New concepts for the treatment of pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas

Nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas form a group of rare tumors with a different biology and clinical behavior. The recently established European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group is organizing a new study devoted specifically to these tumors that were formerly treated according to the principles derived from experience with rhabdomyosarcoma, which is a clearly distinct entity. The new study includes two prospective trials, one for synovial sarcoma and the other for adult-type nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, the role of adjuvant therapy is not yet clear and our understanding of the biology and natural history of nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas is still incomplete. This review presents the latest data on nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma treatment and outcome, and the rationale behind a risk-adapted treatment program that investigates the role of full-dose ifosfamide–doxorubicin chemotherapy in improving the response rate of patients with unresectable disease, the chances of avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy in low-risk synovial sarcomas, and the possible role of chemotherapy in high-risk adult-type soft tissue sarcomas.     

Pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas

The nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTSs) are a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal cell neoplasms that account for about 4% of childhood cancers. Because each histologic subtype of NRSTS is rare, they have been poorly studied and little is known about their biology, natural history, or optimal treatment. Data from adults with soft tissue sarcomas provide some helpful insight, but adult and childhood NRSTSs differ considerably in the distribution of their histologic subtypes, and certain entities are known to behave differently in young children. The greater risks posed to children by treatment, particularly by radiotherapy, also must be considered in treatment planning for children. This article summarizes what is known to date about childhood NRSTS, including the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical approach to diagnosis and treatment of these tumors.     

Role of chemotherapy in pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas

The definition of nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas includes a varied group of malignant soft part tumors that can occur in childhood, but the majority are entities typically observed in adult age. Similar to their adult counterparts, pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas are usually considered scarcely sensitive to chemotherapy, but treatment strategies for these tumors have changed to some degree in recent years, and multiple-modality treatments that also include chemotherapy have increasingly been attempted. Subsets of patients with specific histological subtypes and prognostic variables have been thought likely to benefit from chemotherapy. The recent development of new molecular treatment approaches to specific tumor targets may enable the current limits of systemic therapies to be overcome in the near future, possibly identifying specific agents tailored to each histotype. While awaiting these developments, however, a better use of standard chemotherapy may prove important in improving the cure rate for these patients.     

Role of chemotherapy in pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas

The definition of nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas includes a varied group of malignant soft part tumors that can occur in childhood, but the majority are entities typically observed in adult age. Similar to their adult counterparts, pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas are usually considered scarcely sensitive to chemotherapy, but treatment strategies for these tumors have changed to some degree in recent years, and multiple-modality treatments that also include chemotherapy have increasingly been attempted. Subsets of patients with specific histological subtypes and prognostic variables have been thought likely to benefit from chemotherapy. The recent development of new molecular treatment approaches to specific tumor targets may enable the current limits of systemic therapies to be overcome in the near future, possibly identifying specific agents tailored to each histotype. While awaiting these developments, however, a better use of standard chemotherapy may prove important in improving the cure rate for these patients.     

New Therapeutic strategies for soft tissue sarcomas

Opinion statement The treatment of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is complex. There are limited agents available and many are associated with significant toxicity. When evaluating a patient with metastatic disease, physicians should ask themselves whether there is a role for surgery to render the patient free of disease. Combination chemotherapy in patients who have not received chemotherapy in the adjuvant set-ting is one option, particularly in a young patient with a good performance status. Sequential single-agent therapy for patients who are more elderly or debilitated by their disease may be more appropriate. Gemcitabine appears to be an agent with activity, particularly in patients with leiomyosarcomas. The data regarding prolonged gemcitabine infusions suggest improved activity that was predicted based on prolonged intracellular gemcitabine levels. Because of these data, the prolonged infusion schedule should be used. In addition, because of the paucity of effective agents, consideration of clinical trial participation for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic disease is appropriate, particularly in chemotherapy-insensitive histologies. The role of the newer agents (eg, ecteinascidin-743, epothilones, and mammalian target of rapamycin) is undefined. Ecteinascidin-743 has been the most extensively tested agent, and its ability to slow growth kinetics of a tumor and stabilize it clinically is intriguing. Data regarding the response to BMS-247550 will be published shortly and will help define the further role of epothilones in this disease. There is a preclinical rationale that makes the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors attractive for the treatment of muscle-derived neoplasms. In addition, there are cell-line data suggesting activity in rhabdomyosarcoma. These agents are being tested in adult STS and will likely be tested in pediatric histologies when there are more safety data available in that population. SU11248 will continue to be tested in patients refractory to imatinib mesylate and may well prove to be another active agent for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. As depicted by the analysis of gemcitabine efficacy, agents with activity in a subgroup of STS may be overlooked by the “come one come all” approach to clinical trials in STS. Identifying key targets in specific STS will be helpful in the testing of newer molecularly targeted agents. Biologic differences will support histology-specific trials to better understand the activity of an agent in a specific disease site or specifically target a biologic pathway with relevance to the malignant potential of the disease. For future clinical trials in STS to achieve the goal of histology-specific trials, cooperative group and multi-institutional trials will be required to obtain the appropriate patients with these rare histologies. It will also be increasingly important to be committed to obtaining tumor tissue in these patients to validate hypotheses regarding tumor biology and the effectiveness of therapeutic agents.     

