Phase I/II study of preoperative cetuximab, capecitabine, and external beam radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy, capecitabine, and cetuximab in the preoperative treatment of patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with rectal cancer (T3-T4, and/or N+, endorectal ultrasound) received preoperative radiotherapy (1.8 Gy, 5 days/week for 5 weeks, total dose 45 Gy, three-dimensional conformal technique) in combination with cetuximab [initial dose 400 mg/m(2) intravenous given 1 week before the beginning of radiation followed by 250 mg/m(2)/week for 5 weeks] and capecitabine for the duration of radiotherapy (650 mg/m(2) orally twice daily, first dose level; 825 mg/m(2) twice daily, second dose level). RESULTS: Four and six patients were treated at the first and second dose level of capecitabine, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Thirty additional patients were treated with capecitabine at 825 mg/m(2) twice daily. The most frequent grade 1/2 side-effects were acneiform rash (87%), diarrhea (65%), and fatigue (57%). Grade 3 diarrhea was found in 15%. Three grade 4 toxic effects were recorded: one myocardial infarction, one pulmonary embolism, and one pulmonary infection with sepsis. Two patients (5%) had a pathological complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiotherapy in combination with capecitabine and cetuximab is feasible with some patients achieving pathological downstaging.     

Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin given prior to and concurrently with preoperative pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

This multicentre phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of preoperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/T4 rectal adenocarcinoma with or without nodal involvement). Treatment consisted of one cycle of XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) bid on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1), followed by RT (1.8 Gy fractions 5 days per week for 5 weeks) plus CAPOX (capecitabine 825 mg m(-2) bid on days 22-35 and 43-56, and oxaliplatin 50 mg m(-2) on days 22, 29, 43 and 50). Surgery was recommended 5 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. The primary end point was pathological complete tumour response (pCR). Sixty patients were enrolled. In the intent-to-treat population, the pCR rate was 23% (95% CI: 13-36%). 58 patients underwent surgery; R0 resection was achieved in 57 (98%) patients, including all 5 patients with T4 tumours. Sphincter preservation was achieved in 49 (84%) patients. Tumour and/or nodal downstaging was observed in 39 (65%) patients. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhoea (20%) and lymphocytopaenia (43%). Preoperative capecitabine, oxaliplatin and RT achieved encouraging rates of pCR, R0 resection, sphincter preservation and tumour downstaging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.     

Phase I-II trial of concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin with preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To identify the maximal tolerated dose level of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin and to evaluate the efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rectal T3-T4 and/or N0-N+ rectal cancer received capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily Monday through Friday and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15, concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The radiation dose was increased in 5.0-Gy steps in cohorts of 3 patients starting from 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions (dose level [DL] 1). DL2 and DL3 were designed to reach 42.5 Gy in 17 fractions and 47.5 Gy in 19 fractions, respectively. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed at DL1 or DL2. Of the 3 patients treated at DL3, 1 presented with Grade 3 diarrhea, which was considered a dose-limiting toxicity, and 3 additional patients were added. Of the 6 patients treated at DL3, no new dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and DL3 was identified as the recommended dose in this study. Eight additional patients were treated at 47.5 Gy. Grade 2 proctitis was the most frequent adverse event (40%); Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 2 patients (10%). All patients underwent surgery, and 17 patients (85%) underwent R0 resection. Four patients (20%) presented with a histologic response of Grade 4, 11 (55%) with Grade 3+, 2 (15%) with Grade 3, and 2 patients (10%) with Grade 2. CONCLUSION: The maximal tolerated dose in this study was 47.5 Gy. The high rates of pathologic response of Grade 3+ and 4 must be confirmed through the accrual of new patients in the Phase II study.     

Phase I-II trial of cetuximab, capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiotherapy as preoperative treatment in rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and activity of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent cetuximab, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin in rectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients with rectal cancer (T3-T4 or N+, M1 allowed) entered the trial at five investigator sites; the data from 58 patients were assessable. Cetuximab was given as an initial dose of 400 mg/m2 7 days before the start of RT, and then at 250 mg/m2 once weekly during RT (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). Capecitabine and oxaliplatin were administered according to an established schedule of oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, 22, and 29) and capecitabine (Days 1-14 and 22-35) at three dose levels: 1,000, 1,300, and 1,650 mg/m2/d during the Phase I part of the study. The main endpoint of the Phase II was the pathologic complete response rate. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included in the Phase I part of the study, and the maximal tolerated dose was not reached. Overall, 48 patients were treated at the recommended dose of capecitabine (1,650 mg/m2) and 45 patients (94%) underwent surgery. A pathologic complete response was observed in 4 patients (9%), and moderate (n=12), minimal (n=10), and no tumor regression (n=2) was noted in 24 (53%) of 45 patients. The mean radiation dose intensity, cetuximab, capecitabine, oxaliplatin was 98%, 95%, 94%, and 94%, respectively. The incidence of Grade 3-4 diarrhea was restricted to 19%. Postoperative complications of any grade occurred in 33% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that cetuximab can be combined safely with capecitabine and oxaliplatin plus RT. The low pathologic complete response rate achieved should stimulate additional preclinical investigations to establish the best sequence of triple combinations.     

