Preparation of white cell-reduced red cells by filtration: comparison of a bedside filter and two blood bank filter systems

BACKGROUND: Concern has been raised about the quality of white cell (WBC)-reduced red cells (RBCs) obtained by bedside filtration. The bedside performance and workload of a routine bedside filter have been compared to the laboratory performance and workload of two blood bank filter systems. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Buffy coat-depleted saline- adenine-glucose-mannitol (SAGM) RBCs (90 units) were prepared. Thirty units were filtered with each of the two blood bank filter systems, and 30 units were filtered (but not transfused) with the bedside filter in a clinical department after 8 to 24 days of storage. The RBCs lost and the postfiltration WBC content (Nageotte chamber) were determined for all filtered units, and the workload associated with filtration by each of the filter systems/filter was assessed. Units with a postfiltration content of > or = 2 × 10(6) WBCs were regarded as filtration failures. RESULTS: Four (13%) of the 30 units filtered at the bedside were filtration failures, compared to no failures with either of the blood bank filter systems. In addition, the median WBC content (0.14 × 10(6)) of the units filtered at the bedside (2 units/filter) was significantly higher than that of the units filtered in the blood bank (0.05 × 10(6)). The RBC loss was significantly higher with the filter systems than with the bedside filter, provided 2 units per filter were processed with the latter. The timed workload of the filter systems was 45 to 75 minutes per 12 units, which was similar to the time required for bedside filtration. CONCLUSION: Bedside filtration of 2 units of stored buffy coat-depleted SAGM RBCs per filter resulted in a higher incidence of filtration failure and higher postfiltration WBC content than did laboratory filtration of 1 unit of fresh buffy coat-depleted SAGM RBCs per filter with either of two blood bank filter systems.     

A multicenter study on the efficiency of white cell reduction by filtration of red cells

To evaluate accurately the current performance of filtration, the French Produits Sanguins Labiles study group, composed of 21 transfusion teams, conducted a large-scale 6-month study involving over 1400 filtrations and 3000 controls. Some 745 standard red cell concentrates (RBC concentrates) and 690 concentrates previously white cell (WBC)-reduced by removal of buffy coat (BC-poor RBC concentrates) were filtered using six commercially available filters: at least 170 results were collected per filter, spread among a minimum of three teams. Prefiltration controls show that the removal (manual and automated) of the buffy coat results in an initial WBC reduction of approximately 63 percent, along with a hemoglobin loss of 4 g (7%). After filtration, residual WBCs were counted in the Nageotte manual counting chamber. The reliability of this counting method, which is simple and adapted to low WBC concentrations, was characterized in this study by a 25-percent coefficient of variation (CV) for a concentration of 2.5 WBCs per microL (i.e, 0.6 x 10(6) WBCs/filtered unit). The analysis of the results shows that, for five of six filters (1 filter was excluded), the postfiltration median value of residual WBCs was 1.1 x 10(6) in filtered RBC concentrates (n = 590), whereas it was 0.34 x 10(6) in filtered BC-poor RBC concentrates (n = 581). The difference is significant (p less than 10(-8), Wilcoxon test). Hemoglobin loss due to filtration varies according to the filter, from 5.7 +/- 2.2 to 17.3 +/- 2.5 g.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Research and development in the blood bank: Efforts of a hospital donor center to improve efficiency of in-line leukocyte reduction filters for automated plateletpheresis

In-line leukocyte reduction filters (LRF) are available for use with an automated plateletpheresis (PPH) system. Initially, 62% of PPH units produced with such a filter (LRF6, N = 29) had postfiltration (POF) white blood cell (WBC) counts <5 × 10⁶, with a mean POF WBC of 42 × 10⁶. In an attempt to decrease POF WBCs, PPH were rested 30 to 60 minutes before filtration with LRF6. A new, larger-volume LRF (LRF10) was also assessed for its efficiency of leukodepletion. A total of 625 PPH, 490 filtered with LRF6 and 135 with LRF10, were evaluated using prefiltration (PRF) and POF samples. Mean prefiltration WBC loads averaged 80 × 10⁶ (range, 60–88 × 10⁶) using seven combinations of filters, collection software, and PRF rest periods. Ninety-three percent of PPH units rested prior to filtration with LRF6 (N = 237) had <5 × 10⁶ WBC POF, with a mean of 5 × 10⁶ WBC POF. All PPH units filtered with LRF10 (N = 135), whether rested or not, had <5 × 10⁶ WBC POF, with a mean WBC count of 0.2 × 10⁶ POF. Mean platelet (PLT) yields POF ranged from 3.1 to 3.4 × 10¹¹. A PRF rest decreased mean POF WBC counts in products filtered with LRF6. The LRF10 consistently produced PPH with <5 × 10⁶ WBC POF. Blood centers must thoroughly validate equipment utilized in the production of blood components.     