Treatment options for children with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma

Nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas account for approximately 40% of all soft tissue sarcomas in children. Although these tumors are typically grouped together, individual tumor types with different biological characteristics have been found that may impact on the optimal therapy for each type of sarcoma in the future. Most of the current information regarding this tumor comes from the adult literature. Wide local excision appears to provide the best chance of cure. Future studies are needed to determine which adjuvant therapies are most useful in improving local control and overall survival in the different subsets of patients.     

New chemotherapeutic strategies for soft tissue sarcomas.

Advanced soft-tissue sarcomas are still incurable in the vast majority of patients. The currently available standard methods of treatment such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy have a very modest impact on the natural history of advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Nevertheless, until new strategies become widely available and applicable to this disease, we are obligated to optimize the current resources and make the best use of these modalities. We discuss the approaches of standard chemotherapy used in a dose-intensive fashion (especially in high-risk patients at an earlier stage), attempts to find new drugs with activity in this disease, and tests of the concepts of anti-angiogenic and differentiation therapy. To improve cure rates, patients and physicians must be encouraged to participate in multidisciplinary clinical trials.     

Gemcitabine in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare mesenchymal tumors with poor prognosis once they present as advanced or metastasized disease. Only few cytostatic drugs have been proven to be active in sarcoma patients and there is a clear need for further treatment options in patients with tumors refractory to standard chemotherapy. Gemcitabine, a nucleoside analogue, has shown activity in several epithelial tumors. Clinical data on the activity of gemcitabine in STS, however, are scarce and heterogeneous. In trials including all subtypes of sarcomas response rates observed with single and multiagent schedules are ranging from 3 to 53%. Histopathological subtypes which seem to exhibit an increased susceptibility to gemcitabine are uterine leiomyosarcomas and angiosarcomas. The synergistic role of other cytostatic drugs, e.g. the role of taxanes, still remains unclear and warrants further trials. We here review the available literature on gemcitabine in the treatment of STS.     

New drugs for the treatment of metastatic or refractory soft tissue sarcomas in children

Children with relapsed, recurrent or metastatic sarcomas represent a therapeutic challenge for the pediatric oncologist. Strategies for the development of newer therapies for children with these sarcomas have, in the past, been histology-specific. For example, drug development in rhabdomyosarcoma has relied upon the preclinical xenograft model, whereas therapies for pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas have mostly been derived from adult trials. The progress to date and the tools used in the treatment of advanced pediatric sarcomas will be summarized in this review.     

Clinical features and outcome of initially unresected nonmetastatic pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical features, response to therapy, and outcome of pediatric patients with initially unresected nonmetastatic nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the presenting clinical features and tumor characteristics of all 40 pediatric patients with initially unresected nonmetastatic NRSTS who were seen at our institution between March 1962 and December 1996. A subset of 27 patients for whom complete treatment information was available was analyzed to determine whether response to therapy was associated with local disease control and event-free and overall survival. RESULTS: More than 70% of the 40 patients had tumors with high-risk features (tumor size > 5 cm, high grade, invasiveness). For the 27 patients included in the outcome analysis, 5-year event-free survival and survival estimates were 33% +/- 9% and 56% +/- 10%, respectively. Ten (37%) of these patients had a complete or partial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and only two of the 10 had residual tumor after surgery. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy seemed more effective than either modality alone in inducing a response, but the response to neoadjuvant therapy did not predict outcome. Most treatment failures were local, and postrelapse survival was poor (19% +/- 10%). CONCLUSION: Initially unresected NRSTS constitutes a unique subgroup of pediatric sarcomas that commonly present with high-risk features and respond poorly to neoadjuvant therapy. Only about one third of patients treated with multimodal therapy remain disease-free, and local control is the major limiting factor in achieving cure. More effective risk-directed treatments are needed for this unique subgroup of patients.     