Neo-adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with radiotherapy: a phase II study

BackgroundPreoperative chemoradiation is now standard treatment for stages II–III rectal cancer. Capecitabine (CAP) and oxaliplatin (OX) are synergistic with radiotherapy (RT) and active in colorectal neoplasms.Patients and methodsTwo cycles of CAP 825 mg/m² b.i.d. (days 1–14) and OX 50 mg/m² (days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks were given concomitantly with pelvic conformal RT (45 Gy). Patients with a ≥T3 and/or node-positive rectal tumour were eligible. The pathologic tumour response was defined according to the tumour regression grade (TRG) scale.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. Gastrointestinal adverse events were mostly G1–G2; only two patients experienced G3 vomiting and diarrhoea and six patients had G1 peripheral neuropathy. Haematological toxicity was rare. G2 proctitis and anal pain occurred in two patients. Pathological complete response (TRG1) was observed in nine patients (20.9%; 95% CI 8.7%–33.1%); TRG2 in 19 patients (44.2%); TRG3 in 12 patients (27.9%); and TRG4 in three patients (7%). Overall, nine patients recurred: five with distant metastases, one with local recurrence, and three with both local recurrence and distant metastases.ConclusionsCAP–OX–RT as preoperative treatment for rectal cancer induces a remarkable rate of complete or near-complete pathologically documented response and is well tolerated.     

Phase I/II trial of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiation for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX-RT) in patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) or low-lying rectal cancer received preoperative RT (total dose, 50.4 Gy). Capecitabine was administered concurrently at 825 mg/m2 bid on days 1 to 14 and 22 to 35, with oxaliplatin starting at 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 with planned escalation steps of 10 mg/m2. End points of the phase II study included downstaging, histopathologic tumor regression, resectability of T4 disease, and sphincter preservation in patients with low-lying tumors. RESULTS: Dose-limiting grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in two of six patients treated with 60 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin. Thus, 50 mg/m2 was the recommended dose for the phase II study. Toxicities observed at this dose level were generally mild, with only two cases of short-lived grade 3 diarrhea. Myelosuppression, mainly leukopenia, was restricted to grade 2 in 19% of patients. T-category downstaging was achieved in 17 (55%) of 31 operated patients, and 68% of patients had negative lymph nodes. Pathologic complete response was found in 19% of the resected specimens. Radical surgery with free margins could be performed in 79% of patients with T4 disease, and 36% of patients with tumors < or = 2 cm from the dentate line had sphincter-saving surgery. CONCLUSION: Preoperative XELOX-RT is a feasible and well tolerated treatment. This regimen is proposed for phase III evaluation comparing standard fluorouracil-based therapy with XELOX chemoradiotherapy.     

Phase II study of preoperative irradiation and chemotherapy with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has demonstrated to improve resectability and local control in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). 5-fluorouracil (5FU) has traditionally been the drug of choice in combination with radiation therapy. Early studies of capecitabine (CAP) have shown its potential to replace 5FU. Between March 2002 and April 2005, 31 patients with newly diagnosed LARC (T2 N+ 2 cases, T3 N0-N+ 25 cases, T4 N0-N+ 4 cases) received the combined treatment. Surgery was planned 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5FU plus leucovorin for 6 courses was given in pN+ patients. All patients completed the planned treatment. Grade 3 acute toxicity was observed in 5 patients (16%). Nineteen patients (61%) had a downstaging. A complete pathological remission was observed in 3 cases (10%). Median follow-up is of 23 months (range; 6-36 months). The results of this experience confirm the data of the literature about the feasibility and efficacy of a neoadjuvant treatment with radiation and CAP in LARC.     

