Identification of volatile basic components in tobacco by headspace liquid-phase microextraction coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization with Fourier transform mass spectrometry

A method incorporating headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) with Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FTMS) was established to analyze volatile basic components in tobacco. The sample preparation volume for MALDI-MS was compatible with the volume of the solvent microdrop in the HS-LPME procedure. The pH and the polarity of the solvent for HS-LPME were adjusted by choice of the MALDI matrix and matrix additive. Based on the elemental composition and tandem mass spectrometry information, 25 volatile nitrogenous compounds in tobacco were detected and identified. The approach is fast and sensitive, and has the potential for automation for high-throughput analysis. This approach offers an alternative method for analysis of trace volatile organic compounds in complex samples.     

Temperature-controlled headspace liquid-phase microextraction device using volatile solvents

A novel temperature-controlled headspace liquid-phase microextraction (TC-HS-LPME) device was established in which volatile solvents could be used as extractant. In this device, a PTFE vial cap with a cylindrical cavity was used as the holder of the extraction solvent. Up to 40 μl of extraction solvent could be suspended in the cavity over the headspace of aqueous sample in the vial. A cooling system based on thermoelectric cooler (TEC) was used to lower the temperature of extractant in PTFE vial cap to reduce the loss of volatile solvent during extraction process and increase the extraction efficiency. The selection of solvents for HS-LPME was then extended to volatile solvents, such as dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and acetone. The use of volatile extraction solvents instead of semi-volatile solvent reduced the interference of the large solvent peak to the analytes peaks, and enhanced the compatibility of HS-LPME with gas chromatograph (GC). Moreover, the use of larger volume of extractant solvent increases the extraction capacity and the injection volume of GC after extraction, thus improving detection limits. Several critical parameters of this technique were investigated by using chlorobenzenes (CBs) as the model analytes. High enrichment factors (498–915), low limits of detection (0.004–0.008 μg/L) and precision (3.93–5.27%) were obtained by using TC-HS-LPME/GC-FID. Relative recoveries for real samples were more than 83%.     

Determination of volatile organic acids in tobacco by single‐drop microextraction with in‐syringe derivatization followed by GC‐MS

In this work, the novel technique based on headspace single‐drop microextraction with in‐syringe derivatization followed by GC‐MS was established to determine the volatile organic acids in tobacco. The parameters for headspace single‐drop microextraction and in‐syringe derivatization were optimized, including extraction time, and volume of derivatization reagent and in‐syringe derivatization time. The method validations including linearity, precision, recovery and LOD were also studied. The obtained results illustrated that the optimized technique was easy, highly efficient and sensitive. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to the analyses of volatile organic acids in tobacco samples with seven different brands. It was further demonstrated that the present technique developed in this study does offer a simple and fast approach to determine volatile organic acids in tobacco.     

Characterization of volatile components in dry chrysanthemum flowers using headspace-liquid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography

A headspace-liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME)-GC (gas chromatography) method for the characterization of volatile components in dry chrysanthemum flowers has been developed. In the proposed method, two extraction solvents, n-hexadecane and benzyl alcohol, are used for preconcentrating volatiles in the sample. A droplet of the extraction solvent is squeezed from the GC syringe and inserted in the headspace of the sample bottle with the dry flower, immersed in deionized water, and warmed in a water bath. The optimum HS-LPME parameters in terms of extraction solvent type, droplet magnitude, equilibrium (water bath) temperature, equilibrium time, extraction time, and ionic strength are achieved using GC-FID (flame ionization detection) by varying several levels of the factors that affect the HS-LPME procedure. After extraction under the optimized conditions, the extraction droplet is retracted into the syringe and injected for GC-MS (mass spectrometry) analysis. Thirty-three volatile components are extracted and identified using this HS-LPME-GC-MS method, with the aid of chemometric methods. It is shown that the volatiles in dry chrysanthemum flowers are mainly unsaturated organic compounds, such as monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and their oxygenous derivatives, triterpenoids, and aliphatic compounds. Several representative components, in order of precedence of the retention time, are pinene (106.3 microg/g), camphene (112.7 microg/g), eucapyptol (52.1 microg/g), camphor (29.4 microg/g), borneol (4.2 microg g), bornyl acetate (67.3 microg/g), caryophyllene (0.7 microg/g), and caryophyllene oxide (20.0 microg/g). The relative standard error and detection limit of this method is 5~9% and 0.4 microg/g, respectively.     