Fast neutrons in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas

Results of treatment of 101 cases of soft tissue sarcoma are presented in the paper. Preoperative irradiation technique and radical program of treatment are described. Combined radiation and surgical treatment was given to 45 patients whereas conservative--to 56. Sixty-three cases received adjuvant combination chemotherapy. Response and three-year survival rates were compared to those in control group treated by photons. The results observed in patients of combined and conservative treatment groups who had been irradiated with fast neutrons proved significantly better than in controls. These data suggest vistas in application of fast neutron irradiation for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.     

Antiangiogenesis agents in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies that includes >50 different subtypes, each with unique clinical and pathologic qualities. In general, there is a 50% cure rate, and most cures are achieved with complete surgical resection with or without radiation therapy. The results from chemotherapeutic agents for unresectable or metastatic disease have been disappointing with minimal long‐term benefit. New targeted and novel agents are needed to improve response and survival. Tumor angiogenesis has been an intense focus in cancer therapy over the past decade. Several of numerous antiangiogenesis agents have been developed, and many already have been approved for the treatment of both solid and liquid tumors. Certain STSs are highly vascular tumors that often demonstrate angiogenesis markers. The objective of this review was to evaluate these angiogenesis markers in defining the role of angiogenesis in the treatment of patients with STS. In addition, the authors conducted an in‐depth review of the results from using key antiangiogenesis agents in the treatment of STS. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

屏障切除术治疗软组织肉瘤

软组织肉瘤以手术切除为首选的治疗原则是国内外的共识。切除的方法主要以距肉瘤的远近来确定切缘,然而距离肉瘤多少厘米进行切除尚未有统一的标准,使临床实践无所遵循。屏障切除术摈弃了切缘距离的理论,选择有阻挡肉瘤生长的屏障组织作为设计切缘的依据,使得术前设计和术中解剖看得见、摸得着。由于是屏障性切缘,因而复发率明显下降。将屏障切除和修复重建结合,即降低了复发率又恢复了功能,相得益彰。     

Intraarterial adriamycin in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas

Ten patients with extremity sarcomas adriamycin 60 mg/M² into the artery supp supplying the area of tumor. There were minimal local side effects consisting of occasional local erythema or slight transitory pain. Nine of these patients had subsequent surgery, and an average 32.86% histologic tumor necrosis was recorded in the peripherally viable areas of seven patients with residual tumor, compared to a 5.71 % necrosis recorded in the biopsy sections (P value < 0.01).     

腺泡状软组织肉瘤的临床治疗分析

目的探讨腺泡状软组织肉瘤手术切除及辅助放、化疗的临床治疗效果。方法对1993～2006年间收治的腺泡状软组织肉瘤12例回顾性分析。男5例,女7例。年龄11～37岁。肿瘤直径平均5.5cm。结果12例手术后切除缘评价中,达到广泛切除缘者10例,边缘切除缘者2例,术后辅助放疗2例,全组均予辅助化疗。12例手术后复发3例,占25%。有7例发生转移,首诊时转移2例,其中肺转移瘤5例,脑转移瘤2例。转移率58.3%。转移瘤单纯化疗5例中PR3例,NC1例,PD1例,3例PR患者均采用MAI方案。随访时间10个月～10年6个月,12例中7例生存,5例死亡,经过Kaolan-Meire生存率计算,3年生存率81.2%,5年生存率52.8%。结论腺泡状软组织肉瘤外科治疗应以广泛切除术为基本原则,术后辅助放疗可以减少复发,辅助化疗是转移瘤的主要治疗方法。     