Phase II study of capecitabine (Xeloda) and concomitant boost radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda), an oral fluoropyrimidine, as a radiosensitizer in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a phase II study of capecitabine (825 mg/m2 orally, twice daily continuous) with radiotherapy (52.5 Gy/30 fractions to the primary tumor and perirectal nodes) in 54 patients with LARC (node-negative > or = T3 or any node-positive tumor) staged by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The primary endpoint was pathologic response rate; secondary endpoints included toxicity profiles and survival parameters. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients (median age, 56.7 years; range, 21.3-78.7 years; male:female ratio, 1.7; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1: 100%), 51 patients (94%) had T3N0 or T3N1 disease by EUS. Surgery was not performed in 3 patients; 2 of these patients had metastatic disease, and the third patient refused after a complete clinical response. Of the 51 patients evaluable for pathologic response, 9 patients (18%) achieved complete response, and 12 patients (24%) had microscopic residual disease (< 10% viable cells). In addition, 26 patients of all 54 patients (51%) achieved T-downstaging, and 15 patients of 29 patients (52%) achieved N-downstaging. Grade 3/4 toxicities were radiation dermatitis (9%) and diarrhea (2%). Sphincter preservation rate for tumor < or = 5 cm from the anal verge was 67% (18/27). CONCLUSION: This regimen of radiotherapy plus capecitabine is well tolerated and is more convenient than protracted venous infusion of 5-FU. The pathologic response rate is comparable to our previous experience using protracted venous infusion 5-FU for LARC.     

Multicenter phase II clinical trial of preoperative capecitabine with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Introduction

To assess pathologic complete response, sphincter preservation rates and toxicity profile of preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer.

Materials and methods

Fifty-eight patients from six Spanish centers were included (March 2004 to June 2005) with histological/cytological diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer, age between 18 and 80 years, ECOG 0–2, adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic functions. Prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy was not allowed. Preoperative treatment was capecitabine 825 mg/m² bid concomitant to radiotherapy (45 + 5.4 Gy boost over 5.5 weeks). Surgery was performed 4–8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in this study: 60.3 % males, median age of 64.5 (30.9–78.7) years, 28.6 % with ECOG 0 and 71.4 % with ECOG 1. Median distance of tumor from the anal verge was 7 (1–12) cm. Fifty-two (89.6. %) patients completed preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Primary tumor and node downstaging occurred in 61.1 and 69.6 % of patients, respectively. Surgery was performed in 55 patients (94.8 %): 80 % had negative lymph nodes and 72.7 % underwent sphincter-preserving procedures. A pathologic complete response was observed in 10.5 % (95 % CI 2.5–18.5) of the patients. Main grade I–II toxicities were leucopenia (43.1 %), neutropenia (24.1 %), anemia (36.2 %), diarrhea (32.8 %) and skin disorders (5.1 %), from which diarrhea (6.9 %), leucopenia (1.7 %) and skin disorders (1.7 %) reached grade III. There were no grade IV toxicities.

Conclusions

Preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation is a well-tolerated and effective neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer that achieves encouraging rates of tumor downstaging.     

Phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation with S‐1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

A phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) with S‐1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was conducted. The total radiotherapy dose was 50.4 Gy. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 50 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 and S‐1 80 mg/m² per day on days 1–14 and 22–35. The tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured using diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW‐MRI) before and after CRT. Total mesorectal excision was performed within 6 ± 2 weeks. The primary end‐point was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. A total of 38 patients were enrolled. The pCR rate was 22.9% (8/35; 95% CI, 10.9–42.1), and 10 (28.6%) patients showed near‐total tumor regression. There was no grade 4 adverse event, and grade 3 adverse events included leukopenia (5.4%), diarrhea (5.4%), anorexia (2.7%) and nausea (2.7%). The tumor ADC was calculated in 38 patients (including those who participated in the phase I study). The post‐CRT ADC (P = 0.037) and the percentage change in ADC (P = 0.026) were significantly correlated with pathological response. In conclusion, preoperative CRT with S‐1 plus oxaliplatin showed promising results in pathological responses and favorable toxicity profiles. (Cancer Sci 2013; 104: 111–115)     

A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine for rectal cancer

Purpose

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with the XELOX regimen in rectal cancer patients.

Patients and methods

Twenty-five patients with histopathologically confirmed and locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/T4 or N+) were enrolled in the study. Radiotherapy of 5000 cGy was delivered in 25 fractions of 200 cGy five times per week for a total of 5 weeks. During the first, second, fourth and fifth weeks of radiotherapy, the patients also received the following chemotherapy: 50 mg/m² oxaliplatin on day one and 850 mg/m² capecitabine bid for 5 days. Surgery was scheduled 5–6 weeks after the completion of the preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Four weeks after the surgery, four more cycles of chemotherapy were administered every 3 weeks. The postoperative chemotherapy consisted of 130 mg/m² oxaliplatin on day 1 and 1000 mg/m² capecitabine bid from day 1 to day 14. The end points were the downstage rate, R0 resection rate, and sphincter preservation rate.

