were treated initially with high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. In one patient, the GGF closed with PPI therapy alone. A second patient's GGF was successfully resolved with PPI therapy plus endoscopic injection of fibrin sealant. The remaining three cases were managed with laparoscopic division of the fistula after initial unsuccessful PPI therapy. In these patients, the GGF was of larger diameter than in those patients whose GGF closed with medical therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: MU/GGF should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all postoperative gastric bypass patients who present with abdominal pain. In our series, GGF was always associated with MU. Early diagnosis of GGF can be successfully treated with PPI therapy. Smaller-diameter tracts that do not resolve with medical therapy may respond to endoscopic therapy. Large-caliber fistula are less likely to respond to medical or endoscopic therapy but can be managed laparoscopically.     

Management and treatment outcomes of marginal ulcers after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at a single high volume bariatric center

BackgroundMarginal ulceration (MU) is one of the most common complications after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, the rate of MU varies from 1% to 16% of RYGB patients and predisposing factors remain unclear. The aim of this study is to describe frequency, management, and outcomes of treatment in patients with MU after laparoscopic RYGB.MethodsBetween January 2004 and December 2012, a total of 2,535 patients underwent laparoscopic RYGB at our institution. Patients were routinely placed on proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for 90 days after the procedure. A total of 59 (2.3%) patients presented with MU. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed for all patients.ResultsPatients with MU presented with abdominal pain (n = 35), nausea/vomiting (n = 9), anemia (n = 5), hematemesis (n = 5), and dysphagia (n = 5) as chief complaints. Diagnosis was made at a mean period of 15.2±17.4 months (range, 1–64) after the laparoscopic RYGB. Of these patients, 26 (44.1%) required reoperations including 12 (20.3%) with perforated ulcers. Urgent operation was required in 14 (23.7%) patients due to perforation or active bleeding, and elective operation was performed in 10 (16.9%) patients for chronic and refractory MU or gastrogastric fistula. One (1.7%) patient developed recurrent MU after the revision and had another revision of the anastomosis. One (1.7%) patient underwent reversal of gastric bypass after the revision due to malnutrition and recurrent ulcers. All patients did well at a mean follow up of 28.9±21.7 months (range, 1–78 mo).ConclusionDespite the use of routine PPI, the incidence of MU was not insignificant. A significant portion of patients required surgical treatment. Perforations can be effectively managed by oversewing of the ulcer.     

Total Stapled,Total Intra-Abdominal (TSTI) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: One Leak in 1,000 Cases

Background: Variations in technique of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) have been reported. These changes, mainly in the construction of the gastro-jejunostomy, are intended to decrease complications. Methods: 1,000 consecutive LRYGBPs were performed using the Total Stapled Total Intra-abdominal (TSTI) technique antecolic and antegastric approach. Technical details and results, including perioperative morbidity and mortality, are reported. Results: Although the correction or improvement of the most serious co-morbidities with the use of the TSTI technique were similar to results reported by other gastric bypass surgeons, we noted a considerable difference in the development of leaks using this surgical approach. Current literature on gastric bypass reports a 2-5% incidence of leaks. Using the TSTI approach, the incidence of leaks at our facility was 0.1% (one in 1,000 cases). After analysis of the factors involved, it was concluded that the use of the antecolic and antegastric approach in gastric bypass, as described in the TSTI,should be an important consideration by the surgeon.This technique, which uses a circular stapler, was found to be easy to perform while maintaining a reproducible, controlled opening of the anastomosis. Conclusion: Although this was a non-randomized study, the results found a considerable improvement in the incidence of morbidity and mortality, and a remarkable decrease in the frequency of leaks.     

The need for a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter trial with special focus on assessment of quality of life