Centralised treatment of soft tissue sarcomas in adults

The clinical research developed in specialised centres and oncologic cooperative groups has permitted various scientific societies to collect recommendations used in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and incorporate them into clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Some studies have been conducted in diverse healthcare ambits to assess the influence of CPG. This revision of the medical literature analyses the impact that healthcare management -centralised or otherwise- and clinical practice in conformity with CPG have on the clinical outcome variables of STS. Eight CPG have been identified, as well as 12 conformity studies or audits. These conformity studies and audits demonstrate that the grade of adaptation of medical interventions with CPG, medical healthcare in reference centres and procedures of referrals to these centres, as well as the process of organising healthcare teams into Sarcoma Committees, have a significant influence on clinical outcome. We can conclude that excellent healthcare of STS implies the adaptation of healthcare practice to CPG, the existence of Reference Centres guided by Sarcoma Committees, and the observance of strict referral procedures within the Healthcare Area.     

Pediatric soft tissue sarcomas

Many of the soft tissue sarcomas that occur in children are of the same histology as those in adults; however, the relative prevalence of these sarcomas is different between children and adults. In some cases, the biologic behavior of pediatric sarcomas is more benign than that in adults. Treatment for sarcomas in children is also different. Pediatric sarcomas are more commonly responsive to chemotherapy. Furthermore, in children who are still growing, surgery and radiation are associated with higher morbidity than in adults. This article discusses the diagnosis and treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma and undifferentiated sarcomas, with an emphasis on surgical considerations, and the diagnosis and treatment of nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas in children.     

Pelvic soft tissue sarcomas

Pelvic soft tissue sarcomas (PSTS) are a rare, heterogeneous group of tumors. They have been usually analyzed with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS), but actually have key differences. Due to their unique anatomic location, symptomatic presentation of PSTS may be more common than RPS. Adequate imaging approach is paramount for guiding differential diagnosis, while preoperative biopsy is mandatory, especially when preoperative treatment may be considered as initial approach. The most frequent histologic subtype is leiomyosarcoma, which is different as expected in the retroperitoneum where liposarcoma is the commonest histology. Also solitary fibrous tumor is commonly diagnosed in the pelvis. Surgical approach for PSTS differs from that for RPS mainly due to anatomic relations. Similarly, in the lack of definite evidence from specific trials about neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments, the anatomic constraints to obtain wide margins in the pelvis as well as the expected functional outcome in case of organ resections should be factored into decision for individualized treatment offer. Vascular and genitourinary involvement are frequent, as well as herniation through pelvic foramina. For these reasons a multidisciplinary surgical team should always be considered. Early referral of these patients to high-volume centers is critical and may impact on survival, given that optimal initial resection is a major predictor of curative treatment. International consensus on PSTS treatment is advocated, similarly to the recent efforts realized for RPS.     

Combined-modality treatment of localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities

Over the past 20 years, considerable progress has been made in the treatment of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas. There has been a migration away from amputation toward treatment by excision plus radiation for most patients with localized tumors. Decisions about the optimal use and sequencing of surgery and radiation remain complex. Whereas it is clear that local control is probably not impacted significantly by the treatment sequence, rates of wound complication, fibrosis, and edema are affected by the treatment sequence. In addition, recent single-institution reports indicate that some carefully selected patients can be treated by surgery alone. The recent data evaluating treatment by surgery alone and treatment sequencing variables do not lead to a situation in which clear, uniform recommendations for treatment can be made for many patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Indeed, treatment planning for patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma in the new millennium is infinitely more complex than it was in the era when amputation was the primary treatment for these patients. Considerable clinical experience and multidisciplinary input are required for optimal treatment planning for these patients. Future research should be directed at refining the indications for specific therapies, reducing the toxicities of local therapies, and developing more effective systemic therapies.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare mesenchymal neoplasms with considerable heterogeneity in biologic behavior and response to systemic therapy. Most patients present with localized disease and are potentially curable with multidisciplinary treatment. In patients with a high risk of developing metastatic disease, optimal use of neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy has a definite role in improving patient outcomes by decreasing local and distant recurrences. Histology-specific clinical trials enrolling a homogenous high-risk population have been more successful in demonstrating benefit than larger trials with unselected heterogeneous patient populations. In specific histologic subtypes responsive to chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with close monitoring of response is recommended.