Automation and optimization of liquid-phase microextraction by gas chromatography

Several fully automated liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) techniques, including static headspace LPME (HS-LPME) (a drop of solvent is suspended at the tip of a microsyringe needle and exposed to the headspace of the sample solution), exposed dynamic HS-LPME (the solvent is exposed in the headspace of sample vial for different time, and then withdrawn into the barrel of the syringe. This procedure is repeated a number of times), unexposed dynamic HS-LPME (the solvent is moved inside the needle and the barrel of a syringe, and the gaseous sample is withdrawn into the barrel and then ejected), static direct-immersed LPME (DI-LPME) (a drop of solvent is suspended at the tip of a microsyringe needle and directly immersed into the sample solution), dynamic DI-LPME (the solvent is moved inside the needle and the barrel of a syringe, and the sample solution is withdrawn and ejected), and two phase hollow fiber-protected LPME (HF-LPME) (a hollow fiber is used to stabilize and protect the solvent), auto-performed with a commercial CTC CombiPal autosampler, are described in this paper. Critical experimental factors, including temperature, choice of extraction solvent, solvent volume, plunger movement rate, and extraction time were investigated. Among the three HS-LPME techniques that were evaluated, the exposed dynamic HS-LPME technique provided the best performance, compared to the unexposed dynamic HS-LPME and static HS-LPME approaches. For DI-LPME, the dynamic process can enhance the extraction efficiency and the achieved method precision is comparable with the static DI-LPME technique. The precision of the fully automated HF-LPME is quite acceptable (RSD values below 6.8%), and the concentration enrichment factors are better than the DI-LPME approaches. The fully automated LPME techniques are more accurate and more convenient, and the reproducibility achieved eliminates the need for an internal standard to improve the method precision.     

Residual Solvents Determination in Pharmaceuticals by Static Headspace-Gas Chromatography and Headspace Liquid-Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography

A headspace liquid phase microextraction (HS-LPME) method has been developed and optimized for the residual solvent determination in pharmaceutical products. A microdrop of n-hexanol containing isopropanol (as internal standard) was suspended at the tip of a gas chromatographic syringe and exposed to the headspace of the sample solution. After extraction for an optimized time, the microdrop was retracted into the syringe and injected directly into a GC injection port. Critical experimental factors, including extraction solvent, temperature, ionic strength, stirring rate, extraction time, equilibrium time, drop volume, and sample volume were investigated and optimized. Compared with the static headspace technique, HS-LPME method showed superior results, being compatible with the pharmaceutical samples.     

Determination of preservatives by integrative coupling method of headspace liquid-phase microextraction and capillary zone electrophoresis

An integrative coupling method of headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) was proposed in this paper. In the method, a separation capillary was used to create a microextraction droplet of the running buffer solution of CZE, hold the droplet at the capillary inlet, extract analytes of sample solutions in the headspace of a sample vial, inject concentrated analytes into the capillary and separate the analytes by CZE. The proposed method was applied to determine the preservatives of benzoic acid and sorbic acid in soy sauce and soft drink samples, in which the running buffer solution of 50 mmol/L tetraborate (pH 9.2) was directly used to form the acceptor droplet at the capillary inlet by pressure, and the preservatives in a 6-mL sample solution containing 0.25 g/mL NaCl were extracted at 90°C for 30 min in the headspace of a 14-mL sample vial. Then the concentrated preservatives were injected into the capillary at 10 cm height difference for 20 s and separated by CZE. The enrichment factors of benzoic acid and sorbic acid achieved 266 and 404, and the limits of detection (LODs) were 0.03 and 0.01 μg/mL (S/N=3), respectively. The recoveries were in the range of 88.7-105%. The integrative coupling method of HS-LPME and CZE was simple, convenient, reliable and suitable for concentrating volatile and semi-volatile organic acids and eliminating matrix interferences of real samples.     

Development of single‐drop microextraction and simultaneous derivatization followed by GC‐MS for the determination of aliphatic amines in tobacco

In this work, for the first time, headspace (HS) single‐drop microextraction and simultaneous derivatization followed by GC‐MS was developed to determine the aliphatic amines in tobacco samples. In the HS extraction procedure, the mixture of derivatization reagent and organic solvent was employed as the extraction solvent for HS single‐drop microextraction and in situ derivatization of aliphatic amine in the samples. Fast extraction and simultaneous derivatization of the analytes were performed in a single step, and the obtained derivatives in the microdrop extraction solvent were analyzed by GC‐MS. The optimized experiment conditions were: sample preparation temperature of 80°C and time of 30 min, HS extraction solvent (the mixture of benzyl alcohol and 2,3,4,5,6‐pentafluorobenzaldehyde) volume of 2.0 μL, extraction time of 90 s. With the optimal conditions, the method validations were also studied. The method has good linearity (R² more than 0.99), accepted precision (RSD less than 13%), good recovery (98–104%) and low limit of detection (0.11–0.97 μg/g). Finally, the proposed technique was successfully applied to the analyses of aliphatic amines in tobacco samples of seven different brands. It was further demonstrated that the proposed method offered a simple, low‐cost and reliable approach to determine aliphatic amines in tobacco samples.     

