腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术学习曲线

目的针对已经熟练掌握腹腔镜操作基础的外科医师,探讨腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(TEP)的学习曲线。方法回顾性分析2010年8月至2012年1月由同一术者行TEP治疗腹股沟疝患者50例,按开展手术的时间先后顺序分为A、B、C、D、E组,每组10例患者,每10例做一次阶段总结。各组患者在年龄、疝类型上差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),比较患者手术时间、术中及术后并发症发生率,分析不同阶段的手术效果的差异。结果手术时间各组间差异有统计学意义(F=34.977,P=0.000),在手术时间上A、B组和C、D、E之间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),C、D、E三组患者之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),经过20例患者后,后三个阶段术中出血、腹膜分破、层次走错等现象明显减少,从而手术时间也随之缩短。结论学习TEP手术是个渐进的过程,具备腹腔镜操作基础的术者完成约30例后开始熟悉腹腔镜下完全腹膜外疝修补的手术入路,从而进一步缩短手术时间。     

The totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair

Background: The totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair has become our procedure of choice to manage inguinal hernia in adult patients since March 1993. This technique was developed in an attempt to diminish post-operative pain, shorten the convalescence period and equal the recurrence figures of the classical tension-free repair. Methods: A complete extraperitoneal dissection is performed. A large Marlex prosthesis (15×15 cm) is placed and covers all potential defects. Results: A consecutive series of 195 hernias in 158 patients is proposed. The minimum follow-up in our series is at least 6 months. Morbidity is low and so far, no recurrences have been seen. Conclusions: The totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach for repairing inguinal hernia should have a promising future, because the same principles as the classical tension-free repair are followed. Preliminary results are promising. Further studies, even randomized prospective trials and fair reports of complications, will determine the future of laparoscopic hernia surgery.     

完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术对比分析

目的 对比研究完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）和经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）的临床有效性及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2011年1月至2013年6月,上海市第七人民医院行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术126例患者的临床资料。将126例患者随机分为二组,观察组56例患者行TEP,对照组70例患者行TAPP。比较二组患者的手术时间、术后住院时间、治疗费用、术后并发症及复发。结果 观察组患者手术时间（60±5）min,对照组（65±6）min,二组患者差异有统计学意义（t=10．15,P=0．022）。观察组住院时间（5±2）d,对照组（6±2）d,二组患者差异无统计学意义（t=3．68,P=0．076）。观察组无复发,对照组复发2例,差异有统计学意义（r=0．31,P=0．020）。观察组平均手术费用（7246±671）元,对照组（12387±743）元,二者差异有统计学意义（t：13．25,P=0．001）。二组患者并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（r=1．05,P：0．075）。结论 TEP和TAPP治疗腹股沟疝均安全有效,但TEP手术时间较短,费用较低,临床推广更具有优势。     

腹腔镜下完全腹膜外与经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的临床疗效

目的对比腹腔镜下完全腹膜外与经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的临床疗效。 方法分层抽取深圳市光明新区人民医院普外科2014年1月至2016年1月,收治的腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术患者68例,采用随机数字表法将其分为观察组及对照组,每组34例患者。观察组采用完全腹膜外修补法（laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal,TEP）,对照组采用经腹腹膜前修补法（laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair,TAPP）,术后对2组患者随访6～18个月,对比2组术中情况、住院时间,同时比较2组术后疼痛、并发症发生情况及复发情况。 结果观察组患者术后首次肛门排气时间、住院时间、术后疼痛时间均显著低于对照组（t=7.83、6.16、11.11,P均<0.05）;观察2组并发症发生率及腹股沟疝复发率均无明显差异（χ²=0.77、0.57,P=0.38、0.45）。 结论TEP较TAPP能进一步缩短术后疼痛时间及住院时间,但TEP对手术医师操作能力有较高要求,有待进一步培训推广。     

Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair after an original TEP

Background There are only scant published reports of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of recurrence after a primary TEP procedure. Furthermore, at least two authors have made the statement that such an operation is virtually impossible.Methods We have been performing TEP repair of recurrence after TEP since we 1996, and here we present a retrospective review of our experience with the procedure. We employ a method not varying greatly from the standard TEP done for primary hernia.Results All cases were started laparoscopically, and only one of 20 had to be converted to open. Of these cases, 12 were for same-side recurrence and eight for a contralateral new hernia. With a follow-up of 28–74 months, there have been no fatalities, no complications, and no re-recurrence.Conclusion We have found that TEP repair of recurrent inguinal hernia after a primary TEP repair is entirely feasible technically as well as entirely safe.     