Results

Twenty-five patients received the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The overall regression rate was 85%, with a Grade 3/4 regression rate of 30% and a pathological complete response rate of 12%. Among the 17 patients with lower rectal cancer, thirteen (76%) were originally indicated for abdominal–perineal resection (APR). However, after the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the anus could be preserved in nine patients (53%). The most frequent toxicities of the chemoradiotherapy were diarrhea (64%) and hematological toxicity (60%), followed by nausea and vomiting (48%), urinary tract irritation (28%), and anal pain (24%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were relatively infrequent and presented as diarrhea (12%), myelosuppression (8%), and elevated transaminase (4%). Six cases also experienced long-term anal exudates after surgery.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using the XELOX regimen in rectal cancer patients obviously reduced the TNM staging and improved the pathological complete response rate. The therapy was well-tolerated and had mild adverse events and no serious perioperational complications.     

Bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with radiation therapy in rectal cancer: Phase I trial results

PURPOSE: The overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is associated with poor outcomes in colorectal cancer patients. Bevacizumab, a VEGF inhibitor, enhances the effects of chemotherapy and radiation therapy on tumor cytotoxicity in preclinical models, including colorectal cancer. A Phase I trial was undertaken to evaluate the combination of bevacizumab, capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiation therapy in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum were eligible. Pretreatment staging included computerized tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, and surgical evaluation. Patients received 50.4 Gy of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the tumor in 28 fractions. Capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab were administered concurrently with radiation therapy. After EBRT completion, patients were restaged and evaluated for surgery. Primary endpoints included the determination of dose-limiting toxicity and a recommended Phase II dose, non dose-limiting toxicity, and preliminary radiographic and pathologic response rates. RESULTS: Eleven patients were enrolled. All were evaluable for toxicity and efficacy. Dose level 2 was associated with unacceptable toxicity (primarily diarrhea). Dose level 1 had an acceptable toxicity profile. The recommended Phase II dose in our study was bevacizumab 15 mg/kg Day 1 + 10 mg/kg Days 8 and 22, oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 weekly, and capecitabine 625 mg/m2 bid during radiation days. Six patients had clinical responses. Two patients had a pathologic complete response, and 3 had microscopic disease only. One patient experienced a postoperative abscess, one a syncopal episode during adjuvant chemotherapy, and one a subclinical myocardial infarction during adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of bevacizumab, capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiation therapy in rectal cancer was tolerable, with encouraging response rates. Further investigation with this regimen is being pursued in a Phase II setting.     

Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The aim of this phase II study is to determine the efficacy and tolerability of combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced non-pretreated colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three chemotherapy-na?ve patients were enrolled. Capecitabine 2500 mg/m(2)/day was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m(2) was administered as a 2-h infusion on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were assessable for toxicity and 39 for clinical activity: the main toxicity was grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, which occurred in 28% of the patients. The response rates were 44% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29.3% to 59.0%] and 48.7% (95% CI 33.0% to 64.4%) (intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively). The median overall survival was 20 months (95% CI 12-28). CONCLUSIONS: Combining capecitabine and oxaliplatin yields promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer; therefore, the capecitabine dose we utilized is probably too high. The main toxicity is diarrhea, which is manageable with appropriate dose reductions.This combination may be preferable compared to a standard combination with infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin as it is more convenient and practical with similar efficacy. Thus, phase III trials are needed to clarify its role in the treatment of chemotherapy-na?ve advanced colorectal cancer patients.     

Neoadjuvant chronomodulated capecitabine with radiotherapy in rectal cancer: a phase II brunch regimen study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of chronomodulated capecitabine administered according to a specific time schedule (Brunch Regimen: Breakfast and Lunch) as a part of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

Eighty-five patients with stage II and III rectal cancer were included. Patients received capecitabine (1,650 mg/m² per day; 60 % dose at 8:00 AM and 40 % dose at 12:00 noon) administered during pelvic radiation (total 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, 1.8 Gy daily dose between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.). After chemoradiotherapy, patients underwent surgery. The primary endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR) rate and toxicity.