Determination of organochlorine pesticides in water using solvent cooling assisted dynamic hollow-fiber-supported headspace liquid-phase microextraction

The organic solvent film formed within a hollow fiber was used as an extraction interface in the headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) of organochlorine pesticides. Some common organic solvents with different vapor pressures (9.33-12,918.9 Pa) were studied as extractants. The results indicated that even the solvent with the highest vapor pressure (cyclohexane) can be used to carry out the extraction successfully. However, those compounds (analytes) with low vapor pressures could not be extracted successfully. In general, the large surface area of the hollow fiber can hasten the extraction speed, but it can increase the risk of solvent loss. Lowering the temperature of the extraction solvent could not only reduce solvent loss (by lowering its vapor pressure) but also extend the feasible extraction time to improve extraction efficiency. In this work, a solvent cooling assisted dynamic hollow-fiber-supported headspace liquid-phase microextraction (SC-DHF-HS-LPME) approach was developed. By lowering the temperature of the solvent, the evaporation can be decreased, the extraction time can be lengthened, and, on the contrary, the equilibrium constant between headspace phase and extraction solvent can be increased. In dynamic LPME, the extracting solvent is held within a hollow fiber, affixed to a syringe needle and placed in the headspace of the sample container. The extracting solvent within the fiber is moved to-and-fro by using a programmable syringe pump. The movement facilitates mass transfer of analyte(s) from the sample to the solvent. Analysis of the extract was carried out by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The effects of identity of extraction solvent, extraction temperature, sample agitation, extraction time, and salt concentration on extraction performance were also investigated. Good enrichments were achieved (65-211-fold) with this method. Good repeatabilities of extraction were obtained, with RSD values below 15.2%. Detection limits were 0.209 microg/l or lower.     

Application of Headspace Liquid-Phase Microextraction to the Analysis of Volatile Halocarbons in Water

The determination of four volatile halocarbons (CHCl₃, CCl₄, C₂HCl₃ and C₂Cl₄) in water by headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) with gas chromatography using a micro electron capture detector (GC-μECD) is described. The effects of the type and volume of the extraction solvent, headspace volume, stirring rate, extraction temperature and time and ionic strength on the extraction performance are investigated and optimized. The developed protocol yields a linear calibration curve in the concentration range from 0.05 to 50 µg L^?1 for the target analytes; the detection limits ranged from 0.003 to 0.146 µg L^?1 and the relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) values below 8.45%. The results demonstrate that HS-LPME followed with GC-μECD is a simple and reliable technique for the determination of volatile halocarbons in water samples.     

Rapid determination of acetone in human blood by derivatization with pentafluorobenzyl hydroxylamine followed by headspace liquid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

In the current work, a simple, rapid, accurate and inexpensive method was developed for the determination of acetone in human blood. The proposed method is based on derivatization with O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine hydrochloride (PFBHA), followed by headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). In the present method, acetone in blood samples was derivatized with PFBHA and acetone oxime formed in several seconds. The formed oxime was enriched by HS-LPME using the organic solvent film (OSF) formed in a microsyringe barrel as extraction interface. Finally, the enriched oxime was analyzed by GC/MS in electron ionization (EI) mode. HS-LPME parameters including solvent, syringe plunger withdrawal rate, sampling volume, and extraction cycle were optimized and the method reproducibility, linearity, recovery and detection limit were studied. The proposed method was applied to determination of acetone in diabetes blood and normal blood. It has been shown that derivatization with HS-LPME and GC/MS is an alternative method for determination of the diabetes biomarker, acetone, in blood samples.     