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background  

Minimal access approaches to inguinal hernia repair have added to the ongoing debate over the “best groin hernia repair.” The present prospective randomized controlled trial was done to compare the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) techniques of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.     

SIADH following laparoscopic (totally extraperitoneal) inguinal hernia repair

Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) is recognised to occur after cardiac and traditional open abdominal surgery. However, SIADH after laparoscopic surgery is not well documented in the literature. We report a case of SIADH after laparoscopic (totally extraperitoneal) inguinal hernia repair in an elderly man.     

Planned totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic Spigelian hernia repair

A Spigelian hernia is a congenital defect in the tranversus aponeurosis fascia. Traditionally, an open anterior hernioplasty was used to repair these defects. Recently, laparoscopic approaches have been described. This report describes the first application of the totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach to a planned repair of a Spigelian hernia. The patient was a 62-year-old white female with a reducible left lower quadrant anterior abdominal wall bulge consistent with a Spigelian hernia. At the time of surgery, we exposed the posterior rectus fascia and modified our extraperitoneal inguinal hernia technique by passing the balloon dissector in a more lateral orientation. This created a unilateral preperitoneal space with adequate room for dissection and mesh fixation. The Spigelian defect was easily identified. Its preperitoneal fat contents were reduced, and a 5-mm laparoscopic tacking device was used to secure a piece of prolene mesh. The patient was discharged home with no complications. Placement of the mesh in the preperitoneal space avoids direct interaction of the mesh prosthesis and the intraperitoneal viscera. In conclusion, we find that a laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach is technically feasible and advantageous when a Spigelian hernia is diagnosed preoperatively.     

完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效对比

目的：探讨完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）与经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2010年1月至2013年5月,成都军区昆明总医院收治的腹股沟疝患者216例,均行TAPP或TEP。比较二组患者的手术后疼痛持续时间、并发症及复发情况、住院时间及住院费用。结果 TAPP和TEP组术后疼痛持续时间（｜Z｜＝0．563,P＝0．574）、术后住院时间（｜Z｜＝0．497,P＝0．619）的比较差异均无统计学意义,术后TAPP组复发（对侧复发）1例,TEP组无复发,差异无统计学意义（χ2＝0．718,P＝0．397）;TEP组并发皮下气肿1例,占全部TEP患者总数的1．11％,TAPP组无气肿发生;TAPP组住院费用（8908±611元）低于 TEP组（9123±580元）,差异有统计学意义（F＝24．266,P＝0．003）。结论 TAPP与TEP在临床疗效上无差别,但在住院费用上,TAPP相较比TEP稍少,可依据患者经济水平、意愿以及术者水平等综合选择不同的手术方式。     

The preperitoneal loop in inguinal hernia repair following the totally extraperitoneal technique

Background  

With increasing experience in totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair, we observed an anatomical structure not described in the literature. It is a loop-like structure under the ductus deferens or ligamentum teres uteri anchored laterally and medially to the peritoneum. Relatively constant in distance to the inner inguinal ring and individual in the grade of prominence, it inhibits correct patch placement medially. To identify and describe this so-called preperitoneal loop (pl), we performed this study.     

Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review

Background: The choice of approach to the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia is controversial. There is a scarcity of data comparing the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach with the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach, and questions remain about their relative merits and risks.Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify reports of trials comparing laparoscopic TAPP with laparoscopic TEP. In addition, selected conference proceedings were hand-searched, websites consulted, reference lists of all included papers were scanned, and experts contacted for other potentially eligible reports. All published and unpublished randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopic TAPP with laparoscopic TEP for inguinal hernia repair were eligible for inclusion. Large non-randomised prospective studies were also eligible for inclusion to provide further comparative evidence of complications and serious adverse events. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Statistical analyses were performed using the fixed effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results: The search identified one RCT which reported no statistically significant difference between TAPP and TEP when considering duration of operation, haematoma, length of stay, time to return to usual activities, and recurrence. The eight non-randomised studies suggest that TAPP is associated with higher rates of port-site hernias and visceral injuries whilst there appear to be more conversions with TEP. Vascular injuries and deep/mesh infections were rare and there was no obvious difference between the groups. No studies reporting economic evidence were identified.Conclusions: There is insufficient data to allow conclusions to be drawn about the relative effectiveness of TEP compared with TAPP. Efforts should be made to start and complete adequately-powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which compare the different methods of laparoscopic repair.     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效对比