WBC reduction in RBC concentrates by prestorage filtration: multicenter experience

BACKGROUND: As universal leukocyte (WBC) reduction (ULR) is being considered as a new standard, few data are available on the performance of WBC-reduction filtration in routine practice. The performance of WBC-reduction in RBCs, using varied filtration practices, in meeting the current FDA requirement (<5 x 10(6)), Council of Europe (EC) recommendation, the proposed FDA requirement (<1 x 10(6)), and a more stringent proposal (<5 x 10(5)) for residual WBCs per RBC unit was assessed and compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Participating facilities were the 11 sites of the Viral Activation Transfusion Study (VATS), a prospective study of the impact of transfusion with and without WBC-reduction on survival and HIV viral load in HIV-1-infected patients. Patients randomly assigned to undergo WBC reduction were required to receive RBCs < or =14 days old that had undergone prestorage (within 72 hours of collection) WBC-reduction filtration by a method devised to achieve a postfiltration WBC count of <5 x 10(6). Residual WBC quantitation was performed by PCR in the central VATS laboratory by using frozen WBC-reduced RBC samples obtained at issue for transfusion. RESULTS: A total of 1869 WBC-reduced RBC units were studied. Filtration practices varied within and between sites. There were significant differences in mean residual WBC counts at the 11 sites (p<0.001). Among the WBC-reduced RBC units, 0.8 percent exceeded 5 x 10(6) WBCs per unit, 8.3 percent exceeded 1 x 10(6) WBCs per unit, and 14.3 percent exceeded 5 x 10(5) WBCs per unit. CONCLUSION: Residual WBCs in WBC-reduced RBC units vary within and between sites. WBC reduction was successful, in that over 99 percent and 91 percent of VATS WBC-reduced RBC units met US and EC thresholds, respectively. However, the small but measurable failure rate indicates that not every unit will meet these guidelines.     

Quality control of white cell-reduced red cells: white cell preservation and simplified counting

BACKGROUND: White cell (WBC) degradation restricts the interval between the filtration process and the assay for residual WBCs. Maintaining WBC integrity would permit extended sample storage for batching and/or shipment to centralized laboratories. The usual quality control assay for WBC-reduced red cell units requires determining the number of WBCs in the entire counting area of a Nageotte hemocytometer, which consists of 40 rows. Reducing the counting area would simplify the quality control procedure. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Adsol red cell units were prepared either on the day of collection (Day 0) or on Day 1 and WBC reduced by filtration on the same day. By using prefiltration and postfiltration red cells, samples containing WBC concentrations of 15, 10, and 3 WBCs per microL were prepared by serial dilution. Identical samples were treated with glutaraldehyde and stored at either 20 to 24 degrees C or 1 to 6 degrees C. All samples were assayed on the day of component preparation and on Days 7 and 14. The numbers of WBCs corresponding to 10- and 40-row areas of the Nageotte hemocytometer were determined. RESULTS: For the conditions and WBC concentration range studied, no significant changes in WBC concentrations were observed through Day 14 for glutaraldehyde-treated samples stored at either temperature, although there were substantial decreases in untreated samples. A 10-row measurement was determined to be sufficient for identifying WBC-reduced red cell units passing the present limit of 5 × 10(6) residual WBCs. CONCLUSION: Glutaraldehyde treatment can preserve WBCs in red cell samples at least up to Day 14, which provides increased efficiency in quality control for laboratories. Current red cell WBC-reduction filters produce components that, when assayed, contain fewer than 10 WBCs per full counting area. The simplified procedure would allow reduction of the counting area by 75 percent.     