In-line coupling headspace liquid-phase microextraction with capillary electrophoresis

An analytical technique of in-line coupling headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) with capillary electrophoresis (CE) was proposed to determine volatile analytes. A special cover unit of the sample vial was adopted in the coupling method. To evaluate the proposed method, phenols were used as model analytes. The parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were investigated, including the configuration of acceptor phase, kind and concentration of acceptor solution, extraction temperature and time, salt-out effect, sample volume, etc. The optimal enrichment factors of HS-LPME were obtained with the sample volume of about half of sample vials, which were confirmed by both the theoretical prediction and experimental results. The enrichment factors were obtained from 520 to 1270. The limits of detection (LODs, S/N = 3) were in the range from 0.5 to 1 ng/mL each phenol. The recoveries were from 87.2% to 92.7% and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) were lower than 5.7% (n = 6). The proposed method was successfully applied to the quantitative analysis of the phenols in tap water, and proved to be a simple, convenient and reliable sample preconcentration and determination method for volatile analytes in water samples.     

Direct quantitation of volatile organic compounds in packaging materials by headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

The quantification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in flexible multilayer packaging materials using headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) was studied. The analytes imclude 22 compounds such as aldehydes. ketones, carboxylic acids and hydrocarbons formed by thermooxidative degradation of polyethylene during the extrusion coating process in the manufacture of the packaging, and many of them are involved in the unpleasant and undesirable odour of these materials. External standard calibration using a solution of the analytes in an appropriate solvent was the first approach studied. Aqueous solutions of the analytes provided low reproducibility and the reduction of aldehydes to alcohols under the HS-SPME conditions. Hexadecane was chosen as the solvent since its polarity is similar to that of polyethylene and its volatility is lower than that of the analytes. However, hexadecane should be added to the sample before the analysis as it modifies the absorption capacity of the fibre. A 75-microm Carboxen-poly(dimethylsiloxane) fibre was used to extract the VOCs from the headspace above the packaging in a 15-ml sealed vial at 100 degrees C after 5 min of preincubation. The influence of the extraction time on the amount extracted was studied for a standard solution of the analytes in hexadecane, together with the influence of the volume of the standard solution and the amount of the sample placed in the vial. Standard addition and multiple HS-SPME were also studied as calibration methods and the results obtained in the quantitative analysis of a packaging material were compared.     

Pressurized Liquid Extraction Combined with Dispersive Liquid‐liquid Micro‐extraction as an Efficient Sample Preparation Method for Determination of Volatile Components in Tobacco

The pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) followed by dispersive liquid–liquid micro‐extraction (DLLME) has been developed for extraction of volatile components in tobacco. 35 volatile components were detected by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Methanol–methyl tert‐butyl ether (MTBE) (8:2, v/v) was selected as PLE extraction solvent. The optimized DLLME procedure, 3 mL of pure water and 1.0 mL tobacco extract solution, 40 μL of chloroform as extraction solvent, 0.5 mL of acetonitrile as disperser solvent, was validated. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors were in the range of 96‐159. The limits of detection were between 0.14 and 0.33 μg/kg. The repeatability of the proposed method, expressed as relative standard deviation, varied between 4.3 and 7.5% (n = 6). The recoveries of the analytes evaluated by fortification of tobacco samples were in the range of 84.7‐96.4%. Compared with the conventional sample preparation method for determination of volatile components in tobacco, the proposed method was quick and easy to operate, and had high‐enrichment factors and low consumption of organic solvent.     

Determination of phenols in water samples by single-drop microextraction followed by in-syringe derivatization and gas chromatography-mass spectrometric detection

Trace analysis of phenolic compounds in water was performed by coupling single-drop microextraction (SDME) with in-syringe derivatization of the analytes and GC-MS analysis. The analytes were extracted from a 3ml sample solution using 2.5microl of hexyl acetate. After extraction, derivatization was carried out in syringe barrel using 0.5microl of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide. The influence of derivatizing reagent volume, derivatization time and temperature on the yield of the in-syringe silylation was investigated. Derivatization reaction is completed in 5min at 50 degrees C. Experimental SDME parameters, such as selection of organic solvent, sample pH, addition of salt, extraction time and temperature of extraction were studied. Analytical parameters, such as enrichment factor, precision, linearity and detection limits were also determined. The limits of detection were in the range of 4-61ng/l (S/N=3). The relative standard deviations obtained were between 4.8 and 12% (n=5).     