Results

In 17 patients (20 %), total tumor regression was achieved according to Dworak pathological grading system. Grade III diarrhea occurred in nine patients (10.5 %), while only one patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade II or III proctitis were seen in nine (10.5 %) subjects, and grade I or II cystitis in six (6.9 %). Only three patients (3.3 %) developed hand and foot syndrome (both grade I–II). There were no grade IV toxicities.

Conclusions

Brunch Regimen for locally advanced rectal cancer consisting of neoadjuvant chronomodulated capecitabine and concurrent radiation therapy is effective and well tolerated with good safety profile, particularly with regard to the occurrence of hand and foot syndrome, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.     

放射治疗联合奥沙利铂与卡培他滨治疗局部晚期直肠癌的疗效观察

目的:评价术前放射治疗联合奥沙利铂与卡培他滨的方法治疗局部晚期(T3-4)直肠癌的临床疗效和安全性.方法:54 例局部晚期直肠癌患者接受术前盆腔放射治疗(50 Gy/25次),同步接受奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨的化疗方案(奥沙利铂 100 mg/m2 ,静脉滴注第1天和第22天;卡培他滨 825 mg/m2,口服 2次/d,第1～14天以及第22～35天).结果:54 例患者中有51 例接受了手术治疗,其中10 例(19.7%)患者获得了病理完全缓解(pathologic complete response, pCR),R0切除率为100%,保肛率为51.0%.1年和2年生存率分别为91.0%和83.8%.最常见的不良反应是血液学不良反应,3度以上的不良反应主要是贫血(1.9%)、白细胞减少(11.2%)和血小板减少(1.9%);最常见的非血液学不良反应是腹泻.结论:术前放射治疗联合卡培他滨与奥沙利铂的治疗方案对局部晚期直肠癌有一定的疗效,且不良反应率较低,是一种有效及较为安全的综合治疗方法.     

Phase I trial of preoperative hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with incorporated boost and oral capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and an incorporated boost with concurrent capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The eligibility criteria included adenocarcinoma of the rectum, T3-T4 and/or N1-N2 disease, performance status 0 or 1, and age > or =18 years. Photon IMRT and an incorporated boost were used to treat the whole pelvis to 45 Gy and the gross tumor volume plus 2 cm to 55 Gy in 25 treatments within 5 weeks. The study was designed to escalate the dose to the gross tumor volume in 5-Gy increments in 3-patient cohorts. Capecitabine was given orally 825 mg/m(2) twice daily for 7 days each week during RT. The primary endpoint was the maximal tolerated radiation dose, and the secondary endpoints were the pathologic response and quality of life. RESULTS: Eight patients completed RT at the initial dose level of 55 Gy. The study was discontinued because of toxicity-six Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 3 (38%) of 8 patients. All patients went on to definitive surgical resection, and no patient had a pathologically complete response. CONCLUSION: This regimen, using hypofractionated RT with an incorporated boost, had unacceptable toxicity despite using standard doses of capecitabine and IMRT. Additional research is needed to determine whether IMRT is able to reduce the side effects during and after pelvic RT with conventional dose fractionation.     

Phase II study of panitumumab,oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil,and concurrent radiotherapy as preoperative treatment in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer patients (StarPan/STAR-02 Study)

BackgroundThe aim of this phase II study was to assess the activity of panitumumab in combination with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and external radiotherapy (RT) as preoperative treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.Patients and methodsPatients had rectal adenocarcinoma, cT3N+ or cT4N-/+ stage, located <12 cm from the anal margin. Panitumumab was administered before the start of chemo-RT, and every 2 weeks in combination with 5-fluorouracil–oxaliplatin with concurrent RT. Rectal surgery was carried out 7–8 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant treatment. The primary end point was a pathological complete response rate of 25%.ResultsSixty patients were enrolled from February 2007 to October 2009. Fifty-five (91.7%) patients underwent surgery. Rate of pathological complete response was 21.1% (95% confidence interval 10.4% to 31.6%). Pathological downstaging occurred in 33 of 57 (57.9%) patients. Grade 3–4 toxicity during neoadjuvant treatment was diarrhea (38.9%), cutaneous reactions (18.6%), nausea (5.1%), asthenia (3.4%), anorexia (3.4%), and neutropenia (1.7%). One toxic death was observed for diarrhea.ConclusionsIn our study, the primary end point is not reached and panitumumab combination treatment was associated with high incidence of grade 3–4 diarrhea. The higher pathological complete response rate in comparison with the results of previous neoadjuvant rectal cancer trials with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies supports further studies necessary to understand the possibility of optimal regimens and sequences with chemo-RT.