Improved removal of white cells with minimal platelet loss by filtration of apheresis platelets during collection

BACKGROUND: Filtration of apheresis platelets to remove white cells (WBCs) requires operator intervention after the collection procedure (postcollection filtration), which may cause variable and unsatisfactory filter performance (WBC removal and platelet loss). The MCS+ LN9000 apheresis system filters platelets through a WBC-reduction filter during each collection cycle (continuous filtration) at a flow rate of 15 to 25 mL per minute. Apheresis platelets obtained by continuous filtration were evaluated in terms of platelet loss, WBC removal, and platelet storage properties and then were compared to unfiltered apheresis platelets and to apheresis platelets that underwent postcollection filtration. Two WBC-reduction filters were tested (LRF6 and LRFXL). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 70 apheresis platelets, postcollection filtration was performed by using the LRF6 at flow rates of 80 mL per minute (n = 30) and 50 mL per minute (n = 30) and the LRFXL at 50 mL per minute (n = 10). One hundred fifty-eight apheresis platelets underwent continuous filtration through the LRF6 (n = 58) or the LRFXL (n = 100). Unfiltered apheresis platelets (controls) (n = 30) were obtained by the same collection protocol. RESULTS: Estimated platelet loss with continuous filtration was 7 percent for the LRFXL and 3 percent for the LRF6. A reduction in the filtration flow rate from 80 to 50 mL per minute with postcollection filtration through the LRF6 resulted in markedly lower WBC levels, with 10 percent versus 57 percent of the apheresis platelets having WBC counts <1 × 10⁵, respectively. Additional improvements in WBC removal were found with continuous filtration; 85 percent of the apheresis platelets filtered with the LRF6 and 100 percent of the apheresis platelets filtered with the LRFXL had WBC counts <1 × 10⁵. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous or postcollection filtration of freshly collected apheresis platelets resulted in minimal platelet loss. Better WBC removal from apheresis platelets was obtained with continuous filtration than with postcollection filtration, likely because of the slower flow rate. Platelet storage quality was not affected by filtration.     

Comparison of platelet loss during leukocyte reduction at 4, 24, and 48 hours postcollection using a closed system apheresis kit with integral filter

Prestorage leukocyte reduction of platelet concentrates may reduce adverse effects of transfusion while affording better quality control. Platelets and leukocytes may undergo activation during storage, which could affect the performance of leukocyte reduction filters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of leukocyte reduction and concomitant platelet loss with a new apheresis kit with an integral leukocyte reduction filter. Twelve donors underwent plateletpheresis on three occasions using the CS-3000 PLUS Blood Cell Separator with the Access™ Management System and the Access™ Closed System Apheresis Kit with Integral Sepacell® Leukocyte Reduction Filter and Double Return Line Needle (Baxter-Fenwal Division, Deerfield, IL). Of the three products from each donor, one each was filtered at 4, 24, and 48 hours completion of the plateletpheresis. Mean prefiltration platelet count was 4.43 × 10¹¹ and mean postfiltration platelet count was 3.56 × 10¹¹. Mean platelet recovery at 4, 24, and 48 hours filtration was 75%, 83%, and 84%, respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that platelet recovery with filtration at four hours was significantly less than with filtration at 24 hours (P = 0.0236) and filtration at 48 hours (P = 0.0122). Platelet recovery with filtration at 24 hour did not differ significantly from filtration at 48 hours (P = 0.7684). Mean prefiltration WBC count was 0.93 × 10⁶ and mean postfiltration WBC count was 0.12 × 10⁶. Efficiency of leukocyte reduction was not significantly related to when filtration was performed. There was no significant variation from donor to donor in platelet recovery or in leukocyte reduction efficiency. This method of prestorage leukocyte reduction demonstrated slightly but statistically significantly better platelet recovery with filtration at 24 or 48 hours after platelet collection compared to four hours. All filtration times provided acceptable platelet yields with very low residual WBC. J. Clin. Apheresis 12:14–17, 1997 © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Filtration of RBC units:effect of storage time and temperature on filter performance