Headspace sampling of the volatile fraction of vegetable matrices

The evolution of vapour phase sampling of the volatile fraction of vegetable matrices, or of products directly related to them, over the period 1996-2007 is reviewed. High concentration capacity headspace (HCC-HS) and dynamic headspace (D-HS) techniques, that is headspace sampling approaches where the analytes in the vapour phase are concentrated into a sorbent, an adsorbent or a solvent, are considered. Advantages, disadvantages and applications to the vegetable field of several successful techniques based on these approaches are critically presented, including in-tube sorptive extraction (INCAT, HS-SPDE), headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE), solid-phase aroma concentrate extraction (SPACE), large surface area HCC-HS sampling (MESI, MME, HS-STE), headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) and dynamic headspace samplings (D-HS). The developments necessary to overcome some of the limits of the above approaches and techniques are also discussed in view of their application to new fields.     

Headspace liquid phase microextraction for quantitation of hexanal in potato crisps by gas chromatography

A simple and rapid method using headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) was developed for the determination of hexanal at low levels in potato crisp samples. Parameters such as extraction solvent, agitation of the sample, salt addition, organic drop volume, exposure time, and extraction time were controlled and optimised. The developed protocol was found to yield a linear calibration curve in the concentration range from 0.001 to 2 mg/L and a limit of detection of 0.1 microg/L with a good enrichment factor of > 107 for the analyte. The repeatability of the method was satisfactory (4%). The results demonstrate that HS-LPME is a rapid, accurate, and effective preparation method and could be successfully used for the determination of hexanal in potato crisp samples.     

Simultaneous derivatization and extraction of amphetamine and methylenedioxyamphetamine in urine with headspace liquid-phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

A new method is reported for the simultaneous extraction and derivatization of amphetamine (AM) and methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) using headspace hollow fiber protected liquid-phase microextraction (HS-HF-LPME); quantitation is by gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry in the selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. The derivatizing reagent, pentafluorobenzaldehyde (PFBAY), was added to the extraction solvent. The analytes, volatile and basic, were released from the sample matrix into the headspace first, then extracted and derivatized in the solvent. After that, 2 microl of extract was directly injected into the GC-MS system. Parameters affecting extraction efficiency were investigated and optimized. This method showed good linearity in the concentration range investigated (50-350 ng ml(-1) for AM and 50-700 ng ml(-1) for MDA). Excellent repeatability of the extraction (RSD< or = 4%, n=5), and low limits of quantitation (0.25 ng ml(-1) for AM and 1.00 ng ml(-1) for MDA) were achieved. The feasibility of the method was demonstrated by analyzing human urine samples.     

Determination of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water by Headspace Liquid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Geosmin (GSM) and 2-methylisoborneol (MIB) were extracted from water samples, adsorbed in organic solvent microdrop by headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME), and were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Influence factors such as the extraction solvent types, headspace and microdrop volumes, stirring rate, equilibrium and extraction time, and ionic strength for HS-LPME efficiency were thoroughly evaluated. Under optimized extraction and detection conditions, the calibration curves of GSM and MIB were linear in the range of 5–1000 ng/L. The detection limits of GSM and MIB were 1.1 and 1.0 ng/L, respectively. Average recoveries of 95.45–113.7% (n = 5) were obtained and method precisions were also satisfactory. Trace levels of the off-flavor compounds at ng/L in tap water and raw water were successfully quantified.     

Use of volatile organic solvents in headspace liquid‐phase microextraction by direct cooling of the organic drop using a simple cooling capsule

A low‐cost and simple cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction device for the extraction and determination of 2,6,6‐trimethyl‐1,3 cyclohexadiene‐1‐carboxaldehyde (safranal) in Saffron samples, using volatile organic solvents, was fabricated and evaluated. The main part of the cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction system was a cooling capsule, with a Teflon microcup to hold the extracting organic solvent, which is able to directly cool down the extraction phase while the sample matrix is simultaneously heated. Different experimental factors such as type of organic extraction solvent, sample temperature, extraction solvent temperature, and extraction time were optimized. The optimal conditions were obtained as: extraction solvent, methanol (10 μL); extraction temperature, 60°C; extraction solvent temperature, 0°C; and extraction time, 20 min. Good linearity of the calibration curve (R² = 0.995) was obtained in the concentration range of 0.01–50.0 μg/mL. The limit of detection was 0.001 μg/mL. The relative standard deviation for 1.0 μg/mL of safranal was 10.7% (n = 6). The proposed cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction device was coupled (off‐line) to high‐performance liquid chromatography and used for the determination of safranal in Saffron samples. Reasonable agreement was observed between the results of the cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction high‐performance liquid chromatography method and those obtained by a validated ultrasound‐assisted solvent extraction procedure.