目的:探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal,TEP)与经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)的临床应用价值。方法:选取2012年6月至2013年12月收治的90例腹股沟疝患者。随机分为TEP组与TAPP组。对比分析两组患者的手术时间、术后疼痛时间、住院时间、住院费用、并发症发生情况及复发例数等。结果:与TAPP组相比,TEP组手术时间、术后疼痛时间及住院时间明显缩短,且住院费用明显降低,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组阴囊血清肿、术后暂时性神经感觉异常及尿潴留等并发症发生率、腹股沟疝复发率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对于腹股沟疝患者而言,TEP可进一步缩短术后疼痛时间,减轻患者的经济负担,但对术者的操作熟练程度要求较高,有待进一步推广应用。     

腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的对比研究

目的:对比腹腔镜全腹膜外网片修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的临床疗效.方法:选择2008年3月至2009年12月86例腹股沟疝患者,随机分为两组,观察组行腹腔镜全腹膜外网片疝修补术,对照组行Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术.对比两组患者术后并发症、住院时间、下床时间等,术后随访7～27个月,对比两组的复发...     

Single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Aims

Various single incision laparoscopic surgeries (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgeries (NOTES) have been reported recently. Herein we performed SILS for totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) on three cases.

Cases

Three males of 72, 49, and 73?years old with the diagnoses of bilateral primary inguinal hernia underwent single incision TEP. The operative steps of single incision TEP are very similar to those of a traditional laparoscopic TEP. The difference between them is a 2?cm infraumbilical incision for the placement of three (5?mm) trocars in single incision TEP. We preferred to use a 30° 5?mm laparoscope with some routine laparoscopic instruments during the surgical procedure. All the hernia defects were repaired with VyproII of 15?×?10?cm (Ethicon, NJ, USA). The operations took 32, 26, and 65?min, respectively, with no obvious inconvenience.

Results

All three patients were discharged on the second postoperative day uneventfully. The postoperative follow-up showed no recurrence in the three patients up to now.

Conclusion

The single incision TEP using an access port device is safe and feasible. Meanwhile SILS may reduce medical costs and complication rates through practice and improvement of SILS instruments.     

完全腹膜外疝修补（TEP）手术腹膜前CO2充气对人体的影响

目的完全腹膜外疝修补（TEP）手术需在腹膜前建立间隙，并且应用CO，充气维持足够的操作空间。本临床研究通过腹膜前CO2充气对患者呼吸和循环的影响，从病理生理学的角度来论证TEP手术的安全性。方法2005年1月至6月，本中心行TEP手术的腹股沟疝患者20例（18例斜疝，2例直疝），均为男性，年龄平均60．2岁。腹膜前建立间隙并用CO2充气，维持压力于12mnHg，分别记录充气前、充气后5min、充气后30min、拔管后四个时间段的心率（HR）、血压（BP）、呼气末CO2分压（EtCO2）以及血气分析测定值（PH、PCO2、HCO3）。结果进行统计分析。结果手术均顺利完成，手术时间平均32．6min，术后疼痛分数（VAS）平均（2．7±1．4）分，术后住院平均（3．2±0．5）d，3例患者出现皮下气肿。病理生理指标中HR和PH值在充气后有一定幅度的下降，BP、EtCO2、PCO2和HCO3值在充气后有一定幅度的上升，与充气前指标差异有统计学意义，并且随着充气时间延长变化幅度有所增加，各指标在拔管后迅速恢复并接近充气前水平。结论TEP手术腹膜前CO2充气，CO2在皮下组织弥散可能会形成皮下气肿，CO2吸收会出现CO2蓄积及酸中毒，并造成血压上升及心率减慢。通过麻醉师的合理处理，可以将指标控制在合理的安全范围内，术后能迅速恢复。     

腹腔镜腹膜前补片修补术与完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较

目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis,TAPP)与腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal prosthesis,TEP)治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法:2008年9月至2010年1月收治腹股沟疝患者30例,随机分为TAPP组和TEP组。评定两种术式的治疗效果。结果:两组手术均获成功,无中转开放。TAPP组手术时间明显多于TEP组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组下床活动时间、住院时间及镇痛泵使用率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。TAPP组并发症发生率为13.33%,TEP组为13.33%,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者随访6~12个月,均无复发。结论:TEP与TAPP治疗腹股沟疝临床效果基本相同,值得应用。