BACKGROUND: The influence of time, temperature, and rate of filtration on the efficacy of WBC reduction of RBC units was studied in a controlled, paired-donor format. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten donors underwent whole-blood phlebotomy on two to four occasions each. Units were filtered (RCXL-1, Pall Biomedical) under laboratory conditions and gravity flow as follows: 1) after 0 to 2 hours of storage at 22 degrees C, 2) after 7 to 8 hours at 22 degrees C, 3) after 14 days of storage at 4 degrees C, and 4) under mock bedside conditions after 14 days of storage at 4 degrees C. Prefiltration and postfiltration cell counts and prefiltration WBC CD11a expression were assessed on Days 0 and 14. RESULTS: WBC content before filtration was 2.20 and 2.34 x 10(9) (p>0.05) for units stored for 2 and 8 hours (Groups 1 and 2) and declined to 52.8 and 7. 57 x 10(4) (p<0.01) after filtration. The efficacy of WBC reduction in units stored for 14 days was similar to that in units stored for 8 hours, but absolute postfiltration WBC counts were significantly lower because of a 0.6 log reduction in the starting WBC count after 14 days of storage (postfiltration WBC content of 1.02 and 2.31 x 10(4) for units filtered under laboratory vs. bedside conditions [p>0.05]). Filtration under bedside conditions was associated with a greater degree of variation in residual WBC counts than laboratory filtration. WBC reduction by filtration was significantly greater in units stored for at least 8 hours (Groups 2, 3, and 4) than in those stored for less than 2 hours (4.59 log vs. 3.83 log reduction in WBC content, p<0.05). Surface expression of leukocyte function antigen 1 as measured by CD11a was similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: WBC reduction of RBC units by filtration was least effective when performed within 2 hours of collection. Efficacy of WBC reduction increased significantly after the units were stored for 8 hours to 14 days, without significant differences between these storage intervals. Laboratory filtration yielded more consistent results than did mock bedside filtration. Temperature and filtration rate had no effect on the efficacy of WBC reduction by filtration.     

The effect of whole-blood storage time on the number of white cells and platelets in whole blood and in white cell-reduced red cells

BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) can be stored for some time before it is processed into components. After introduction of universal white cell (WBC) reduction, it was observed that longer WB storage was associated with more residual WBCs in the WBC-reduced red cells (RBCs). Also, weak propidium iodide (PI)-positive events were observed in the flow cytometric WBC counting method, presumably WBC fragments. The effect of storage time on the composition of WB and subsequently prepared WBC-reduced RBCs was studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: WB was collected in bottom-and-top collection systems with inline filters, obtained from Baxter, Fresenius, or MacoPharma. Units were stored at room temperature and separated into components in 4-hour intervals between 4 and 24 hours after collection. RBCs were WBC-reduced by inline filtration (approx. 50/group). RESULTS: Platelet (PLT) counts were lower in WB stored for 4 to 8 hours compared to 20 to 24 hours (mean +/- SD): 79 +/- 31 versus 102 +/- 30 for Baxter (p < 0.01); 91 +/- 31 versus 101 +/- 35 for Fresenius (not significant); and 73 +/- 47 versus 97 +/- 31 (all x 10(9) per unit) for MacoPharma (p < 0.01), respectively. The median residual WBC counts in WBC-reduced RBCs for WB stored for 4 to 8 and 20 to 24 hours were 0.03 versus 0.17 for Baxter (p < 0.001), 0.00 versus 0.06 for Fresenius (p < 0.001), and 0.13 versus 0.26 (all x 10(6) per unit) for MacoPharma (not significant), respectively. All WBC-reduced RBCs contained fewer than 5 x 10(6) WBCs per unit. A longer storage time of WB was associated with more weak PI-positive events, irrespective of the filter. CONCLUSION: Longer storage of WB before processing results in counting higher numbers of PLTs in WB, higher numbers of WBCs in WBC-reduced RBCs, and more weak PI-positive events.     