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy on the development of gastric outlet obstruction and quality of life in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer found during explorative laparotomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies, including one randomized trial, propagate to perform a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy routinely in patients with periampullary cancer found to be unresectable during laparotomy. Others suggest an increase of postoperative complications. Controversy still exists in general surgical practice if a double bypass should be performed routinely in these patients. METHODS: Between December 1998 and March 2002, patients with a periampullary carcinoma who were found to be unresectable during exploration were randomized to receive a double bypass (hepaticojejunostomy and a retrocolic gastrojejunostomy) or a single bypass (hepaticojejunostomy). Randomization was stratified for center and presence of metastases. Patients with gastrointestinal obstruction and patients treated endoscopically for more than 3 months were excluded. Primary endpoints were development of clinical gastric outlet obstruction and surgical intervention for gastric outlet obstruction. Secondary endpoints were mortality, morbidity, hospital stay, survival, and quality of life, measured prospectively by the EORTC-C30 and Pan26 questionnaires. It was decided to perform an interim analysis after inclusion of 50% of the patients (n = 70). RESULTS: Five of the 70 patients randomized were lost to follow-up. From the remaining 65 patients, 36 patients underwent a double and 29 a single bypass. There were no differences in patient demographics, preoperative symptoms, and surgical findings between the groups. Clinical symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction were found in 2 of the 36 patients (5.5%) with a double bypass, and in 12 of the 29 patients (41.4%) with a single bypass (P = 0.001). In the double bypass group, one patient (2.8%) and in the single bypass group 6 patients (20.7%) required (re-)gastrojejunostomy during follow-up (P = 0.04). The absolute risk reduction for reoperation in the double bypass group was 18%, and the numbers needed to treat was 6. Postoperative morbidity rates, including delayed gastric emptying, were 31% in the double versus 28% in the single bypass group (P = 0.12). Median postoperative length of stay was 11 days (range 4-76 days) in the double versus 9 days (range 6-20 days) in the single bypass group (P = 0.06); median survival was 7.2 months in the double versus 8.4 months in the single bypass group (P = 0.15). No differences were found in the quality of life between both groups. After surgery most quality of life scores deteriorated temporarily and were restored to their baseline score (t = -1) within 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy significantly decreases the incidence of gastric outlet obstruction without increasing complication rates. There were no differences in quality of life between the two groups. Together with the previous randomized trial from the Hopkins group, this study provides sufficient evidence to state that a double bypass consisting of a hepaticojejunostomy and a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy is preferable to a single bypass consisting of only a hepaticojejunostomy in patients undergoing surgical palliation for unresectable periampullary carcinoma. Therefore, the trial was stopped earlier than planned.     

Is Routine Cholecystectomy Required During Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass?

Background: Routine cholecystectomy is often performed at the time of gastric bypass for morbid obesity. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of gallstone formation requiring cholecystectomy following a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). Methods: 289 LRYGBP were performed between November 1999 and May 2002. 60 patients (21%) who had prior cholecystectomy were excluded. If gallstones were identified by intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS), simultaneous cholecystectomy was performed. Patients without gallstones were prescribed ursodiol for 6 months and scheduled for follow-up with transabdominal ultrasound. Results: During LRYGBP, gallstones were detected in 40 patients using IOUS (14%) and simultaneous cholecystectomy was performed. Of 189 patients with no stones identified by IOUS, 151 patients (80%) had a postoperative ultrasound after 6 months. 39 patients developed gallstones (22%) and 12 developed sludge (8%), as demonstrated by ultrasound at the time of follow-up. 11 patients had gallstone-related symptoms and subsequently underwent cholecystectomy (7%). 106 patients (70%) were gallstone-free at the time of ultrasound follow-up. Ursodiol compliance was found to be significantly lower for patients developing stones than for gallstone-free patients (38.9% vs 58.3%, z =-2.00, P = 0.045). Conclusions: There is a low incidence of symptomatic gallstones requiring cholecystectomy after LRYGBP. Prophylactic ursodiol is protective. Routine IOUS and selective cholecystectomy with close patient follow-up is a rational approach in the era of laparoscopy.     

Is Routine Cholecystectomy Required During Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass?

Background: Routine cholecystectomy is often performed at the time of gastric bypass for morbid obesity.The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of gallstone formation requiring cholecystectomy following a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). Methods: 289 LRYGBP were performed between November 1999 and May 2002. 60 patients (21%) who had prior cholecystectomy were excluded. If gallstones were identified by intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS), simultaneous cholecystectomy was performed. Patients without gallstones were prescribed ursodiol for 6 months and scheduled for follow-up with transabdominal ultrasound. Results: During LRYGBP, gallstones were detected in 40 patients using IOUS (14%) and simultaneous cholecystectomy was performed. Of 189 patients with no stones identified by IOUS, 151 patients (80%) had a postoperative ultrasound after 6 months. 33 patients developed gallstones (22%) and 12 developed sludge (8%) as demonstrated by ultrasound at the time of follow-up. 11 patients had gallstone-related symptoms and subsequently underwent cholecystectomy (7%). 106 patients (70%) were gallstone-free at the time of ultrasound follow-up. Ursodiol compliance was found to be significantly lower for patients who developed stones than for gallstone-free patients (38.9% vs 58.3%, z =-2.00, P = 0.045). Conclusions: There is a low incidence of symptomatic gallstones requiring cholecystectomy after LRYGBP. Prophylactic ursodiol is protective. Routine IOUS and selective cholecystectomy with close patient follow-up is a rational approach in the era of laparoscopy.     