Validation of use of the Nageotte hemocytometer to count low levels of white cells in white cell-reduced platelet components

BACKGROUND: Determination of the white cell (WBC) count in WBC-reduced platelet components requires methods that have a detection limit in the range of approximately 5.0 × 10(2) to 5.0 × 10(4) per mL. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With a 50-microL Nageotte hemocytometer and bright-field microscopy (200x magnification), studies were conducted to develop and validate a method that could be used routinely with filtered and apheresis-harvested platelets. A 1-in-5 dilution of sample with a commercially available blood-diluting fluid was used because, with a lower (1-in-2) dilution, the observed number of WBCs was substantially less than the number expected at relatively high platelet counts (> 1.9 × 10(9)/mL). RESULTS: The observed and expected WBC counts in WBC- reduced platelet samples correlated well at levels between approximately 5 and 1100 WBCs per counting area (5.0 × 10(2)-1.1 × 10(5)/mL). At levels of more than 300 to 400 WBCs per counting area, accurate counts were obtained when 10 of the 40 rectangles were counted. CONCLUSION: These studies provide data to confirm that the 50- microL Nageotte hemocytometer can be used to accurately count low levels of WBCs in platelet components.     

Clinical trial and local process evaluation of an apheresis system for preparation of white cell-reduced platelet components

BACKGROUND: A new method for the consistent preparation of white cell (WBC)-reduced plateletpheresis components, the Spectra Leukoreduction System (LRS), was evaluated by clinical trial and local process validation. The centrifuge-based system was projected to decrease the WBC content of plateletpheresis components to a level below 1 × 10(6) per unit. Phase I and II clinical trials were performed. The manufacturer's claims were then tested at the local level with an ongoing quality assurance program. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In Phase I, a cross-over analysis of five subjects compared LRS to standard plateletpheresis procedures in collection efficiency and component quality: a panel of in vitro measures was taken on Day 0 and Day 5. In Phase II, the LRS process was tested on a larger scale (n = 57; control = 58) with component transfusion. Finally, validation, determination of degree of conformance with standards, and ongoing quality control were performed locally on a newly installed instrument. RESULTS: Phase I and II trials revealed no significant differences between LRS and control units in donor or recipient safety and comfort, platelet function and yield, or component volume. WBC per-unit values were significantly different: the LRS median per unit was 3.2 × 10(4) WBCs, versus 81.4 × 10(4) for control units. Assessment of process capability gave an estimate of 99-percent confidence that 99.5 percent of LRS units would be WBC reduced to < 1 × 10(6) WBCs. Local process validation and quality control revealed 90-percent confidence that 99 percent of the units would be WBC reduced and 99.9-percent confidence that 75 percent would exceed platelet yield standards; the process was stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: The LRS is safe for apheresis and the component produced is safe for transfusion with platelet function and yield equivalent to controls and WBC reduction superior to controls. Local process evaluation confirmed that component quality meets the goals of the institution.     

White cell-reduced red cells prepared by filtration: a critical evaluation of current filters and methods for counting residual white cells

White cell (WBC) reduction, red cell (RBC) recovery, and filtration time were determined in 1-day-old standard and buffy coat-depleted RBCs filtered in the laboratory through six commercial filters for WBC reduction. Residual WBCs were counted with a Burker chamber (BC), with a Nageotte chamber (NC), and by flow cytometry (FC). Results show that BC counts were 0 in several cases in which WBCs were detected with NC and FC, which indicated that the traditional BC method is too insensitive in use with currently available filters. Calibration curves performed by FC and with NC with samples containing known concentrations of WBCs from 1000 to 1 per microL showed that both FC and NC detected, on average, 67 percent of WBCs present in the samples (efficiency). However, the efficiency of FC showed small variability (61-70%) at different WBC levels, whereas the variability with NC was large (39-91%). This greater variability prevented the correction of NC counts by using a single factor and indicated difficulty in NC standardization. Therefore, because our main aim was to compare different filters rather than to define absolute levels of WBC contamination, uncorrected FC and NC counts were chosen to be reported. True WBC counts per unit should not exceed values that can be obtained by dividing uncorrected counts by the lowest efficiencies (61% for FC and 39% for NC). Uncorrected NC and FC counts were below 2 × 10(6) per unit in all units processed through three of the filters and below 5 × 10(6) per unit in all units processed through the other three.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

White cells in fresh-frozen plasma: evaluation of a new white cell- reduction filter

BACKGROUND: Fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) has generally been regarded as an acellular component. Recently, viable lymphocytes have been detected in this component and the question of irradiation of FFP for certain patients has been raised. Whether the numbers of white cells (WBCs) in FFP are sufficient to require WBC-reduction of acellular components for patients receiving WBC-reduced cellular components has not been determined. WBC numbers in FFP were examined, and the performance of a new commercial WBC-reduction filter for FFP was assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: WBC numbers in plasma processed for use as FFP and in thawed FFP were counted before and after WBC-reduction filtration by the use of flow cytometry Fast and slow filtration was used to simulate laboratory and bedside filtration, respectively. Three different methods for plasma harvesting (soft-spin, hard-spin, and second-spin methods) were assessed. The filter capacity was also examined. RESULTS: The numbers of WBCs in plasma covered a three-log10 range (soft-spin method, 0.04-3.6 × 10(6); hard-spin method, 0.47-45.4 × 10(6); second- spin method, 0.4–37.2 × 10(6)). For the hard-spin and second-spin methods which produced the greatest plasma yields, 92 percent and 85.7 percent of bags, respectively, had counts>1 × 10(6) and 43 percent (hard-spin method) and 45.7 percent (second-spin method) had counts>5 × 10(6). There was no significant difference between the counts obtained in plasma and thawed FFP. The filter reduced WBC numbers to <1 × 10(5) in all but 3 of 49 bags. In the remaining three, there were <2 × 10(5) WBCs. Five bags of plasma could be processed effectively through each filter. CONCLUSION: FFP may contain WBC numbers above the threshold at which the use of WBC-reduction filters for cellular components in some patients is necessary. Confirmation of these findings and similar investigations on plasma prepared by other methods may help in defining a role for the use of WBC-reduction filters for FFP     

Preparation of white cell-reduced platelet concentrates from whole blood during component preparation

This article introduces a new method of component preparation that is capable of producing white cell (WBC)-reduced platelet concentrates (PCs) from whole blood. Whole blood is separated into packed red cells (RBCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) by centrifugation, and the PRP is expressed through a newly designed WBC removal filter into the platelet storage bag. The filtered PRP is then centrifuged and yields WBC-reduced PCs and plasma for freezing as fresh-frozen plasma (FFP). The method uses standard triple-pack blood bags and centrifugation protocols. Fifteen WBC-reduced PCs prepared with this technique had an average volume of 56.7 mL, an average Day 5 platelet content of 8.6 x 10(10) per unit, and an average Day 5 WBC content of 0.83 +/- 0.7 x 10(4) per unit (0.14 WBCs/microL). This represents WBC removal equal to at least 99.9 percent (3 log10) of the WBCs found in standard PCs prepared in our laboratory by an identical centrifugation protocol. Paired studies documented a 4.5-percent platelet loss by filtration. Filtration had no effect on the plasma prepared for FFP as measured by prothrombin time; activated partial thromboplastin time; factors I, V, VIII:C, and VIII:von Willebrand factor; antithrombin-III; albumin; globulin; or total protein. This method holds promise as a simple and highly effective technique for the production of WBC-reduced PCs by filtration during component preparation.     

Quality control of red cell filtration at the patient's bedside

BACKGROUND: Concern has been raised about the quality of white cell (WBC) reduction in blood components when it is performed by filtration at the patient's bedside. Thus, the quality of red cell (RBC) filtration performed at the bedside through two new flatbed WBC- reduction filters was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In the laboratory, 25 and 10 RBC units suspended in additive solution were stored for 1 to 2 and 14 to 21 days, respectively, and filtered through each filter. At the end of filtration, an automated complete blood count and a manual WBC count (Nageotte chamber) were determined in two samples collected from 1) a segment clamped at 5 and 25 cm below the filter along the line connecting prefiltration and postfiltration bags and 2) the postfiltration bag. In addition, 10 of the 11 nurses of the hematology outpatient clinic administered to hematologic patients 25 RBC units stored for 1 to 2 days through each type of filter. At the end of transfusion, a segment was collected from the transfusion set and a WBC count was performed as described above. No filter priming or rinsing with saline was done. RESULTS: WBC counts obtained after laboratory filtration in the segments were similar to those obtained from the postfiltration bags and from the segments collected at the bedside in all cases, with the exception of 14- to 21-day-old RBCs filtered in the laboratory through one of the filters, which produced slightly higher WBC counts in the segments than were seen in the postfiltration bags. The difference was not significant. In no case was the count in the postfiltration bag higher than that in the segment. Nurse training was easy, and bedside filtration was associated with no untoward effects. CONCLUSION: The RBC filtration at the patient's bedside can be equal in quality to that performed in the laboratory, at least in such clinical settings as hematology and oncology departments in which blood transfusion is common practice, and if simple training is provided to the nursing staff. Under the conditions of this study, it seems that quality control of RBC bedside filtration is feasible and simple.     