胃袖状切除术与Roux—en—Y胃旁路术治疗2型糖尿病疗效的Meta分析

目的系统评价胃袖状切除术与Roux—en—Y胃旁路术治疗2型糖尿病的疗效。方法以减重手术、胃切除术、胃绕道术、胃旁路手术、胃转流术、胃袖状切除术、糖尿病、bariatricsurgery、gastricbypass、sleevegastrectomy、diabetes、T2DM等为关键词检索Cochranelibrary、PubMed、中国期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、中文科技期刊全文数据库和万方数据库。检索时间为各数据库建库至2012年12月。最终纳入胃袖状切除术对比Roux—en—Y胃旁路术治疗2型糖尿病的相关文献,再由2名研究者分别独立提取数据并进行文献质量评价,用RevMan5．1．2软件进行Meta分析。计数资料采用相对危险度（riskratio,RR）或比值比（oddsratio,OR）分析统计,计量资料采用均数差（meandifference,MD）或标准差（standardmeandifference,SMD）分析统计。采用Jr2对异质性进行定量分析。结果共纳入符合标准的文献5篇,其中胃袖状切除术组164例,Roux—en—Y胃旁路术组184例。Meta分析结果显示：与胃袖状切除术比较,Roux—en—Y胃旁路术能更显著地提高患者糖尿病的缓解率（OR=0．48,95％C／：0．26～0．91,P〈0．05）,提高随访期间停止服药的比例（OR=0．37,95％C／：0．16～0．84,P〈0．05）,更有效降低糖化血红蛋白水平（MD=0．28,95％C／：0．14—0．43,P〈0．05）和体质量（MD=-0．44,95％CI：-0．76～-0．13,P〈0．05）。胃袖状切除术与Roux—ell—Y胃旁路术患者术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义（OR=1．81,95％C／：0．20～16．73,P〉0．05）。结论Roux—en—Y胃旁路术较胃袖状切除术在治疗2型糖尿病的疗效方面具有一定的优势。     

Prophylactic Cholecystectomy with Open Gastric Bypass Operation

Background: There has been controversy regarding prophylactic cholecystectomy with Roux-en Y gastric bypass. The results reported in open cases showed no significant increase in morbidity by the addition of cholecystectomy. A series of open cases were reviewed to evaluate the propriety of prophylactic cholecystectomy. Method: The records of 141 patients undergoing cholecystectomy during open gastric bypass were reviewed, documenting age, ultrasound findings and pathology. Results: Of the 141 cases analyzed, the incidence of gall-bladder pathology was 80%. 24 (17%) of the 141 patients were noted to have gallstones on preoperative ultrasound examination, and 3 (2%) showed polyps. 9 patients (6%) had gallstones at surgery with normal ultrasound. Cholesterolosis was present in 52 cases (37%) and chronic cholecystitis in 25 cases (18%). Conclusion: In view of the high incidence of gall-bladder disease (80%) already present in morbidity obese patients undergoing gastric bypass and the lack of significant morbidity in open surgery with prophylactic cholecystectomy, the addition of prophylactic cholecystectomy appears appropriate.     

Reoperative bariatric surgery. Lessons learned to improve patient selection and results.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the spectrum of presentation, safety, and efficacy of operative bariatric surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The only lasting therapy for medically complicated clinically severe obesity is bariatric surgery. Several operative approaches have resulted in disappointing long-term weight loss or an unacceptable incidence of complications that require revisionary surgery. METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients who underwent reoperative bariatric surgery from 1985 to 1990 were observed prospectively. One, two, or three previous bariatric procedures had been performed in 77%, 18%, and 5% of patients, respectively. Reoperation was required for unsatisfactory weight loss after gastroplasty or gastric bypass (61%), metabolic complications of jejunoileal bypass (23%), or other complications (16%), including stomal obstruction, alkaline- or acid-reflux esophagitis, and anastomotic ulcer. Revisionary procedures included conversion to vertical banded gastroplasty (33% of operations) and vertical Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (52% of operations); partial pancreato-biliary bypass was used selectively in four patients with severe, medically complicated obesity. RESULTS: A single patient died postoperatively of a pulmonary embolus; serious morbidity occurred in 11%. Weight loss (mean +/- SEM) after reoperation for unsuccessful weight loss was greater with gastric bypass than with vertical banded gastroplasty (54 +/- 6% versus 24 +/- 6% of excess body weight). Metabolic complications of jejunoileal bypass were corrected, but 67% of the patients were dissatisfied with their postoperative lifestyle because of changes in eating habits or weight gain (64% of patients). Stomal complications and esophageal reflux symptoms were reversed in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative bariatric surgery in selected patients is safe and effective for unsatisfactory weight loss or for complications of previous bariatric procedures. Conversion to gastric bypass provides more effective weight loss than vertical banded gastroplasty.     