Counting of residual WBCs in WBC-reduced blood components: a multicenter evaluation of a microvolume fluorimeter by the United Kingdom National Blood Service

BACKGROUND: Implementation of universal WBC reduction of blood components means that automated analytical methods may be the only satisfactory way for production laboratories to meet increased testing requirements. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter study on the performance of a microvolume fluorimeter (IMAGN 2000, Becton Dickinson) was undertaken on 519 RBC, 353 platelet, and 27 fresh plasma units. RESULTS: WBC counts for the RBC samples ranged from 0.02 to 6.94 x 10(6) per unit (mean, 0.57) as determined by FC and from 0.02 to 5.53 x 10(6) per unit (mean, 0.40) as determined by MVF with a mean FC bias of +0.15 x 10(6) WBCs per unit, and discrepancies outside the 95% limits of agreement were mainly associated with higher FC counts. The series of platelet samples showed means of 0.90 (range, 0.06-19.45) and 0.66 (range, 0.01-18.95) x 10(6) WBCs per unit for FC and MVF methods, respectively. FC and MVF results were in good agreement at low counts, although significant discrepancies were noted at higher counts. Overall, for the platelet units, there was a mean FC bias of +0.34 x 10(6) WBCs per unit. The intermethod agreement exceeded 99 percent for both types of blood component when the single (both UK and United States) decision point of 5.0 x 10(6) WBCs per unit was applied. The mean WBC counts for the 27 analyzed fresh plasma units were 61.8, 56.0, and 46.0 per microL by Nageotte hemocytometry, FC, and MVF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation found that the level of intersite consistency for FC was relatively poor compared to that for MVF. The results nevertheless validated the broad equivalence of FC and MVF results for the current Council of Europe and UK/US decision points of <1.0 and <5.0 x 10(6) WBCs per unit.     

WBC filtration of whole blood after prolonged storage at ambient temperature by use of an in-line filter collection system

BACKGROUND: Before-storage WBC reduction by filtration appears to be an effective way to prevent transfusion-associated complications. It also has superiority over WBC reduction at the time of transfusion (bedside), due to the many variables associated with such practice and the difficulty in performing adequate quality control. To determine the adaptability of collection systems containing in-line filters to the current blood collection strategy, the feasibility, efficiency, and quality of before-storage WBC reduction of whole blood (WB) units were evaluated, following their prolonged storage at ambient temperature prior to component preparation, by use of an integral in-line filter. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood was collected from random donors into quadruple blood pack units with an integral in-line filter and divided into three groups, according to storage conditions. WBC reduction was performed at room temperature, on WB units after storage at ambient temperature either for less than 8 or up to 18 hours on 1,4-butanediol cooling trays or for 18 hours in the cold. RESULTS: All the filtration procedures met the AABB threshold of less than 5 x 10(6) residual WBCs per unit and the European requirements for WBC counts of less than 1 x 10(6) WBCs per unit. The average filtration time was less than 22 minutes in all units studied. Filtration time and blood flow rate were both significantly longer, and RBC loss was significantly higher in WB units that were filtered after prolonged storage in the cold. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate before-storage WBC reduction can be achieved when performed on WB units, which were stored at ambient temperature for 18 hours, by use of an in-line filtration system. The procedure, performed under relatively simple logistics, results in good-quality, standard components, which require no further modifications when supplied to the transfusion services.     

Multicenter evaluation of two flow cytometric methods for counting low levels of white blood cells

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric methods can be used to count residual white blood cells (WBCs) in WBC-reduced blood products, which should contain fewer than 1 x 10(6) WBCs per unit (approximately 3.3 WBCs/ microL). In this study two flow cytometric methods for counting WBCs under routine conditions in nine laboratories were evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Panels of red blood cells (RBCs), platelets (PLTs), and plasma were prepared containing 33.3, 10.0, 3.3, 1.0, and 0.3 WBCs per microL and counted with flow cytometric methods (either LeucoCOUNT, BD Biosciences, four laboratories; or LeukoSure, Beckman Coulter, five laboratories). Requirements were that at the level of 3.3 WBCs per microL, coefficient of variation was < or =20 percent and accuracy was > or =80 percent. Routine flow cytometric quality control (QC) data of WBC-reduced blood products from two laboratories were analyzed. RESULTS: At the level of 3.3 WBCs per microL, none of the laboratories met the requirements for all three blood products. The LeucoCOUNT method met requirements at more laboratories than the LeukoSure method for RBCs and PLTs, but the opposite was true for plasma. Routine QC data showed that >99 percent of the flow cytometric measurements for WBC-reduced products was below the 95 percent prediction interval at 3.3 WBCs per microL. CONCLUSION: None of the laboratories met the requirements for accuracy and precision for all three blood products. Nevertheless, routine results showed that in >99 percent of the products, WBC counts were below guideline limits. Therefore, both flow cytometric methods are suitable for QC with pass-fail criterion.     

Flow cytometric determination of residual white blood cell levels in preserved samples from leukoreduced blood products

BACKGROUND: In preparation for a proposed consolidated testing service, Canadian Blood Services undertook the evaluation of a commercial test kit for the enumeration by flow cytometry of residual white blood cells (rWBCs) present in preserved samples recovered from leukoreduced (LR) blood and platelet products. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The stability of preserved WBCs, the equivalency of WBCs used for spiking, test method precision, specificity, reliability, accuracy, and sensitivity were investigated. For comparative purposes, WBC counts were also determined by Nageotte as well as by flow cytometry. RESULTS: WBCs were stable up to 4 weeks at room temperature for all components by either method. Within methods, no differences were observed due to the source of WBC used for spiking purposes. By either method, test precision was acceptable (<20% coefficient of variation) and of similar reliability at a target value of 10 +/- 5 WBCs per microL. The flow cytometric method was shown to be more specific and accurate than the Nageotte method. Sensitivity by either method was 0.1 WBCs per microL. On average, Nageotte counts were lower than those observed by flow cytometry. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that WBCs in WBC stabilizing solution-treated samples from LR blood components were stabilized up to 4 weeks at room temperature and that rWBC determinations made with a WBC enumeration kit by flow cytometry have the required precision, specificity, reliability, and accuracy in the relevant test range. This validated WBC stabilization and flow cytometric counting method is considered acceptable as part of a quality control program for leukoreduced blood products.     

Automated white blood cell counts in cerebrospinal fluid using the body fluid mode on the platform Sysmex XE-5000

Abstract

Background. The Sysmex XE-5000 offers automated quantification of red blood cells and white blood cells (WBCs) in body fluids, with differentiation of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) and mononuclear cells (MNCs). Methods. We evaluated automated WBC counting in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using the body fluid mode on the Sysmex XE-5000, comparing it with flow cytometry as the reference method, and also with manual counting by microscopy. Experimental analysis for linearity and limit of detection was performed by diluting isolated WBCs in cell-free CSF. To study the ability to discriminate between PMNs and MNCs, samples were spiked using MNCs separated from peripheral blood. Comparison of WBC counts between a counting chamber and the XE-5000 was performed for 198 CSF samples. Results. In the experimental set-up, within-run (CV 19%) and between-day imprecision (CV 15.3%) in quantitating total number of WBC on XE-5000 was acceptable for WBC counts ≥ 25 × 10⁶/L. Compared with expected cell counts, mean bias was + 2.6% for flow cytometry, + 5.5% for XE-5000 and ? 73.2% for manual counting. Differentiation between PMNs and MNCs was in concordance with flow cytometry. In comparisons of clinical CSF samples, overall agreement between the XE-5000 and manual counting was observed in 81% of the samples, but mean difference in WBC differentiation was higher for PMN (51.1 × 10⁶/L) than for MNC (7.95 × 10⁶/L). Conclusion. Despite limited precision at low WBC counts, XE-5000 could be a favourable alternative to the labour-intensive, time-consuming and less reliable manual counting and cuts turnaround times in routine CSF-based diagnosis.