Conservative Management of Anastomotic Leaks after 557 Open Gastric Bypasses

Background: One of the most serious complications after gastric bypass is an anastomotic leak. In a prospective surgical protocol for the management of this complication, the authors determined the incidence of anastomotic leaks Methods: From August 1999 to January 2005, 557 patients with morbid obesity were submitted to laparotomic resectional gastric bypass. In all patients a left drain was placed during surgery. All patients had a radiological study with liquid barium sulphate on the 5th postoperative day. After the occurrence of an anastomotic leak, the daily output of the leak was carefully measured. Results: 12 patients developed an anastomotic leak at the gastrojejunostomy. All were managed medically, with antibiotics if necessary, enteral or parenteral feeding and frequent control by imaging procedures. In 8 patients, the left drain was maintained in situ up to 43 days after surgery. In 4 patients, the drain had been removed between the 5th and 8th days after surgery after a normal radiologic study, but had to be inserted under radiological control 2-3 weeks after the gastric bypass. Daily output increased significantly the second week after surgery, and the leak closed at a mean of 30 days after surgery. One patient of the 12 (8%) died 32 days after surgery from septic shock, without any abdominal collection secondary to the leak. Conclusion: The occurrence of an anastomotic leak is nearly 2% after gastric bypass. The majority of them can be managed medically, without the need for a reoperation, due to the fact that there is no acid production in the small gastric pouch and there is no intestinal reflux due to the long Roux loop.     

Influence of the severity of obesity on morbidity and mortality after gastric bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of severity of obesity on morbidity and mortality following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and vertical ringed gastroplasty, with severity classified as morbid obesity (MO) defined by a body mass index (BMI) between 35 and 55 Kg/m2 and super-morbid obesity (SMO) defined by a BMI exceeding 55 Kg/m2. METHOD: A series of patients who underwent the aforementioned type of gastric bypass surgery were followed for 5 years. The patients were classified as to whether they had associated sleep apnea syndrome, alveolar hypoventilation, or "overlap syndrome". RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were enrolled: 70 (66.7%) classified as having MO and 35 (33.3%) classified as having SMO. Distribution by sex was significantly different in the 2 groups, but respiratory diseases were similar. PaO2 was higher in the MO group, PaCO2 was lower, and the alveolar-arterial gradient was smaller. Duration of surgery was shorter in the MO group (120.43 +/- 32.97 vs. 136.76 +/- 28.28 minutes). The percentage of complications was similar in the 2 groups (32.86% and 45.7% in the MO and SMO groups, respectively), although the incidence of respiratory complications was higher in SMO patients (8.57% vs. 20% in the MO and SMO groups, respectively). No differences were observed in the rates of surgical, hemodynamic, or infectious complications. Length of hospital stay was similar (6.44 vs. 6.69 for MO and SMO patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: More severe obesity can be associated with preoperative arterial blood gas alterations in patients with concomitant respiratory disease and a higher incidence of respiratory complications in the early phase of recovery from gastric bypass surgery.     

Is Prophylactic Cholecystectomy Useful in Obese Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass?

Background: Obesity constitutes a clear risk factor for cholelithiasis, especially if it is associated with a rapid weight loss, as is the case of patients following bariatric surgery. Prophylactic cholecystectomy is indicated in biliopancreatic diversions due to the high incidence of postoperative cholelithiasis. However, there is no agreement on gastric bypass. This study was conducted to establish the incidence of cholecystopathy demonstrated by histology and to assess the indication for prophylactic cholecystectomy in a systematic way on patients undergoing gastric bypass. Methods: The evaluation is based on 100 consecutive morbidly obese patients undergoing open gastric bypass surgery with concomitant prophylactic cholecystectomy. Variables studied were: age, gender, body mass index, preoperative ultrasound and the anatomopathologic analysis of the gallbladder that was removed. Results: Of the 100 patients who took part in the trial, 11 had had a previous cholecystectomy. Among the 89 patients remaining, preoperative ultrasound diagnosis of cholelithiasis was 16.8%, and the actual postoperative incidence was 24.7%. Other histologic alterations were: cholesterolosis 46.1%, chronic unspecified cholecystitis 22.5%, and granulomatous cholecystitis 1.1%. The total incidence of cholecystopathy was 93.3%. The morbi-mortality related to cholecystectomy was 0%. Conclusions: Based on these results and given the absence of morbidity, we believe that prophylactic cholecystectomy is suitable during open gastric bypass.     

腹腔镜胃旁路术和迷你胃旁路术对肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者的短期治疗效果

目的探讨腹腔镜胃旁路手术和迷你胃旁路术对合并2型糖尿病的病态肥胖症患者的治疗效果。方法7例伴有2型糖尿病的单纯性肥胖症患者中1例行腹腔镜胃旁路术．6例行腹腔镜迷你胃旁路术,观察患者术后2型糖尿病治疗效果。结果7例患者手术顺利,手术时间100～170（平均135）min。无手术并发症。术后平均随访1年,体质量平均减少24．3kg,均已停用所有降糖药物,各项糖尿病检查指标均正常。结论腹腔镜胃旁路术或迷你胃旁路术对2型糖尿病短期治疗有效。